Isn't NH LARC SUPPOSED To Be For Low Income Litigant's?

Isn't NH LARC SUPPOSED To Be For Low Income Litigant's?

Then why isn't it?
A married woman, with pending divorce and custody proceeding's, who can not afford an Attorney, is told by the NH Judge handling her divorce case to contact NH Legal Assistance/LARC to retain an Attorney. After week's of trying to make contact, she finally makes contact, but when her child's name is mentioned, she's told there's a conflict of interest and they can't help her.
She's in shock. How can there be a conflict of interest when her estranged husband own's his own house, his own business and three new vehicles? Do they honestly consider him to be low income?
So because this man is obviously receiving free legal assistance and clearly doesn't need it, his very low income wife has to go without legal assistance? Where is the fairness and justice in NH when low income litigant's can't obtain low income legal assistance, but their estranged spouses who have it all can?
This scenario reminds me of another tale of this same kind of injustice in NH. A divorced couple fighting over the custody of their child, were both given court-appointed Lawyer's. The injustice here was the mother was low income, but the father's income was over 100K a year. Now why in the world would a Judge in the NH Judicial system grant the father a court-appointed Lawyer when the father has plenty of money to pay for his own? The father and mother don't live together and by law, this should never have happened. The Judge just kept on letting the State keep footing the  bill for a man illegally. 
Where is the justice in NH? Why hasn't this Judge been reprimanded? Our NH tax dollars at work!
Why are these people who don't need low income legal assistance receiving it and the low income people of NH being pushed aside?