MEDIA ADVISORY-MOTHER OPPOSING JUDICIAL OPPRESSION

MEDIA ADVISORY
RELEASED: December 17, 2010

CONTACT:
Denise-Marie McIntosh
35 Edmond Drive
Nashua, NH 03063
Pro Se Litigant
(603) 886-0096
dmvc@live.com

MOTHER OPPOSING JUDICIAL OPPRESSION

Denise-Marie McIntosh, a Nashua, NH, mother and pro se litigant, takes on the State of New Hampshire, the Department of Health and Human Services through the Division of Children, Youth and Families, et al. The plaintiff/mother’s brief for an appeal supports that the matter is VOID and demands a jury trial; this document outlines a system with governmental checks and balances in absentia, frighteningly separating a mother and child since 2005, and giving custody to a father who admitted to strangling that same mother in 2002. This same Division shockingly allowed her to continue services as a foster mother, and two weeks after recommending custody of the couple’s child should go to the abusive husband/father, the Division asked her to take in a second foster child.

The Real Facts—many of which took the mother over six years to obtain because the Nashua District Court, DHHS, CASA and others denied her access to her files, in many instances since the beginning of the case—show the injustices perpetrated by the Department of Health and Human Services (hereafter DHHS). Only upon intervention from State Representatives, many (not all) of the relevant records were released this past February 2010. These previously concealed documents show that DHHS used unconstitutionally gathered evidence and fraudulent fact witnesses to conduct an investigation based on improper analysis by untrained workers. Exculpatory evidence was purposefully ignored which would have conclusively proven the Plaintiff/Mother’s innocence in the entire matter behind the De Novo appeal, an agenda the father had started against her in 2004. This matter supports a VOID judgment based on denial of procedural due process, lack of jurisdiction, misapplication of rights, orders made under the color of law, and more. Because the case has an equitable claim joined with a legal claim, the mother is entitled to a jury trial demand, under her 7th amendment rights.

On 12/16/10, the Superior Court, through a series of untrained workers, tried to find numerous ways to dissuade the Plaintiff/Mother from filing her Appeal; only after repeatedly asserting her rights at the court house for more than six hours was she finally allowed to do so.

This information needs to be made public because of threats made to the Plaintiff/Mother and other mothers and families in the New Hampshire community who are fighting for their children’s rights, especially in cases such as this arising out of domestic violence (the father in this matter admitted to strangling her in 2002; a marital master later revoked the restraining order simply because he pleaded he was a teacher and would lose his job). Mothers are being denied parental rights because they are labeled “over protective” and therefore “unfriendly” to the fathers who abused them. The individual and institutional abuses of child protection workers, judges and various others associated in these cases is a nation-wide problem requiring oversight to end the reign of terror behind closed door proceedings.

Motion to Court and Supporting Documentation for Reporters use
to Ensure Validity of Press Release.

Also see:http://thetruthbitesnh.blogspot.com/