Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
I can thoroughly believe this. I'm in Ontario, Canada & all of my children were made Crown Wards without access 12 years ago on a default ruling because of a negligent lawyer who did nothing on the case. There's been favourtism, bias, collusion & corruption. Ontario, Canada is the only province that has no accountability or oversight for it's MUSH sector agencies (Schools, Hospitals, Police, & children's aid societies). Our provincial gov't is self-defeating; they strike down their own & cater to corporate enterprise.
ReplyDeleteThe paternal adopted family (husband an adoptee, not his natural nuclear family) was given "silent access" to the children & has enjoyed 12 years of uninterrupted liberal relationships with no need for litigation or a court order. My mother (children's maternal BIOLOGICAL grandmother)hadn't seen the children since summer of 2000 when the world was free & the children were in my care. Maternal grandma never sought to interfere or step-forward; didn't have the mental capacity to engage the court. ALot of barriers to access court services from my community which is without a family court & city 50 km's away. The silent access was accidentally disclosed through the legal process (via affidavit) as it was enveloped in secrecy (not meant to be revealed). My mother, after 9 years, whom has no legal proclivities yet no prohibitions enlisted me to assist her & travelled to the region my sons live in for the purpose of my eldest boy's public school graduation 3 years ago (2009). Child protection authorities got wind of the intent & alerted Provincial police to be on the look-out for a "white haired" senior lady (grandmother) & middle aged mother. The matter of our actions was visited in court the following year in the context of the continuing litigation for my having access to my sons. Prior to this the maternal grandmother was retaliated against by having her voluntary access to her granddaughter (oldest of my 3 children) terminated & then I received an official letter from the CPS dept. for my sons (letter addressing both my mother & I though we live separately at different addresses; it was left to my duty to inform her of the consequences) that if we ever sought to attempt contacting the boys again then a restraining order would be brought; it cautioned us of further criminal law action. Again, there is really no grounds to come against the grandmother but because I had to accompany her on the journey the inference of full penalty of law was levied toward her...The maternal grandmother was also addressed by the Court & told she has no right to access the boys & must get a lawyer, file with the courts & go through the process if she should desire such contact; be reviewed for consideration. Keeping in the mind the Paternal grandparents have never had to lift a finger. The whole system is LAWLESS & UNACCOUNTABLE, completely at the discretion of the Children's Aid Society who can conspire to act above the law, extend liberties via favouritism to select individuals & consort to eliminate others; which is what was done in the context of the case for Crown Wardship whereby the CAS played the hand of GOD by re-arranging our family balance/constellation when they chose which family could remain in the children's lives versus the other. This is not in ordinance with the constitutional entrenchments of children's rights when it comes to Crown Wardship & matters of family access etc.
ReplyDeleteIt is understood in the context of applied law that all family is terminated lest they seek legal redress for access orders. My lawyer rose to defence saying the trip to the graduation was a "benign" incident as the whole enveloping scenario as put forth by the Child Protection agents & their council served to make us like THIEVES in the night who conspired to commit an act (my mom was openly accused of conspiring to DECEIVE the children's aid society); villainizing us & placing the fear of false intent into my children which then corrupted my court application for access as the boys have been psychologically programmed for many years to assure maternal parental & family alienation as a guarantee of permanently extorting/corrupting any ability for retained custody or access for the purpose of permanent uninterrupted state custody & serving the expounded interests of the paternal family who's amiable relationship with the CPS agency extends back to the 1960's...2 of their 3 children were adopted from the same state agency that has my children & 2 others in their family network were also adopted from this agency.
ReplyDeleteIt's been alleged they are PROTECTED people, whilst those who are benign with no criminal history or malfeasance toward their community or society are threatened & treated as 'sub-human' in the idyllism that we are cankerous, as if we intend to "toxify" the children's environment. I've been told in times past that if I were to ever go near my children or try to contact them, then I could be assured of arrest...there is strong emphasis to even send a card or make a phone call is equally LIBELLOUS/chargeable & I could face full penalty of law. In the conclusion of my most bizarre & corrupt case for my children (as said by the Judge & lawyer) in the final negotiations; it was absolute that I would receive nothing & my sons had clearly expressed (via their court appointed children's council) they want nothing to do with me as their memories & emotions have been perverted toward any interests in maternal family contact....
ReplyDeletethe lawyer wanted to give some sort of assurance of possible future re-unification, he presented an idea & all parties agreed. I found it painfully ludicrous, I was awarded by court order permission to write each of my sons every 3 months to be PUT ON FILE for when they are 18 years old; at such time the CPS agency is to wilfully unseal the letters & cards & give them to the boys so they may see them & choose if they wish to pursue the possibility of relating in years to come. It is a militant sociological basis of Government being able to control everything we do, sociologically, because of the formulation of constitutional acts of our respective countries which is a guideline for how Government should give select services & supports to it's people & us as citizens living within the declared borders of a country are then extended select freedoms & entitlements as PATRONS of the land...but in the wider applications, for Canadians that is, the CROWN is absolute power/supremacy & the Crown trumps all...this originates from the British Commonwealth of which our country was originally founded & established...archaic remnants of a monarchical system of rule.
ReplyDeleteI can believe this also. I'm in NH and my newborn granddaughter Isabella was ILLEGALLY placed in foster care. The Foster stranger's told us in the beginning we would become good friends. And NO, I didn't condone them working for DCYF in the kidnapping of my granddaughter. I've been fighting for her since she was taken. Good friends, what a joke. They stuck their heads so far up DCYF's butt's, just to make sure they would get to keep Isabella, they followed DCYF's orders when told not to have anything to do with Isabella's biological family. All they wanted was my granddaughter and their monthly blood money, so they bowed down to DCYF's every whim.
DeleteOne Saturday I was home alone cleaning, when all of Isabella's brand new, unused toy's starting going off in her unused bedroom. I had the strangest feeling something was wrong with my granddaughter, so I called the Foster stranger's to ask if she was alright. The barren Foster witch got on the phone and told me to never call their house again. Then she called the Hudson, NH Police. They called me and told me if I called there again I'd be arrested. Mind you, there was NO Court order. Then the Nashua Police came to my house and told me the same thing. Then supposedly, someone tried to break into their house that night and left cigarette butt's outside their door. I got the blame of course, though the cop's never came to my house. In court I asked, did you get the DNA off the butt's? No answer of course. I also had cataract's and couldn't even see at night and what would a grandmother do, leave the rest of my family and home to do something so stupid and illegal? Brain dead is what they are.
The lying DCYF Lawyer Kate McClure went into court for my daughter's review hearing and asked the Judge to make a court order stating I couldn't call there or go to their house. He refused. He told them if they didn't want to talk to me, just hang up.What a miracle. He must finally feel guilty about taking my granddaughter from her family illegally. Yes, illegally. Kate McClure lied to the Judge with a proven false report. A false report of abuse that she said happened in my home. Strange, the report say's no such thing.
I hope and pray my granddaughter is a handful. Just like her mother was, only REAL parent's and REAL family can handle much more than the "Chosen" by DCYF stranger's.I hope Isabella gives them a real run for the money. I won't even wish them luck. Their sure going to need it!