Unbiased Reporting

What I post on this Blog does not mean I agree with the articles or disagree. I call it Unbiased Reporting!

Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly

Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital

Saturday, February 18, 2012

CHILD DEATHS IN STATE FOSTER CARE 2006-2009


http://afrafrontpagenews.blogspot.com/2012/02/child-deaths-in-state-foster-care-2006.html

CHILD DEATHS IN STATE FOSTER CARE 2006-2009


STATE         2006       2007       2008        2009     TOTAL


ALABAMA
   24
    23
    20       
    14
    81
ARIZONA
   16
    28
    11
    30
    85
ARKANSAS
   19
    20
    21
    13
    73
CALIF.
  140
  184
  185
  185
  694
COLO.
   24
   28
   32
   36
  120
CONN.
    3
     4
     6
     4
    17
DEL.
    1
    -
     2
     3
      6
DC.
    2
    2
     8
     5
    17
FLORIDA
  140
  153
  185
  156
  634





1727

GEORGIA
   63
   61
   68
   60
   252
IDAHO
     1
     1
     2
     4
       8
ILLINOIS
   58
   73
   69
   77
  277
INDIANA
   42
   53
   34
   50
  179
IOWA
     6
     5
   11
   10
    32
KANSAS
    5
   10
   10
     8
    33
KENTUCKY
   36
   41
   22
   34
   133
LOUIS.
   37
   27
   30
   40
   134
MAINE
     1
     1
     4
     2
       8





1056

               TOTAL KIDS DEAD IN STATE CARE   =  2783





 STATE       2006       2007       2008        2009      TOTAL

MARY.
    -
     11
    20
    17
    48
MASS.
     6
     16
    21
    -
    43
MICHIGAN
     -
      -
    59
    58  
  117
MINN.
     14
    17
    16
    21
    68
MISS.
      4
    19
    17
    14
    54
MISSOURI
    43
    49
    42
    39
   173
MONTANA
      1
      1
      1
     -
       3
NEBRASKA
     15
    16
    17
    10
    58
NEVADA
     14
    21
    17
    29
    81





    645

NEW HAM
      2
      5
     -
      1
        8
NEW JER.
    32
    33
      29
     24
    118
NEW MEX
    14
      7
      19
     10
      50
NEW YORK
    73
    96
     107
   109
   385
N. CAROL.
     -
     -
       -
    -
   ****
N DAKOTA
      2
      1
        3
       2
       8
OHIO
    74
    90
      74
     79
   317
OKLAH.
    25
    30
      31
     22
   108
OREGON
    17
    12
      14
     13
    56





 1050

TOTAL DEAD IN STATE CARE                                1695
**** DEATHS WERE NOT REPORTED ?
 TOTAL DEAD 2 PAGES                                           4478





STATE         2006       2007      2008        2009       TOTAL

PENN.
     33
    47
    45
     40
  165
RH. ISL.
      -
      -
     -
       2
      2
S. CAROL.
    19
    19
    21
     28
    87
S. DAKOTA
      1
      8
     2
       4
    15
TENN.
    22
    44
    55
     46
   167
TEXAS
   257
   228
   223
   279
   987
UTAH
    13
     11
    15
       8
    47
VERMONT
     -
      3
      1
      3
      7
VIRGINIA
    20
    31
    37
    28
   116





 1593


WASH.
     21
     27
   23
    21
    92
W. VIIRG.
     15
    12
    5
     6
    38
WISCON.
     13
    22
   30
    24
    89
WYOMING
       1
     2
     1
    -
     4





    223

     TOTAL KIDS DEAD IN STATE CARE PAGE 3     1816
      TOTAL DEAD FROM ALL PAGES                       6294



 EXCERPTS FROM FREDRIC BASTIAT “THE LAW”

Legal plunder has two roots: One of them, as I have said
before, is in human greed; the other is in false philanthropy.




Three Systems of Plunder
The sincerity of those who advocate protectionism, socialism,
and communism is not here questioned. Any writer who
would do that must be influenced by a political spirit or a political
fear. It is to be pointed out, however, that protectionism,
socialism, and communism are basically the same plant in three
different stages of its growth. All that can be said is that legal
plunder is more visible in communism because it is complete
plunder; and in protectionism because the plunder is limited to
specific groups and industries.* Thus it follows that, of the three
systems, socialism is the vaguest, the most indecisive, and, consequently, the most sincere stage of development.
But sincere or insincere, the intentions of persons are not
here under question. In fact, I have already said that legal plunder
is based partially on philanthropy, even though it is a false
philanthropy .With this explanation, let us examine the value—the origin and the tendency—of this popular aspiration which claims to
accomplish the general welfare by general plunder.

How to Identify Legal Plunder
But how is this legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply.
See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them,
and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if
the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing
what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime.
Then abolish this law without delay, for it is not only an evil
itself, but also it is a fertile source for further evils because it
invites reprisals. If such a law—which may be an isolated case—
is not abolished immediately, it will spread, multiply, and
develop into a system.
The person who profits from this law will complain bitterly,
defending his acquired rights. He will claim that the state is
obligated to protect and encourage his particular industry; that
this procedure enriches the state because the protected industry
is thus able to spend more and to pay higher wages to the poor
workingmen

CPS AND THE GOVERNMENT DO THIS WHEN TAKING OUR KIDS
GIVING THEM TO FOSTER PARENTS WHO THEN HAVE MORE
RIGHTS TO OUR CHILDREN THEN WE EVER DID.


No comments:

Post a Comment