The Truth Bites "NH"
Link
The information provided on the link above with caddy uneducated commentary is not what people are putting in for the redress of grievance committee; nor should it be.
For example the link opens to the McIntosh petition and this one is way off; it was put in as below with the exception of #2 which was most recently changed due to the fact that the Judicial Branch in NH can suddenly make laws beyond case law and is currently not providing accused parents with an Attorney, I believe one paper reported Governor Lynch will be signing on it or did affective July 1, 2011.
In any case, do not assume the Redress of Grievance Committee can actually change your case; your wrong it is another venue to address consitutents concerns; they can react to what was done in your case by checking the laws and making sure it doesn't happen again and again;
By changing or adding to an existing law, they can move forward with impeachments on individuals who have acted under the color of law;
They can make a law that ALL Courts are open to the public as the McIntosh case makes an example of under the NH 169-C to ensure accountability;
For example as recently as January 1, 2011 legislators (not the redress) MADE non-fatal strangulation a law; because the victim's family pushed for legislators to write legislation due to a loved one who died because the non-fatal attempt on the victim resulted in no jail time allowing the perpetrator to go back and kill his victim;
This is what McIntosh really put in.
New Hampshire House of Representatives
Redress of Grievances Committee
GRIEVANCE PETITION REQUEST
Representative: _Peter Silva_______________________________
District: _Hillsborough District 26__________________________
On behalf of: _Ms. Denise-Marie McIntosh_______________________
SUCCINCT SUMMARY OF GRIEVANCE
Grievance against the Department of Health and Human Services division of Children Youth and Families; Judge Thomas Bamberger and Marital Master Alice Love for their failure to apply and/or follow the laws of the State of New Hampshire and failure to allow procedural due process in their decisions and/or actions in the Matter of William P. McIntosh and Denise-Marie McIntosh 00-M-927 and In Re. Simon M. 2005-JV-565 resulting in the separation of a fit mother from her son for seven (7) years through allegations based on fraud.
PROPOSED REMEDY
1. Amend the laws of the State so that actions that take place under the NH RSA 169-C "Child Protection Act" are open to the public; to avoid mishandling of cases and better representation for all parties.
2. Amend the laws of the State so that families can have advocates who assure compliance since there are no longer court appointed attorneys; to ensure families rights are protected as was provided for under NH RSA 169-C "The Child Protection Act".
3. By session law request that the appointment of Marital Master Love and/or Judge Bamberger be impeached for failure to provide the reasonable amount of procedural due process required in Family Court Decisions.
4. For Such other and further relief the General Court deems just, proper and equitable in the circumstances.
NOTE: Candy Knightly Petition and the Nardone Petition aren't right either. Mine isn't too far off. The rest of them most likely aren't right either. But I would like to thank Mr. Horrigan for advertising my blog even if he has gotten the petition's wrong.
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
The text of the petition posted on my web site is what the House Clerk's Office gave us. That text is what Rep. Silva filed in May 2011 on Ms. McIntosh's behalf. That text IS the petition. The Redress Committee could amend the petition, but not till they deal with what was actually filed.
ReplyDeleteFor whatever it's worth, the committee has failed to amend two other petitions with wrong names on them. In one case, a complainant's name was wrong.
No worry, I'll handle it. Someone's wires got crossed. At least the Petition's are in and we are being afforded Redress. That's what matter's.
ReplyDeleteComment from Denise-Marie McIntosh:
ReplyDeleteThe problem with Mr. Horrigan's posts is in the demeaning and degrading comments on other petitions put in. Many people are threatened by NH DCYF not to talk about their case; deterring them from going to Concord to talk with legislators, after comments from legislators like Horrigan it makes the integrity of the entire committee questionable when they keep someone like him on it and further alienates constituents from legislators.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20013520-503544.html On 8/12/10 CBS reported that after Horrigan made off color remarks about Mrs. Palin he submitted a resignation letter to the speaker of the house. Since it wasn’t accepted obviously Horrigan feels he can do whatever he wants at anyone’s expense and has no accountability. So why wasn't it accepted?