Unbiased Reporting

What I post on this Blog does not mean I agree with the articles or disagree. I call it Unbiased Reporting!

Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly

Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital

Saturday, June 25, 2011

The Constitution is DEAD in Family Court

The Constitution is DEAD in Family Court

AFRA EDITORIALS
By Leonard Henderson
June 25, 2011

The Constitution is DEAD in Family Court
...and it has been dead for a long time.

In the summer of 1999, when I was utterly confused why I was in trouble with CPS, it occurred to me to search the internet to see if other people were having similar problems with Oregon CPS.

That is how I found Will and Pamela Gaston's "A Voice for Children" website. They had been heavily involved in court cases for several years. I was absolutely SHOCKED at how lawless the Oregon courts were and the absolutely corrupt, insane decisions Gastons were getting.

Obviously the Constitution did not apply, nor did any actual laws either. CPS had a free hand to do whatever they wanted to. The courts would contrive any shitty "decision" necessary to defend the Status Quo and keep the agencies operating at their full, evil capacity. Everybody working in the system has a "get out of jail free" card. Right or wrong has nothing to do with it.

Watching how Pamela presented her cases to GET THE TRUTH ON THE RECORD was an extremely useful learning curve to me.

Along the line, it occurred to a bunch of us that we did not merely have a problem in our particular state- it was a nation-wide problem.

Not since the overthrow of the Weimar Republic have the leaders of a major democracy used their offices and the mass media to disseminate invective against millions of their own citizens. In fact it was Adolph Hitler who urged that “the state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people” and who explained, in the words of Rabbi Daniel Lapin, that “as long as government is perceived as working for the benefit of children, the people happily will endure almost any curtailment of liberty.” Using children to tug on our heartstrings may be not only a weakness of the sentimental. It also may be a ploy by those cynical and unscrupulous enough to exploit children for their own purposes. This is likely to be remembered as one of the most diabolical perversions of governmental power in our history, a time when we allowed children to be used and abused by fast-talking government officials and paid for it with our families, our social order and our constitutional rights.-- STEPHEN BASKERVILLE (in about 2000)

As we explored around the country, we ran into numerous dynamic people who were dealing with CPS THE HARD WAY. We ended up getting together and started the American Family Rights Association for the exact reason to develop and promote defense against the lawless fascist CPS and their colluding psychiatric contractors.

As far as we know, no state in the United State requires CPS to operate within Constitutional constrictions, because child abuse allegations are Civil in nature, not Criminal. See What Happens in the FOG. So if you are accused of having dirty dishes or not enough groceries, you have no more rights than the Jews did in Germany in 1940.

Ever since the 1950's, there has been an ever-growing emphasis on "The Child" world-wide. This has basically evolved into stripping EVERYBODY of all rights, replaced with the "Best Interest of the Child" mantra, which says that the child has some sort of a weird new "Civil Right" to have government make all their decisions for them. See Best interest of the child- A new "Civil Right".

Three years ago, I heard the Obamination say some words that made the hair raise up on the back of my neck- "Negative Liberties"-

..."But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can't do to you. Says what the Federal government can't do to you, but doesn't say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf, and that hasn't shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was, um, because the civil rights movement became so court focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change"...


The look on my face November 5, 2008 When the Obamination said that, I nearly fell off my chair.
I screamed at my TV "What kind of weird twisted up communist NewSpeak shit is THAT??

A Constitutional Right is a "Negative Liberty"?"

He even explained it- "Says what the states can't do to you".

(Constitutional Right or Negative Liberty, if you are in family court, you are at the mercy
of a lawless judge, who can just make stuff up as he goes along)

And then Obama twisted his Constitution comment into a RACE issue too.

Which confuses me greatly, because CPS is kidnapping more black kids than any other race.

Are they Napoleon's pups to be a new Obama Army?

So now, here's the brand new TIME magazine for July, 2011-

I have known about this for a couple days now, and frankly it has really been burning my guts. I really don't want to have to admit that the Constitution has been progressively reduced to insignificance, and the system now pretty much does whatever it wants to without feeling any particular constraint from the Constitution.

I really cannot understand how the Lefties can have so much confidence in tossing out our legal system for a Kangaroo court or China Court. I guess they believe that it's fine as long as the POWER remains in their hands to rape and destroy families.

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." --John F. Kennedy, In a speech at the White House, 1962

We know from dealing with CPS and the family courts for so many years now, Constitutional Rights do not apply- practically ANYWHERE anymore.

That's why we developed our advice in using Sworn Declarations to Make the Record in Court. It's about the only non-violent thing left we can do.

The fact is, CPS people have been committing CONSTITUTIONAL violations and Federal Crimes against America's families (crimes that the Federal Statutes call for the Death Penalty).

Us old fashioned Americans are really, REALLY PISSED. They had better hope that WE stick with Constitutional constraints (there are a bunch of us ready for WAR) when we start dishing it back to them for their TREASON.

"Nothing whatever but the constitutional law, the political structure, of these United States protects any American from arbitrary seizure of his property and his person, from the Gestapo and the Storm Troops, from the concentration camp, the torture chamber, the revolver at the back of his neck in a cellar." -Rose Lane


Comment on this story

"Better be wise by the misfortunes of others than by your own." --Aesop (c. 550 B.C.) legendary Greek fabulist

If CPS hasn't attacked YOUR FAMILY yet, see If you are ever approached by anyone from social services.... and WHEN THEY COME AFTER YOU

Learn as much as you can, as fast as you can at How To Fight CPS

Get YOUR VERSION OF HISTORY ON THE RECORD with your Sworn Declaration

Leonard Henderson, co-founder
American Family Rights Association
http://familyrights.us
"Until Every Child Comes Home" ©
"The Voice of America's Families" ©

I am not a lawyer and I do not pretend to give legal advice. If you need legal advice, see AFRA's Lawyer Friends who certainly are not pretenders (http://familyrights.us/info/law) I merely relate the things I learned in the past that seemed to work in my own case or things that others have related to me that worked in their cases. I provide information for free and do not expect to receive any form of payment or reward on this side of heaven. Therefore, DO NOT rely on this information as legal advice. Real Legal advice would come from a real lawyer who hates CPS and prepares a VIGOROUS DEFENSE against a negative (proving nothing happened) instead of talking you into a plea bargain (http://familyrights.us/bin/The_Problem_with_Plea_Bargaining.htm)

AFRA Editorials are NOT copyrighted. Please feel free to forward widely. We are at 100% total complete WAR with CPS, not trying to be famous or important.

No comments:

Post a Comment