DMVC Productions = Results: Concurrent Legislative & Judicial Power News » Vote for this!!:
http://www.unionleader.com/article/20120503/NEWS06/120509947
The above article appeared in the unionleader 5/3/12; "quotes from article appear in italics"
"Democracy is the only system that persists in asking the powers that be whether they are the powers that ought to be." Sydney J. Harris
After heated debates and angry constituents brought numerous complaints to legislators about items ruled on in and similar to cases like this onehttp://openjurist.org/831/f2d/362/witte-v-justices-of-new-hampshire-superior-court where the supreme court ruled in its own favor; and the lack of regulatory rule-making applied across the board in all New Hampshire Courts, the courts appear to have finally backed down a bit and have offer a reasonable solution "concurrent Legislative and Judicial Powers" to "regulate court administrative and procedural matters by statute."
Read More:
Note: Sharing posts, does not always mean I agree with them. Some I do and some I don't. In this case, I would rather CACR-26 passed. Put our Constitution back to the way our forefather's wrote it.
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
we have seen these past decades how the courts hsvr usurped and abused the power that they never really had in the first place.
ReplyDeleteI say NO "concurrent Legislative and Judicial Powers" they will just abuse it all over again and probably rule that its illegal or something.
NO WAY!! let the courts go pound sand. they do not deserve one iota of consideration in this and must be held in check.
(UPDATE: The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 4-1 to recommend that the constitutional resolution pass the Senate with the change offered by the Supreme Court justices, described below, a committee spokesman said. The Senate is expected to take up the measure next week.)
ReplyDelete