CHILD DEATHS IN STATE FOSTER CARE 2006-2009

http://afrafrontpagenews.blogspot.com/2012/02/child-deaths-in-state-foster-care-2006.html

CHILD DEATHS IN STATE FOSTER CARE 2006-2009

STATE         2006       2007       2008        2009     TOTAL

ALABAMA	24	23	20	14	81
ARIZONA	16	28	11	30	85
ARKANSAS	19	20	21	13	73
CALIF.	140	184	185	185	694
COLO.	24	28	32	36	120
CONN.	3	4	6	4	17
DEL.	1	-	2	3	6
DC.	2	2	8	5	17
FLORIDA	140	153	185	156	634
					1727

GEORGIA	63	61	68	60	252
IDAHO	1	1	2	4	8
ILLINOIS	58	73	69	77	277
INDIANA	42	53	34	50	179
IOWA	6	5	11	10	32
KANSAS	5	10	10	8	33
KENTUCKY	36	41	22	34	133
LOUIS.	37	27	30	40	134
MAINE	1	1	4	2	8
					1056

               TOTAL KIDS DEAD IN STATE CARE   =  2783

 STATE       2006       2007       2008        2009      TOTAL

MARY.	-	11	20	17	48
MASS.	6	16	21	-	43
MICHIGAN	-	-	59	58	117
MINN.	14	17	16	21	68
MISS.	4	19	17	14	54
MISSOURI	43	49	42	39	173
MONTANA	1	1	1	-	3
NEBRASKA	15	16	17	10	58
NEVADA	14	21	17	29	81
					645

NEW HAM	2	5	-	1	8
NEW JER.	32	33	29	24	118
NEW MEX	14	7	19	10	50
NEW YORK	73	96	107	109	385
N. CAROL.	-	-	-	-	****
N DAKOTA	2	1	3	2	8
OHIO	74	90	74	79	317
OKLAH.	25	30	31	22	108
OREGON	17	12	14	13	56
					1050

TOTAL DEAD IN STATE CARE                                1695

**** DEATHS WERE NOT REPORTED ?

 TOTAL DEAD 2 PAGES                                           4478

STATE         2006       2007      2008        2009       TOTAL

PENN.	33	47	45	40	165
RH. ISL.	-	-	-	2	2
S. CAROL.	19	19	21	28	87
S. DAKOTA	1	8	2	4	15
TENN.	22	44	55	46	167
TEXAS	257	228	223	279	987
UTAH	13	11	15	8	47
VERMONT	-	3	1	3	7
VIRGINIA	20	31	37	28	116
					1593

WASH.	21	27	23	21	92
W. VIIRG.	15	12	5	6	38
WISCON.	13	22	30	24	89
WYOMING	1	2	1	-	4
					223

     TOTAL KIDS DEAD IN STATE CARE PAGE 3     1816

      TOTAL DEAD FROM ALL PAGES                       6294

 EXCERPTS FROM FREDRIC BASTIAT “THE LAW”

Legal plunder has two roots: One of them, as I have said

before, is in human greed; the other is in false philanthropy.

Three Systems of Plunder

The sincerity of those who advocate protectionism, socialism,

and communism is not here questioned. Any writer who

would do that must be influenced by a political spirit or a political

fear. It is to be pointed out, however, that protectionism,

socialism, and communism are basically the same plant in three

different stages of its growth. All that can be said is that legal

plunder is more visible in communism because it is complete

plunder; and in protectionism because the plunder is limited to

specific groups and industries.* Thus it follows that, of the three

systems, socialism is the vaguest, the most indecisive, and, consequently, the most sincere stage of development.

But sincere or insincere, the intentions of persons are not

here under question. In fact, I have already said that legal plunder

is based partially on philanthropy, even though it is a false

philanthropy .With this explanation, let us examine the value—the origin and the tendency—of this popular aspiration which claims to

accomplish the general welfare by general plunder.

How to Identify Legal Plunder

But how is this legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply.

See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them,

and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if

the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing

what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime.

Then abolish this law without delay, for it is not only an evil

itself, but also it is a fertile source for further evils because it

invites reprisals. If such a law—which may be an isolated case—

is not abolished immediately, it will spread, multiply, and

develop into a system.

The person who profits from this law will complain bitterly,

defending his acquired rights. He will claim that the state is

obligated to protect and encourage his particular industry; that

this procedure enriches the state because the protected industry

is thus able to spend more and to pay higher wages to the poor

workingmen

CPS AND THE GOVERNMENT DO THIS WHEN TAKING OUR KIDS

GIVING THEM TO FOSTER PARENTS WHO THEN HAVE MORE

RIGHTS TO OUR CHILDREN THEN WE EVER DID.