Exposing Child UN-Protective Services and the Deceitful Practices They Use to Rip Families Apart/Where Relative Placement is NOT an Option, as Stated by a DCYF Supervisor
Unbiased Reporting
What I post on this Blog does not mean I agree with the articles or disagree. I call it Unbiased Reporting!
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
Thursday, February 7, 2013
Punitive Versus Public Health Oriented Responses to Drug Use by Pregnant Women
Punitive Versus Public Health Oriented Responses to Drug Use by Pregnant Women
Jean Reith Schroedel, Ph.D. and Pamela Fiber, M.A.
†‡
During the past fifteen years, the term fetal abuse has been applied to
physical and developmental harms caused by prenatal drug exposure, but
not to other preventable threats to fetal well-being.
1 Although Roe v. Wade established the legal rationale for fetal abuse prosecutions,
2 which held that a state may have a compelling interest in intervening in a woman’s
pregnancy after the fetus reaches viability, states did not initially use Roe to
prosecute pregnant women whose substance abuse threatened fetal wellbeing.
3 The situation began to change in the mid-1980s, when media attention on the problems of “crack babies”
4 combined with technological
advances in in utero fetal health monitoring to create a public outcry
against pregnant substance abusers.5
Read More:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment