The Truth Bites "NH": NH does it again…

The Truth Bites "NH": NH does it again…

NH does it again…
A mother defendant below has a civil suit against the state of NH 226-2010-CV-00612, Nashua Superior Court South.

On 1/5/11 while driving down Broad Street in Nashua, NH she is stopped after sitting at a red light turning onto Bluehill Ave at 2:20 am, allegedly for speeding on Board Street. Witnesses’ confirm the police only came up behind her at the red light with no flashing lights. The mother relays the office stated, “Do you know why you are being stopped?” To which, she replied, “No, the light was green.” The officer stated, “You were speeding.” And she asked, “Where? I got every red light.” He then answered, “On Broad Street.” She inquired of the officer why hadn’t he stopped her sooner. He said that he didn’t want to stop her on the bridge. She asked him to tell her how fast she was going. He replied that he had clocked her. She simply asked, “Where? You just got behind me coming from the 96 Broad street gas station 500 yards away.”



For the 1st hearing CASE No. 459-2011-CR-01499, the officer did not show up on 4/25/11; the Defendant relayed to prosecutor Giggi that she was not speeding and was stopped at Bluehill Ave and not Broad Street as stated on the ticket. The Prosecutor stated that the officer’s notes indicated she was speeding as of Dublin Street a mile away and that Bluehill Ave. was off Board Street. Our question is if she was speeding, why didn’t he stop her sooner and why did witnesses state the officer hadn’t appeared until more than three quarters of a mile from where he stated she came in from? Did he eyeball and guesstimate it?? Seriously…

Had the proceeding been able to proceed without conflict due to the presiding Justice Bamberger, it would have been dismissed because the officer was not present to be cross-examined on 4/25/11.
Furthermore, on 4/25/11 the court issued a new notice for a hearing on June 3, 2011 at 8:15 AM located in the Juvenile Hearing Room as requested by Officer /Prosecutor Giggi.

Here's the oddity in this case, Prosecutor Giggi had the court set up another date for a hearing. The peculiarity of which is that it is scheduled in a non-public court room, specifically the Juvenile Hearing Room of the NASHUA District Court on 6/3/11 at 8:15 am. This is the same date the woman has a hearing in the criminal portion of the civil suit in Merrimack Family Court.

But of most concern, a public matter “a traffic ticket” is now going to be heard in a closed door court, the Juvenile Hearing Room is an inappropriate venue for a hearing on a traffic ticket and seeks to preclude public access and should be changed to an appropriate public court if the motion to dismiss is not granted. The Defendant also had to request the recusal of Judge Bamberger and Judge Leary due to their conflict in the civil matter above.

Typical of Nashua, New Hampshire Police stuck in the intimidation pose, a sign of guilt. Only time will tell and still waiting for a response in the Civil Matter for over a month. The Criminal matter which should have been heard within 30 days will finally be heard after 69 days in the Merrimack Family Court which is open to the public on June 3, 2011 at 11:30am. A copy of the criminal matter which parallels the civil matter will be out here shortly. The civil matter is of course trying to be kept private by the Division of Health and Human Services, however it will be public record once it hits the 1st circuit and we will have links for you right here.

Sometimes the truth IS a revolutionary act.