Permanency outcomes of children in kinship and non-kinship foster care: Testing the external validity of kinship effects

Permanency -- New Child Welfare Information Gateway Library Additions


Permanency outcomes of children in kinship and non-kinship foster care: Testing the external validity of kinship effects

Eun Koh, a,
a Postdoctoral Research Associate, Children and Family Research Center, School of Social Work, University of Illinois, Urbana—Champaign, 150 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 2120, Chicago, IL 60606, United States
Received 26 May 2009; revised 15 October 2009; accepted 16 October 2009. Available online 25 October 2009.
Abstract
The study investigates the permanency outcomes of children in kinship foster homes in comparison to children in non-kinship foster homes. To examine whether the effects of kinship placements are generalizable across states, the study utilizes the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) data obtained for five states that participated in the Fostering Court Improvement project: Arizona, Connecticut, Missouri, Ohio, and Tennessee. The study also addresses the issue of selection biases with the use of propensity score matching (PSM) methods. A partially longitudinal file was created from the states' AFCARS 6-month submissions from March 2000 to September 2005. The PSM method created the matched samples of the study, balancing the mean covariates between kin and non-kin children.
Analyses of survival times were conducted to investigate the permanency outcomes of children in kinship and non-kinship foster homes, using unmatched and matched samples. In the study, permanency outcomes include legal permanence and placement stability. The study finds that the direction and the size of kinship effects vary across the states with respect to the outcome of legal permanence, but positive advantages of kinship placements are reported for placement stability in all five states. Implications of the findings for practice and policy are discussed.
Keywords: Foster care; Kinship care; Legal permanence; Placement stability; Propensity score matching

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Permanency outcomes of kin and non-kin children
3. Method
3.1. Data
3.2. Sample
3.3. Analysis
3.3.1. Propensity score matching
3.3.2. Analysis of survival times
4. Results
4.1. Propensity score matching
4.2. Permanency outcomes
5. Discussions
6. Limitations
7. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References




http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V98-4XJ17JV-1&_user=10&_coverDate=03/31/2010&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=5e820757ea9f1ba5207039795736a809




Tel.: +1 312 641 2505x18; fax: +1 312 641 2337.
Children and Youth Services Review
Volume 32, Issue 3, March 2010, Pages 389-398