Unbiased Reporting

What I post on this Blog does not mean I agree with the articles or disagree. I call it Unbiased Reporting!

Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly

Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital

Sunday, August 29, 2010

Austin Knightly Has Been Sold By Nashua, NH DCYF!



According to Lorraine Bartlett of DCYF, Austin was to be sold in December of 2009. If this isn't a lie, like everything else that comes out of their mouth's, Austin has been sold!
Not only is Austin being kept from his Grandparent's, Aunt's, Uncles, cousin's, mother and father, he's also being kept from his little sister who cries herself to sleep every night for her brother. Can DCYF go any lower?

Placing mistreated children with relatives produces encouraging results-NH Doesn't Get the Message!

Originally Published: 8/29/2010
Placing mistreated children with relatives produces encouraging results
Pennsylvania's new focus makes kids and taxpayers happy, advocates say
By Holly Herman
Reading Eagle

Note from unhappygrammy-NH still doesn't get the message. They would rather traumatize children, drug them and keep the blood money rolling in!



Contact Holly Herman: 610-478-6291 or hherman@readingeagle.com.

http://readingeagle.com/article.aspx?id=244819

Exhibit puts foster kids' best faces forward-Just like a Pet Store!

Exhibit puts foster kids' best faces forward

County children's agency partners with Heart Gallery

The Heart Gallery exhibit's, located all over the country, help DCYF/CPS to sell off our Nation's hard to place children, that nobody want's, supposedly. That is except for their families they've been stolen from. But giving them back would be a huge loss of money for the greedy DCYF/CPS. So they dress our children up and maybe even get them to crack a smile, just to make they look happy and normal, in hopes of selling them off faster. These children are put on display like pet's in a pet store. How demeaning! But DCYF/CPS want's the money these kid's bring in. They don't know the meaning of "The best interest's" of a child!
People can pick and choose a traumatized child, due to DCYF/CPS involvement, the same way DCYF/CPS can pick and choose parent's of their liking and even get blood money to take the child in. Compliment's of our Government!

Read more: http://www.sbsun.com/news/ci_15928618?source=rss#ixzz0y0V1cw6i

Saturday, August 28, 2010

Child deaths and Child Protective Services

Child deaths and Child Protective Services
August 4th, 2010 8:45 am ET

It is only through mass outrage by citizens that the abuse of children by our present Child Protective Service (CPS) will stop.

When a well packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over
generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.
by……..Dresden James

The courts rubber stamp CPS accusations and children are removed from their parents. However, in some cases children are not removed. There are several reasons why either takes place.


Recently, in Kent County there have been two child deaths at the hands of CPS.


Two year old Rozlynn Martinez was murdered by her mother's boyfriend in February, 2010. Her body placed into a commercial dumpster and perhaps the county incinerator. This precious child should have been removed from her mother's home. By all accounts, her Mother loved her and suspected she might be being abused by the boyfriend, an abusive convicted felon. CPS was monitoring the case and saw that perhaps the mother was too involved with the boyfriend, since he was also the father of her second child.


Another precious five year old, Emily Meno and her twin sister were removed from their mother and placed into a foster home of a single person. The two girls had frequent seizures and were considered disabled. By all accounts, this first time foster mother was over-whelmed with the responsibility of the girls and out of frustration killed Emily in July, 2010.


Another precious five year old was removed from her mother. Her grandmother lived with the family from birth and cared for the child until she was ordered removed by the court and placed into Foster care.


Let us examine the rational of CPS on these cases. Rozlynn should have been removed from her home until the abusive felon boyfriend was no longer in the home. Perhaps, the CPS caseworker had no foster home that would take Rozlynn . Perhaps, the caseworker was just not paying close enough attention to a child of Hispanic heritage.


Emily, was placed into a foster home where the caseworker was not paying close attention to the needs of the children and the foster mother. Emily should never have been placed into a one person caregiver home where there had been no previous experience with disabled children. However, CPS receives the highest of federal funding for removing disabled children.


The child removed from her grandmother's loving care was not done so because of abuse or neglect. It was stated in court that "she is a wonderful child". She had a good home, she was loved and she was happy. Then, why take her? Because, she would sell well in the adoption market and had already been promised to an adoptive family.


The Department of Human Service has told the Michigan Legislature, that Michigan terminates the rights of more parents than any other state. Is it possible that most of the nation's bad parents live in Michigan? Is it possible that it is needed revenue by the state instead?


Children are removed or not removed because they sell well or do not sell well in the adoption market. The federal funding paid yearly to the states is billions of dollars from Social Security Title IV E. This is revenue the state cannot afford to lose. Therefore, states are actually trafficking in children.

It is your social security funds used for child removal from families. CPS in this nation is a business, it makes money. There are federal quotas for children placed into adoption. States must meet these quotas in order to keep the federal funding coming. Children are bought and sold into adoption slavery for the funding! It happens hundreds of times every day in this nation.


If this is not enough to strike fear in the parents of this nation, then what is? Get involved with an organization to stop this abuse of children by Child Protective Service. www.citizensforparentalrights.org

http://www.examiner.com/family-court-in-grand-rapids/child-deaths-and-child-protective-service

Exposing Child Protective Services-CONFESSIONS OF A CPS HEADHUNTER

Exposing Child Protective Service
by
Black Michael
(name changed)
transcribed exclusive interview part 2 of 3
as told to Georgie and Destiny


CONFESSIONS OF A CPS HEADHUNTER
(where marked (x-x), signifies the recording was unclear to transcribe)


My name is Black Michael and I granted way of Canada and Australia and the world my exclusive story as a retired headhunter who is trying to make amends for the over 25,000 children removed over a twenty-two year period.
CPS and other agencies paid me to falsify information to make these children wards of the court. As I said last week my job was to locate families on welfare, low income, low I.Q. or the least likely to be able to afford counsel that could get them their children returned to their custody. I was paid $1,800 per child I brought into care, with a $500.00 bonus if a child was in someway handicapped and a $10,000 bonus if a child was adopted out without parental consent.
I am not proud of what I did and I am now trying to see that as many children as I can will be returned to their loving families. This is why I am stepping forward to give testimony to what we headhunters do.
First, we located a family that fit the criteria. Then watched that family for a circumstance that really happened, that was not really dangerous. But, when which likely made it look likely abuse, neglect or some other endangerment was going on. We then made written, sworn statements to the agencies we worked for and a warrant would then be issued for the child or children in that family to be removed from the family home.
As headhunters, we often testified in court as to our allegations under oath and then to the false identity so that our names would not show as in a stream of cases before the court. It has come to my attention that CPS and other agencies in the last month have doubled the
2010 - 11 children can be brought into care quota. Instead of the approximately 240,000
children, the headhunter quota has risen from 80,000 souls and innocents 155 during this physical term.
It sickens me that this is happening to innocent families, and I am determined to see that those for whom I was responsible for falsifying records are returned home where possible.
I am at great risk doing this interview and would not have consented had Georgie had not agreed to keep my true identity hidden and my voice altered. If she had not agreed to these terms I would not be granting this exclusive interview.
With the economy as it is and the expected depression through by 2012, CPS and like organizations are doubling their quotas to stay in business and have no doubt for them this business is slowly monetary and has nothing to do with the safety of children in legitimate terms.
More children die in the hands of their foster parents than in the hands of their true parents for which I know I am responsible for the loss of life to these 11 of these children by falsifying records and statements.
I am not proud of the work I did, nor of the money I earned. All my efforts are now being put into bringing as many of these children home as possible. I have been instrumental in having 22 children now returned to their rightful families and I continue to work on bringing more home. To (x-x) I have to step forward slowly and cautiously because should it become known that I am the one known who is contacting judges and prosecutors and recanting my testimony I would be dead within weeks, if not days.
As headhunters, we took a full week long course on how to spot vulnerable families, how to falsify allegations, how to testify to CPS benefit. This course also taught us that when children were taken into care the immediate program of separation of child from family would begin. The child would be rewarded for compliance and punished for defiance. A type of mind control would be used by foster parents even though these foster parents did not know they were being taught these skills during their training of two weeks.
Foster parents only have criminal checks. They are not interviewed by psychologists or trained personnel. They merely have to express their want to be foster parents and follow the instructions of care and reward and punishment to keep the children in their care under their control. The foster parent school is to separate the child from his or her parents as widely as possible.
The child, when the prearranged telephone call or visit has not produced, the child is told your mother and father hate you, they don't want you, that is why they never showed up. We love you, we want you, you are safe with us as long as you follow our simple rules and expectations. Very quickly most contact with birth parents and families is brought to very limited contact.
Every session and visit is monitored and if the parent probes into the well being of their child, the foster parent is taught how to reprogram the child's responses to such questions. In essence, they are taught to forget their former families and accept foster homes or adoption as their only recourse to being truly loved.
I have agreed to keep these interviews going with Georgie as I can to expose the system for the deceitful, despicable corporations that they are. While I am not beyond being called those same names, I do hope parents realize the great danger I am currently putting myself in exposing CPS and other like agencies and their reprogramming of children's lives.
As headhunters, we were aware that approximately 50% of children in foster homes are abused, sexually assaulted and mind controlled. We worked for pay and put those statistics to the back of our minds, shoved that knowledge away, knowing we were not the perpetrators of these atrocities. But the truth is, we put those children in harms way and are just as guilty as the foster parents who abuse these children on an ongoing and daily basis.
While child protection agencies are aware of these atrocities, they also ignore them for the greater part as conditioning of children and separation (x-x) from real families plays a real part of reprogramming of these innocent minds.
I will continue this interview at later date. Again my most humble apologies for the pain I have caused both parents and children for whom I was responsible in separating.


May God have mercy on my soul……..Black Michael

http://www.examiner.com/family-court-in-grand-rapids/confessions-of-a-cps-headhunter-part-2-of-3

Exposing Child Protective Service-CONFESSIONS OF A CPS HEADHUNTER

Exposing Child Protective Service
by
Black Michael
(name changed)
transcribed exclusive interview part 1 of 3
as told to Georgie and Destiny
CONFESSIONS OF A CPS HEADHUNTER
(where marked (x-x), signifies the recording was unclear to transcribe)

I worked as a headhunter for twenty-two years and with false allegations brought in over 25,000 children for which I was paid $1,800 a head for. If a child was mentally handicapped, fetal drug alcohol syndrome and MS handicapped, I got a bonus of $500.00 for each of them.
We targeted low income, the impoverished and little to no education. The less means they had to fight a legal battle with, the more bonuses we received. I know I was responsible for bringing in 11 children, that were later murdered by their foster parent and the guilt of that has eaten and chewed at my spirit until it is so full of holes, I sure my heart looks like Swiss cheese.
In one case a woman was doing laundry in the projects and sat beside her about a 18 month old playing with a metal hanger. The mother’s view of the child was restricted by blowing wet sheets on the wind and I in my allegations said the child was utterly alone and could have poked his eye out or wandered out into traffic less than thirty feet away and be killed. Her little boy ended up being adopted out to a white family in India without parental consent. I am not proud of what I did. I am sickened to my sole by what I did to those innocent little children.
It really did not hit me what I was really doing until another headhunter came up to me and congratulated me on my 25,000 score on innocents taken from loving homes. I know those parents were good parents. They loved their children enough to die for them, they just lacked the money, education and to know how to get their children safely home. Point -They changed my name for every court case, so no name would link me in other files.
God, I have lived in mansions, had a body guard, drove swanky cars. I had it all. Every time a child was adopted out without parental consent that I have given child protective services, I got another $10,000 as a reward. Not for all the cars, houses, villas, not for all the money around the world, would I send one more innocent into a foster family as a repent.
I know I am going to hell. But, starting with Australia and Canada and the world, I am confessing my story and the only amends I can move and for a lot of these kids, it is far to late. I vow to bring them home and tell the judges what I was hired to do and why and who paid me.
I promised Georgie the exclusive interview and she left square bracketed as (x-x) and I cannot go on. The guilt is choking my throat and soon I will not be able to talk. But, I will come back and finish this exclusive interview. You ladies are doing a fine smart job. I give you both credits - high credits, for seeing so clearly all the corruption going on from judges to lawyers to crown counsel to social workers to simple clerks. You are headed in the right direction and you are both going to make a huge difference in this sick world by bring some babies home to their mothers and fathers where they have belonged since they were born.
I can say it and mean it I am so very sorry, so very sorry. That words do not make amend, owning up to our mistakes does. So I am off to my office here at home to see which child I can return home next.

http://www.examiner.com/family-court-in-grand-rapids/confessions-of-a-cps-headhunter

Foster Parents; Did you know? CPS and relative placements. Part 1 of 4

Foster Parents; Did you know? CPS and relative placements. Part 1 of 4
August 28th, 2010 1:41 pm ET

Foster Parents: Did you know?
CPS Relative placements
Part 1 of 4

In this series we will explore the controversial subject; relative placements.

In the foster care system, most states have made provisions for relative placements, the statutes are often bypassed.

In other words; it is in the Statutes that instruct each CPS office make every effort to locate relatives immediately after the child (ren) are taken into custody in order to place them with family. However, many times even though relatives are located, as the statutes dictate, we find that relatives are often not contacted, considered, or interviewed as possible placements for the child (ren).

Clarification; even though relatives have successfully been located, relatives like; grandparents, uncles, aunts, who often stand by to assist children who been removed from their parents, the relatives are never considered for placement. Your examiner has witnessed these cases personally in serving as advocate for grandparents.

We offer you the following quotes, eliminating the non-essential wording. If you would like to read the entire report, compiled as of Jan. 2008, you may view it at the website below; Child Welfare Information Gateway. http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/placement.cfm

Pay close attention to this one; In order for States to receive Federal payments for foster care and adoption assistance, Federal law requires that they "consider giving preference to an adult relative over a non-related caregiver when determining placement for a child, provided that the relative caregiver meets all relevant State child protection standards".

Here are some facts pertaining to relative placements;

Approximately 36 States and Puerto Rico give preference or priority to relative placements in their statutes remaining States use statutory language such as "may consider" placement with relatives.
Generally, preference is given to the child's grandparents, followed by aunts, uncles, adult siblings, and cousins.

Approximately 23 States and the District of Columbia require relatives to undergo a criminal background check.

Approximately 14 States and the District of Columbia have established "kinship care" or "relative caregiver" programs by statute to provide relatives with benefits to help offset the cost of caring for a placed child.

Nine States address foster care payments for kin caregivers in statute, benefits whether in money or services.

Approximately seven States also give preference to relatives when making adoptive placements.

http://www.examiner.com/foster-families-in-national/foster-parents-did-you-know-cps-and-relative-placements-part-1-of-4