Exposing Child UN-Protective Services and the Deceitful Practices They Use to Rip Families Apart/Where Relative Placement is NOT an Option, as Stated by a DCYF Supervisor
Unbiased Reporting
What I post on this Blog does not mean I agree with the articles or disagree. I call it Unbiased Reporting!
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Friday, January 23, 2015
NH DCYF and The Family Court's Play Favorites!
Twin, 9 year old boy's, left alone for month's to fend for themselves by a "supposed" babysitter and the parent's aren't charged by DCYF or the Court's, yet a Mother who leaves her son with a babysitter for a few HOURS , has her child stolen by NH DCYF and never returned after the babysitter leaves him home alone sleeping.
See: http://www.unionleader.com/article/20150123/NEWS03/150129565
The Mother is charged with child endangerment, the charges are dropped in Criminal Court, but the Judge refuses to drop charges in Family Court and won't allow new found evidence proving the Mother's innocence. Shouldn't she have gotten her son back? She didn't and relatives weren't even allowed custody. Her son was ILLEGALLY adopted, never to be seen again. So what gives DCYF and the Family Court's the right to pick and choose whose kids are returned? Why is does one family get better treatment than another? Where's the equality? What's good for one SHOULD be good for the other!
The parent's of the twin boy's are not facing charges, so why was the Mother of the little boy charged? She had a babysitter also and her child wasn't left alone for months.
How can DCYF and the Family Court's get away with playing Favorites?
See: http://www.unionleader.com/article/20150123/NEWS03/150129565
The Mother is charged with child endangerment, the charges are dropped in Criminal Court, but the Judge refuses to drop charges in Family Court and won't allow new found evidence proving the Mother's innocence. Shouldn't she have gotten her son back? She didn't and relatives weren't even allowed custody. Her son was ILLEGALLY adopted, never to be seen again. So what gives DCYF and the Family Court's the right to pick and choose whose kids are returned? Why is does one family get better treatment than another? Where's the equality? What's good for one SHOULD be good for the other!
The parent's of the twin boy's are not facing charges, so why was the Mother of the little boy charged? She had a babysitter also and her child wasn't left alone for months.
How can DCYF and the Family Court's get away with playing Favorites?
Does a Report of Child Sexual Molestation Warrant Immediate Removal of a Child?
If someone calls in a report to DCYF of a child/children being sexually molested, wouldn't that warrant immediate removal? Wouldn't this be considered "Imminent Danger"?
Why would a newborn, blonde haired, blue eyed grandchild be considered to be in "Imminent Danger", but NOT the children of the accused parents?
Why would the children be left in the home, but the newborn never even allowed into the home?
How does a DCYF Lawyer get away with telling a Judge there is sexual molestation going on in a home and not mention the children were never removed. The Judge never even asked. How does she even get away with making the false statement, when she already knows it was already Proven to be a false report?
Could it be the day the report was called in that it was already Proven a False Report? Or could it be the False reporter never stated where the "supposed" abuse took place? So where did the DCYF Lawyer come up with,"It happened in the Grandparent's home", when there was no address given? No dates, no times?
Isn't "Hearsay" without proof in Family Court cases ILLEGAL?
Isn't "Slander" also ILLEGAL?
NH DCYF as well as the NH Family Court's need to get their shit together. How many more Grandparents have been and will be screwed over because of the ILLEGAL practices of both DCYF and the Family Courts?
How many more children and families will suffer the abuse of DCYF and the Family Courts?
Why would a newborn, blonde haired, blue eyed grandchild be considered to be in "Imminent Danger", but NOT the children of the accused parents?
Why would the children be left in the home, but the newborn never even allowed into the home?
How does a DCYF Lawyer get away with telling a Judge there is sexual molestation going on in a home and not mention the children were never removed. The Judge never even asked. How does she even get away with making the false statement, when she already knows it was already Proven to be a false report?
Could it be the day the report was called in that it was already Proven a False Report? Or could it be the False reporter never stated where the "supposed" abuse took place? So where did the DCYF Lawyer come up with,"It happened in the Grandparent's home", when there was no address given? No dates, no times?
Isn't "Hearsay" without proof in Family Court cases ILLEGAL?
Isn't "Slander" also ILLEGAL?
NH DCYF as well as the NH Family Court's need to get their shit together. How many more Grandparents have been and will be screwed over because of the ILLEGAL practices of both DCYF and the Family Courts?
How many more children and families will suffer the abuse of DCYF and the Family Courts?
Caseworker in fatal child abuse case charged
Caseworker in fatal child abuse case charged:
DENVER - A former human services caseworker was charged Thursday in connection to a fatal child abuse case. Rotchana Madera, 27, was charged with forgery, tampering with evidence and official misconduct.
DENVER - A former human services caseworker was charged Thursday in connection to a fatal child abuse case. Rotchana Madera, 27, was charged with forgery, tampering with evidence and official misconduct.
Woman charged with involuntary manslaughter in adopted daughter's neglect death
Woman charged with involuntary manslaughter in adopted daughter's neglect death | MLive.com:
WYOMING, MI -- A Wyoming woman is charged with involuntary manslaughter in the March death of her adopted 18-month-old child.
WYOMING, MI -- A Wyoming woman is charged with involuntary manslaughter in the March death of her adopted 18-month-old child.
Over-protective parenting may be seeping into child welfare laws
Over-protective parenting may be seeping into child welfare laws | Daily Brew - Yahoo News Canada:
When I was a little kid I had a friend named Bobby. He was a year or two younger than me and the boys I played with but he liked to hang around with us.
When I was a little kid I had a friend named Bobby. He was a year or two younger than me and the boys I played with but he liked to hang around with us.
''Drug addicts don't make bad parents'' social worker told disgruntled dad of 'at risk' 4-year-old
''Drug addicts don't make bad parents'' social worker told disgruntled dad of 'at risk' 4-year-old - Mirror Online:
A council has been slammed after a social worker told a disgruntled father "drug addicts don't make bad parents."
A council has been slammed after a social worker told a disgruntled father "drug addicts don't make bad parents."
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
