I gave a few other scenario's of event's that really happened in New Hampshire, of people who WERE charged with "What could Happen", including Mother's, charged with "Neglect in the Future".
After discussing the prospect of being charged with what could happen with another family member, we came to a conclusion. First off, charging a person with "What Could Happen" is pure stupidity. How often could we see this happening and for what reason's?
Here are some more stupid examples:
A Police Officer would be able to stop you for speeding, even though you weren't, because you COULD speed in the future, so he might as well ticket you right now.
A person could be arrested for shoplifting, even though they didn't shoplift, because they COULD shoplift in the future.
A person could get arrested for being intoxicated, even though they weren't because they COULD be intoxicated in the future.
There are just too many stupid scenario's to What Could Happen. Can you see how stupid and idiotic it would be if everyone were charged with a crime before they ever even committed one. So does it make any sense to charge a parent with "Neglect in the Future"? For What COULD Happen? This is how the State of New Hampshire identifies "Neglect". You don't have to be guilty of abusing your child. DCYF wannabe Psychic's will tell the Judge you WILL neglect your child in the future, so steal the child now so you can't.
This law is idiotic and need's to go, otherwise we're all in trouble!
New Hampshire Definition of Neglect:
Citation: Rev. Stat. § 169-C:3
Neglected child means a child:
Who is without proper parental care or control, subsistence, education as required by law, or other care or control necessary for his or her physical, mental, or emotional health, when it is established that his or her health has suffered or is very likely to suffer serious impairment, and the deprivation is not due primarily to the lack of financial means of the parents, guardian, or custodian
No comments:
Post a Comment