Monday, May 7, 2012

Why NH CACR 26 Need's to Pass




On May 3rd,2012, a Senate hearing took place in Concord, where I and many other New Hampshire citizen's were able to speak up on our concerns, fighting for the passage of CACR 26. Many of us are fighting for the return of our children and grandchildren. None of us were adjudicated as "unfit" parent's or grandparent's, yet our children and grandchildren were torn from our lives due to the passage of 73-A in 1978.
Many of the NH voter's unknowingly voted for it's passage, unaware of the harm it would cause if passed. The people of NH were not afforded the right of a pamphlet, to explain what 73-A was and how it would effect their right's. Just like the Obamacare bill, where our Government officials were forced to sign it before reading what was in it. It makes no sense to me.
The problem with 73-A is the Supreme Court Justices were given the power to do whatever they want, as to the rules of the Court's.They are in charge of the rule making, without any outside interference. They can waive their own rules and as many of us have seen, they don't even have to follow their own rules.
Many of us have lost our children because our evidence of innocence was not allowed into court, because the Court's "waive" the rules.
"Hearsay" is STILL allowed in NH Court's, even though the United States Supreme Court ruled in 2004-Crawford v. Washington: Rule 9.0, that "Hearsay" is NOT admissible in Family Court cases or Domestic Violence cases. All it takes in NH to lose your child is "Hearsay", without any proof of guilt.
Slandering family member's with false report's, already "Proven" false report's, where DCYF lies about the family member's. Where the family member's NEVER get to face their accuser and documentation proving innocence is NEVER allowed in Family Court.
Father's, mother's and grandparent's are alienated against their children and grandchildren, by their spouse and/or DCYF.
Federal Law 42 U.S.C, states relative placement of children WILL be considered before Foster placement. This doesn't happen in NH, because our Judges make their own rules, which go against Govt. mandates.
Services are "Supposed" to be provided to at-risk families BEFORE a child is taken. That doesn't happen either.The Judges go along with everything DCYF tell's them and why wouldn't they? Our stolen children bring in more money for the State.
Judges who terminate Fictitious men's rights, knowing full well these men are NOT the father's.
Judges who terminate a parent's rights, even after testimony and proof prove the parent's innocence, after he writes the opposite of testimony and proof he was just supplied in Court. Our Supreme Court Justices state the lower Court Judge made NO error's. They're just as bad. Do ANY of them read the Court transcripts? Do they listen to the tapes, or is it all just fun and games in the Supreme Court?
Why should the Court's have this power when innocent people are being railroaded? Many times, parent's criminal charges of child endangerment or abuse are dropped in Criminal Court due to new found evidence proving innocence, yet Family Court NEVER drops the charges because they refuse to admit the evidence and the children are NEVER returned. Many are ILLEGALLY adopted!
ALL of the Court's should be run the same way. Accused and convicted criminals have more rights than parents. Parent's have NO rights in NH!
And just try to file a complaint against a NH Judge or a Lawyer. This is the good ole boy's network. They ALL stand up for their own.
So YES! CACR 26 NEED'S to Pass! Then we need to work on OPEN Family Court's, Jury Trials for parent's AND ALL Administrative Rules for the Court's And DCYF, need to be made Law. Maybe then, the Court's and DCYF will think twice before they screw over any more families!


No comments:

Post a Comment