Judiciary Infecting Legislature Via the N.H. Bar Assn.

STOP Judicial Child Abuse: Judiciary Infecting Legislature Via the N.H. Bar Assn.:


SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2011

Judiciary Infecting Legislature Via the N.H. Bar Assn.
A Question:

Why are union-monopoly BAR-admitted attorneys working for the legislature and permitted to participate, even administratively, in the legislative process?

An Observation:

BAR-Admitted Attorneys practicing in branches of government other than the judicial branch violates the separation of powers doctrine specifically because the professional rules of conduct and the attorney's oath create an officership of the admitted attorney with the court binding a primary loyalty to the judiciary; not a loyalty to the client and not a loyalty to any other branch of government.

This means for example, attorney Edward Mosca acting as house counsel, as a bar admitted attorney, when counseling the legislature, creates a violation of the separation of powers. His motivation and loyalty is necessarily bound to the judiciary, which means that his legal counsel and advice to the legislature is, ipso facto, stained with preexistent and superior loyalties to another branch of government.

In simpler terms, he will likely give counsel to the legislature which is favorable to the industry in which he works; in the judiciary, and with judges - every day. He is really a lobbyist disguised as house counsel.

We find this to be the case, right down to legislative services' attorneys being members of the bar.

I ask, where can we obtain justice, when there is such a deep and complex co-mingling of the branches of government who have such complicated webs of devotion and loyalty and obligation woven artfully but hypocritically throughout their duplicitous careers?

This professional schizophrenia needs to stop immediately.

I would think that there is only one lawful means for a bar admitted attorney to practice in another branch of government: if he withdrew his membership from the bar or at a bare minimum, suspended the membership during their course of practice with another branch of government.

I guess, this would mean that bar admitted attorneys, could not practice law at all while serving in another branch.

This solution would discourage the pandemic proliferation of corruption by attorneys such as Edward Mosca, who seek a foothold in the law making process even after losing a bid for State Rep.

This solution would encourage more "common" people to get a hold of their legislature and would most assuredly make government more transparent.