A Letter From A Mom

A Letter From A Mom
by Watchman Noyes on Monday, November 1, 2010 at 8:56pm
Hello all ..this is a letter from J4P's Mom sent to various politicians. She and JULY 4 PATRIOT have asked we post this on our sites. Please do pass this around, re-post it and share it. Thank you for reading. Posted with permissions from J4Ps Mom and J4P.

We have tried to talk to people but there is no person who will listen to us so, I decided I would write you and let you know my feelings. It seems that the American Citizen......is not allowed to have any feelings or beliefs unless they are agreed to by the government and may be arrested for them. Seems as though they are supposed to be quashed in these new days. I am old and remember when the United States was revered and everyone was proud to say, “I am an American”, at this moment I am not sure. Let me tell you my reasons.There is an agency set up by the American government to protect its smallest citizens from harm. They have regulations, laws and limits in writing. They tell me that they do not have to follow the laws, they are able to do whatever they want. They can take these young citizens without warning or evidence and hold them without warrant and without reason to force the parents to do something that the constitution says they do not have to do.The present situation is as follows:

1.Vengeful wife presses charges of rape of daughter on husband during a divorce.2.Husband and wife separated for a year, both are seeing other people.3.Husband then charged with weapon, found “not guilty” in Federal court.4.Husband has girlfriend with daughter and daughter found to have NOT been harmed by him by Child Protective Services.5.Child Protective Services suggests that he not be alone with child so child is either with her mother or his parents and never alone with him. (This arrangement was approved by Child Protective Services.)6.CPS decided that the accused had to take a 2 year voluntary counseling as a child abuser (in which he would have to admit guilt and the OK Supreme Court has ruled on such a case that it was unconstitutional and could not be required.)This could be used against him in his court case.7.The mother was told she needed to take a 6 month voluntary course for she and the child for non offender sex abuse classes (in which she would have to admit that she believed he was guilty and the OK Supreme Court has ruled on such a case and said it was unconstitutional and could not be required)8. Child Protective Services says the mother must see that the child is removed from the state for protection because the mother may have to go to the bathroom or take a shower and the child may be molested during that time. Said it was not because she was not a protective or bad mother but because she did not believe he was guilty.9.Judge refused to hold scheduled hearing and screamed at the mother and attorney in courthouse waiting area that she needed to “get in there and sign the papers,this is my case and I am not waiting” when the mother and attorney came to talk to the accused.10.Before any papers were presented to the mother to be signed (had to be written and presented to her attorney) the sister of the accused came from Tennessee, pape rwork was done and she took temporary custody and removed the child to Tennessee (original “suggestion” by CPS). She was met in Tennessee because the judge called a judge there and said he wanted the child returned to OK.11.The TBI looked at the paperwork and said it was in order and suggested she go ahead and enroll the child in school, which she did the following morning.12.The day the child started her new school she was taken kicking and screaming by CPS in Tennessee on orders of OK. (She was now far enough away from the accused that there could be no type of contact.)13.Child brought back to OK and hearing held. The mother was told that if the child’s grandmother was here from Chicago arrangements could be made the mother and her daughter to go to Chicago and the case would be dismissed.Arrangements were made and tentative rental of a U-haul to move all their possessions was acquired. During the court hearing all the things required of them were presented to the court. The child was not adjudicated deprived in the hearing and they had 4 days to make a final decision.14.On the fourth day the decision is made. The grandmother of the child said in court that she did not believe the accused is guilty so they refuse to let the mother and child go with her. Child has to remain in state custody. They will consider removing custody from the mother and giving it to the great-grandmother but she has to come to OK so they can talk to her and make a decision.

Here is where we are:There does not have to be evidence, in fact there can be no evidence of abuse, neglect or any type of harm to a child but the child can be removedand custody taken because they believe that some day there might be.It does not matter what the law states because they do not have tofollow it. In fact, they state that even if the accused is found“not guilty” they can call wherever he lives and tell the CPSthere that he is in the area and he will never be allowed to be withchildren for the rest of his life. He will be on “their list”and that is their right. This agency has total control, there is nooversight, there is nowhere to turn for recourse and there is no“common sense”.

America? When there is an agency that has total immunity and does not have to follow the law of the land, abide by the constitution and can take children away for no lawfulreason that is not what it sounds like to me.

RECAP: Unlawful kidnapping, holding hostage, ransom is admission of guilt.

These are things that are just not understandable for me. Please explain why this can happen in America. Sounds like a country I studied in school many years ago.How can this happen in a “free society” governed by laws and aconstitution.

Keep us in your prayers

J4P’s mom