PART TWO
by
James Roger Brown
HARVESTING CHILDREN FOR CONDITIONAL FEDERAL FUNDING:
BY THE NUMBERS
“Article 16.3. The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.” Universal Declaration of Human Rights, English Version, United Nations Department of Public Information.
“When I meet a man I ask myself, 'Is this the man I want my children to
spend their weekends with?'“ Rita Rudner, Comedienne, from Michael Moncur's (Cynical) Quotations.
Laying a cornerstone
Structural corruption occurs when employees of a government agency or program are required, as a condition of continued employment, to falsify reports, commit perjury, or engage in other illegal activity to obtain agency funding or meet agency or program goals. Structural corruption is similar to what accountants refer to as “implied corruption” or “implied fraud.”
Sitting down at the table
The tables included in this article are for the benefit of those needing documentation to convince others of the level of fraud and corruption political extremists and allied criminals have brought into government agencies and programs. Some readers have probably suspected children were being exploited by government employees in child “protection” agencies, but have been unable to convince your naive friends. When you inform those naive friends of these articles and they dismiss you with “Ah, he’s just some kind of anti-government militia nut job,” you can print copies, sit them down at the table and show them.
Now, here it is. You’ve got tables.
1. LAYING THE FOUNDATION FOR CHILD PROTECTION FRAUD: MANDATED STATE TITLE IV-E FEDERAL FUND CLAIM REPORTS
“And every one who hears these words of mine, and does not act upon them, will be like a foolish man, who built his house upon the sand.” Jesus Christ, Matthew 7:26 NAS Bible
State agencies are required, as a condition of federal funding, to file quarterly Federal Title IV-E Expenditure Reports (Federal Form IV-E-12, OMB No. 0980-01310, “The OMB number may have changed as of October 1999,” George Babbitt, Arkansas Department of Human Services). Among the information State child protection service agencies must report are projections of the average number of children that will be held in State protective custody and State custody for adoption during the reporting period.
Children held in State protective custody have been removed from parental custody. Children held in State custody for adoption have been removed from parental custody and parental rights terminated.
No comments:
Post a Comment