Bogus Foreclosure: NH State Rep helps apparently slam Harmon foreclosure mill

Off Topic, but extremely important to our families!

NH DCYF Try's to Contact Austin's Honduran Father in Mexico

My grandson Austin's FICTITIOUS Father's right's were terminated on 9/25/07. The document's are provided below.
Notice how Austin's Birth Certificate states his father was born in Honduras on November 26, 1969.
Also notice on the Petition for Termination of Parental Rights, Austin's father's date of Birth was listed as January 23, 1980. A man eleven years younger than Austin's REAL Father.
Also notice on the accompanying DCYF Contact log, DCYF would be trying to contact Austin's Bio Father, by publication in Mexico. Now why would DCYF try to contact a man from Honduras in Mexico?
Are they that stupid? Do I even have to ask that question? What was their ulterior motive? I can tell you what their ulterior motive was. They knew Austin's father was in Honduras, but didn't want him to respond, making it that much easier to terminate both his and Austin's Mother's rights. Their Federal incentive would be allotted all the sooner. Even after the caseworker was told this man was NOT Austin's father, the caseworker responded with, "Oh well. No big deal. It doesn't matter." There you go father's. According to DCYF your rights don't matter. How many more father's have had their rights terminated ILLEGALLY in NH? A few more that I know of personally, not to mention my granddaughter Isabella's father also, where DCYF pulled some fictitious man's name out of thin air and denied her REAL father a paternity test and custody, stating he had NO standing to fight for his daughter.
DCYF was in possession of Austin's birth certificate, his REAL father's address in Honduras, his SS number AND his phone number.
So doesn't this make the ILLEGAL adoption's of both Austin and Isabella Null and Void? Isn't that the way the Law is SUPPOSED to work? So when does it begin?

Due process

Due process - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

Due process is the legal requirement that the state must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects individual persons from it. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, this constitutes a due-process violation, which offends against the rule of law.
Due process has also been frequently interpreted as limiting laws and legal proceedings (see substantive due process), so that judges - instead of legislators - may define and guarantee fundamental fairness, justice, and liberty. This interpretation has proven controversial, and is analogous to the concepts of natural justice, and procedural justice used in various other jurisdictions. This interpretation of due process is sometimes expressed as a command that the government must not be unfair to the people or abuse them physically.
Due process is not used in contemporary English law, though two similar concepts are natural justice (which generally applies only to decisions of administrative agencies and some types of private bodies like trade unions) and the British constitutional concept of the rule of law as articulated by A. V. Dicey and others.[1] However, neither concept lines up perfectly with the American conception of due process, which, as explained below, presently contains many implied rights not found in the ancient or modern concepts of due process in England.[2]
Due process developed from clause 39 of the Magna Carta in England. When English and American law gradually diverged, due process was not upheld in England, but did become incorporated in the Constitution of the United States.

Common law fraud has nine elements

Fraud - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

Common law fraud has nine elements:[3][4]
a representation of an existing fact;
its materiality;
its falsity;
the speaker's knowledge of its falsity;
the speaker's intent that it shall be acted upon by the plaintiff;
plaintiff's ignorance of its falsity;
plaintiff's reliance on the truth of the representation;
plaintiff's right to rely upon it; and
consequent damages suffered by plaintiff.
Most jurisdictions in the United States require that each element be pled with particularity and be proved with clear, cogent, and convincing evidence (very probable evidence) to establish a claim of fraud. The measure of damages in fraud cases is to be computed by the "benefit of bargain" rule, which is the difference between the value of the property had it been as represented, and

Amy Leichtenberg on "Dr. Phil Exposes the Crisis in Family Court"

State officials investigating several cases of abuse of adopted children

State officials investigating several cases of abuse of adopted children:

"An alleged child starvation case near Longview is one of more than a dozen cases — including one death — that have state officials reviewing how adopted children are placed and treated."

The Proven DCYF False Report That Stole Our Granddaughter Isabella From Us

The Document above is a false report called in to Nashua, NH DCYF on September 14,2005 against my daughter and her estranged husband.The names of family member's are blacked out due to their innocence.
My granddaughter Isabella, niece of the family in the false report was born on August 31, 2005 in Nashua. On Sept. 14, 2005, a disgruntled so-called friend asked my daughter to drive her to Kohl's Department Store in Nashua to shoplift. My daughter refused. That same day DCYF worker Tracy Roukie came knocking at my door, where my daughter and her two children were staying temporarily.
Roukie explained the report to my daughter, never stating the report was called in against her estranged husband or WHERE the supposed abuse took place. As you can see, the document doesn't say WHERE it supposedly took place either.
My daughter and I were enraged, thinking anyone could do anything so horrendous to the children and also couldn't figure out when or where it could have happened. We immediately took the children to the hospital and had them thoroughly examined. The Doctor found NO evidence of ANY kind of abuse.
By the time we were done at the Hospital, Tracy Roukie couldn't be reached so my daughter left her a voicemail and delivered the paperwork the next morning. Tracy told her the case was being closed as unfounded. My estranged son-in-law was never questioned and there was NO investigation. We THOUGHT everything was all set.
A report had been called in to DCYF on September 2,2005 against my daughter who had just given birth to Isabella, by Hospital Social Worker Kathy Lizotte, at the recommendation of Janice Watson from Healthy Steps Methadone Program for Pregnant Women. Janice also got the SW to have Isabella admitted into NICU for withdrawl symptoms at 10 PM the evening of 9/1/05, after Isabella had already been signed off for discharge on 9/2/05, by the SW and three Nurses, who stated there was nothing wrong with the baby. Janice also led us to believe the baby was suffering from Methadone withdrawls, as she had told us MOST baby's do. She also said Methadone withdrawls are much worse than other drug withdrawls.
The SW told DCYF there were drug's in the baby, due to the lies Janice Watson told her, even though the toxicology reports for Isabella didn't come back until 9/4/05 and 9/6/05. So of course, DCYF worker Melissa Deane showed up at the Hospital. The same caseworker who testified in court that she was unaware my daughter was given Morphine in labor.
When the toxicology report came back, it showed morphine in the baby. The morphine IV given to her mother in labor for 19 hours due to the baby being placenta previa at birth and my daughter being forced to give birth naturally.
After my daughter being told the case was being closed as unfounded, the Police came to the door on 9/21/05 with a Petition for abuse and neglect against the new mother. The Preliminary Hearing was scheduled for 9/26/05. We couldn't understand why this was happening. My daughter was in a legal methadone program and was given morphine in labor. Not because of anything she did.
My family and I met DCYF worker Melissa Deane and DCYF Lawyer Kate McClure in the courthouse lobby before the hearing. I asked for custody of Isabella if she were taken from my daughter. Kate McClure responded with, "There's no way you're taking that baby with sexual molestation going on in YOUR house." I asked her, "What are you talking about? There is NO sexual molestation going on at my house." She stated, "Yes there is and it will be proven in court." I told her ,"No there isn't and it won't be proven in court because it never happened. The report was already proven false by Tracy Roukie."
My daughter went into the courtroom, by herself, with no-one allowed in for support. Kate McClure relayed the PROVEN false report to Judge Leary and told him the abuse happened at my house. My daughter was furious and yelled out it didn't happen at our house, so Judge Leary asked Kate McClure, "It happened at her house?" She answered, "Yes, at her house." My husband and I were never even allowed to stand up to the accusation. There was no evidence substantiating the false report. Nothing. All it took was Hearsay without proof. A lie by a DCYF Lawyer to keep our granddaughter from us for the past six year's. The document CLEARLY shows it was NOT stated where the SUPPOSED abuse took place. It does NOT say the abuse took place at my house as stated by Kate McClure, the DCYF Lawyer who also ordered me to drop my complaint against her with the Attorney Discipline Office, which of course I didn't.
Another little piece of information; Since the KIDNAPPING of my granddaughter, my daughter and I have filed SEVERAL motions with the court for the CD from the Preliminary hearing, along with two other's, which prove perjury by three State witnesses. ALL have been denied which shows me the Family Courts definitely go along with DCYF's deceitful practices, keeping their dirty little secret's hidden. It's definitely time to OPEN ALL the "Secret Courts". Do you think maybe this would make DCYF and the Family Court's held accountable? I believe it would.
We were clearly slandered and have been treated like dirt ever since. Grandparent's who have always protected our children and grandchildren. Children we would die for. No criminal or even driving record, slandered by DCYF liar's who are protected by the court system.
The problem in abuse and neglect cases is "Preponderance of Evidence", which means, it COULD have happened, but NO proof is needed that it IN DEED happened. The Law's MUST change! As in Criminal Court, where the "Burden of Proof" MUST be met, Civil Court MUST have the same rules. Why should convicted criminal's be given more rights than Parent's? They shouldn't be.
As for Hearsay and the court's NOT allowing evidence proving innocence admitted into Family Court:
Rule 1.2 waver of rules allows the court to throw out all evidence.

The second part of article 73a,The last sentence was added
to this Amendment , which gives the judiciary legislative power to to create Rules which in affect nullify what the House passes. Rule 1.2 waver of rules. In other words the court makes up its own rules and if it wants to throw out any evidence for any or no reason at all it can and can use hearsay to reach a conclusion. This need's to change .

Oh and by the way, the False Reporter was NEVER arrested or charged, even though I reported it to the Police. She still shoplifts and does God only knows what else. She got away with tearing apart MY family, along with wasting tax dollar's furthering her sick agenda.
One last point I would like to make. After searching for a NH Lawyer to take my case of Slander and Defamation against NH DCYF, no-one would take it. I was told by a well-known Lawyer that no Lawyer in NH would take my case, even with my proof, because they're all afraid of being disbarred, because that's what happens in NH when a Lawyer fights DCYF. So who are they accountable to? NO-ONE!!! Like a former caseworker told my husband and I, "DCYF can do whatever they want because OUR Government gave them the power to do so." It's time to remove that POWER!