Lawmaker proposes legislation to protect parental rights in medical decision-making | fox4kc.com:
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — A Missouri lawmaker is pushing to reinforce parental rights when it comes to the health of their children, and it comes in the wake of a recent Missouri case.
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Wednesday, April 1, 2015
DA: Guilty plea in Larson child abuse case expected Tuesday
DA: Guilty plea in Larson child abuse case expected Tuesday - WBTV 3 News, Weather, Sports, and Traffic for Charlotte, NC:
CHARLOTTE, NC (Adam Bell/The Charlotte Observer) -
Union County prosecutors say they anticipate Wanda Sue Larson, a former social services supervisor, will plead guilty Tuesday in a child abuse case in which a boy in her care was found shackled to her porch with a dead chicken tied around his neck.
CHARLOTTE, NC (Adam Bell/The Charlotte Observer) -
Union County prosecutors say they anticipate Wanda Sue Larson, a former social services supervisor, will plead guilty Tuesday in a child abuse case in which a boy in her care was found shackled to her porch with a dead chicken tied around his neck.
Medical Tyranny in Tennessee: Forced Antibiotics on Newborns
Medical Tyranny in Tennessee: Forced Antibiotics on Newborns:
The Times Free Press in Chattanooga, Tennessee reported last week that the Erlanger Health System was going to start forcing all newborn babies in their health facilities to receive an antibiotic ointment applied to their eyes at birth, whether their parents want it or not. Even if nurses and midwives attending the birth do not approve of the antibiotic ointment, the hospital allegedly stated that they will apply it anyway, using security guards at the patient’s bedside if need be.
The Times Free Press in Chattanooga, Tennessee reported last week that the Erlanger Health System was going to start forcing all newborn babies in their health facilities to receive an antibiotic ointment applied to their eyes at birth, whether their parents want it or not. Even if nurses and midwives attending the birth do not approve of the antibiotic ointment, the hospital allegedly stated that they will apply it anyway, using security guards at the patient’s bedside if need be.
Medical Kidnapping: A Threat to Every Child in America Today
Medical Kidnapping: A Threat to Every Child in America Today:
If you live in the United States of American today, and you have children in your home under the age of 18, every day you are in danger of losing your children to the State through medical kidnapping.All across the United States today, parents are losing custody of their biological children due to medical kidnapping. Medical kidnapping is defined as the State taking away children from their biological parents and putting them into State custody and the foster care system, simply because the parents did not agree with a doctor regarding their prescribed medical treatment for the family. In some cases it is as simple as telling a doctor you are going to seek a second opinion on a suggested medical procedure, and then ending up being charged with “medical abuse” and losing your children.
Sunday, March 29, 2015
NH Senate Passes Bill Giving DCYF More (Undeserved) Power
The New Hampshire Senate passed Bill 244 recently, which in effect gives NH DCYF more power. More Undeserved power. Though I commend the NH Senate on their work on this Bill, they have unwittingly given DCYF more power than they already had, putting more families lives at stake in NH. With a little tweaking, this could very well be a good Bill.
See:
Senate passes bill prompted by Nashua 3-year-old’s death; sponsor sees good chances in NH House
For starter's, why would DCYF need to seek a motion to enter one's home when they already enter people's homes without a Court order or Warrant? People stupid enough to let them in their homes to begin with. Yes, I WAS one of those stupid people 9 1/2 year's ago. I believed they worked for our Government and our Government would never harm us. The joke was on me! They will tell you they have a Court Order, Warrant or both, but when you ask to see either/or, you are refused. My husband in fact asked if they had either. They stated they did. When he asked to see them, they refused. After much research, I found out they had neither, yet they came into my home, with the Police, too afraid to come here alone and dragged my grandchildren out.
I pray the House amend's this Bill before it's passage. The Amendment I'm hoping for, would strike DCYF entering a home as part of an abuse and neglect investigation. I would like to see an Amendment that states the Police have the authority to enter one's home to check on the welfare of children.
I know there are many people out there who do NOT trust their local Police, but I myself, as well as many other's trust the Police before DCYF. DCYF is much worse and most people are aware of that and if they're not, they should be. The Police don't get paid for removing children from their homes. There is NO incentive for them to do so. Most Police don't even like DCYF/CPS any more than the rest of us.
Second, "This bill clarifies the burden of proof ". Does that mean "Hearsay" without proof will no longer be used to steal children? Will DCYF finally have the burden of proving their allegation's, instead of stealing a child under the guise of "Preponderance of Evidence" ? Where a child will no longer be stolen because the parent may or may not have done anything wrong, or abuse could have happened, but no-one know's for sure? How about another add on? That DCYF and the Family Court's can NOT charge a parent with "anticipated
Neglect in the Future"? Does it make any sense to charge someone for something they haven't done? If it did, there wouldn't be enough Prison's to hold all the people that just Might commit a crime some day.
Another problem in NH is parent's whose charges are dropped in Criminal Court, due to proof of innocence, who are never allowed to admit the evidence in Family Court, Never get their children back. So why does a parent with Criminal Felony Child Abuse charges pending, get ALL of her 5 children back before ever even going to Court on the charges? What is wrong with this State?
As for establishing a commission to review child abuse fatalities, an investigation into DCYF practices should definitely be included.
See:
Senate passes bill prompted by Nashua 3-year-old’s death; sponsor sees good chances in NH House
http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/news/statenewengland/1060180-469/senate-passes-bill-prompted-by-nashua-3-year-olds.html
SB 244 - AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2015/SB0244.html
ANALYSIS
This bill clarifies the burden of proof and requires the department of health and human services to seek a motion to enter a home as part of a child abuse or neglect investigation in certain circumstances. The bill also establishes a commission to review child abuse fatalities.For starter's, why would DCYF need to seek a motion to enter one's home when they already enter people's homes without a Court order or Warrant? People stupid enough to let them in their homes to begin with. Yes, I WAS one of those stupid people 9 1/2 year's ago. I believed they worked for our Government and our Government would never harm us. The joke was on me! They will tell you they have a Court Order, Warrant or both, but when you ask to see either/or, you are refused. My husband in fact asked if they had either. They stated they did. When he asked to see them, they refused. After much research, I found out they had neither, yet they came into my home, with the Police, too afraid to come here alone and dragged my grandchildren out.
I pray the House amend's this Bill before it's passage. The Amendment I'm hoping for, would strike DCYF entering a home as part of an abuse and neglect investigation. I would like to see an Amendment that states the Police have the authority to enter one's home to check on the welfare of children.
I know there are many people out there who do NOT trust their local Police, but I myself, as well as many other's trust the Police before DCYF. DCYF is much worse and most people are aware of that and if they're not, they should be. The Police don't get paid for removing children from their homes. There is NO incentive for them to do so. Most Police don't even like DCYF/CPS any more than the rest of us.
Second, "This bill clarifies the burden of proof ". Does that mean "Hearsay" without proof will no longer be used to steal children? Will DCYF finally have the burden of proving their allegation's, instead of stealing a child under the guise of "Preponderance of Evidence" ? Where a child will no longer be stolen because the parent may or may not have done anything wrong, or abuse could have happened, but no-one know's for sure? How about another add on? That DCYF and the Family Court's can NOT charge a parent with "anticipated
Neglect in the Future"? Does it make any sense to charge someone for something they haven't done? If it did, there wouldn't be enough Prison's to hold all the people that just Might commit a crime some day.
Another problem in NH is parent's whose charges are dropped in Criminal Court, due to proof of innocence, who are never allowed to admit the evidence in Family Court, Never get their children back. So why does a parent with Criminal Felony Child Abuse charges pending, get ALL of her 5 children back before ever even going to Court on the charges? What is wrong with this State?
As for establishing a commission to review child abuse fatalities, an investigation into DCYF practices should definitely be included.
Saturday, March 28, 2015
Federal study finds alarming use of antipsychotics among nation's poor children, foster kids
Federal study finds alarming use of antipsychotics among nation's poor children, foster kids - ContraCostaTimes.com:
When federal inspectors set out to examine how powerful antipsychotic drugs were being used on children in the nation's public health systems, they found a 4-year-old on four psychiatric drugs, a 10-year-old prescribed without medical records, and a 16-year-old on six psych meds, including a prescription at double the maximum recommended dosage.
When federal inspectors set out to examine how powerful antipsychotic drugs were being used on children in the nation's public health systems, they found a 4-year-old on four psychiatric drugs, a 10-year-old prescribed without medical records, and a 16-year-old on six psych meds, including a prescription at double the maximum recommended dosage.
Family vs State: Parents Allege DCFS Cover-up of Foster Care Abuse
Family vs State: Parents Allege DCFS Cover-up of Foster Care Abuse | WSILTV | WSIL TV Top Stories:
MURPHYSBORO --During times of family crisis, authorities often place children in the care of the Department of Children and Family Services. A Jackson County case calls into question children's safety under the protection of the state of Illinois.
MURPHYSBORO --During times of family crisis, authorities often place children in the care of the Department of Children and Family Services. A Jackson County case calls into question children's safety under the protection of the state of Illinois.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)