Judge calls emergency hearing after 9Wants to Know investigates custody case | 9news.com:
DENVER - Denver Juvenile Court Judge Donna Schmalberger called an emergency hearing on Tuesday afternoon to address a 9Wants to Know investigation of Joey and Pedro Vasquez, two American born boys who are 1,700 miles away in Mexico.
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Wednesday, October 16, 2013
Biological father of Cherokee girl at center of custody battle honored in Tulsa
Biological father of Cherokee girl at center of custody battle honored in Tulsa:
TULSA, Oklahoma — The biological father of a Cherokee girl at the center of a lengthy custody dispute was honored in an elaborate ceremony Tuesday by the National Congress of American Indians.
TULSA, Oklahoma — The biological father of a Cherokee girl at the center of a lengthy custody dispute was honored in an elaborate ceremony Tuesday by the National Congress of American Indians.
Former foster parent charged with sex assault
Former foster parent charged with sex assault | CTV Calgary News:
An Airdrie man is accused of sexually assaulting a youth who was once in his care and is now facing charges.
Read more:
An Airdrie man is accused of sexually assaulting a youth who was once in his care and is now facing charges.
Read more:
Outpouring 'Overwhelming' for Gun-Toting Ex-Clerk Protest Scheduled 10/19/13
Outpouring 'Overwhelming' for Gun-Toting Ex-Clerk - Good News - Nashua, NH Patch:
A protest is scheduled for Saturday, Oct. 19th, 2013 at 2 PM in front of Bear's former place of work. The Shell Station on the corner of Lake and Main St. in Nashua, NH. Please participate and show your support for Bear, wrongfully terminated from his job of ten years for standing up to a would be robber.
A protest is scheduled for Saturday, Oct. 19th, 2013 at 2 PM in front of Bear's former place of work. The Shell Station on the corner of Lake and Main St. in Nashua, NH. Please participate and show your support for Bear, wrongfully terminated from his job of ten years for standing up to a would be robber.
Two funds, a job ad and a peaceful protest have been set up so far by friends and strangers interested in helping Bear Cothran.
What a difference a day makes.
On Tuesday, Bear Cothran was just a guy who'd just lost his job, quietly regrouping at home.
Then, stories began circulating online about the circumstances of his job loss – while working third shift at a local Shell convenience store on Oct. 14, Cothran wasconfronted by a robber with a knifewho demanded money and threatened to kill him. Cothran, licensed to carry a concealed weapon, pulled out his gun and scared the robber off. Hours later, Cothran got word he'd been fired for violating his company's "no weapons" policy.
Cothran knew there'd likely be consequences, and accepted them after his direct supervisors went to bat for him in hopes of saving his job.
On Tuesday, Bear Cothran was just a guy who'd just lost his job, quietly regrouping at home.
Then, stories began circulating online about the circumstances of his job loss – while working third shift at a local Shell convenience store on Oct. 14, Cothran wasconfronted by a robber with a knifewho demanded money and threatened to kill him. Cothran, licensed to carry a concealed weapon, pulled out his gun and scared the robber off. Hours later, Cothran got word he'd been fired for violating his company's "no weapons" policy.
Cothran knew there'd likely be consequences, and accepted them after his direct supervisors went to bat for him in hopes of saving his job.
Read More:
According to SAMSHA Guidelines NH DCYF and The NH Family Courts ILLEGALLY Order Mother's Out of Methadone Treatment
According to the SAMSHA guidelines - See: Know Your Rights-Rights for Individuals on Medication-Assisted Treatment : NH DCYF and the NH Family Courts (specifically in Nashua), are GUILTY of NOT following Federal Government guidelines pertaining to Mother's receiving Medication Assisted Treatment for substance abuse. This is FACT and I possess the documentation to prove it.
According to SAMSHA's book of guidelines at the above link: See Page 12-Section:
GOVERNMENT ACTIVITIES, BENEFITS, AND
SERVICES
The ADA and Rehabilitation Act protect a person in MAT from
discrimination by the government in its –
• Services – such as health or social services and education and
training programs
• Benefit programs – like welfare or child care assistance and other
forms of financial assistance, such as student loans
• Activities – like probation and parole, zoning, occupational licensing,
and driver’s licensing
If an individual is “qualified” – meaning the individual meets the eligibility
requirements of the program or activity involved – the individual may not be
denied the opportunity to participate in or be denied benefits from these and
other public services, benefit programs or governmental activities because of a
disability. Additionally, individuals in MAT may not be treated less favorably
than other individuals simply because they are participating in MAT.
Child Welfare System. May judges, prosecuting attorneys, and others in the child
welfare system require parents to end their participation in MAT in order to get their
children back or to keep their children?
No. Courts and other government agencies may not single out people in MAT
and require them to stop taking legally prescribed medications. Such a
requirement would be no different than telling an insulin-dependent, diabetic
parent that she may not have her children back unless she stops taking insulin
and addresses her diabetes through nutrition and exercise alone. Courts may,
however, require people in MAT to comply with treatment requirements.
My questions: Why are Mother's in NH, specifically Nashua, being singled out to lose custody of their children by these fraudulent means?
Why was one Mother, one Mother that I'm aware of from Nashua, Court ordered OUT of Methadone Treatment in order to regain custody of her now eight year old daughter? Eight years lost due to the ILLEGAL practices of both NH DCYF and the Family Court. A child placed in Foster care and ILLEGALLY adopted by strangers after her Mother was given two week's to detox on her own from 80 mgs of Methadone from a Government subsidized Treatment program, in order to get her child back. A quite unfeasible feat for ANYONE. Isn't it better to be IN treatment than out in the Streets trying to get well? Definitely a Conflict of Interest when SAMSHA say's one thing and NH DCYF and the Family Courts say the opposite. Definitely ILLEGAL, but just one of the many fraudulent practices used against NH parents.
Why did her Court appointed puppet, whom the Court refused to fire, NOT stand up to this ILLEGALITY?
Why did no-one step in and stop this injustice? Why do the NH Family Courts get away with these illegalities? Is there no Lawyer in this State with the gut's to fight this very unfriendly, abusive Family Court system? And why does the NH Supreme Court let this corruption fester? Maybe IF Family Court's were OPEN to the public, this corruption and abuse of families would end. Being one parent, alone with no support,(not even having a Lawyer in their corner), in a Courtroom filled with corruption can't be very comfortable. How can any parent ever win when Injustice in NH Courts prevails over justice?
And by the way, the Mother DID detox from Methadone before her review hearing, but that didn't matter. The CPSW went into Court and perjured herself. She told the Judge the Mother wasn't off the Methadone Treatment(lie). She told him the Mother wasn't being drug tested (lie), her doses weren't going down (lie) and her levels of Methadone weren't going down (lie). No proof of course! All it takes in NH Family Court's is Hearsay without proof to steal a child. Also ILLEGAL, but practiced every day in NH.
My question: If the Mother WAS'NT being drug tested, how could the CPSW state the doses and levels weren't going down? And how stupid could the Judge be to go along with such an idiotic statement? DUH!
So NO, NH DCYF and the Family Court's do NOT follow SAMSHA guidelines, yet they still receive Title IV funding for ALL of NH's ILLEGALLY Stolen Children! What a racket!
Proof NOBODY cares about NH Families!
According to SAMSHA's book of guidelines at the above link: See Page 12-Section:
GOVERNMENT ACTIVITIES, BENEFITS, AND
SERVICES
The ADA and Rehabilitation Act protect a person in MAT from
discrimination by the government in its –
• Services – such as health or social services and education and
training programs
• Benefit programs – like welfare or child care assistance and other
forms of financial assistance, such as student loans
• Activities – like probation and parole, zoning, occupational licensing,
and driver’s licensing
If an individual is “qualified” – meaning the individual meets the eligibility
requirements of the program or activity involved – the individual may not be
denied the opportunity to participate in or be denied benefits from these and
other public services, benefit programs or governmental activities because of a
disability. Additionally, individuals in MAT may not be treated less favorably
than other individuals simply because they are participating in MAT.
Child Welfare System. May judges, prosecuting attorneys, and others in the child
welfare system require parents to end their participation in MAT in order to get their
children back or to keep their children?
No. Courts and other government agencies may not single out people in MAT
and require them to stop taking legally prescribed medications. Such a
requirement would be no different than telling an insulin-dependent, diabetic
parent that she may not have her children back unless she stops taking insulin
and addresses her diabetes through nutrition and exercise alone. Courts may,
however, require people in MAT to comply with treatment requirements.
My questions: Why are Mother's in NH, specifically Nashua, being singled out to lose custody of their children by these fraudulent means?
Why was one Mother, one Mother that I'm aware of from Nashua, Court ordered OUT of Methadone Treatment in order to regain custody of her now eight year old daughter? Eight years lost due to the ILLEGAL practices of both NH DCYF and the Family Court. A child placed in Foster care and ILLEGALLY adopted by strangers after her Mother was given two week's to detox on her own from 80 mgs of Methadone from a Government subsidized Treatment program, in order to get her child back. A quite unfeasible feat for ANYONE. Isn't it better to be IN treatment than out in the Streets trying to get well? Definitely a Conflict of Interest when SAMSHA say's one thing and NH DCYF and the Family Courts say the opposite. Definitely ILLEGAL, but just one of the many fraudulent practices used against NH parents.
Why did her Court appointed puppet, whom the Court refused to fire, NOT stand up to this ILLEGALITY?
Why did no-one step in and stop this injustice? Why do the NH Family Courts get away with these illegalities? Is there no Lawyer in this State with the gut's to fight this very unfriendly, abusive Family Court system? And why does the NH Supreme Court let this corruption fester? Maybe IF Family Court's were OPEN to the public, this corruption and abuse of families would end. Being one parent, alone with no support,(not even having a Lawyer in their corner), in a Courtroom filled with corruption can't be very comfortable. How can any parent ever win when Injustice in NH Courts prevails over justice?
And by the way, the Mother DID detox from Methadone before her review hearing, but that didn't matter. The CPSW went into Court and perjured herself. She told the Judge the Mother wasn't off the Methadone Treatment(lie). She told him the Mother wasn't being drug tested (lie), her doses weren't going down (lie) and her levels of Methadone weren't going down (lie). No proof of course! All it takes in NH Family Court's is Hearsay without proof to steal a child. Also ILLEGAL, but practiced every day in NH.
My question: If the Mother WAS'NT being drug tested, how could the CPSW state the doses and levels weren't going down? And how stupid could the Judge be to go along with such an idiotic statement? DUH!
So NO, NH DCYF and the Family Court's do NOT follow SAMSHA guidelines, yet they still receive Title IV funding for ALL of NH's ILLEGALLY Stolen Children! What a racket!
Proof NOBODY cares about NH Families!
Tuesday, October 15, 2013
How social services are paid bonuses to snatch babies for adoption
How social services are paid bonuses to snatch babies for adoption | FACS NSW Help & Complaints:
National disgrace: The number of babies taken from their mothers and put up for adoption is rising sharply
For a mother, there can be no greater horror than having a baby snatched away by the State at birth.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)