What The Adoption and Safe Families Act Means To the Families of America

What The Adoption and Safe Families Act Means To the Families of America

In 1997, President Clinton passed the Adoption and Safe Families Act, which was intended
to “promote the adoption of children in foster care.”
In doing so, good ole President Clinton put a huge price tag on the heads of American children, though well intended, this Act has literally torn apart thousands and thousands of innocent families.
President Clinton's intent was to find adoptive homes for ABUSED children taken from their families and placed in Foster care. ABUSED children who are NOT safe in their own homes. ABUSED children  without other relatives willing and able to raise them. Abused children with nowhere else to go.
Federal mandates were put into place  when this Act was established to make sure families were not torn apart needlessly. To make sure children were placed with relatives when their homes weren't safe. It was a way to provide CPS/DCYF with incentive money for doing a good job. For finding homes for children who needed them. 
As we are all aware, the intent of The Adoption and Safe Families Act has been totally abused by the people who are supposed to be "protecting" our most precious God given gift, our children. 
Vice President Mondale stated this Act could very well be abused and he was right. It has been abused since the day it went into effect. Children are being removed at alarming rates throughout our Country. For every child taken and placed in Foster care, CPS/DCYF are rewarded. Children are taken for the most frivolous reasons. Parent's and families are lied about, CPS worker's perjure themselves, Hearsay without proof of abuse is used in these cases, though it's supposed to be illegal and Family Court Judges ALWAYS take the word of CPS/DCYF over the family.
The majority of the children taken and placed in Foster care have never been abused or neglected, while many abused children remain in their homes suffering.
Unabused Children are then adopted out. CPS/DCYF receive even more blood money for each of these children, even after innocence is proven. Fictitious father's lose the rights to their children, making it all the easier to adopt them out, while the Judges are well aware the REAL Fathers rights have never been terminated. The children are adopted out ILLEGALLY!
Why doesn't our Government have a clue? CPS/DCYF and the Family Courts are obtaining Title IV blood money FRAUDULENTLY! What don't they get? Our children are Not For Sale!
Put an end to The Adoption and Safe Families Act. Our children belong with their REAL Families. The Families railroaded by CPS/DCYF and the Family Courts!

Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere

Legally Accessible - Not so much: Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere:

People are going Pro Se, meaning they represent themselves because of idiot, Lawyers, like Attorney Ralph Suozzo , who waste their clients time and money.  While I don't mind that he is screwing Susan Vonderheide a Nashua license Psycho. aka Psychologist who takes money in cases from the parent whose the highest bidder and lies for them. 

I feel it's important to share it with consumers because, it is a perfect example of the lack of ethics and responsibility in today's NH Attorney's.

Read More:

Father asks high court to block SC adoption ruling

Father asks high court to block SC adoption ruling | azfamily.com Phoenix:

WASHINGTON (AP) — The birth father of a girl of Cherokee heritage asked the Supreme Court Friday to stop a state-court ordered handover of his daughter to adoptive parents.

Child Welfare Policy Manual

Child Welfare Policy Manual:

As a result of the enactment of "Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008" (Public Law 110-351), the relevant CWPM Q/As are in the process of being revised to reflect the many changes made by the law. Until such time as the edits to the sections of the CWPM related to the changes made to the Act by P.L. 110-351 are complete, please refer to the statute and official guidance from the Children's Bureau (such as Program Instructions and Information Memoranda) for definitive guidance on the requirements. You also may contact your Regional Office representative for further clarification. This manual replaces the Children's Bureau's former policy issuance system. This Child Welfare Policy Manual updates and reformats all of the existing relevant policy issuances (Policy Announcements and Policy Interpretation Questions) into an easy to use question and answer format. This manual is broken down into nine main policy areas (with detailed subsections): AFCARS, CAPTA, Independent Living, MEPA/IEAP, Monitoring, SACWIS, Title IV-B, Title IV-E, Tribes/Indian Tribal Organizations. Future policy guidance will be disseminated in this format and announced as "Updates!" to the manual. This web-based manual ensures that the most current policy information is available to the States in the quickest and most accurate way. All questions/comments should be directed to the Children's Bureau Regional Program Managers. Click here to see or print either the full table of contents, or the table of contents for just one section. Table of Contents (full text) 1. AFCARS 2. CAPTA 3. INDEPENDENT LIVING 4. MEPA/IEAP 5. MONITORING 6. SACWIS 7. TITLE IV-B 8. TITLE IV-E 9. TRIBES/INDIAN TRIBAL ORGANIZATIONS User's Guide Withdrawn Child Welfare Policies References Print the Manual Additions to the Manual Deletions to the Manual Modifications to the Manual Cumulative Change History of Questions & Answers

Our local Social "Services" and Child "Protection" Agencies:Serving to Protect who, exactly?

Our local Social "Services" and Child "Protection" Agencies:Serving to Protect who, exactly? - Opinion - Campbell, CA Patch:

If not for the hopes of liberty and justice to hold on to, the entire child welfare system would undoubtedly scream the cries of the all-consuming face of evil, ready to swallow everything in my entire being that dared cross its path. 

Read More:

Social workers under fire over unborn baby row

Social workers under fire over unborn baby row | Herald Scotland:

SOCIAL workers on the Western Isles have been accused of bullying and making decisions without proper evidence during attempts to take an unborn baby into care after the mother gives birth.

A representative for the family involved in the case is demanding an investigation and has taken his complaint to the Scottish Government.

David Harris says he wants a probe into unsubstantiated claims by a senior social worker that the mother was spotted drinking.

Read More:

Audit called for Child Protective Services: America’s fourth scandal

Audit called for Child Protective Services: America’s fourth scandal - Hi-Desert Star: Letters To Editor:

With today’s serious government scandals being brought to light, there remains one that has eluded the national attention under the premise of protecting children.

It has recently been spotlighted again in the Hi-Desert Star’s May 15 article, “Lawmaker calls for audit of Child Services” and channel 11’s continued series of “System of Lies,” which aired May 15.

The latter reference documented a lawsuit against Orange County’s Child Protective Services, while more lawsuits continue to pile up.

It’s chilling to hear that when social workers are caught in lies and perjury, the punishment, according to Orange County’s director, is absolutely nothing! After attorney Shawn McMillan of San Diego won Deanna Fogherty-Hardwick’s case against Orange County CPS, the director refused to admit any wrongdoing. In reply to the Supreme Court’s decision on the matter, he stated, “That’s their opinion.” This response exemplifies an agency that has little or no accountability, which does not inspire public trust or confidence.

Hundreds of billions of our tax dollars are at work paying for:

1. A child’s “removal” (often unnecessary and unwarranted);

2. “Services” required to keep the child in foster care;

3. Group homes (up to $8,500 per month per child);

4. Contracted service providers for the parent(s) to earn the right to remain a parent(s);

5. Personnel positions (receptionists, caseworkers, supervisors, transporters, court clerks, transcribers, judges, etc.);

6. Adoption bonuses the department earns for going above the previous year’s quota;

7. Psychotropic drugs “needed” for children experiencing separation anxiety;

8. The department’s defense in lawsuits and the consequent settlements.

Read More: