Unbiased Reporting

What I post on this Blog does not mean I agree with the articles or disagree. I call it Unbiased Reporting!

Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly

Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Constitutional Amendment Introduced to Protect Children and Parents

June 18, 2013
I am very excited to announce that we were just able to send out the following press release announcing the introduction of the Parental Rights Amendment in the 113th Congress:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE // June 18, 2013 // Washington, D.C. – Congressman Mark Meadows (R-NC) today introduced a resolution in the U.S. House to amend the United States Constitution to protect children and parents from governmental overreach. The proposed Parental Rights Amendment already has 40 original cosponsors. ParentalRights.org leads grassroots support for the measure.

“In a time when longstanding truths and traditions are being tested, we must safeguard the right of parents to direct their children’s upbringing and education,” Meadows explained. “This amendment to our Constitution would ensure that these decisions are made not by faceless bureaucrats but by parents who love their children and know them best.

Constitutional lawyer and ParentalRights.org president Michael Farris agrees. “Traditionally the Supreme Court has held that fit parents make decisions that are in their child’s best interests. But that presumption is being eroded today in our courts and in U.N. conventions. More and more, judges are making decisions based on what they think is best for the child, rather than respecting the natural right of loving parents to make that call.

The proposed amendment would establish, in part, that “[t]he liberty of parents to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children is a fundamental right.” Other sections establish a high legal standard to protect these rights and a safeguard against international law overriding the parental role. This is the fourth consecutive Congress in which the measure has been introduced.

Support for the Parental Rights Amendment has increased through a number of high-profile incidents in recent months, including a California case in which Child Protective Services removed a baby from his parents’ custody because they sought a second medical opinion prior to heart surgery. And more recently, a bill that would assign a government worker to oversee every child from birth is being considered in Scotland in response to their obligations under the United Nations’ Convention on the Rights of the Child. Parental rights supporters believe the proposed amendment will keep such laws from ever being adopted here.

More information on the proposed Amendment, including the full text and a current list of cosponsors, is available at ParentalRights.org(End press release.)
Action Items
If your Congressman is not yet on board, call or email his office and urge him to cosponsor this important resolution. To find contact information and to see whether he is already on board, click on your state at ParentalRights.org/States.

You might also want to tweet (on Twitter) or post to your congressman’s Facebook page urging support for the Amendment. In addition to making contact (as in a phone call or email), you will be making it public as well. Others can see that you have broached this subject with him, which often inspires a more timely response.

Also, check out our website again on Wednesday or Thursday for a bill number. Now that the bill has been introduced, a number will be assigned within the next 72 hours. As soon as that happens, we will post that number on our website so that you can use it in your correspondence with your representative.

Sincerely,

Michael Ramey
Director of Communications & Research

Johns Hopkins Scientist Blasts CDC for Pushing Flu Shot

Johns Hopkins Scientist Blasts CDC for Pushing Flu Shot:

Federal health authorities vastly overstate the benefits of the flu shot and, for most healthy people, vaccination is unnecessary at best and potentially risky at worst, a Johns Hopkins scientist tells Newmax's Steve Malzberg.


Read More:

Changing a System: Child Protective Services (2 of 6)

Changing a System: Child Protective Services (2 of 6) - We Are 1776 : We Are 1776:

rsz_cps2

[Please note that this is the second of six articles concerning the Child Protective Services. Read the first here.]
There is clear evidence why such changes, and more, must be made to the system in order to preserve it. First of all, let’s look at the numbers. In 2001, there were 5,000,000 cases reported to the Child Protective Services of those 5,000,000 cases, 903,000 were confirmed to be victims of abuse. Of all of the victims of abuse, as of September 30, 2001, 542,000 children were placed in foster care with an average age of 10 and an average stay of three years. That is an increase in 48% since 1990. In 1999, the total costs associated with maltreatment were $14.4 billion and the direct cost of maltreatment (i.e. CPS, hospitals, etc.) was $24.3 billion in 2001.
Read More:

Changing a System: Child Protective Services (1 of 6)

Changing a System: Child Protective Services (1 of 6) - We Are 1776 : We Are 1776:



[Please note that this is the first of 6 concerning the Child Protective Services.]
The Child Protective Services has come under much criticism in recent months. One high profile abuse case even led to the passage of an audit in the State of California. Perhaps it is time to reform the system and change the laws surrounding the Child Protective Services. As of right now, the actions that the Child Protective Services take are a mystery. Nobody really has access to their records; an individual, off the street, cannot gain access to their records. Reform is necessary, to use the cliche, “for the children.” There are several changes which must be made to the Child Protective Services.

Read More:

Foster parent pleads to child sex abuse

Foster parent pleads to child sex abuse - Southern Maryland News:

A Lexington Park foster parent has entered an Alford plea to one count of sex abuse of a minor. Lowell Johnson, 65, entered the plea in St. Mary’s County Circuit Court on Monday with Judge Michael Stamm presiding. An Alford plea means Johnson did not admit guilt but conceded the state had enough evidence to present at trial to convict him.

Read More:

Hospitals in China Advertise Sale of Unwanted Babies

Hospitals in China Advertise Sale of Unwanted Babies » The Epoch Times:

Note: DCYF in New Hampshire Advertise Sale of Stolen, very much WANTED Children!




Hospitals in central China are advertising the selling of unwanted babies, according to a report by China National Radio (CNR), an official radio station.

Read More:


Monday, June 17, 2013

James O'Keefe Confronts NH Assistant Attorney General "Richard Head" Over Indicting Journalist's



BREAKTHROUGH hits shelves June 18. Order your copy today:http://goo.gl/b0Hn9. In May of 2012, a few months after sending state officials to search the home of a Project Veritas videographer, New Hampshire state authorities arrived at the home of Mike Rogers with a criminal grand jury subpoena for James O'Keefe. How state officials knew the address of where O'Keefe was staying before he even got there is a mystery. We filed a public records request to determine if these authorities were working with the Feds, but they never responded.  

Read More: