DMVC Productions = Results : "Gallon Smashing" does it cross a line...:
Many people are weighing in on this argument and some compare it to being charged with what could have happened. I have to disagree, there is a line and "Gallon Smashing" Crosses it.
Read More:
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Wednesday, March 27, 2013
Tuesday, March 26, 2013
Charging People With What Could Happen is Pure Stupidity
I wrote a post a few day's ago which had to do with people being charged with what could happen, after I was made aware of the gallon smashing video made by teens in Grocery Stores. http://unhappygrammy-grandparentsblog.blogspot.com/2013/03/should-people-be-charged-with-what.html
I gave a few other scenario's of event's that really happened in New Hampshire, of people who WERE charged with "What could Happen", including Mother's, charged with "Neglect in the Future".
After discussing the prospect of being charged with what could happen with another family member, we came to a conclusion. First off, charging a person with "What Could Happen" is pure stupidity. How often could we see this happening and for what reason's?
Here are some more stupid examples:
A Police Officer would be able to stop you for speeding, even though you weren't, because you COULD speed in the future, so he might as well ticket you right now.
A person could be arrested for shoplifting, even though they didn't shoplift, because they COULD shoplift in the future.
A person could get arrested for being intoxicated, even though they weren't because they COULD be intoxicated in the future.
There are just too many stupid scenario's to What Could Happen. Can you see how stupid and idiotic it would be if everyone were charged with a crime before they ever even committed one. So does it make any sense to charge a parent with "Neglect in the Future"? For What COULD Happen? This is how the State of New Hampshire identifies "Neglect". You don't have to be guilty of abusing your child. DCYF wannabe Psychic's will tell the Judge you WILL neglect your child in the future, so steal the child now so you can't.
This law is idiotic and need's to go, otherwise we're all in trouble!
New Hampshire Definition of Neglect:
Citation: Rev. Stat. § 169-C:3
Neglected child means a child:
Who is without proper parental care or control, subsistence, education as required by law, or other care or control necessary for his or her physical, mental, or emotional health, when it is established that his or her health has suffered or is very likely to suffer serious impairment, and the deprivation is not due primarily to the lack of financial means of the parents, guardian, or custodian
I gave a few other scenario's of event's that really happened in New Hampshire, of people who WERE charged with "What could Happen", including Mother's, charged with "Neglect in the Future".
After discussing the prospect of being charged with what could happen with another family member, we came to a conclusion. First off, charging a person with "What Could Happen" is pure stupidity. How often could we see this happening and for what reason's?
Here are some more stupid examples:
A Police Officer would be able to stop you for speeding, even though you weren't, because you COULD speed in the future, so he might as well ticket you right now.
A person could be arrested for shoplifting, even though they didn't shoplift, because they COULD shoplift in the future.
A person could get arrested for being intoxicated, even though they weren't because they COULD be intoxicated in the future.
There are just too many stupid scenario's to What Could Happen. Can you see how stupid and idiotic it would be if everyone were charged with a crime before they ever even committed one. So does it make any sense to charge a parent with "Neglect in the Future"? For What COULD Happen? This is how the State of New Hampshire identifies "Neglect". You don't have to be guilty of abusing your child. DCYF wannabe Psychic's will tell the Judge you WILL neglect your child in the future, so steal the child now so you can't.
This law is idiotic and need's to go, otherwise we're all in trouble!
New Hampshire Definition of Neglect:
Citation: Rev. Stat. § 169-C:3
Neglected child means a child:
Who is without proper parental care or control, subsistence, education as required by law, or other care or control necessary for his or her physical, mental, or emotional health, when it is established that his or her health has suffered or is very likely to suffer serious impairment, and the deprivation is not due primarily to the lack of financial means of the parents, guardian, or custodian
Where Are Warnings for DCS Caretakers When There's a Threat of Violence?
Where Are Warnings for DCS Caretakers When There's a Threat of Violence? | Pith in the Wind:
Susan Randolph was shot and her husband killed after the father of a girl DCS had temporarily placed with them came to their house to murder the girl (which he did). Randolph sued the state for negligence in the shootings and won, and then the state attempted to keep the judgment a secret. When you hear all the ways DCS screwed up, you can't blame the state for not wanting anyone to know:
Read More:
Susan Randolph was shot and her husband killed after the father of a girl DCS had temporarily placed with them came to their house to murder the girl (which he did). Randolph sued the state for negligence in the shootings and won, and then the state attempted to keep the judgment a secret. When you hear all the ways DCS screwed up, you can't blame the state for not wanting anyone to know:
Read More:
World-Herald editorial: Welcome idea can help child welfare
World-Herald editorial: Welcome idea can help child welfare - Omaha.com:
Nebraska has seen a lot of turmoil in its child welfare system, yet one thing lamentably has remained unchanged: The state continues to remove a high percentage of children out of troubled homes.
Read More:
Nebraska has seen a lot of turmoil in its child welfare system, yet one thing lamentably has remained unchanged: The state continues to remove a high percentage of children out of troubled homes.
Read More:
Use of psychotropic medication for youth in foster care - Stability, Permanency and Adoption Blog
Use of psychotropic medication for youth in foster care - Stability, Permanency and Adoption Blog:
This guest blog post was written by Abdifateh Ahmed.
In summary the article gives us insights on the subject of the use of medication for treating behavioral and mental health tribulations in foster care children. The article further, talks about how we should use medications as a help for the relief of child and not offered as an alternative to deal with children's behavior and issues without considering or attempting non-medication options first. The article mentions the study that depicts a high psychotropic medication use amongst youth which doubled up over the decades and also further mentions foster children to be more likely on multiple medications "ranging from 13-52% than those in the general youth population 4%". Psychotropic drugs that were prescribed include those used to treat ADHD, anxiety, depression and psychosis. There is a national approach to this issue and States are stepping up to take action on the problem of over medicated children since Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act was signed into law in 2008.
Read More:
10 Children Living In Limbo As Judge Fails To Act, DCF Alleges
10 Children Living In Limbo As Judge Fails To Act, DCF Alleges - Courant.com:
Adoptions stalled; Judge E. Curtissa Cofield had 120 days to rule on placements, state says; lawmaker reacts to 'failure in the process'
A juvenile court judge has been ordered to address a batch of child-protection cases that she inexplicably allowed to languish, stalling adoptions or other permanent placements for 10 children who had been removed from their parents because of abuse or neglect.
Read More:
Monique Taylor speaks about kids abused in Child Welfare
The NDP's critic of Ontario's Children and Youth Services, Monique Taylor speaks with AM900's Scott Thomson about her concerns of all the abuse of children in the care of Ontario's Children's Aid Societies and the need for Ombudsman oversight.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)