American Indian children's welfare in question with adoptions - Farmington Daily Times:
FARMINGTON — The task of finding adoptive families for American Indian children is becoming increasingly difficult and troublesome.
Read More:
Exposing Child UN-Protective Services and the Deceitful Practices They Use to Rip Families Apart/Where Relative Placement is NOT an Option, as Stated by a DCYF Supervisor
Unbiased Reporting
What I post on this Blog does not mean I agree with the articles or disagree. I call it Unbiased Reporting!
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Monday, January 14, 2013
Sunday, January 13, 2013
Westminster woman refuses to turn daughter over
Westminster woman refuses to turn daughter over : Rutland Herald Online:
WESTMINSTER — A Westminster woman was arrested for allegedly refusing to turn her daughter over to the Department for Children and Families.
Read More:
WESTMINSTER — A Westminster woman was arrested for allegedly refusing to turn her daughter over to the Department for Children and Families.
Read More:
Family Advocate Services - What you need to know...
DMVC Productions = Results: Family Advocate Services - What you need to know...:
Going to court can be overwhelming especially since the New Hampshire Court system has discontinued the appointment of counsel in NH RSA 169-C cases.
What a Family Advocate can do for you:
1. Direct you to where your rights are NH RSA 169-C;
2. Help you understand the process and prepare you to assert your rights;
3. Point out the protocols that DCYF is suppose to be following as shown here;
4. Help you determine what paperwork you need to bring to court and/or an attorney if you can afford one cutting the cost in your legal matter.
Read More:
Going to court can be overwhelming especially since the New Hampshire Court system has discontinued the appointment of counsel in NH RSA 169-C cases.
What a Family Advocate can do for you:
1. Direct you to where your rights are NH RSA 169-C;
2. Help you understand the process and prepare you to assert your rights;
3. Point out the protocols that DCYF is suppose to be following as shown here;
4. Help you determine what paperwork you need to bring to court and/or an attorney if you can afford one cutting the cost in your legal matter.
Read More:
If Criminal Charges of Child Endangerment Are Dropped Shouldn't They Also Be Dropped in Family Court?
If a parent is arrested for Child Endangerment and the child/children are removed from their care, but the Criminal charges are later dropped in NH Superior Court due to evidence proving innocence, wouldn't you think the charges would also be dropped in Family Court? Think again! Not in NH!
There have been many of these same case scenario's in NH. Why does Family Court over rule Superior Court in their decisions? Superior Court being a higher Court SHOULD over rule the lower Court. At least that's what I was always taught.
So why are parent's proof of innocence being denied in Family Court after all Criminal charges are dropped?
Why do the Family Court Judges have the power to deny such evidence and deny the rights of parents to their children?
Why are Family Court Judges given such a high power?
Why are they allowed to make up their own rules?
If a parent is found innocent in one Court, what gives the Family Court the right to deny them their innocence? To deny them their children? To deny them "Due Process"? To deny them their Constitutional rights?
Is CPS/DCYF all that powerful that they can and do turn any Family Court Judge against a parent or family member? You bet they are!
One would be ecstatic that they proved their innocence in the higher Court, believing Family Court charges would now be dropped. That their beloved children would now be returned. That the nightmare of DCYF and the Courts was finally over. Not in NH! The nightmare has just begun.
The Family Court Judges let DCYF pull their strings. DCYF fear the children will now be returned, vowing to make sure that never happens, they tug the Judges strings a little harder, making sure he abides by their plan, not the Rules of the Court. One might ask, "What do these DCYF worker's have on these unethical Judges?" "What would make them rule against innocent parent's?" Ah yes, MONEY!
The Judges don't even bother reading the files. They don't listen to the parent's. It's as if parent's are invisible and the only thing that matter's are the lying words of DCYF. Perjury in Family Courts in NH runs rampant. Hearsay, though illegal in Domestic Violence and abuse and neglect cases, is still used in NH Family Court to this day. See
So am I wrong, or isn't it totally feasible to assume when charges of Child Endangerment are dropped in the Higher Superior Court, the charges WILL also be dropped in Family Court? I mean, wouldn't anyone expect that outcome? And if it doesn't happen, shouldn't The NH Supreme Court step in and rectify?
As I already stated, NOT IN NH! Our stolen children are worth too much money to do right by families.
Dealing with NH Family Court's and DCYF is a Lose, Lose, Losing battle. We may have lost the battle, but we WON'T lose the war! Don't ever give up fighting for your rights!
Unhappy Grammy
There have been many of these same case scenario's in NH. Why does Family Court over rule Superior Court in their decisions? Superior Court being a higher Court SHOULD over rule the lower Court. At least that's what I was always taught.
So why are parent's proof of innocence being denied in Family Court after all Criminal charges are dropped?
Why do the Family Court Judges have the power to deny such evidence and deny the rights of parents to their children?
Why are Family Court Judges given such a high power?
Why are they allowed to make up their own rules?
If a parent is found innocent in one Court, what gives the Family Court the right to deny them their innocence? To deny them their children? To deny them "Due Process"? To deny them their Constitutional rights?
Is CPS/DCYF all that powerful that they can and do turn any Family Court Judge against a parent or family member? You bet they are!
One would be ecstatic that they proved their innocence in the higher Court, believing Family Court charges would now be dropped. That their beloved children would now be returned. That the nightmare of DCYF and the Courts was finally over. Not in NH! The nightmare has just begun.
The Family Court Judges let DCYF pull their strings. DCYF fear the children will now be returned, vowing to make sure that never happens, they tug the Judges strings a little harder, making sure he abides by their plan, not the Rules of the Court. One might ask, "What do these DCYF worker's have on these unethical Judges?" "What would make them rule against innocent parent's?" Ah yes, MONEY!
The Judges don't even bother reading the files. They don't listen to the parent's. It's as if parent's are invisible and the only thing that matter's are the lying words of DCYF. Perjury in Family Courts in NH runs rampant. Hearsay, though illegal in Domestic Violence and abuse and neglect cases, is still used in NH Family Court to this day. See
SUPREME COURT RULES 9-0
ON MARCH 8, 2004, SUPREME COURT RULES THAT HEARSAY EVIDENCE IN CHILD ABUSE/NEGLECT AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES IS NOT ADMISSIBLE. PARENTS HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO CONFRONT THEIR ACCUSER UNDER THE 6TH AMENDMENT. DCF, THE AAG AND THE STATES ATTORNEY MUST NOW COMPLY WITH THE 6TH AMENDMENT IN CHILD ABUSE/NEGLECT AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES.
As I already stated, NOT IN NH! Our stolen children are worth too much money to do right by families.
Dealing with NH Family Court's and DCYF is a Lose, Lose, Losing battle. We may have lost the battle, but we WON'T lose the war! Don't ever give up fighting for your rights!
Unhappy Grammy
Saturday, January 12, 2013
Redress of grievances committee could continue as private company
Redress of grievances committee could continue as private company | Concord Monitor:
A week after lawmakers abolished the Redress of Grievances Committee, a former House member has revived it as a private business dedicated to reigning in unfair judges and government officials.
Kevin Avard, a Nashua Republican who served on the redress committee before losing his re-election bid last year, created the Center for Redress of Grievances in late November. He is holding his first organizational meeting today at the library in Hooksett from 2:30 to 4:30 p.m.
According to registration papers filed with the secretary of state’s office, the center will investigate wrongdoing by government officials and try to rectify it with legislation or publicity. Avard has two talk shows on a Nashua cable access station and plans to pitch stories about government misdeeds to other media outlets.
Read More:
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)