Children in care of CPS are Legislature's responsibility:
The National Association of Social Workers -- Arizona Chapter is deeply concerned about the safety and well-being of Arizona's children in the state child-welfare system, especially in light of the impossible demands upon Child Protective Services staff as the number of children coming into CPS care continues to rise exponentially.
Read more:
Exposing Child UN-Protective Services and the Deceitful Practices They Use to Rip Families Apart/Where Relative Placement is NOT an Option, as Stated by a DCYF Supervisor
Unbiased Reporting
What I post on this Blog does not mean I agree with the articles or disagree. I call it Unbiased Reporting!
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Monday, January 7, 2013
Sunday, January 6, 2013
Saturday, January 5, 2013
Warrant Foster mom beat child in her care
RN-T.com - Warrant Foster mom beat child in her care:
A woman is facing felony charges for allegedly beating two children, including a foster child in her care, with a belt, according to Floyd County Jail reports.
Read more:
A woman is facing felony charges for allegedly beating two children, including a foster child in her care, with a belt, according to Floyd County Jail reports.
Read more:
Supreme Court to examine Indian Child Welfare Act requirements in adoption case
Supreme Court to examine Indian Child Welfare Act requirements in adoption case - The Washington Post:
The Supreme Court added an emotional case to its docket Friday, agreeing to review a lower court’s decision that federal law requires a couple to return the child they cared for since birth to her Native American father.
The Supreme Court added an emotional case to its docket Friday, agreeing to review a lower court’s decision that federal law requires a couple to return the child they cared for since birth to her Native American father.
Friday, January 4, 2013
A court should be particularly cautious about making subjective judgments which aid the conspirators in giving effect to their fraud and as a practical matter ratify the fraud
A court should be particularly cautious about making subjective judgments which aid the conspirators in giving effect to their fraud and as a practical matter ratify the fraud | NJ Family Issues:
Law Lessons from MARGARITA GUZMAN, f/k/a MARGARITA BAUTISTA v. DARIO BAUTISTA, App. Div., A-2617-09T3, June 15, 2011:
It is beyond peradventure that a court may reform a PSA if there is evidence of fraud, overreaching, or other unconscionable conduct by a party. Miller, supra, 160 N.J. at 419; see also, e.g., Guglielmo v. Guglielmo, 253 N.J. Super. 531, 542 (App. Div. 1992) (reforming PSA where attorney representing wife was related to husband and had previously represented him). In Von Pein v. Von Pein, 268 N.J. Super. 7, 15-17 (App. Div. 1993), we set aside a PSA specifically upon demonstration that the husband concealed various investment accounts and did not identify their existence in discovery. It is equally axiomatic that when a party’s claims of fraud are disputed, as they were in this case, a plenary hearing is necessary to “look beyond the four corners of the [PSA],” and resolve the factual disputes. Conforti, supra, 128 N.J. at 327.
Read More:
Fraud upon the court is not a tort giving rise to a civil action for damages and trial by jury; it is an equitable remedy that affords relief from a judgment that may be accompanied by imposition of sanctions
Fraud upon the court is not a tort giving rise to a civil action for damages and trial by jury; it is an equitable remedy that affords relief from a judgment that may be accompanied by imposition of sanctions | NJ Family Issues:
Law Lessons from Grinbaum v. Wolf, App. Div., A-4305-09T2, December 9, 2011:
Fraud upon the court is not a tort giving rise to a civil action for damages and trial by jury; it is an equitable remedy that affords relief from a judgment that may be accompanied by imposition of sanctions, such as attorney’s fees, that the judge has inherent authority to award. Triffin v. Automatic Data Processing, Inc., 394 N.J. Super. 237, 251-53 (App. Div. 2007); see also Triffin v. Automatic Data Processing, Inc., 411 N.J. Super. 292, 309-11 (App. Div. 2010).
Read More:
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)