NEWS RELEASE-Frank W. Szabo, candidate for Sheriff of Hillsborough County

NEWS RELEASE

MURDER IS NEVER LAWFUL

August 9, 2012

Goffstown, New Hampshire

Frank W. Szabo, candidate for Sheriff of Hillsborough County, announced to his supporters last night his position on abortion.

The County Sheriff is duty-bound and fully authorized to protect the Citizens, their property and their Rights.  That includes all Citizens.  A Citizen’s Rights are Natural Rights and unalienable simply by virtue of the Citizen being alive.  Life begins at conception.

Abortion on demand is murder.  Once elected, Sheriff Szabo will arrest anyone involved in the murder of a Citizen of Hillsborough County.

For those confused about this position in relation to Roe v. Wade, Frank points out the fact that there have been many court decisions which were unconstitutional and unlawful.  The Office of Sheriff requires that the Constitution be honored and obeyed in agreement with Common Law.  Aborting otherwise healthy fetuses violates both.

Inquiries may be directed to Frank at 215-793-4132.

*****

Frank W. Szabo will be a Constitutional Sheriff, protecting the Citizens as well as their Rights and property.

Far too often we hear of rogue federal and state agencies trampling the Rights of Citizens, unlawfully taking personal property and intimidating and harassing Citizens.  As recognized by the United States Supreme Court and a multitude of historical documents and court cases, a Constitutional Sheriff has the authority to protect Citizens and private businesses from all unlawful actions.  Frank W. Szabo will be that Sheriff.

Interested Citizens may review previous interviews with Frank at http://szaboforsheriff.com/about-me.html  or contact Frank directly at Frank@SzaboForSheriff.com or 215-793-4132.  The campaign FaceBook page can be viewed at https://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Frank-W-Szabo-For-Sheriff-of-Hillsborough-County/277456675653327.

#######################################

KingCast congratulates Michael Holman for his quest for Justice and draft lawsuit against Senator Kelly Ayotte and others for stealing his children

Chris King's First Amendment Page: KingCast congratulates Michael Holman for his quest for Justice and draft lawsuit against Senator Kelly Ayotte and others for stealing his children and giving them to an active drug addict mother.:

KingCast congratulates Michael Holman for his quest for Justice and draft lawsuit against Senator Kelly Ayotte and others for stealing his children and giving them to an active drug addict mother.

Read more:

Therapist's suicide could trigger challenges in legal cases

Local News | Therapist's suicide could trigger challenges in legal cases | Seattle Times Newspaper:

 "The arrest and suicide of a prominent Seattle psychologist who was often an expert witness in sexual-abuse and child-custody cases could raise questions about his recommendations, and some could be challenged, judges say."

Citizen use of Grievance Committees against Tyrannical Judges?

Judicial Abuse: Citizen use of Grievance Committees against Tyrannical Judges?:

Judicial Abuse of citizens has become so prevalent there had to be some sort of back swing. Is this a sign of good things to come in the judicial reform arena? Do we need widespread use of Grievance Committees to start taking back our US Constitutional Rights? Do we need more of our own media reporting to shine a light on these criminal operators of courts? 

Read More:

Psychotropic Medication Use in Child Welfare

Psychotropic Medication Use in Child Welfare:

A research brief released by the Administration for Children and Families examines the use of psychotropic medications by children in child welfare. What makes this brief unique is its exploration of and distinction among the use of psychotropic medications across placement types (in-home and out-of-home settings), mental health needs, and usage in tandem with other mental health treatments or services.

After going to court, family and government reach accord on new plan for 8-year-old with cancer

After going to court, family and government reach accord on new plan for 8-year-old with cancer - NY Daily News:

A Minnesota mother, who tried to prevent her 8-year-old daughter from receiving chemotherapy, got into a legal wrangle with local child protective services recently. Her battle, she suggests, highlights the issues at stake in the ongoing debate over government power to mandate individual medical decisions.

Read more:

PETITION #6 Grievance of Candy Knightly. (Report filed 8/8/12) | Kevin Avard for State Rep

PETITION #6 Grievance of Candy Knightly. (Report filed 8/8/12) | Kevin Avard for State Rep:

It's time to Bring Isabella Home!

PETITION #6 Grievance of Candy Knightly. (Report filed 8/8/12)

Published August 9, 2012 | By kevin

MAJORITY

Grievance Founded with Recommendations.

Committee Majority Findings:

In a petition involving the Division for Children, Youth and Families (DCYF), the Redress of Grievances Committee, after hearing from the Petitioner and her mother and seeing the documents supporting that testimony, finds numerous inexplicable acts that indicate wrongdoing by individuals in the Division.  It finds that the Division, which refused to attend our hearings to respond even to questions of a general nature concerning their policies in similar situations, appear to have been intent on denying several relatives of an admitted former drug addict (who had been in the act of cleaning up) of adopting her child despite our laws providing for placement with relatives Sec RSA 169-C:6 V, 169-C:6-a I(f), 169-C:19, and 169-C:24 In fact, the Committee saw evidence that DCYF actually facilitated the adoption of the child prior to the rights of the mother being terminated in court.  Further, DCYF failed to contact the actual father, instead providing the courts with the name of another individual, while twice through the courts denying paternity testing to the individual claiming to be the actual father. The Committee also agrees with the Petitioner that the courts systematically violated Part 1, Article 15 when it denied the admission of all exculpatory evidence showing the mother did not harm her child. While it seems possible that the acts of the agency were well intended in the interests of the child, they also seem to have been notably opposed to the rights of parents and relatives as provided for in our statutes. Because of the sheer number of supported allegations raising significant red flags in this case, the Committee believes this matter should be thoroughly investigated with a view to revisiting the decision to returning the child to the custody of relatives or its actual mother. For this reason, the Committee recommends, as we have in a prior report, that in the next legislative term a standing legislative oversight committee be set up to review situations like these in depth with agencies involved in potential wrongdoing against our citizens. Any such committee must, like that of the U.S. Congress, have full subpoena power. The Committee also recommends a complete review of any policies making individuals working for our agencies immune from prosecution with a view to limiting that immunity when, in the course of their duties, they infringe on the rights of our citizens. Vote 9-3.

Rep. Harry B. Hardwick for the Majority of the Committee