Mom discusses alleged child abuse by adopted mother | abc30.com:
"HANFORD, Calif. (KFSN) -- A South Valley mother whose children claim severe child abuse and torture by their adopted mother -- is now fighting to get her children back.
Kelly Morris, 50, is accused of felony child abuse and torture on her four adopted children."
Read More:
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Thursday, May 31, 2012
Foster parent's fate in jury's hands soon
Foster parent's fate in jury's hands soon | Local | News | The Belleville Intelligencer:
PICTON - A Picton jury could begin deliberating the fate of county foster parent on trial for sex crimes on Monday.
Read More:
June is False Allegations Month
FAAM Resources » SAVE: Stop Abusive and Violent Environments:
June is False Allegations Month
FAAM Resources
June is False Allegations Month
FAAM Resources
Transparency is essential to public confidence in the Judiciary. ONLY the Legislative and Executive Branches can protect us
- By Joseph Kenick
- “Confidentiality has done more to protect the system than to protect the children in the system,’’ said Michael Nash, chief presiding judge of Los Angeles County’s children’s court. He ruled in January that dependency hearings in his county will be open to the public unless there is proof the child will be harmed. How come we don't have that here in New Hampshire? I begged the court to interview... the children in chambers and MM Cross refused. I pleaded with the GAL to investigate the children's complaints of abuse and she refused. Even when my son told his doctor and his school guidance counselor he was HIT WITH A BAT for pleading to live with me, the 2011 DCYF report states "worker did not formally interview the children at the request of Ms. Kenick". THIS HAS TO CHANGE!
· The change is usually spurred by a horrific child abuse case or a push from local media to gain access. The beating death of 6-year-old Elisa Izquierdo by her mother prompted the opening of New York family courts in 1997 and the passage of a state open-records law referred to as “Elisa’s Law.’’
But the practice can vary by county or by judge, even in states that are presumed to be open. A New York...Times reporter visited local courtrooms at random last year and found that many were closed with locked doors or hostile deputies.
“Social workers were identified as falsifying records and lying in court, and I heard horror stories from family court judges. The lack of transparency has harmed far too many families and children,’’ Kentucky Rep. Susan Westrom said.“In every state there are lots of people worried and upset that courts are going to be opened and then a few years later everybody forgets the courts were ever closed. The disasters that everybody worried about never happened and there is a modest uptick in attention. It’s constructive,’’ said Matt Fraidin, a law professor at the University of the District of Columbia. Lawyers in Michigan, Missouri, Kansas, Oregon, and Utah told Fraidin no problems have been reported since opening courtrooms there.
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Reported Child Abuse Claims Often Difficult to Prove
Reported Child Abuse Claims Often Difficult to Prove:
Note: And that's why only liar's and Psychic wannabees are hired by DCYF. They must steal the child any way they can! And they don't have to worry about the Judges, or should I say the DCYF Puppet's who ALWAYS rule in favor of DCYF. Fraud, perjury, slander, you name it, NH Family Court's are well known for railroading innocent families.
"Newswise — DURHAM, N.H. – Only a quarter of all reported cases of child abuse are found to have sufficient evidence to take action, with higher-income children in rural areas more likely than their urban counterparts to have a report of child abuse substantiated, according to new research from the Carsey Institute at the University of New Hampshire."
Read More:
Note: And that's why only liar's and Psychic wannabees are hired by DCYF. They must steal the child any way they can! And they don't have to worry about the Judges, or should I say the DCYF Puppet's who ALWAYS rule in favor of DCYF. Fraud, perjury, slander, you name it, NH Family Court's are well known for railroading innocent families.
"Newswise — DURHAM, N.H. – Only a quarter of all reported cases of child abuse are found to have sufficient evidence to take action, with higher-income children in rural areas more likely than their urban counterparts to have a report of child abuse substantiated, according to new research from the Carsey Institute at the University of New Hampshire."
Read More:
NH and Ct. DCYF Wannabee Psychic's Predict "Neglect in the Future" to Steal Children
DCYF Wannabee Psychics, in both New Hampshire and Connecticut, steal children on the pretext of anticipated "Neglect in the Future".
In Connecticut, children are taken from their parents for "Predictive Neglect"; see:
http://www.cga.ct.gov/2012/rpt/2012-R-0103.htm
The courts have ruled that predictive neglect exists when a child is in danger of being harmed in the future, even if no harm has presently occurred. The Connecticut Appellate Court has stated that Connecticut's statutes “clearly and explicitly recognize the state's authority to act before harm occurs to protect children whose health and welfare may be adversely affected and not just children whose welfare has been affected. The [person filing the neglect petition] need not show, but simply allege, that there is a potential for harm to occur” (In re Michael D., 58 Conn. App. 119, 123-24 (2000)). Courts also have ruled that under the doctrine, a child can be considered neglected without ever having been under the custody of a parent (In re Jermaine S., 86 Conn. App. 819, 829 (2005)).
In New Hampshire, children are taken from their parent's for "Neglect in the Future".
http://www.childabusestories.
In Connecticut, children are taken from their parents for "Predictive Neglect"; see:
http://www.cga.ct.gov/2012/rpt/2012-R-0103.htm
The courts have ruled that predictive neglect exists when a child is in danger of being harmed in the future, even if no harm has presently occurred. The Connecticut Appellate Court has stated that Connecticut's statutes “clearly and explicitly recognize the state's authority to act before harm occurs to protect children whose health and welfare may be adversely affected and not just children whose welfare has been affected. The [person filing the neglect petition] need not show, but simply allege, that there is a potential for harm to occur” (In re Michael D., 58 Conn. App. 119, 123-24 (2000)). Courts also have ruled that under the doctrine, a child can be considered neglected without ever having been under the custody of a parent (In re Jermaine S., 86 Conn. App. 819, 829 (2005)).
In New Hampshire, children are taken from their parent's for "Neglect in the Future".
http://www.childabusestories.
Neglect - Citation: Rev. Stat. § 169-C:3
'Neglected child' means a child:
'Neglected child' means a child:
- Who is without proper parental care or control, subsistence, education as required by law, or other care or control necessary for his or her physical, mental, or emotional health, when it is established that his or her health has suffered or is very likely to suffer serious impairment, and the deprivation is not due primarily to the lack of financial means of the parents, guardian, or custodian
Even the Court's go along with this witch hunt. Anything to make money right?
It's time for our State Legislator's to put a stop to this nonsense. No-one can predict the future. Especially NOT DCYF. The only prediction they ever make that comes true, is when they tell you you'll never get your children back, because they already know there is a bias against ALL families in Family Court!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)