Unbiased Reporting

What I post on this Blog does not mean I agree with the articles or disagree. I call it Unbiased Reporting!

Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly

Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Petition Reformation of the Adoption and Safe Families Act

Petition Reformation of the Adoption and Safe Families Act:


THE PETITION

   We, the undersigned, demand a reformation of the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997. We believe the Act was intended for children whose parents had passed away, children who were legitmately, with supporting evidence, abused in some form or fashion, children whose parent/parents were serving life terms in prison, children for which Social Service Agencies had verifiable evidence that supported the need and necessity of removal of those children from their biological families and subsequent termination of parental rights. The ideallic reason for this was so those children wouldn't languish in a system of numbers and budget-concerned foster care homes. 
    However, since it's enactment, the "bonuses" for children adopted out of foster care systems have caused hundreds of thousands of children to be removed from their biological families and homes. These precious children, though agencies claim to attempt reunification or Kinship care as a priority and first option, are more often than not, (about 66% of the time depending on which state the statistics are gathered from) placed in foster care with non-relatives.

    In September of 2010, 408,375 children were in foster care according to Adminstration for Children and Families-United States Department of Health and Human Services, 254,375 of those children entered foster care just nine short months before this analysis. Of those 408,375 children, 107,573 never returned home but were placed with non-relatives, ran away, were emancipated, transferred to another agency or died. That same year, parental rights were terminated for 64,084 of those children. We are not just talking about terminations on a piece of paper, we're talking about 64,084 children, living human beings, who were effectively robbed of their family, ancestral ties and children who will likely, in adolescence through adulthood, struggle with perceived or actual abandonment issues. The biological parents are never permitted to explain the situation and are not permitted contact again until the child turns 18, if at all, assuming the child isn't dead or serving a prison sentence.

    Now, we do acknowledge and appreciate that there are many children who SHOULD be removed from their parents as those children are in danger of physical, sexual, emotional and psychological harm. However, the small percentage of those children who are NOT being abused are those for whom we are advocating.

    You've likely heard about cases in which innocent parents were falsely accused. Of those cases, some of those parents got their children back after long and costly battles, both financially and emotionally for the children and parents, but far more weren't reunited. Those children went on to be adopted by non-relatives, despite their biological parent/parents best efforts, compliance with court-ordered treatment plans and a complete lack of evidence to support any wrongdoing on the part of those parents.

   Instead, federal funds, in excess of $451,000,000.00, were distributed to local and state government for the purposes of foster care and adoption. Not a single red cent of the $451 million was distributed to the families "under investigation" from which children were taken to attempt to rehabilitate or assist the 'troubled' families. Of that $451 million, an offensive and almost comical, if it weren't so sad and destroying so many lives, mere $640,000 was spent on the training of social workers, CASA representatives, G.A.L.'s and the like.

   I, as well as countless other parents, believe the root of the problem lies within the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 itself as well as it's predecessors such as CAPTA of 1974 and the 1980 Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act, P.L. 96-272.

   In 1988, the original author of P.L. 96-272 and Chairman of the congressionally appointed Select Committee on Children, Youth and Families, recognized the blantant fraud being committed under the guise of child “protection” and subsequently made this assertion;

                       "What has been demonstrated here is that you have a system that is simply in contempt. This system has been sued and sued and orders have been issued and they just continue on their merry way. And HHS just continues to look the other way. You have a system that is not only out of control, it’s illegal at this point. What you are really engaged in is state sponsored child abuse.” ~~~~George Miller
   The bonuses offered to State and county governments for each child adopted out of foster care, bonuses for children with special needs--which now include children in therapy, on medication or those suffering attachment disorders as a direct result of being removed from otherwise innocent parents whose only crime may have been their tax bracket. From October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010, 84% of foster children adopted were labelled as 'special needs'. Bonuses for the respective government if the adoptions within that state or county exceed the number of the same the previous year have, unfortunately, corrupted the once wholesome idea. When we mix this with under-qualified, under-trained and over-worked social service agency workers, we have a recipe for disaster and destruction of the likely not perfect but caring, functional, concerned American Family.

     We, the citizens of the United States of America, demand a reformation of the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 to abolish the 'kids for cash' criteria. No one agency shall profit from the removal of children from falsely accused parents. Our nation's children are not our golden tokens for more federal funding. 

Let's Pass This Bill: Legislation Mandating Siblings In Foster-care Get Weekly Visits

Let's Pass This Bill: Legislation Mandating Siblings In Foster-care Get Weekly Visits - Courant.com:

During their nearly 16 years in Connecticut's foster care system, sisters Ariana and Tiana Alicea often went months without seeing one another.


Read More:

Monday, May 7, 2012

The Child Abuse Hysteria Special - Baby LK Report For May 6th 2012

When the bough breaks: Proving child abuse not as easy in Pa.

When the bough breaks: Proving child abuse not as easy in Pa. - www.phillyburbs.com: Bensalem: child abuse, crime,:

Could it be that "Hearsay" isn't allowed in Court? Or could it be PA CPS have higher standards and don't just remove children at the drop of a hat like NH does!

A bruised ear kept the Bucks County child welfare caseworker awake at night. The injury wasn’t to her, but rather a child whose case she was assigned.


Read More:

N.H. Fraud in Non-Profit Organizations Fraud ... oophs Kelly Ayotte

DMVC Productions = Results: N.H. Fraud in Non-Profit Organizations Fraud ... oophs Kelly Ayotte:

This is getting to be a very expensive state to live in if only; because, of the following practices of fraud through non-profits in the live free or die or state;


Read More:

Why NH CACR 26 Need's to Pass




On May 3rd,2012, a Senate hearing took place in Concord, where I and many other New Hampshire citizen's were able to speak up on our concerns, fighting for the passage of CACR 26. Many of us are fighting for the return of our children and grandchildren. None of us were adjudicated as "unfit" parent's or grandparent's, yet our children and grandchildren were torn from our lives due to the passage of 73-A in 1978.
Many of the NH voter's unknowingly voted for it's passage, unaware of the harm it would cause if passed. The people of NH were not afforded the right of a pamphlet, to explain what 73-A was and how it would effect their right's. Just like the Obamacare bill, where our Government officials were forced to sign it before reading what was in it. It makes no sense to me.
The problem with 73-A is the Supreme Court Justices were given the power to do whatever they want, as to the rules of the Court's.They are in charge of the rule making, without any outside interference. They can waive their own rules and as many of us have seen, they don't even have to follow their own rules.
Many of us have lost our children because our evidence of innocence was not allowed into court, because the Court's "waive" the rules.
"Hearsay" is STILL allowed in NH Court's, even though the United States Supreme Court ruled in 2004-Crawford v. Washington: Rule 9.0, that "Hearsay" is NOT admissible in Family Court cases or Domestic Violence cases. All it takes in NH to lose your child is "Hearsay", without any proof of guilt.
Slandering family member's with false report's, already "Proven" false report's, where DCYF lies about the family member's. Where the family member's NEVER get to face their accuser and documentation proving innocence is NEVER allowed in Family Court.
Father's, mother's and grandparent's are alienated against their children and grandchildren, by their spouse and/or DCYF.
Federal Law 42 U.S.C, states relative placement of children WILL be considered before Foster placement. This doesn't happen in NH, because our Judges make their own rules, which go against Govt. mandates.
Services are "Supposed" to be provided to at-risk families BEFORE a child is taken. That doesn't happen either.The Judges go along with everything DCYF tell's them and why wouldn't they? Our stolen children bring in more money for the State.
Judges who terminate Fictitious men's rights, knowing full well these men are NOT the father's.
Judges who terminate a parent's rights, even after testimony and proof prove the parent's innocence, after he writes the opposite of testimony and proof he was just supplied in Court. Our Supreme Court Justices state the lower Court Judge made NO error's. They're just as bad. Do ANY of them read the Court transcripts? Do they listen to the tapes, or is it all just fun and games in the Supreme Court?
Why should the Court's have this power when innocent people are being railroaded? Many times, parent's criminal charges of child endangerment or abuse are dropped in Criminal Court due to new found evidence proving innocence, yet Family Court NEVER drops the charges because they refuse to admit the evidence and the children are NEVER returned. Many are ILLEGALLY adopted!
ALL of the Court's should be run the same way. Accused and convicted criminals have more rights than parents. Parent's have NO rights in NH!
And just try to file a complaint against a NH Judge or a Lawyer. This is the good ole boy's network. They ALL stand up for their own.
So YES! CACR 26 NEED'S to Pass! Then we need to work on OPEN Family Court's, Jury Trials for parent's AND ALL Administrative Rules for the Court's And DCYF, need to be made Law. Maybe then, the Court's and DCYF will think twice before they screw over any more families!


One example of N.H. Supreme Court abusing Pt.2, Art. 73-A of the N.H. Constitution

- STOP! Judicial Child Abuse:

The N.H. Supreme Court has been abusing its power since it was handed a virtually “blank check” in 1978 with the passage of Article 73-a of the second part of the N.H. Constitution.  Here, I want to show you a specific example of how they are continually abusing their power and the only way to stop it is to challenge it with the passage of CACR26, recently passed in the House of Representatives and recommended “ought to pass” by the Senate Judiciary committee (amended as proposed by the Supreme Court itself).


Read More: