Unbiased Reporting

What I post on this Blog does not mean I agree with the articles or disagree. I call it Unbiased Reporting!

Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly

Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital

Monday, April 30, 2012

Mum flips at custody talks

Mum flips at custody talks - news - waikato-times | Stuff.co.nz:

 "The threat of losing her children sent a Hamilton woman into a violent rage at a Child, Youth and Family office, Hamilton District Court heard last week.
Hannah Rose Neilson, 22, was charged with assault after a meeting with her ex-partner on April 17, where they discussed the custody of their two children."

Read More:

Is the N.H. Family Court complicit in the manifestation of Parental Alienation Syndrome?

- STOP! Judicial Child Abuse:


Author:  Greg Brede – PAS Intervention

Is the N.H. Family Court complicit in the manifestation of Parental Alienation Syndrome?

BACKGROUND
Parental Alienation is the intentional act of one parent separating the other parent known as the Target Parent, from the child through direct verbal statements or visual cues. The direct verbal statement can include your Mom/Dad left you, does not want to be in your life, no longer loves you or did bad things to you. I have heard directly that the child cannot be left alone with me and don’t go with me alone. The visual cues can be negative facial expressions when the absent parent is talked about, a subtle laugh about that parent when they are discussed or a “NO” head shake when the child is in the child’s presence. Parental Alienation is manipulating the child to establish a position that is not consistent with the feelings that they once had for the now alienated parent. This can be out of loyalty to the residential parent, to please them or to ensure they do not receive any consequences that that are unsure could occur.  

Read More:

N.H. Family Court violates state law by ordering therapeutic reunification for fit parents – Part 1, Introduction

- STOP! Judicial Child Abuse:


In New Hampshire, the N.H. Family Court makes a common practice of mandating “therapeutic reunification” for fit parents.  This is an unlawful practice that we will be discussing in quite some depth in the upcoming days and weeks.  By way of introduction, we need to rewind the tape, so to speak so that we can place this concept in context.
Hundreds of aggrieved mothers and fathers have come forward and reached out to STOP! Judicial Child Abuse because they have been separated from their children with no finding of abuse or neglect.  In some cases, separation occurs for weeks, in other cases it occurs for months, and in many unfortunate cases, the separation lasts in excess of years.  Take, for example, the case of Cherry Hussie, who has not seen her children since 2009, or the case of Dr. Vandenberg, who has not seen his daughter in three years.

Read More:

A WIN on the War Against the Abuse of Power and Human Rights

DMVC Productions = Results: A WIN on the War Against the Abuse of Power and Human Rights:

A message of hope to start the week:

Former Liberian president Charles Taylor is finally being brought to justice; the quotes in italic's are taken from Dumisani Muleya's article found in full here:http://allafrica.com/stories/201204280152.html

This article covers the why behind the lesson's to be herald in the age of the world wide Internet full of Communication; it is this, the abuse of power and human rights is unacceptable and we the people of this world are not going to tolerate oppression under any disguise to our world neighbors or at home.  The time for Child Protection Services and Governments  "The world over, leaders often abuse office with reckless abandon, forgetting one day they would be held to account in a court of law or court of public opinion." 



Read more:

NH DCYF Ignores The Indian Child Welfare Act


Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C.§1901 et seq.:) Passed by Congress in 1978





Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C.§1901 et seq.:)  Passed by Congress in 1978, this Act is aimed at preserving Native American families and tribes. The Act:


·    establishes legal standards for removal of Native American children from their families,
·    represents a placement preference for Native American children who are placed outside their parents' home, giving priority to relatives and members of the child's  tribe; and
·    requires notification to the parent or Native American custodian and the Native American child's tribe when a Native American child is placed involuntarily into out-of-home placement








My grandchildren were taken from their Mother on January 20,2006 and placed in my home, until they were removed from my home on February 3,2006, by her DCYF worker  and another DCYF worker, along with four Police officer's. The DCYF Lawyer went Judge shopping to remove the kid's because my younger, extremely ill daughter was living with us, who had an open case, which the Judge was already aware of. In fact, he had no problem with her being there. DCYF didn't bother to look for other relatives. They never do.


I had always been told since I was just a child, that my ancestors were of American Indian heritage. A fact I've always been proud of. As a child I always loved going to my Great Aunts house for visits. Her home was filled with pictures of American Indian's, which I surmised were my ancestors.
My husband was also told as a child that he also has American Indian heritage. DNA Testing is the next step.


My daughter was interviewed by DCYF worker. After going through my daughters file, just yesterday, searching for another paper of importance, I came across the DCYF Interview, which states my daughter told the worker of our family's American Indian heritage. The worker did nothing to follow through on this information. Wasn't it the duty of DCYF to follow through on this information, per The Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C.§1901 et seq.:) Passed by Congress in 1978 The document of Proof is dated February 22,2006. 


Shouldn't some kind of action be taken against DCYF for not following up on my daughter's revelation? Whether 
we are of Indian heritage or not, wasn't it up to DCYF to investigate this claim and also to fully document the 
investigation? 
I am now trying to find a way to get DNA testing on my husband and myself to in fact prove we are of Indian heritage. Wouldn't this be a very good reason to return my grandchildren? Will CPS/DCYF ever learn how to follow the Law?
I decided not to post the document due to retaliation, but I DO have it in my possession.

Sunday, April 29, 2012

Rep. Lambert On Tabled Bills, Bid For Senate AND The Redress Grievance Committee

Extended Interview: Rep. Lambert On Tabled Bills, Bid For Senate - Video - WMUR New Hampshire:

Extended Interview: Rep. Lambert On Tabled Bills, Bid For Senate

Read more:
 http://www.wmur.com/video/30962072/detail.html#ixzz1tR4Uc0iL

Unprecedented surge in unaccompanied child immigrants puts stress on federal support system

Unprecedented surge in unaccompanied child immigrants puts stress on federal support system - The Washington Post:

McALLEN, Texas — An unprecedented surge of children caught trudging through South Texas scrublands or crossing at border ports of entry without their families has sent government and nonprofit agencies scrambling to expand their shelter, legal representation and reunification services. On any given day this year, the U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement has been caring for more than 2,100 unaccompanied child immigrants.


Read More: