What’s private about family cases? | The Salt Lake Tribune:
A Salt Lake Tribune article ("Filings in family law cases closed off," Tribune, April 12) reports on a new court rule that makes some records in family law cases private, which is a change from previous practice. I believe there is more to the story.
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Sunday, April 15, 2012
Child welfare official charged with rape
Child welfare official charged with rape - The Times of India:
BANGALORE/TUMKUR: A deputy director ofwomen and child welfare department in Tumkur was accused of allegedly raping a woman who runs an institute for special children in Tumkur. S Radhakrishna was taken into custody by Yelahanka police on Saturday.
BANGALORE/TUMKUR: A deputy director ofwomen and child welfare department in Tumkur was accused of allegedly raping a woman who runs an institute for special children in Tumkur. S Radhakrishna was taken into custody by Yelahanka police on Saturday.
Saturday, April 14, 2012
Sarah's Story-A Child Repeatedly Molested by Her Father
Sarah's Story:
4/8/97
In summary, The following case (described in the child's own words) is about a family that initially broke up During the separation and specifically during visits with the father, the child was repeatedly molested. This was discovered by a CPS worker, who investigated the case. The end result was to remove the child from both parents, place the child in a foster home. The mother was eventually able to gain custody after two years. The father was convicted of the molest, but is now asking for custody.
The child's attorney is suing the mother in Family Court in San Diego to have custody taken from the mother. This action is currently taking place in spite of the fact that the child is completely happy with her mother and does not want to return to life with her father.
The following was transcribed 11/22/95 by a member of Cal-Arch
from a paper written in pencil. The only changes are corrections
in spellings. This child has chosen to use the pseudonym of
Sarah to protect her privacy, at the urging of a Cal-Arch
member. (Cal-Arch is California Alliance for the Rights of
Children.) ...
Sarah's Story
Read More at:
http://www.johnnypumphandle.com/cc/sarah.htm
This is my true story -- "Sarah"
9/15/98 - Side note - Patty & Greg Houser's son - Aaron Houser - is currently under indictment for murder of a 12 year old girl - Stephanie Crowe.
01/15/99 - The murder trial of Stephanie Crowe is still pending against the three boys, but a new suspect has been identified.
Sarah's Update - January 1999
Return to Cases
4/8/97
In summary, The following case (described in the child's own words) is about a family that initially broke up During the separation and specifically during visits with the father, the child was repeatedly molested. This was discovered by a CPS worker, who investigated the case. The end result was to remove the child from both parents, place the child in a foster home. The mother was eventually able to gain custody after two years. The father was convicted of the molest, but is now asking for custody.
The child's attorney is suing the mother in Family Court in San Diego to have custody taken from the mother. This action is currently taking place in spite of the fact that the child is completely happy with her mother and does not want to return to life with her father.
The following was transcribed 11/22/95 by a member of Cal-Arch
from a paper written in pencil. The only changes are corrections
in spellings. This child has chosen to use the pseudonym of
Sarah to protect her privacy, at the urging of a Cal-Arch
member. (Cal-Arch is California Alliance for the Rights of
Children.) ...
Sarah's Story
Read More at:
http://www.johnnypumphandle.com/cc/sarah.htm
This is my true story -- "Sarah"
9/15/98 - Side note - Patty & Greg Houser's son - Aaron Houser - is currently under indictment for murder of a 12 year old girl - Stephanie Crowe.
01/15/99 - The murder trial of Stephanie Crowe is still pending against the three boys, but a new suspect has been identified.
Sarah's Update - January 1999
Return to Cases
The War on Families, Thank's to The Adoption Promotion Act
The War on Families is finally coming out into the open. It's been a long, hard fight for many of us, still fighting for the return of our illegally stolen children. A fight parent's and families didn't start, but intend to stop before biological families are extinct!
After all these year's, fighting DCYF and the Family Court's, detoured and denied at every turn. In NH we finally have the Redress Grievance Committee, resurrected by NH Speaker Bill O'Brien, giving us back our Right of Redress, which is a very important part of the New Hampshire Constitution. Bill O'Brien and the Redress Grievance Committee have given us back our Constitutional Rights. Right's that should have never have been taken away.
Attorney General Michael Delaney has accused the Committee of intimidating and harassing NH DCYF, which isn't true in the least. The Committee want's answer's. Answer's DCYF are afraid to give. Answer's pertaining to the Protocol's DCYF is SUPPOSED to follow, but in too many cases don't. Answer's to practices used against parent's and families, railroaded by DCYF and the Family Court's,which aren't even in their Protocols or Administrative Rules. Neither, followed by NH DCYF.
The Petitioner's haven't come forward with mere accusation's. They have come before the Committee with REAL proof. In many cases, documentation by DCYF itself. Documentation which show's Protocol's weren't followed. Documentation which show's lies and contradiction. Document's which prove Hearsay without evidence was used in the removal of our children. Document's which prove SLANDER was used against parent's and family member's in order to place a child in foster care, in order to obtain Title IV federal funding.
Why would a Government agency use such deceitful practices against it's own citizen's? Why does DCYF have the right to play God with our families lives? Why do they have the right to pick and choose parent's for our children, taking away our God given right's, placing our children with stranger's, whom they believe will be better parent's than we are? Stranger's, who God left unable to have children of their own in many cases. Did DCYF ever stop and think maybe God had a reason to deny these people children? What gives DCYF the right to overrule God? What gives them the right to use our children as pawn's? To alienate one parent against the other? To alienate children against their parent's? To split up husband's and wives and traumatize our innocent children?
The answer that come's to my mind, is The Adoption Promotion Act. VP Mondale made the statement that the ACT in itself could be turned around and NOT used as it was intended. He was right. That is exactly what has happened. There is NO preservation of families, as Federally mandated. DCYF/CPS all over our great country have used the Adoption Promotion Act to make money off of our ILLEGALLY stolen children. Federal mandates are NOT followed. NH DCYF alone has failed miserably in their Statewide Assessment's. They have been in non-compliance for almost twenty year's. So why does the Federal Government still keep rewarding them with incentive money for children who should never have been removed from their homes?
Why hasn't an investigation ensued? Aren't families the cornerstone of our great country? Why are families being treated with such disrespect? With such low disregard? Treated worse than convicted criminal's? Why are our children and grandchildren being needlessly traumatized and drugged? Torn from the families they know and love? Children removed from innocent parent's? Innocent family member's?
This is America! Is Money more important than Families? Families that have all worked together to make our Country the greatest Country in the world?
After all these year's, fighting DCYF and the Family Court's, detoured and denied at every turn. In NH we finally have the Redress Grievance Committee, resurrected by NH Speaker Bill O'Brien, giving us back our Right of Redress, which is a very important part of the New Hampshire Constitution. Bill O'Brien and the Redress Grievance Committee have given us back our Constitutional Rights. Right's that should have never have been taken away.
Attorney General Michael Delaney has accused the Committee of intimidating and harassing NH DCYF, which isn't true in the least. The Committee want's answer's. Answer's DCYF are afraid to give. Answer's pertaining to the Protocol's DCYF is SUPPOSED to follow, but in too many cases don't. Answer's to practices used against parent's and families, railroaded by DCYF and the Family Court's,which aren't even in their Protocols or Administrative Rules. Neither, followed by NH DCYF.
The Petitioner's haven't come forward with mere accusation's. They have come before the Committee with REAL proof. In many cases, documentation by DCYF itself. Documentation which show's Protocol's weren't followed. Documentation which show's lies and contradiction. Document's which prove Hearsay without evidence was used in the removal of our children. Document's which prove SLANDER was used against parent's and family member's in order to place a child in foster care, in order to obtain Title IV federal funding.
Why would a Government agency use such deceitful practices against it's own citizen's? Why does DCYF have the right to play God with our families lives? Why do they have the right to pick and choose parent's for our children, taking away our God given right's, placing our children with stranger's, whom they believe will be better parent's than we are? Stranger's, who God left unable to have children of their own in many cases. Did DCYF ever stop and think maybe God had a reason to deny these people children? What gives DCYF the right to overrule God? What gives them the right to use our children as pawn's? To alienate one parent against the other? To alienate children against their parent's? To split up husband's and wives and traumatize our innocent children?
The answer that come's to my mind, is The Adoption Promotion Act. VP Mondale made the statement that the ACT in itself could be turned around and NOT used as it was intended. He was right. That is exactly what has happened. There is NO preservation of families, as Federally mandated. DCYF/CPS all over our great country have used the Adoption Promotion Act to make money off of our ILLEGALLY stolen children. Federal mandates are NOT followed. NH DCYF alone has failed miserably in their Statewide Assessment's. They have been in non-compliance for almost twenty year's. So why does the Federal Government still keep rewarding them with incentive money for children who should never have been removed from their homes?
Why hasn't an investigation ensued? Aren't families the cornerstone of our great country? Why are families being treated with such disrespect? With such low disregard? Treated worse than convicted criminal's? Why are our children and grandchildren being needlessly traumatized and drugged? Torn from the families they know and love? Children removed from innocent parent's? Innocent family member's?
This is America! Is Money more important than Families? Families that have all worked together to make our Country the greatest Country in the world?
SLANDER-Definition for the NH Attorney General
slander - definition of slander by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.:
Seeing as our Attorney General obviously has a problem with the word SLANDER, in context to DCYF SLANDERING parent's and Family member's, I believe everyone has a right to know the definition of SLANDER. So here it is:
n."1. Law Oral communication of false statements injurious to a person's reputation.
2. A false and malicious statement or report about someone.
v. slan·dered, slan·der·ing, slan·ders
v.tr.
To utter a slander about. See Synonyms at malign.
v.intr.
To utter or spread slander."
ALSO: http://definitions.uslegal.com/s/slander/
Slander is the oral communication of false statements that are harmful to a person's reputation. If the statements are proven to be true, it is a complete defense to a charge of slander. Oral opinions that don't contain statements of fact don't constitute slander. Slander is an act of communication that causes someone to be shamed, ridiculed, held in contempt, lowered in the estimation of the community, or to lose employment status or earnings or otherwise suffer a damaged reputation.
Yes AG Delaney, NH DCYF is GUILTY of SLANDER, whether you want to admit it or not. And yes, you do have an obligation to the citizen's of NH, slandered by DCYF, to rectify the harm caused to so many children and families due to DCYF's unlawful practices of SLANDER!
Seeing as our Attorney General obviously has a problem with the word SLANDER, in context to DCYF SLANDERING parent's and Family member's, I believe everyone has a right to know the definition of SLANDER. So here it is:
n."1. Law Oral communication of false statements injurious to a person's reputation.
2. A false and malicious statement or report about someone.
v. slan·dered, slan·der·ing, slan·ders
v.tr.
To utter a slander about. See Synonyms at malign.
v.intr.
To utter or spread slander."
ALSO: http://definitions.uslegal.com/s/slander/
Slander Law & Legal Definition
Slander is the oral communication of false statements that are harmful to a person's reputation. If the statements are proven to be true, it is a complete defense to a charge of slander. Oral opinions that don't contain statements of fact don't constitute slander. Slander is an act of communication that causes someone to be shamed, ridiculed, held in contempt, lowered in the estimation of the community, or to lose employment status or earnings or otherwise suffer a damaged reputation.
The basic elements of a claim of slander include;
- a defamatory statement;published to third parties; and which the speaker or publisher knew or should have known was false.
Slander is primarily covered under state law, but is subject to First Amendment guarantees of free speech. The scope of constitutional protection extends to statements of opinion on matters of public concern that do not contain or imply a provable factual assertion. If the slander unjustly accused you of a crime or reflected on your profession, the court or jury can assess the damages. For other types of slander you generally must prove some actual damage to be able to recover.
Slander of title is a common law tort involving a disparaging remark regarding ownership of property. It affects the owner's ability to transfer the property, resulting in a monetary loss.
Friday, April 13, 2012
'Miracle' Baby In 'Very Serious' Condition
'Miracle' Baby In 'Very Serious' Condition - Health News Story - WMUR New Hampshire:
Girl Declared Dead At Birth, Found Alive In Morgue Refrigerator
BUENOS AIRES (CNN) -- A premature baby who survived hours in a morgue refrigerator in Argentina was in "very serious" condition after doctors detected an infection, state media reported.
Read more:
Girl Declared Dead At Birth, Found Alive In Morgue Refrigerator
BUENOS AIRES (CNN) -- A premature baby who survived hours in a morgue refrigerator in Argentina was in "very serious" condition after doctors detected an infection, state media reported.
Read more:
Convicted madam tears up testifying about adopted daughters being taken away
Convicted madam tears up testifying about adopted daughters being taken away - Chicago Sun-Times:
"A notorious madam whose two adopted daughters were taken away by the state has testified in juvenile court that running a brothel was “an addiction” for her."
Read More:
"A notorious madam whose two adopted daughters were taken away by the state has testified in juvenile court that running a brothel was “an addiction” for her."
Read More:
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)