More focus needed on prevention | HeraldNet.com - Opinion:
Child Abuse Prevention Month reminds me of the parable of the river. There's a peaceful community on the edge of a river. One day, a villager notices a baby floating down the river and dives into the water to rescue the infant. She takes the baby home, hoping someone would come looking for him.
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Saturday, March 31, 2012
It's That Time Of Year Again-National Child Abuse Propaganda Month
It's That Time Of Year Again:
Yes Folks! Tomorrow begins...
National Child Abuse Propaganda Month
Where all month long, CPS Agents and System Sucks of all shapes and sizes get together to glorify themselves, raise awareness, and blow the issue of child abuse and neglect out of proportion with their one size fits all labels.
LK: http://legallykidnapped.blogspot.com/2012/03/its-that-time-of-year-again.html#ixzz1qizffs9E
Yes Folks! Tomorrow begins...
National Child Abuse Propaganda Month
Where all month long, CPS Agents and System Sucks of all shapes and sizes get together to glorify themselves, raise awareness, and blow the issue of child abuse and neglect out of proportion with their one size fits all labels.
LK: http://legallykidnapped.blogspot.com/2012/03/its-that-time-of-year-again.html#ixzz1qizffs9E
Criminals Have More Right's Than Parent's
Criminals Have More Right's Than Parent's
NH HB 591 concerning Determination of Parental Rights and Responsibilities; Best Interest, for some very STRANGE reason was Tabled by the NH House with a vote of 113-167. This Bill definitely should have passed. What is the problem? We need to put families first!
Summary
NH HB 591 concerning Determination of Parental Rights and Responsibilities; Best Interest, for some very STRANGE reason was Tabled by the NH House with a vote of 113-167. This Bill definitely should have passed. What is the problem? We need to put families first!
Summary
Relative to the determination of parental rights based on the best interest of the child; relative to grounds for modification of an order regarding parental rights and responsibilities, and relative to grandparent and stepparent visitation rights.
NH children, their parent's, their grandparent's and their entire families are being harmed each and every day by the NH Family Judicial system.
The "Best Interest's" of our children and grandchildren are NOT considered in their care and custody. The only thing considered is the money to be made off the backs of mother's and father's in the fight for their very much loved children, torn apart by an unjust Family Judicial system.
When one parent poison's the court with false allegation's without proof, should that parent be rewarded with full custody of the child created by both parent's?
Should our innocent children suffer because their parent's don't see eye to eye?
Should our innocent children be alienated by the custodial parent out of spite and hatred and kept from their loving mother/father and other family member's?
And yes, criminals DO have more right's than parent's. They're allowed Due Process, Jury trials, Open Court, Court appointed CRIMINAL Lawyer's AND thy're allowed to admit evidence proving their innocence. They can prove their innocence at any time and be exonerated and set free, unlike parent's who aren't allowed to even admit evidence proving innocence. Admittance of Hearsay is NOT allowed as it is in Family Court, though CRAWFORD v. WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT RULES 9-0 states Hearsay is not to be admitted(2004). Parent's and families are allowed None Of The Above and are treated so much worse than criminal's. Losing a child is worse than being behind bar's. It's worse than death! So why such harsh punishment for a Parent?
Why is there no emphasis on the word FAMILY in the NH Family Court's? Are they unclear of the meaning of what a Family really is? Or is the money they make off these broken families too important?
It's quite obvious the NH Family Justice system need's to look up the definition of Family, because they clearly don't have a clue.
.
.
noun
1.
a.
a basic social unit consisting of parents and theirchildren, considered as a group, whether dwellingtogether or not: the traditional family.
b.
a social unit consisting of one or more adults togetherwith the children they care for: a single-parent family.
2.
the children of one person or one couple collectively: We want a large family.
3.
the spouse and children of one person: We're taking thefamily on vacation next week.
4.
any group of persons closely related by blood, as parents,children, uncles, aunts, and cousins: to marry into a sociallyprominent family.
5.
all those persons considered as descendants of a common progenitor.
NH need's to have Shared Parenting. 50/50 would be an excellent start and children should NOT be kept from their grandparent's and other family member's they've grown to love.
Why is it so hard to just get along, for our children's sake's? Alienating a child from from their parent's and other family member's is just wrong and downright selfish!
Put it this way, if NOT for your spouse or significant other, or even the grandparent's, would your child even be in existence today?
A message to the NH Family Court's: Stop the needless desecration of our families with your bias and greed. Treat families with the respect in which you want to be treated. And STOP admitting Hearsay without proof of guilt!
And Parent's: Stop harming your children by keeping them from their mother/father and their entire families.
Put your children first and foremost in your lives. Stop the tug of war. You are only hurting your children. Stop being selfish!
Friday, March 30, 2012
State's top court rules pension law changes breached judges' contracts
State's top court rules pension law changes breached judges' contracts | SeacoastOnline.com:
CONCORD — The state Supreme Court on Friday found in favor of seven retired judges by ruling that a 2005 change to judicial pension law was unconstitutional because it breached the judges’ contracts by decreasing their pensions during their employment.
The opinion by the state’s highest court finds that the judges were vested the day they were appointed and changing the terms of their pension benefits was unconstitutional. The case was brought to the Supreme Court by retired probate court judge Raymond Cloutier, who in 2008 said his pension was erroneously calculated by use of new pension law, not the law in place when he first took the bench.
Attorney General Michael Delaney, in Supreme Court filings, previously accused the seven judges of gaming the retirement system.
Read More:
This Judge gamed the Family Court System also. I guess he want's some of that money the state received for all the parent's whose right's he terminated of their illegally stolen children after writing the opposite of testimony and proof at their TPR'S!
Taking on one bad judge at a time...
STOP! Judicial Child Abuse: Taking on one bad judge at a time...:
I know many people who have had horrific experiences while dealing with New Hampshire Judicial Branch officials. Never have I known someone who has had such a provably criminal experience at the hands of a judge who also managed to catch the act on cameras Ademo Freeman (legal name Adam Mueller) of Keene, NH.
This, of course, was a large topic of my interview on "Speak Up New Hampshire!" with NH State Representative Kevin Avard.
Read More:
I know many people who have had horrific experiences while dealing with New Hampshire Judicial Branch officials. Never have I known someone who has had such a provably criminal experience at the hands of a judge who also managed to catch the act on cameras Ademo Freeman (legal name Adam Mueller) of Keene, NH.
This, of course, was a large topic of my interview on "Speak Up New Hampshire!" with NH State Representative Kevin Avard.
Read More:
Modification of Grandparent Visitation in Tennessee: Lovlace v. Copley
Modification of Grandparent Visitation in Tennessee: Lovlace v. Copley « Herston on Tennessee Family Law:
Facts: In their divorce, Mother was designated the primary residential parent of Child and Father was awarded supervised visitation. Eventually, Mother married Stepfather. The paternal grandparents petitioned for grandparent visitation, which ultimately led to an agreed order providing for grandparent visitation. Several years later, Father consented to Stepfather’s adoption of Child. The order of adoption specifically stated it did not alter or modify the grandparent visitation rights established in the previous agreed order. Later, the
grandparents petitioned to modify the prior agreed order to allow additional visitation with Child. Mother and Stepfather counter-petitioned to terminate the grandparent visitation in its entirety. After a hearing, the trial court modified the prior agreed order only to mandate specific times for the grandparent visitation. The trial court denied the grandparents’ request for more visitation and denied the Mother and Stepfather’s request to terminate grandparent visitation entirely. The grandparents appealed.
grandparents petitioned to modify the prior agreed order to allow additional visitation with Child. Mother and Stepfather counter-petitioned to terminate the grandparent visitation in its entirety. After a hearing, the trial court modified the prior agreed order only to mandate specific times for the grandparent visitation. The trial court denied the grandparents’ request for more visitation and denied the Mother and Stepfather’s request to terminate grandparent visitation entirely. The grandparents appealed.
On Appeal: The Court of Appeals, in three separate opinions, vacated the trial court’s judgment.
Read More:
Read More:
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)