DMVC Productions: MOJO URGENT NOTICE New Legislation - Clarification? - Call/Write Reps. Now:
The Public & Legislator's should ask some general questions to go with and/or add to the good intentions proposed in this bill for an Amendment to our New Hampshire Constitution:
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Friday, February 10, 2012
Connecticut DCF To Steer Away From Confrontational Treatment Of Families
Connecticut DCF To Steer Away From Confrontational Treatment Of Families - Courant.com:
HARTFORD -—
The state Department of Children and Families will no longer investigate relatively minor reports of neglect as part of a shift away from its traditional adversarial approach. Instead, it will offer help to the family.
HARTFORD -—
The state Department of Children and Families will no longer investigate relatively minor reports of neglect as part of a shift away from its traditional adversarial approach. Instead, it will offer help to the family.
Joshua Youssef - Redress Hearing of Yet Another Fit Parent Denied His Child By N.H. Family Courts
STOP Judicial Child Abuse: Joshua Youssef - Redress Hearing of Yet Another Fit Parent Denied His Child By N.H. Family Courts:
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2012
Joshua Youssef - Redress Hearing of Yet Another Fit Parent Denied His Child By N.H. Family Courts
Joshua Youssef is another fit parent who has been denied all visitation and parental rights to his son - FOR MORE THAN ONE YEAR - by the N.H. Family Court, with absolutely no finding of abuse or neglect. This is Mr. Youssef's first hearing before the N.H. House of Representatives Redress of Grievance Committee, where he tells his horror story before lawmakers who are eager to see reform in the N.H. Judiciary
Mr. Youssef is an upstanding and well-respected lifelong citizen of New Hampshire. He is an entrepreneur, job-creator and employer, community and political activist, and foremost, is a good father to an 8 year old boy whom the Courts have denied him even a single visit with in over one Year.
Since mid-2010, guardian ad litem Tracy Bernson, an anti-family, feminist activist began a campaign to orchestrate false and fraudulent allegations against Mr. Youssef, which allegations were cleared with absolutely no trace of truth. According to Syracuse, New York Newspaper, Bernson has suffered from major depression and she herself has reported in public forums to have major problems with Children.
In her croneyism, Marital Master Nancy J. Geiger adopted the corrupt and unlawful insider recommendations of Bernson to effectively terminate Mr. Youssef's parental rights with NO FINDING OF ABUSE OR NEGLECT. In furtherance of the N.H. Family Court cronyism, Judges Edward Gordon and Brackett Scheffy perfunctorily signed Geiger's slovenly, lazy work into an order - destroying not only the family, but destroying an innocent (then) 6-Year old child.
Watch these videos to learn about what is going on in N.H. Family Courts - and just exactly how guaridans ad litem such as Tracy Bernson, Marital Masters such as Nancy Geiger and Leonard Green, and Judges such as Brackett Scheffy and Edward Gordon are enemies of freedom, and destroyers of good American Families. The videos total 2 hours, but we think that you will be fairly well informed of the truth once you hear Mr. Youssef's testimony.
N.H. Family Courts Deny Fit Parent Visitation & Custody - Part 1, Hearing 1
N.H. Family Courts Deny Fit Parent Visitation & Custody - Part 2, Hearing 1
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2012
Joshua Youssef - Redress Hearing of Yet Another Fit Parent Denied His Child By N.H. Family Courts
Joshua Youssef is another fit parent who has been denied all visitation and parental rights to his son - FOR MORE THAN ONE YEAR - by the N.H. Family Court, with absolutely no finding of abuse or neglect. This is Mr. Youssef's first hearing before the N.H. House of Representatives Redress of Grievance Committee, where he tells his horror story before lawmakers who are eager to see reform in the N.H. Judiciary
Mr. Youssef is an upstanding and well-respected lifelong citizen of New Hampshire. He is an entrepreneur, job-creator and employer, community and political activist, and foremost, is a good father to an 8 year old boy whom the Courts have denied him even a single visit with in over one Year.
Since mid-2010, guardian ad litem Tracy Bernson, an anti-family, feminist activist began a campaign to orchestrate false and fraudulent allegations against Mr. Youssef, which allegations were cleared with absolutely no trace of truth. According to Syracuse, New York Newspaper, Bernson has suffered from major depression and she herself has reported in public forums to have major problems with Children.
In her croneyism, Marital Master Nancy J. Geiger adopted the corrupt and unlawful insider recommendations of Bernson to effectively terminate Mr. Youssef's parental rights with NO FINDING OF ABUSE OR NEGLECT. In furtherance of the N.H. Family Court cronyism, Judges Edward Gordon and Brackett Scheffy perfunctorily signed Geiger's slovenly, lazy work into an order - destroying not only the family, but destroying an innocent (then) 6-Year old child.
Watch these videos to learn about what is going on in N.H. Family Courts - and just exactly how guaridans ad litem such as Tracy Bernson, Marital Masters such as Nancy Geiger and Leonard Green, and Judges such as Brackett Scheffy and Edward Gordon are enemies of freedom, and destroyers of good American Families. The videos total 2 hours, but we think that you will be fairly well informed of the truth once you hear Mr. Youssef's testimony.
N.H. Family Courts Deny Fit Parent Visitation & Custody - Part 1, Hearing 1
N.H. Family Courts Deny Fit Parent Visitation & Custody - Part 2, Hearing 1
Thursday, February 9, 2012
Incidents of killings in child custody disputes
Incidents of killings in child custody disputes - Wire - State & Regional - bellinghamherald.com:
Incidents of a parent killing his or her child or children in a custody dispute include:
Read more here:
Incidents of a parent killing his or her child or children in a custody dispute include:
Read more here:
Teen mom caught on video stuffing cotton down baby's throat
Teen mom caught on video stuffing cotton down baby's throat - Live5News.com | Charleston, SC | News, Weather, Sports:
CHARLESTON, SC (WCSC) -
Hospital officials at MUSC say a 17-year-old Summerville mother was arrested after she stuffed a piece of cotton down her child's throat, covered her with a blanket and walked away at the children's hospital last Friday.
CHARLESTON, SC (WCSC) -
Hospital officials at MUSC say a 17-year-old Summerville mother was arrested after she stuffed a piece of cotton down her child's throat, covered her with a blanket and walked away at the children's hospital last Friday.
Press Release:The High Cost of Foster Care Abuse
The High Cost of Foster Care Abuse - US Politics Today:
More than 500,000 children in the U.S. reside in some form of foster care. Within one year of their initial placement, at least 15 percent of them will experience neglect, abuse, or other harmful conditions.
Read More:
More than 500,000 children in the U.S. reside in some form of foster care. Within one year of their initial placement, at least 15 percent of them will experience neglect, abuse, or other harmful conditions.
Read More:
Please contact the NH State Reps on NH CACR 26
CACR 0026:
PLEASE SUPPORT CACR 26! This Bill MUST Pass! Parent's are losing their children because the Family Court Judges don't have to admit evidence into Family court.
My two grandchildren were STOLEN by the State of NH because the Judge REFUSED to admit the evidence proving innocence into court!
Help save our Children!!!!
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/memberlookup.aspx-House Roster
CACR 26 – AS INTRODUCED
2012 SESSION
12-2423
06/09
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 26
RELATING TO: administration of the supreme court.
PROVIDING THAT: the article authorizing the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of all the courts of the state shall be repealed.
SPONSORS: Rep. Mirski, Graf 10; Rep. Sorg, Graf 3; Rep. Ingbretson, Graf 5; Rep. Winter, Merr 3; Rep. Balboni, Hills 21; Rep. Comerford, Rock 9; Rep. Lambert, Hills 27; Rep. Weyler, Rock 8; Rep. Brownrigg, Hills 27
COMMITTEE: Judiciary
ANALYSIS
This constitutional amendment concurrent resolution repeals the article that authorizes the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of the courts of the state.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.
Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]
Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.
12-2423
06/09
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twelve
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION PROPOSING CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
RELATING TO: administration of the supreme court.
PROVIDING THAT: the article authorizing the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of all the courts of the state shall be repealed.
Be it Resolved by the House of Representatives, the Senate concurring, that the
Constitution of New Hampshire be amended as follows:
I. That article 73-a of the second part of the constitution, relative to authorizing the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of all the courts of the state, be repealed.
II. That the above amendment proposed to the constitution be submitted to the qualified voters of the state at the state general election to be held in November, 2012.
III. That the selectmen of all towns, cities, wards and places in the state are directed to insert in their warrants for the said 2012 election an article to the following effect: To decide whether the amendments of the constitution proposed by the 2012 session of the general court shall be approved.
IV. That the wording of the question put to the qualified voters shall be:
“Are you in favor of amending the second part of the constitution by repealing article 73-a, relative to authorizing the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of all the courts of the state.”
V. That the secretary of state shall print the question to be submitted on a separate ballot or on the same ballot with other constitutional questions. The ballot containing the question shall include 2 squares next to the question allowing the voter to vote “Yes” or “No.” If no cross is made in either of the squares, the ballot shall not be counted on the question. The outside of the ballot shall be the same as the regular official ballot except that the words “Questions Relating to Constitutional Amendments proposed by the 2012 General Court” shall be printed in bold type at the top of the ballot.
VI. That if the proposed amendment is approved by 2/3 of those voting on the amendment, it becomes effective when the governor proclaims its adoption.
PLEASE SUPPORT CACR 26! This Bill MUST Pass! Parent's are losing their children because the Family Court Judges don't have to admit evidence into Family court.
My two grandchildren were STOLEN by the State of NH because the Judge REFUSED to admit the evidence proving innocence into court!
Help save our Children!!!!
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/memberlookup.aspx-House Roster
CACR 26 – AS INTRODUCED
2012 SESSION
12-2423
06/09
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 26
RELATING TO: administration of the supreme court.
PROVIDING THAT: the article authorizing the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of all the courts of the state shall be repealed.
SPONSORS: Rep. Mirski, Graf 10; Rep. Sorg, Graf 3; Rep. Ingbretson, Graf 5; Rep. Winter, Merr 3; Rep. Balboni, Hills 21; Rep. Comerford, Rock 9; Rep. Lambert, Hills 27; Rep. Weyler, Rock 8; Rep. Brownrigg, Hills 27
COMMITTEE: Judiciary
ANALYSIS
This constitutional amendment concurrent resolution repeals the article that authorizes the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of the courts of the state.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.
Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]
Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.
12-2423
06/09
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twelve
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION PROPOSING CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
RELATING TO: administration of the supreme court.
PROVIDING THAT: the article authorizing the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of all the courts of the state shall be repealed.
Be it Resolved by the House of Representatives, the Senate concurring, that the
Constitution of New Hampshire be amended as follows:
I. That article 73-a of the second part of the constitution, relative to authorizing the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of all the courts of the state, be repealed.
II. That the above amendment proposed to the constitution be submitted to the qualified voters of the state at the state general election to be held in November, 2012.
III. That the selectmen of all towns, cities, wards and places in the state are directed to insert in their warrants for the said 2012 election an article to the following effect: To decide whether the amendments of the constitution proposed by the 2012 session of the general court shall be approved.
IV. That the wording of the question put to the qualified voters shall be:
“Are you in favor of amending the second part of the constitution by repealing article 73-a, relative to authorizing the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of all the courts of the state.”
V. That the secretary of state shall print the question to be submitted on a separate ballot or on the same ballot with other constitutional questions. The ballot containing the question shall include 2 squares next to the question allowing the voter to vote “Yes” or “No.” If no cross is made in either of the squares, the ballot shall not be counted on the question. The outside of the ballot shall be the same as the regular official ballot except that the words “Questions Relating to Constitutional Amendments proposed by the 2012 General Court” shall be printed in bold type at the top of the ballot.
VI. That if the proposed amendment is approved by 2/3 of those voting on the amendment, it becomes effective when the governor proclaims its adoption.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)