Incidents of killings in child custody disputes - Wire - State & Regional - bellinghamherald.com:
Incidents of a parent killing his or her child or children in a custody dispute include:
Read more here:
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Thursday, February 9, 2012
Teen mom caught on video stuffing cotton down baby's throat
Teen mom caught on video stuffing cotton down baby's throat - Live5News.com | Charleston, SC | News, Weather, Sports:
CHARLESTON, SC (WCSC) -
Hospital officials at MUSC say a 17-year-old Summerville mother was arrested after she stuffed a piece of cotton down her child's throat, covered her with a blanket and walked away at the children's hospital last Friday.
CHARLESTON, SC (WCSC) -
Hospital officials at MUSC say a 17-year-old Summerville mother was arrested after she stuffed a piece of cotton down her child's throat, covered her with a blanket and walked away at the children's hospital last Friday.
Press Release:The High Cost of Foster Care Abuse
The High Cost of Foster Care Abuse - US Politics Today:
More than 500,000 children in the U.S. reside in some form of foster care. Within one year of their initial placement, at least 15 percent of them will experience neglect, abuse, or other harmful conditions.
Read More:
More than 500,000 children in the U.S. reside in some form of foster care. Within one year of their initial placement, at least 15 percent of them will experience neglect, abuse, or other harmful conditions.
Read More:
Please contact the NH State Reps on NH CACR 26
CACR 0026:
PLEASE SUPPORT CACR 26! This Bill MUST Pass! Parent's are losing their children because the Family Court Judges don't have to admit evidence into Family court.
My two grandchildren were STOLEN by the State of NH because the Judge REFUSED to admit the evidence proving innocence into court!
Help save our Children!!!!
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/memberlookup.aspx-House Roster
CACR 26 – AS INTRODUCED
2012 SESSION
12-2423
06/09
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 26
RELATING TO: administration of the supreme court.
PROVIDING THAT: the article authorizing the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of all the courts of the state shall be repealed.
SPONSORS: Rep. Mirski, Graf 10; Rep. Sorg, Graf 3; Rep. Ingbretson, Graf 5; Rep. Winter, Merr 3; Rep. Balboni, Hills 21; Rep. Comerford, Rock 9; Rep. Lambert, Hills 27; Rep. Weyler, Rock 8; Rep. Brownrigg, Hills 27
COMMITTEE: Judiciary
ANALYSIS
This constitutional amendment concurrent resolution repeals the article that authorizes the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of the courts of the state.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.
Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]
Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.
12-2423
06/09
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twelve
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION PROPOSING CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
RELATING TO: administration of the supreme court.
PROVIDING THAT: the article authorizing the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of all the courts of the state shall be repealed.
Be it Resolved by the House of Representatives, the Senate concurring, that the
Constitution of New Hampshire be amended as follows:
I. That article 73-a of the second part of the constitution, relative to authorizing the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of all the courts of the state, be repealed.
II. That the above amendment proposed to the constitution be submitted to the qualified voters of the state at the state general election to be held in November, 2012.
III. That the selectmen of all towns, cities, wards and places in the state are directed to insert in their warrants for the said 2012 election an article to the following effect: To decide whether the amendments of the constitution proposed by the 2012 session of the general court shall be approved.
IV. That the wording of the question put to the qualified voters shall be:
“Are you in favor of amending the second part of the constitution by repealing article 73-a, relative to authorizing the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of all the courts of the state.”
V. That the secretary of state shall print the question to be submitted on a separate ballot or on the same ballot with other constitutional questions. The ballot containing the question shall include 2 squares next to the question allowing the voter to vote “Yes” or “No.” If no cross is made in either of the squares, the ballot shall not be counted on the question. The outside of the ballot shall be the same as the regular official ballot except that the words “Questions Relating to Constitutional Amendments proposed by the 2012 General Court” shall be printed in bold type at the top of the ballot.
VI. That if the proposed amendment is approved by 2/3 of those voting on the amendment, it becomes effective when the governor proclaims its adoption.
PLEASE SUPPORT CACR 26! This Bill MUST Pass! Parent's are losing their children because the Family Court Judges don't have to admit evidence into Family court.
My two grandchildren were STOLEN by the State of NH because the Judge REFUSED to admit the evidence proving innocence into court!
Help save our Children!!!!
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/memberlookup.aspx-House Roster
CACR 26 – AS INTRODUCED
2012 SESSION
12-2423
06/09
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 26
RELATING TO: administration of the supreme court.
PROVIDING THAT: the article authorizing the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of all the courts of the state shall be repealed.
SPONSORS: Rep. Mirski, Graf 10; Rep. Sorg, Graf 3; Rep. Ingbretson, Graf 5; Rep. Winter, Merr 3; Rep. Balboni, Hills 21; Rep. Comerford, Rock 9; Rep. Lambert, Hills 27; Rep. Weyler, Rock 8; Rep. Brownrigg, Hills 27
COMMITTEE: Judiciary
ANALYSIS
This constitutional amendment concurrent resolution repeals the article that authorizes the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of the courts of the state.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.
Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]
Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.
12-2423
06/09
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twelve
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION PROPOSING CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
RELATING TO: administration of the supreme court.
PROVIDING THAT: the article authorizing the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of all the courts of the state shall be repealed.
Be it Resolved by the House of Representatives, the Senate concurring, that the
Constitution of New Hampshire be amended as follows:
I. That article 73-a of the second part of the constitution, relative to authorizing the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of all the courts of the state, be repealed.
II. That the above amendment proposed to the constitution be submitted to the qualified voters of the state at the state general election to be held in November, 2012.
III. That the selectmen of all towns, cities, wards and places in the state are directed to insert in their warrants for the said 2012 election an article to the following effect: To decide whether the amendments of the constitution proposed by the 2012 session of the general court shall be approved.
IV. That the wording of the question put to the qualified voters shall be:
“Are you in favor of amending the second part of the constitution by repealing article 73-a, relative to authorizing the chief justice of the supreme court to make rules governing the administration of all the courts of the state.”
V. That the secretary of state shall print the question to be submitted on a separate ballot or on the same ballot with other constitutional questions. The ballot containing the question shall include 2 squares next to the question allowing the voter to vote “Yes” or “No.” If no cross is made in either of the squares, the ballot shall not be counted on the question. The outside of the ballot shall be the same as the regular official ballot except that the words “Questions Relating to Constitutional Amendments proposed by the 2012 General Court” shall be printed in bold type at the top of the ballot.
VI. That if the proposed amendment is approved by 2/3 of those voting on the amendment, it becomes effective when the governor proclaims its adoption.
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Proof Parental Rights Terminations in New Hampshire are Always LOST
Proof Parental Rights Terminations in New Hampshire are Always LOST!
The above document from the Lawyer who fought for the mother at her Termination of Parental Rights Hearing in NH, clearly show's even when the fraud of NH DCYF comes out in court, the parent still loses. Innocence means nothing in NH where DCYF is concerned. It's just a nine letter word that means absolutely NOTHING!
By reading this document, you can see that the loss of parental rights at TPR's are pre-arranged. Everybody in NH loses, not just this one mother.
At first meeting with this Lawyer, the grandmother was told, "No matter what you prove, the case will still be lost." What does that tell you? That ALL TPR's in NH are lost.
TPR's in NH are just a way for families to THINK they're getting a fair deal, when in reality loss of the parent's rights is planned way before the twelve month mark and the Lawyer's of NH know this ahead of time.
The grandmother chose this Lawyer for her daughter's TPR. She knew he was a fighter. He brought out ALL the fraud used against her daughter, even though he knew from day one she would still lose, because every parent loses. He did an excellent job and the family clearly knew the case was won, or should I say, should have been won. The Mother's innocence was proven and DCYF and the Family Court's fraud was finally brought out into the open. A lot of good it did when DCYF has the Judges in their pocket's.
After the TPR, before the decision was sent out by the court, the Lawyer spoke to the grandmother and the above Memorandum is what he wrote. The Lawyer never would have stated these fact's if he knew there was a chance in hell that the mother would win. Just as ALL the other Lawyer's in NH know, nobody wins a TPR!
The day the Court's decision came in the mail, the family was shocked. The mother's rights were terminated by the extremely bias Judge Raymond Cloutier, just one of many of DCYF's cohort's. He terminated the mother's right's on the grounds of opposite testimony and proof admitted into court. Everything he wrote was the opposite of what was presented. Many times in court, he looked like he was sleeping. Maybe he was. This is the same Judge who has since retired and is suing the State for more pension money. He should lose his pension, never mind get more money.
A Supreme Court appeal was filed and of course lost because every parent loses these appeals in NH also. The Supreme Court stated the Judge made NO error's. Unbelievable! Does anyone within the court system even read the files or do they just sit around making money for doing nothing except screwing over innocent parents and collecting their undeserved Federal funding for ALL our stolen children?
So here is the proof as plain as day, but nobody listens to us. They only listen to DCYF. Don't get caught in their web, because there is definitely NO ESCAPE!
Unhappy Grammy
The above document from the Lawyer who fought for the mother at her Termination of Parental Rights Hearing in NH, clearly show's even when the fraud of NH DCYF comes out in court, the parent still loses. Innocence means nothing in NH where DCYF is concerned. It's just a nine letter word that means absolutely NOTHING!
By reading this document, you can see that the loss of parental rights at TPR's are pre-arranged. Everybody in NH loses, not just this one mother.
At first meeting with this Lawyer, the grandmother was told, "No matter what you prove, the case will still be lost." What does that tell you? That ALL TPR's in NH are lost.
TPR's in NH are just a way for families to THINK they're getting a fair deal, when in reality loss of the parent's rights is planned way before the twelve month mark and the Lawyer's of NH know this ahead of time.
The grandmother chose this Lawyer for her daughter's TPR. She knew he was a fighter. He brought out ALL the fraud used against her daughter, even though he knew from day one she would still lose, because every parent loses. He did an excellent job and the family clearly knew the case was won, or should I say, should have been won. The Mother's innocence was proven and DCYF and the Family Court's fraud was finally brought out into the open. A lot of good it did when DCYF has the Judges in their pocket's.
After the TPR, before the decision was sent out by the court, the Lawyer spoke to the grandmother and the above Memorandum is what he wrote. The Lawyer never would have stated these fact's if he knew there was a chance in hell that the mother would win. Just as ALL the other Lawyer's in NH know, nobody wins a TPR!
The day the Court's decision came in the mail, the family was shocked. The mother's rights were terminated by the extremely bias Judge Raymond Cloutier, just one of many of DCYF's cohort's. He terminated the mother's right's on the grounds of opposite testimony and proof admitted into court. Everything he wrote was the opposite of what was presented. Many times in court, he looked like he was sleeping. Maybe he was. This is the same Judge who has since retired and is suing the State for more pension money. He should lose his pension, never mind get more money.
A Supreme Court appeal was filed and of course lost because every parent loses these appeals in NH also. The Supreme Court stated the Judge made NO error's. Unbelievable! Does anyone within the court system even read the files or do they just sit around making money for doing nothing except screwing over innocent parents and collecting their undeserved Federal funding for ALL our stolen children?
So here is the proof as plain as day, but nobody listens to us. They only listen to DCYF. Don't get caught in their web, because there is definitely NO ESCAPE!
Unhappy Grammy
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)