Accusation's From the Lying Director of the Nashua, NH Methadone Program

The Document above is a Nashua DCYF Contact Log, dated 6/27/06. It was a Face to Face contact between DCYF Lawyer Kate McClure and caseworker Anna Salvatore.
I was accused of being in the lobby of Healthy Steps Methadone Program in Nashua, by the lying Director, accused of passing information against Healthy Steps, being disruptive and telling the patient's not to go in because Healthy Steps is DCYFs silent partner in the stealing of babies.
I guess when I parked in front of the Hospital one morning, while my daughter retrieved her supposedly missing record's, missing for almost six month's, Janice must have seen my bumper sticker's which did say Healthy Steps was DCYFs Silent partner. I guess the truth hurt's.
I was finally allowed into the courtroom after filing a motion to intervene and was accused of the above accusation. I spoke up and asked, "There are camera's outside the hospital and Healthy Steps aren't there? So where's the tape?" No answer of course.
Janice is the same person who tried to take my daughter under her wing. Who tried to strain mine and my daughter's close relationship, telling me to stop making appointment's for my sick daughter. Telling me to let her make them herself and then at the next meeting with her, Janice stated she made appointment's for my daughter. Two faced don't you think?
This is also the same woman who used to go in and see my daughter in the hospital several times for dehydration because she was so sick her whole pregnancy. Accusing her of doing a bad bag. Doing a bad bag when she couldn't even walk to go get a bag. Wheeled into the hospital in a wheelchair each morning, vomiting non-stop.
This is the same person who reported to DCYF that I am a closet drinker and I swap pills with my daughter's. I don't drink and I didn't drink then and as for swapping pill's, I don't even take pill's and never did. The only time I ever took ANY kind of medication was for surgery. Even then I only took them at bedtime and cut the pill in half because I wanted to feel like myself. Not some drugged up zombie. EVERYONE knows how I feel about drug's and alcohol and I don't condone their use by ANYONE!
This is also the same woman who goes behind her patient's back's and tell's all. Is that what a Counselor or Director is supposed to do? I don't think so. Is it even legal for her to turn over every piece of documentation on a patient to the court? False documentation at that, which include false positive drug test's. Isn't she only supposed to state the patient is in the program? It's quite clear why she turned on my daughter. Because my daughter wouldn't go against the other patient's in the program and she couldn't break the close relationship we shared.
This is also the same woman who testified in court the methadone given to my daughter in labor didn't have time to reach her baby, so the morphine wouldn't have had time either. That's odd, because the baby was NEVER tested for Methadone!
Now I know why there are so many people out there who hold their problems in, instead of talking to their Counselor's, which causes so much harm in the long run. You can blame Counselors like this one who don't take their patient's rights seriously.

Bogus Foreclosure: NH State Rep helps apparently slam Harmon foreclosure mill

Off Topic, but extremely important to our families!

NH DCYF Try's to Contact Austin's Honduran Father in Mexico

My grandson Austin's FICTITIOUS Father's right's were terminated on 9/25/07. The document's are provided below.
Notice how Austin's Birth Certificate states his father was born in Honduras on November 26, 1969.
Also notice on the Petition for Termination of Parental Rights, Austin's father's date of Birth was listed as January 23, 1980. A man eleven years younger than Austin's REAL Father.
Also notice on the accompanying DCYF Contact log, DCYF would be trying to contact Austin's Bio Father, by publication in Mexico. Now why would DCYF try to contact a man from Honduras in Mexico?
Are they that stupid? Do I even have to ask that question? What was their ulterior motive? I can tell you what their ulterior motive was. They knew Austin's father was in Honduras, but didn't want him to respond, making it that much easier to terminate both his and Austin's Mother's rights. Their Federal incentive would be allotted all the sooner. Even after the caseworker was told this man was NOT Austin's father, the caseworker responded with, "Oh well. No big deal. It doesn't matter." There you go father's. According to DCYF your rights don't matter. How many more father's have had their rights terminated ILLEGALLY in NH? A few more that I know of personally, not to mention my granddaughter Isabella's father also, where DCYF pulled some fictitious man's name out of thin air and denied her REAL father a paternity test and custody, stating he had NO standing to fight for his daughter.
DCYF was in possession of Austin's birth certificate, his REAL father's address in Honduras, his SS number AND his phone number.
So doesn't this make the ILLEGAL adoption's of both Austin and Isabella Null and Void? Isn't that the way the Law is SUPPOSED to work? So when does it begin?

Due process

Due process - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

Due process is the legal requirement that the state must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects individual persons from it. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, this constitutes a due-process violation, which offends against the rule of law.
Due process has also been frequently interpreted as limiting laws and legal proceedings (see substantive due process), so that judges - instead of legislators - may define and guarantee fundamental fairness, justice, and liberty. This interpretation has proven controversial, and is analogous to the concepts of natural justice, and procedural justice used in various other jurisdictions. This interpretation of due process is sometimes expressed as a command that the government must not be unfair to the people or abuse them physically.
Due process is not used in contemporary English law, though two similar concepts are natural justice (which generally applies only to decisions of administrative agencies and some types of private bodies like trade unions) and the British constitutional concept of the rule of law as articulated by A. V. Dicey and others.[1] However, neither concept lines up perfectly with the American conception of due process, which, as explained below, presently contains many implied rights not found in the ancient or modern concepts of due process in England.[2]
Due process developed from clause 39 of the Magna Carta in England. When English and American law gradually diverged, due process was not upheld in England, but did become incorporated in the Constitution of the United States.

Common law fraud has nine elements

Fraud - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

Common law fraud has nine elements:[3][4]
a representation of an existing fact;
its materiality;
its falsity;
the speaker's knowledge of its falsity;
the speaker's intent that it shall be acted upon by the plaintiff;
plaintiff's ignorance of its falsity;
plaintiff's reliance on the truth of the representation;
plaintiff's right to rely upon it; and
consequent damages suffered by plaintiff.
Most jurisdictions in the United States require that each element be pled with particularity and be proved with clear, cogent, and convincing evidence (very probable evidence) to establish a claim of fraud. The measure of damages in fraud cases is to be computed by the "benefit of bargain" rule, which is the difference between the value of the property had it been as represented, and

Amy Leichtenberg on "Dr. Phil Exposes the Crisis in Family Court"

State officials investigating several cases of abuse of adopted children

State officials investigating several cases of abuse of adopted children:

"An alleged child starvation case near Longview is one of more than a dozen cases — including one death — that have state officials reviewing how adopted children are placed and treated."