CHASE HOME FOR CHILDREN v. NEW HAMPSHIRE DIVISION FOR CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILIES - Argued: September 15, 2011.:
CHASE HOME FOR CHILDREN v. NEW HAMPSHIRE DIVISION FOR CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILIES
CHASE HOME FOR CHILDREN & a.
v.
NEW HAMPSHIRE DIVISION FOR CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILIES.
No. 2010-548.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire.
Argued: September 15, 2011.
Opinion Issued: November 22, 2011.
Orr & Reno, P.A., of Concord (Lisa Snow Wade and Rachel Aslin Goldwasser on the brief, and Ms. Wade orally), for the plaintiffs.
Michael A. Delaney, attorney general (Nancy J. Smith, senior assistant attorney general, and Rebecca L. Woodard, assistant attorney general, on the brief, and Ms. Smith orally), for the State.
DUGGAN, J.
The defendant, the New Hampshire Division for Children, Youth and Families (DCYF), appeals the order of the Superior Court (Fauver, J.) to pay $3,553,479.55 to the plaintiffs, Chase Home for Children, Child & Family Services, Hannah House, NFI North, Odyssey House, Orion House and Pine Haven Boys Center. We affirm.
Read More:
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Does NH DCYF Now leave Baby's with Their Mother's in Methadone Treatment?
Does NH DCYF Now leave Baby's with Their Mother's in Methadone Treatment?
Is this something new thank's to all my ranting and raving? It's now okay to leave children in the care of their parent's in Methadone treatment, but it wasn't okay when my granddaughter was born? Is DCYF finally being held accountable after ordering my daughter OUT of Methadone Treatment? An ILLEGAL and DISCRIMINATORY practice? Are they finally aware Mother's in Methadone treatment CAN safely parent their child? That forcing a parent out of treatment only start's the addiction cycle all over again? That forcing a parent out of treatment at a fast pace will most surely cause the parent to relapse?
A parent in treatment can care for her child, yet DCYF in the past has chosen to remove many children from their recovering parent's, yet let women of drug addicted baby's off the hook. Baby's addicted to crack and heroin and baby's addicted to the mother's overindulgence of their pain medication.
In NH, DCYF does NOT take addicted baby's from their parent's. Their harder to place and Not worth as much money to DCYF. They only take the baby's from falsely accused parent's. Parent's whose baby's show NO sign of addiction. Parent's given morphine in labor. Parent's NOT afforded a REAL investigation, in which the DCYF worker testify's in court she didn't know the mother was given morphine in labor. Parent's who speak their mind's, who are now labeled to have an attitude problem when Counselor's and Hospital staff don't like when the parent speaks up after being treated like the scum of the earth.
Baby's are taken from new mother's because NH DCYF and CASA don't want grandparent's helping the parent with their grandchildren. They feel they can tell a parent that they can't live with their parent's with the baby, when they can't afford to move out on their own. Why, so the mother can be another NH welfare case? A mother who want's nothing to do with welfare, yet the DCYF worker sign's an application for Title IV-B funding when the mother refuses because she does NOT want TANF/welfare.
Even when the parent is sickly, CASA ask's,"Do you really think your daughter will be able to take care of the baby when she's so sick?" The grandparent responds with, "We'll be there to help." Then CASA comes back with,"Oh no. We don't want you helping her. She has to do it all on her own." Grandparent's response, "Didn't your mother ever help you with your children when you were sick? Isn't that what grandparent's do? Help their children when they need them?" No answer from CASA of course.
So why is NH DCYF now leaving children with parent's in Methadone treatment? Will they ever admit they were wrong stealing children from recovering parent's? I doubt that will ever happen!
Is this something new thank's to all my ranting and raving? It's now okay to leave children in the care of their parent's in Methadone treatment, but it wasn't okay when my granddaughter was born? Is DCYF finally being held accountable after ordering my daughter OUT of Methadone Treatment? An ILLEGAL and DISCRIMINATORY practice? Are they finally aware Mother's in Methadone treatment CAN safely parent their child? That forcing a parent out of treatment only start's the addiction cycle all over again? That forcing a parent out of treatment at a fast pace will most surely cause the parent to relapse?
A parent in treatment can care for her child, yet DCYF in the past has chosen to remove many children from their recovering parent's, yet let women of drug addicted baby's off the hook. Baby's addicted to crack and heroin and baby's addicted to the mother's overindulgence of their pain medication.
In NH, DCYF does NOT take addicted baby's from their parent's. Their harder to place and Not worth as much money to DCYF. They only take the baby's from falsely accused parent's. Parent's whose baby's show NO sign of addiction. Parent's given morphine in labor. Parent's NOT afforded a REAL investigation, in which the DCYF worker testify's in court she didn't know the mother was given morphine in labor. Parent's who speak their mind's, who are now labeled to have an attitude problem when Counselor's and Hospital staff don't like when the parent speaks up after being treated like the scum of the earth.
Baby's are taken from new mother's because NH DCYF and CASA don't want grandparent's helping the parent with their grandchildren. They feel they can tell a parent that they can't live with their parent's with the baby, when they can't afford to move out on their own. Why, so the mother can be another NH welfare case? A mother who want's nothing to do with welfare, yet the DCYF worker sign's an application for Title IV-B funding when the mother refuses because she does NOT want TANF/welfare.
Even when the parent is sickly, CASA ask's,"Do you really think your daughter will be able to take care of the baby when she's so sick?" The grandparent responds with, "We'll be there to help." Then CASA comes back with,"Oh no. We don't want you helping her. She has to do it all on her own." Grandparent's response, "Didn't your mother ever help you with your children when you were sick? Isn't that what grandparent's do? Help their children when they need them?" No answer from CASA of course.
So why is NH DCYF now leaving children with parent's in Methadone treatment? Will they ever admit they were wrong stealing children from recovering parent's? I doubt that will ever happen!
Diabetes Mellitus In Children Linked To Antipsychotic Meds: Study
Diabetes Mellitus In Children Linked To Antipsychotic Meds: Study | ThirdAge:
Diabetes mellitus in children may be tied to them increasingly being prescribed antipsychotic medications, a study suggests.
Diabetes mellitus in children may be tied to them increasingly being prescribed antipsychotic medications, a study suggests.
Bachmann would foster children as president
Bachmann would foster children as president - The Washington Post:
Comment: I met Michelle Bachman in NH and gave her proof of wrongdoing by child protective services AND the Family Courts, not only in NH but Nationwide. I gave her a list of questions the victimized families in NH wanted her to answer before agreeing to throw their support her way. I still have gotten no response, but I now have my answer thank's to this article. It's quite obvious she does NOT support the families of ILLEGALLY stolen children and still intends to work with CPS in the placement of our children in foster care. I tried to keep an open mind when I asked her if she would support our plight. If she had, my fellow family rights Activist's would have supported her. We CAN NOT and WILL NOT support any candidate who help's CPS and the courts in the demise of our families.
Comment: I met Michelle Bachman in NH and gave her proof of wrongdoing by child protective services AND the Family Courts, not only in NH but Nationwide. I gave her a list of questions the victimized families in NH wanted her to answer before agreeing to throw their support her way. I still have gotten no response, but I now have my answer thank's to this article. It's quite obvious she does NOT support the families of ILLEGALLY stolen children and still intends to work with CPS in the placement of our children in foster care. I tried to keep an open mind when I asked her if she would support our plight. If she had, my fellow family rights Activist's would have supported her. We CAN NOT and WILL NOT support any candidate who help's CPS and the courts in the demise of our families.
North Naples grandparents sought by police in California child abduction
North Naples grandparents sought by police in California child abduction » Naples Daily News:
NAPLES — At half-past midnight on Sept. 2, a 12-year-old boy packed two duffel bags and tiptoed across his mother's living room floor. He remembered at the last moment to take his shoes with him out the window.
NAPLES — At half-past midnight on Sept. 2, a 12-year-old boy packed two duffel bags and tiptoed across his mother's living room floor. He remembered at the last moment to take his shoes with him out the window.
A CHILD STEALER, IS A CHILD STEALER, IS A CHILD STEALER!!!
A CHILD STEALER, IS A CHILD STEALER, IS A CHILD STEALER!!! | ExposingTheRecord.org:
How do you react when Social Services, the likes of CPS agents JULIE RIGGINS, SAUNDRA JUDD, NIKKIE LYONS, JOHN GUSTAVSON, Guardian ad Litem Volunteer BACCUHUS CARVER, or whatever their name(s) take your children or threaten to take your children?
How do you react when Social Services, the likes of CPS agents JULIE RIGGINS, SAUNDRA JUDD, NIKKIE LYONS, JOHN GUSTAVSON, Guardian ad Litem Volunteer BACCUHUS CARVER, or whatever their name(s) take your children or threaten to take your children?
GAL Tracy A. Bernson: A Guardian ad Litem That Doesn't Like Children
STOP Judicial Child Abuse: GAL Tracy A. Bernson: A Guardian ad Litem That Doesn't Like Children:
We are not looking to stir up any trouble here. We are just reporting the news. It has come to the attention of STOP! Judicial Child Abuse that Guardian ad Litem Tracy A. Bernson is severely depressed. Is this who you want making "recommendations" for your family and your children?
Read More:
We are not looking to stir up any trouble here. We are just reporting the news. It has come to the attention of STOP! Judicial Child Abuse that Guardian ad Litem Tracy A. Bernson is severely depressed. Is this who you want making "recommendations" for your family and your children?
Read More:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)