Preliminary exam set for Sept. 6 in child's second degree murder case > ActionNews17 | Ken Benitez | FPTV | Channel 17 | Tangipahoa
AMITE---The 21st Judicial District Court has set a Sept. 6 preliminary examination hearing in the case of a foster father arrested last spring for the alleged second-degree murder of a three-year-old child in his care.
Judge Ray Chutz set the P.E. at the request of defense attorney Michael Thiel, who is representing potential defendent Mark Johnson, who was charged in May with the April death of Faith Saucier, age 3, who was a foster child assigned to Johnson and his wife.
NOTE:Johnson is married to an employee of 21st Judicial District Attorney Scott Perrilloux
Click here for earlier posting:
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
Addiction a brain disorder, not just bad behavior
Addiction a brain disorder, not just bad behavior | oregonlive.com
WASHINGTON (AP) — Addiction isn't just about willpower. It's a chronic brain disease, says a new definition aimed at helping families and their doctors better understand the challenges of treating it.
"Addiction is about a lot more than people behaving badly," says Dr. Michael M. Miller of the American Society for Addiction Medicine.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Addiction isn't just about willpower. It's a chronic brain disease, says a new definition aimed at helping families and their doctors better understand the challenges of treating it.
"Addiction is about a lot more than people behaving badly," says Dr. Michael M. Miller of the American Society for Addiction Medicine.
Foster Parents; Breaking News. CPS Caught!
Foster Parents; Breaking News. CPS Caught! - National Foster Families | Examiner.com
Foster Parents; Breaking News.
CPS Caught?
Good news for all parents who have lost a child to CPS, or mandatory orders issued to place their child on drugs. We ask this question; has your child been diagnosed, labeled as ADD, ADHD or any of the other thousands of invented disorders voted into existence annually by psychologists serving the pharmaceutical companies who make them. www.cchr.org
Continue reading on Examiner.com Foster Parents;
Foster Parents; Breaking News.
CPS Caught?
Good news for all parents who have lost a child to CPS, or mandatory orders issued to place their child on drugs. We ask this question; has your child been diagnosed, labeled as ADD, ADHD or any of the other thousands of invented disorders voted into existence annually by psychologists serving the pharmaceutical companies who make them. www.cchr.org
Continue reading on Examiner.com Foster Parents;
How socialite brought down black-market baby brokers
Former Manhattan party girl and Estee Lauder baby mama Taylor Stein pays $180,000 for baby, then helps bust ring of kiddie-peddlers - NYPOST.com
A beautiful city socialite bought a black-market baby for $180,000 -- then helped the FBI bring down the kiddie-peddling ring that sold him to her.
Former Manhattan society girl Taylor Stein -- who also has a love child with cosmetics billionaire William Lauder -- wept at times as she recounted to The Post yesterday how she unwittingly became embroiled in the sensational case involving three female fiends who used cash-strapped surrogates and sperm and egg donors from Ukraine to prey on the rich and desperate, charging at least $100,000 per baby.
Read more:
A beautiful city socialite bought a black-market baby for $180,000 -- then helped the FBI bring down the kiddie-peddling ring that sold him to her.
Former Manhattan society girl Taylor Stein -- who also has a love child with cosmetics billionaire William Lauder -- wept at times as she recounted to The Post yesterday how she unwittingly became embroiled in the sensational case involving three female fiends who used cash-strapped surrogates and sperm and egg donors from Ukraine to prey on the rich and desperate, charging at least $100,000 per baby.
Read more:
AFRA Front Page News: Whatever Schools Teach, Parents Have No Rights
AFRA Front Page News: Whatever Schools Teach, Parents Have No Rights
Since California Governor Jerry Brown signed SB 48 into law on July 14, the curriculum for California public schools must include “the role and contributions of…lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans” in California and American history. Already, those on the left are preparing to defend the law in courts, while those on the right are driving petitions to overturn the law by a ballot initiative.
Why go to all that trouble?
Because the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction over California and a handful of other states, has already made clear that there can be no opt-outs of anything in the curriculum, even if parents might find it offensive or contrary to their own educational ideals for their children.
Some parents will like this form of education. Other parents will object to it. At ParentalRights.Org our view is simply this: Parents, not government, should be able to make these decisions.
As it is, whatever curriculum California ultimately decides to keep, there will be public school parents who dislike it and who still have no rights under the Ninth Circuit to even opt their children out.
In 2005, the Ninth Circuit declared in Fields v. Palmdale that “[p]arents…have no constitutional right…to prevent public schools from providing its students with whatever information it wishes to provide, sexual or otherwise, when and as the school determines that it is appropriate to do so.”
“In sum,” they wrote, “we affirm that the Meyer-Pierce [fundamental parental] right does not extend beyond the threshold of the school door.”
And it’s not just California and neighboring states, either. In 2007, the U.S. District Court for Massachusetts decided the same thing in Parker v. Hurley: parents have no right to opt their children out of a public school course. Nor are we aware of any decision to the contrary in any Circuit or District in the country since 2000.
So get ready for more legislation and more petitions as parents go back and forth over what all public school children must learn. When parents lack the basic right to simply pull their child out of a single class they dislike, there is no lesser recourse available than to change the entire curriculum for all.
The proposed Parental Rights Amendment to the Constitution can correct this by reversing Palmdale and Parker and re-establishing parental rights for fit parents regardless of their child’s location. Until then, parents will just have to duke it out in the legislature – because what their children learn in public school is entirely a matter of state law, and not of parental discretion.
Sincerely,
Michael Ramey
Director of Communications & Research
Since California Governor Jerry Brown signed SB 48 into law on July 14, the curriculum for California public schools must include “the role and contributions of…lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans” in California and American history. Already, those on the left are preparing to defend the law in courts, while those on the right are driving petitions to overturn the law by a ballot initiative.
Why go to all that trouble?
Because the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction over California and a handful of other states, has already made clear that there can be no opt-outs of anything in the curriculum, even if parents might find it offensive or contrary to their own educational ideals for their children.
Some parents will like this form of education. Other parents will object to it. At ParentalRights.Org our view is simply this: Parents, not government, should be able to make these decisions.
As it is, whatever curriculum California ultimately decides to keep, there will be public school parents who dislike it and who still have no rights under the Ninth Circuit to even opt their children out.
In 2005, the Ninth Circuit declared in Fields v. Palmdale that “[p]arents…have no constitutional right…to prevent public schools from providing its students with whatever information it wishes to provide, sexual or otherwise, when and as the school determines that it is appropriate to do so.”
“In sum,” they wrote, “we affirm that the Meyer-Pierce [fundamental parental] right does not extend beyond the threshold of the school door.”
And it’s not just California and neighboring states, either. In 2007, the U.S. District Court for Massachusetts decided the same thing in Parker v. Hurley: parents have no right to opt their children out of a public school course. Nor are we aware of any decision to the contrary in any Circuit or District in the country since 2000.
So get ready for more legislation and more petitions as parents go back and forth over what all public school children must learn. When parents lack the basic right to simply pull their child out of a single class they dislike, there is no lesser recourse available than to change the entire curriculum for all.
The proposed Parental Rights Amendment to the Constitution can correct this by reversing Palmdale and Parker and re-establishing parental rights for fit parents regardless of their child’s location. Until then, parents will just have to duke it out in the legislature – because what their children learn in public school is entirely a matter of state law, and not of parental discretion.
Sincerely,
Michael Ramey
Director of Communications & Research
Twisted web of lies in Godboldo Case: Big Pharma, multiple agencies, judge, DHS all profit from child abduction
Twisted web of lies in Godboldo Case: Big Pharma, multiple agencies, judge, DHS all profit from child abduction
(NaturalNews) There is a good chance you have heard the story of Maryanne Godboldo and how armed government agents broke down her door and attempted to kidnap her 13-year-old daughter Ariana to turn over to CPS because she refused to medicate her with a potentially dangerous and mind-altering anti-psychotic drug Risperdal (http://www.naturalnews.com/032191_C...). Maryanne had been using holistic remedies for her daughter instead, such as dance therapy.
Learn more:
(NaturalNews) There is a good chance you have heard the story of Maryanne Godboldo and how armed government agents broke down her door and attempted to kidnap her 13-year-old daughter Ariana to turn over to CPS because she refused to medicate her with a potentially dangerous and mind-altering anti-psychotic drug Risperdal (http://www.naturalnews.com/032191_C...). Maryanne had been using holistic remedies for her daughter instead, such as dance therapy.
Learn more:
JURY RULES AGAINST MARYANNE GODBOLDO IN CUSTODY TRIAL
JURY RULES AGAINST MARYANNE GODBOLDO IN CUSTODY TRIAL | VOICE OF DETROIT: The city's independent newspaper, unbossed and unbought
DETROIT – Despite testimony that Mia Wenk, a “social services specialist” with a bachelor’s degree in criminal justice, authorized the psychiatric hospitalization of Ariana Godboldo-Hakim, 13, and the administration of four dangerous psychotropic drugs, without reviewing the child’s medical records, a jury found Aug. 9 that it was Ariana’s mother Maryanne Godboldo who had neglected her.
DETROIT – Despite testimony that Mia Wenk, a “social services specialist” with a bachelor’s degree in criminal justice, authorized the psychiatric hospitalization of Ariana Godboldo-Hakim, 13, and the administration of four dangerous psychotropic drugs, without reviewing the child’s medical records, a jury found Aug. 9 that it was Ariana’s mother Maryanne Godboldo who had neglected her.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)