Conservative groups present DHHS 'sting' video | The Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram
GO James Okeefe!!!
AUGUSTA - Two conservative groups, Americans For Prosperity of Maine and the Maine Heritage Policy Center, presented a video clip they allege exposes "vulnerabilities" in Maine's Department of Health and Human Services.
The video, sent to Carol Weston, state director of AFP, by James O'Keefe, shows an actor portraying a drug smuggler attempting to receive medicaid benefits. According to Weston, he eventually leaves the state office with an application form to fill out to receive MaineCare benefits.
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Thursday, August 11, 2011
TLC-NCJFCJ Has Issued a News Alert Regarding a Nationwide Protest Directed at Family Courts, GAL'S, and Child Protective Services Workers
TLC What's New
The National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ) has issued a news alert saying that it has learned of a nationwide protest that is planned for this Friday, August 12, by an organization called "govabuse," which is reportedly going to direct its protest against Child Protective Services workers, family court judges, and guardians ad litem. At this time, the protest is planned from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. outside courthouses in at least 42 states around the nation. The group's website identifies 12 Texas counties where protests are planned. To visit the group's website to see the list of Texas protest sites, click here. Current NCJFCJ President, Hon. Patricia Martin, was recently quoted in a Southern Poverty Law Center blog about the protest. Although the protest is billed as nonviolent, TLC wanted you to be aware of the possibility that this may be happening in your county. To learn more and to view the comments of Judge Martin, click here.
(In order for anyone to click on the two spot's in this article, you must be registered with the site, which seem's to be only for Judges and Attorney's.)
The National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ) has issued a news alert saying that it has learned of a nationwide protest that is planned for this Friday, August 12, by an organization called "govabuse," which is reportedly going to direct its protest against Child Protective Services workers, family court judges, and guardians ad litem. At this time, the protest is planned from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. outside courthouses in at least 42 states around the nation. The group's website identifies 12 Texas counties where protests are planned. To visit the group's website to see the list of Texas protest sites, click here. Current NCJFCJ President, Hon. Patricia Martin, was recently quoted in a Southern Poverty Law Center blog about the protest. Although the protest is billed as nonviolent, TLC wanted you to be aware of the possibility that this may be happening in your county. To learn more and to view the comments of Judge Martin, click here.
(In order for anyone to click on the two spot's in this article, you must be registered with the site, which seem's to be only for Judges and Attorney's.)
‘Patriot’ Groups Glom on to National Protest of Family Court System
‘Patriot’ Groups Glom on to National Protest of Family Court System | Hatewatch | Southern Poverty Law Center
A nationwide “family rights protest” set for next week – and billed as one of the biggest ever — is attracting attention and support from antigovernment militia, “Patriot” and “sovereign citizens” groups.
Protests organized by a group called “govabuse” are planned outside courthouses in more than 300 counties in at least 42 states on Aug. 12. Organizers say the protests – fueled by a Facebook campaign and utilizing a special red, white and blue ribbon — are intended to shed light on “abuse of constitutional rights” by family court judges, guardians ad litem and child protective service workers. The group complains that the system is “used to separate and financially demolish families.”
Patricia M. Martin, a Chicago judge who is president of the of National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, said such judges are always seeking to improve the system. She said her organization “has worked tirelessly for 74 years to ensure the constitutional rights of all parties involved in cases our membership presides over.” She added, “We are committed to keeping families together and when needed, strengthening the ability of parents to raise their children.”
The national association, she said, works “to improve training for judges and other court personnel resolving disputes that involve child protection, juvenile justice, family violence and family law matters. Of paramount importance to our membership is access to justice and the protection of the rights of all.”
Reas More:
A nationwide “family rights protest” set for next week – and billed as one of the biggest ever — is attracting attention and support from antigovernment militia, “Patriot” and “sovereign citizens” groups.
Protests organized by a group called “govabuse” are planned outside courthouses in more than 300 counties in at least 42 states on Aug. 12. Organizers say the protests – fueled by a Facebook campaign and utilizing a special red, white and blue ribbon — are intended to shed light on “abuse of constitutional rights” by family court judges, guardians ad litem and child protective service workers. The group complains that the system is “used to separate and financially demolish families.”
Patricia M. Martin, a Chicago judge who is president of the of National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, said such judges are always seeking to improve the system. She said her organization “has worked tirelessly for 74 years to ensure the constitutional rights of all parties involved in cases our membership presides over.” She added, “We are committed to keeping families together and when needed, strengthening the ability of parents to raise their children.”
The national association, she said, works “to improve training for judges and other court personnel resolving disputes that involve child protection, juvenile justice, family violence and family law matters. Of paramount importance to our membership is access to justice and the protection of the rights of all.”
Reas More:
Wednesday, August 10, 2011
MEMBER OF REDRESS COMMITTEE GIVES OUT WRONG INFORMATION
The Truth Bites "NH"
Link
The information provided on the link above with caddy uneducated commentary is not what people are putting in for the redress of grievance committee; nor should it be.
For example the link opens to the McIntosh petition and this one is way off; it was put in as below with the exception of #2 which was most recently changed due to the fact that the Judicial Branch in NH can suddenly make laws beyond case law and is currently not providing accused parents with an Attorney, I believe one paper reported Governor Lynch will be signing on it or did affective July 1, 2011.
In any case, do not assume the Redress of Grievance Committee can actually change your case; your wrong it is another venue to address consitutents concerns; they can react to what was done in your case by checking the laws and making sure it doesn't happen again and again;
By changing or adding to an existing law, they can move forward with impeachments on individuals who have acted under the color of law;
They can make a law that ALL Courts are open to the public as the McIntosh case makes an example of under the NH 169-C to ensure accountability;
For example as recently as January 1, 2011 legislators (not the redress) MADE non-fatal strangulation a law; because the victim's family pushed for legislators to write legislation due to a loved one who died because the non-fatal attempt on the victim resulted in no jail time allowing the perpetrator to go back and kill his victim;
This is what McIntosh really put in.
New Hampshire House of Representatives
Redress of Grievances Committee
GRIEVANCE PETITION REQUEST
Representative: _Peter Silva_______________________________
District: _Hillsborough District 26__________________________
On behalf of: _Ms. Denise-Marie McIntosh_______________________
SUCCINCT SUMMARY OF GRIEVANCE
Grievance against the Department of Health and Human Services division of Children Youth and Families; Judge Thomas Bamberger and Marital Master Alice Love for their failure to apply and/or follow the laws of the State of New Hampshire and failure to allow procedural due process in their decisions and/or actions in the Matter of William P. McIntosh and Denise-Marie McIntosh 00-M-927 and In Re. Simon M. 2005-JV-565 resulting in the separation of a fit mother from her son for seven (7) years through allegations based on fraud.
PROPOSED REMEDY
1. Amend the laws of the State so that actions that take place under the NH RSA 169-C "Child Protection Act" are open to the public; to avoid mishandling of cases and better representation for all parties.
2. Amend the laws of the State so that families can have advocates who assure compliance since there are no longer court appointed attorneys; to ensure families rights are protected as was provided for under NH RSA 169-C "The Child Protection Act".
3. By session law request that the appointment of Marital Master Love and/or Judge Bamberger be impeached for failure to provide the reasonable amount of procedural due process required in Family Court Decisions.
4. For Such other and further relief the General Court deems just, proper and equitable in the circumstances.
NOTE: Candy Knightly Petition and the Nardone Petition aren't right either. Mine isn't too far off. The rest of them most likely aren't right either. But I would like to thank Mr. Horrigan for advertising my blog even if he has gotten the petition's wrong.
Link
The information provided on the link above with caddy uneducated commentary is not what people are putting in for the redress of grievance committee; nor should it be.
For example the link opens to the McIntosh petition and this one is way off; it was put in as below with the exception of #2 which was most recently changed due to the fact that the Judicial Branch in NH can suddenly make laws beyond case law and is currently not providing accused parents with an Attorney, I believe one paper reported Governor Lynch will be signing on it or did affective July 1, 2011.
In any case, do not assume the Redress of Grievance Committee can actually change your case; your wrong it is another venue to address consitutents concerns; they can react to what was done in your case by checking the laws and making sure it doesn't happen again and again;
By changing or adding to an existing law, they can move forward with impeachments on individuals who have acted under the color of law;
They can make a law that ALL Courts are open to the public as the McIntosh case makes an example of under the NH 169-C to ensure accountability;
For example as recently as January 1, 2011 legislators (not the redress) MADE non-fatal strangulation a law; because the victim's family pushed for legislators to write legislation due to a loved one who died because the non-fatal attempt on the victim resulted in no jail time allowing the perpetrator to go back and kill his victim;
This is what McIntosh really put in.
New Hampshire House of Representatives
Redress of Grievances Committee
GRIEVANCE PETITION REQUEST
Representative: _Peter Silva_______________________________
District: _Hillsborough District 26__________________________
On behalf of: _Ms. Denise-Marie McIntosh_______________________
SUCCINCT SUMMARY OF GRIEVANCE
Grievance against the Department of Health and Human Services division of Children Youth and Families; Judge Thomas Bamberger and Marital Master Alice Love for their failure to apply and/or follow the laws of the State of New Hampshire and failure to allow procedural due process in their decisions and/or actions in the Matter of William P. McIntosh and Denise-Marie McIntosh 00-M-927 and In Re. Simon M. 2005-JV-565 resulting in the separation of a fit mother from her son for seven (7) years through allegations based on fraud.
PROPOSED REMEDY
1. Amend the laws of the State so that actions that take place under the NH RSA 169-C "Child Protection Act" are open to the public; to avoid mishandling of cases and better representation for all parties.
2. Amend the laws of the State so that families can have advocates who assure compliance since there are no longer court appointed attorneys; to ensure families rights are protected as was provided for under NH RSA 169-C "The Child Protection Act".
3. By session law request that the appointment of Marital Master Love and/or Judge Bamberger be impeached for failure to provide the reasonable amount of procedural due process required in Family Court Decisions.
4. For Such other and further relief the General Court deems just, proper and equitable in the circumstances.
NOTE: Candy Knightly Petition and the Nardone Petition aren't right either. Mine isn't too far off. The rest of them most likely aren't right either. But I would like to thank Mr. Horrigan for advertising my blog even if he has gotten the petition's wrong.
Foster Mother Guilty of Abusing Infant
Foster Mother Guilty of Abusing Infant | NBC San Diego
A San Diego woman was convicted Tuesday of abusing her foster child, a 3-month-old boy who suffered seven broken bones.
Source: Foster Mother Guilty of Abusing Infant | NBC San Diego
A San Diego woman was convicted Tuesday of abusing her foster child, a 3-month-old boy who suffered seven broken bones.
Source: Foster Mother Guilty of Abusing Infant | NBC San Diego
DSHS leaked confidential info in nearly 4,000 cases
DSHS leaked confidential info in nearly 4,000 cases | Seattle News, Weather, Sports, Breaking News | KOMO News | Local & Regional
SEATTLE -- The state admits it could have put thousands of parents at risk for identity theft or physical or emotional harm after one agency accidentally leaked confidential information.
SEATTLE -- The state admits it could have put thousands of parents at risk for identity theft or physical or emotional harm after one agency accidentally leaked confidential information.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)