Report says LGC owes taxpayers $100 million | New Hampshire NEWS06
WOW, thing's are really heating up in New Hampshire! First DHHS has to pay back the Fed's $35 MIL, now the LCG owes the Taxpayer's $100 MIL. Who will get caught next? Hopefully NH DCYF will be next, fraudulently receiving federal funding! I can dream can't I!
CONCORD - The battle over whether taxpayers should get back $100 million that Local Government Center insurance operations collected is headed to administrative hearings at the Secretary of State's Office.
A report by the office's Bureau of Securities Regulation states that the LGC illegally converted its non-profit health and property insurance operations into Delaware corporations in 2003. Since that time, the report alleges LGC has engaged in a list of questionable activities. They include shifting health insurance funds into unrelated operations, running a bloated reserve fund, forcing insured towns to pay New Hampshire Municipal Association dues, and creating a generous retirement plan for its workers and administrators.
Bureau of Securities Regulation's Summary of Report on Local Government Center
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Tuesday, August 2, 2011
Foster Child Bill of Rights-Not Practiced in New Hampshire
Foster Child Bill of Rights
Download this document in these formats:
Foster Child Bill of Rights (PDF) | RTF
Preamble
The Department of Children and Families recognizes the following rights of children and youth in foster care. These rights are intended to guide the Department and its providers in the delivery of care and services to foster youth with the commitment to permanency, safety and well being. This Bill of Rights was developed by the Department’s Youth Advisory Board.
So when does this Bill of Right's go into effect, because it sure isn't how Foster children are treated in New Hampshire!
Every Foster Child
Shall be treated with respect by DCF staff, foster parents and providers without regard to race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, religion and/or disability.
Shall have family and relatives explored first as potential placement providers.
Shall have reasonable access to a caseworker who makes case plan decisions. Reasonable access shall include the social worker and supervisor’s office telephone numbers and email addresses as well as, a minimum, monthly visits by social worker.
Shall participate in the development and review of the service plan and have input into changes to the plan that affect permanence, safety, stability or well being. Youth age 14 and older should also be presented with the service plan for their review and signature.
Shall be informed in a manner appropriate to age and level of understanding of the reason(s) the Department of Children and Families became involved with his/her family and why he/she is in care.
Shall be included in the Foster Care Review meeting, Permanency Hearing and Lead Agency Team meeting if age 14 and older, unless documented by court order or service plan that participation would be detrimental to the youth. If the youth is unable to attend in person, he/she Shall have the right to submit a written statement to be considered at the meeting.
Shall be provided with information about a foster family or program and, whenever possible,Shall have an opportunity to meet the foster parent or program staff before placement occurs.
Shall live with a family and in placement settings that provide a safe and nurturing environment while supporting permanency, and well being, including encouraging youth’s goals, interests, social and school activities.
Shall have involvement as appropriate with family members and should participate in the development of visitation plans.
Shall receive support from social worker, foster family/provider in maintaining positive contact with significant people (relatives, teachers, friends and community supports) including assistance with contact information and visitation.
Shall be treated as a family member and, whenever possible, be included in a foster family’s activities, holidays and rituals and be able to freely discuss reason(s) with social worker and foster family if choosing to not participate.
Shall have access to medical, dental, vision, mental and behavioral health services regularly and more often as needed.
Shall have access to information contained in medical, dental, and educational records held by DCF as well as personal documents such as social security card, birth certificate, green card, etc. When youth leave DCF, they Shall be given copies of medical, dental and educational records held by DCF and original social security card, birth certificate, and green card.
Shall have the opportunity to have private conversations with social worker on a regular basis. Foster youth should also be made aware of the process for contacting the supervisor and attorney regarding any questions or concerns.
Shall be informed of the names and phone numbers of assigned attorneys and be aware that they can contact their attorneys and
that there is a process to request a change of attorneys.
Shall have access to personal possessions, personal space and privacy with allowance for safety.
Shall receive assistance in acquiring life skills, education, training and career guidance to accomplish personal goals and prepare for the future and be informed of the post-secondary educational and employment supports available to youth in care through the Department.
Shall be informed that DCF provides clothing, birthday and holiday payments to foster parents and placement providers for youth in placement.
Download this document in these formats:
Foster Child Bill of Rights (PDF) | RTF
Preamble
The Department of Children and Families recognizes the following rights of children and youth in foster care. These rights are intended to guide the Department and its providers in the delivery of care and services to foster youth with the commitment to permanency, safety and well being. This Bill of Rights was developed by the Department’s Youth Advisory Board.
So when does this Bill of Right's go into effect, because it sure isn't how Foster children are treated in New Hampshire!
Every Foster Child
Shall be treated with respect by DCF staff, foster parents and providers without regard to race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, religion and/or disability.
Shall have family and relatives explored first as potential placement providers.
Shall have reasonable access to a caseworker who makes case plan decisions. Reasonable access shall include the social worker and supervisor’s office telephone numbers and email addresses as well as, a minimum, monthly visits by social worker.
Shall participate in the development and review of the service plan and have input into changes to the plan that affect permanence, safety, stability or well being. Youth age 14 and older should also be presented with the service plan for their review and signature.
Shall be informed in a manner appropriate to age and level of understanding of the reason(s) the Department of Children and Families became involved with his/her family and why he/she is in care.
Shall be included in the Foster Care Review meeting, Permanency Hearing and Lead Agency Team meeting if age 14 and older, unless documented by court order or service plan that participation would be detrimental to the youth. If the youth is unable to attend in person, he/she Shall have the right to submit a written statement to be considered at the meeting.
Shall be provided with information about a foster family or program and, whenever possible,Shall have an opportunity to meet the foster parent or program staff before placement occurs.
Shall live with a family and in placement settings that provide a safe and nurturing environment while supporting permanency, and well being, including encouraging youth’s goals, interests, social and school activities.
Shall have involvement as appropriate with family members and should participate in the development of visitation plans.
Shall receive support from social worker, foster family/provider in maintaining positive contact with significant people (relatives, teachers, friends and community supports) including assistance with contact information and visitation.
Shall be treated as a family member and, whenever possible, be included in a foster family’s activities, holidays and rituals and be able to freely discuss reason(s) with social worker and foster family if choosing to not participate.
Shall have access to medical, dental, vision, mental and behavioral health services regularly and more often as needed.
Shall have access to information contained in medical, dental, and educational records held by DCF as well as personal documents such as social security card, birth certificate, green card, etc. When youth leave DCF, they Shall be given copies of medical, dental and educational records held by DCF and original social security card, birth certificate, and green card.
Shall have the opportunity to have private conversations with social worker on a regular basis. Foster youth should also be made aware of the process for contacting the supervisor and attorney regarding any questions or concerns.
Shall be informed of the names and phone numbers of assigned attorneys and be aware that they can contact their attorneys and
that there is a process to request a change of attorneys.
Shall have access to personal possessions, personal space and privacy with allowance for safety.
Shall receive assistance in acquiring life skills, education, training and career guidance to accomplish personal goals and prepare for the future and be informed of the post-secondary educational and employment supports available to youth in care through the Department.
Shall be informed that DCF provides clothing, birthday and holiday payments to foster parents and placement providers for youth in placement.
Petition: Judge Monize: Reunify Leslie brown and children
Petition: Judge Monize: Reunify Leslie brown and children | Change.org
Father was never charged with any crime, mother of children was the perpetrator and father has done everything that DCF has requested and has even gone above and beyond in order for reunification and now they are trying to adopt children out unjustified!
Father was never charged with any crime, mother of children was the perpetrator and father has done everything that DCF has requested and has even gone above and beyond in order for reunification and now they are trying to adopt children out unjustified!
Teen, siblings faced foster care after their parents were jailed
Teen, siblings faced foster care after their parents were jailed
It wasn't supposed to be this way.
Victoria Ford came from a prominent, well-to-do family. What was happening didn't happen to families like hers. Short of an intervening miracle, she and her three siblings would find themselves in a foster home.
Victoria Ford, uses her life story to encourage social workers and other officials to seek alternatives to state care when dealing with children displaced from their homes by a parental arrest.
Read more:
It wasn't supposed to be this way.
Victoria Ford came from a prominent, well-to-do family. What was happening didn't happen to families like hers. Short of an intervening miracle, she and her three siblings would find themselves in a foster home.
Victoria Ford, uses her life story to encourage social workers and other officials to seek alternatives to state care when dealing with children displaced from their homes by a parental arrest.
Read more:
Monday, August 1, 2011
Searchers find missing N.H. girl’s body, term death ‘suspicious’
Searchers find missing N.H. girl’s body, term death ‘suspicious’ from Metro Desk
WEST STEWARTSTOWN, N.H. -- Searchers found the body of a missing New Hampshire girl today in the Connecticut River in the far northern part of the state, and law enforcement officials said they considered her death “suspicious.”
WEST STEWARTSTOWN, N.H. -- Searchers found the body of a missing New Hampshire girl today in the Connecticut River in the far northern part of the state, and law enforcement officials said they considered her death “suspicious.”
ADOLF HITLER and today's SOCIAL SERVICE WORKER: In the best interest of the child - sound familiar?
AADOLF HITLER and today's SOCIAL SERVICE WORKER: In the best interest of the child - sound familiar?
The Lebensborn project was one of most secret and terrifying Nazi projects
Adolf Hitler's “In the best interest of the child” is a favorite line perpetually quoted by today's Social Workers the Child Protection Services and Family Court Judges: It was originally a slogan designed by Hitler’s social engineers.
The Lebensborn project was one of most secret and terrifying Nazi projects
Adolf Hitler's “In the best interest of the child” is a favorite line perpetually quoted by today's Social Workers the Child Protection Services and Family Court Judges: It was originally a slogan designed by Hitler’s social engineers.
Fight Child Protective Services Help « CPS Corruption Has To Be Stopped
Fight Child Protective Services Help « CPS Corruption Has To Be Stopped
« Don’t Ever Trust CPSCPS PLACEMENT, COURTS, FALSE ACCUSATIONS, ABUSE OF POWER, FIGHT CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES »
Fight Child Protective Services Help
By cbliss
If you are having difficulty processing how a person can be charged with any negligence or abuse related to a child and not be found innocent if they are indeed innocent – let me inform you of the differences between criminal court and family court. In criminal court the law does indeed maintain that a person is innocent until proven guilty. The state or prosecuter has the burden to prove that the defendant is guilty, in fact they have to prove it is reasonably possible just to get the defendent into court and tried. Some evidence must be obtained of some kind, and an indictment is needed. Therefore, while it is possible for an innocent person to be convicted of a crime, it is more difficult to do so.
In fact, this mantra ‘Innocent until proven guilty’ is so ingrained in our minds as Americans from tv, movies and culture that we mistakenly believe this is the law in ALL courts, and fail to be aware that it is only the law in criminal court. This is not the case in family court, where child abuse and neglect allegations are made. In family court there is no burden of proof on the state, county or prosecutor. Furthermore, you are guilty unless and until you can prove your innocence. Don’t believe it is true? Call up an attorney, friend or judge, or do an internet search to find out for yourself. This is not criminal court, and all abuse allegations begin in family court. If found guilty in family court by a judge, you may be tried in a criminal court – but only after.
One more thing – you can be punished for your ‘guilt’ (being you are believed guilty until you prove otherwise) before you are even brought before a judge.
Now let me ask you….if I accuse you of hitting your children in an abusive way how are you going to prove otherwise? Testimony of friends, family, bosses, co-workers, teachers and neighbors? No one has ever seen a mark on your child, heard of any abuse claims in the past or seen you abuse your children…..so what? Obviously you are clever enough to hit without leaving a mark (how many of us from watching too much tv know that the ‘right’ people know how to do this professionally), and you are also smart enough not to do it except in the privacy of your own home. Your children say it never happened? You are terrorizing them and influencing them to say that. No medical records of any untoward abuse or suspected abuse? Well who would bring their kid into the doctors office for injuries sustained during abuse? You just didn’t bring them in, doesn’t mean there weren’t any injuries. Lie-detector test? Not admissible in court, and even if it were – who here fully believes in their scientific accuracy? Sorry – guess you can’t prove your innocence – no matter who you are.
Why is the court set up this way? In the supposed interest of the child. The ‘better safe than sorry’ motive. Many offenders are clever enough to abuse children without any clue as to their guilt. Better to assume guilt and take action until innocence can be proven. The problem here is this – if you are innocent, your children have been taken away and put in foster care, tramatized by doctors visits, the foster care system and social services….to start with. Is this really ‘safe’? And how is it not ‘sorry’ either way you look at it?
This is just the beginning of the terrorism of Americans at the hand of Social Services – and it is all perfectly legal – furthermore considered either socially acceptable, or out of the ignorance of most Americans, believed to be untrue.
« Don’t Ever Trust CPSCPS PLACEMENT, COURTS, FALSE ACCUSATIONS, ABUSE OF POWER, FIGHT CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES »
Fight Child Protective Services Help
By cbliss
If you are having difficulty processing how a person can be charged with any negligence or abuse related to a child and not be found innocent if they are indeed innocent – let me inform you of the differences between criminal court and family court. In criminal court the law does indeed maintain that a person is innocent until proven guilty. The state or prosecuter has the burden to prove that the defendant is guilty, in fact they have to prove it is reasonably possible just to get the defendent into court and tried. Some evidence must be obtained of some kind, and an indictment is needed. Therefore, while it is possible for an innocent person to be convicted of a crime, it is more difficult to do so.
In fact, this mantra ‘Innocent until proven guilty’ is so ingrained in our minds as Americans from tv, movies and culture that we mistakenly believe this is the law in ALL courts, and fail to be aware that it is only the law in criminal court. This is not the case in family court, where child abuse and neglect allegations are made. In family court there is no burden of proof on the state, county or prosecutor. Furthermore, you are guilty unless and until you can prove your innocence. Don’t believe it is true? Call up an attorney, friend or judge, or do an internet search to find out for yourself. This is not criminal court, and all abuse allegations begin in family court. If found guilty in family court by a judge, you may be tried in a criminal court – but only after.
One more thing – you can be punished for your ‘guilt’ (being you are believed guilty until you prove otherwise) before you are even brought before a judge.
Now let me ask you….if I accuse you of hitting your children in an abusive way how are you going to prove otherwise? Testimony of friends, family, bosses, co-workers, teachers and neighbors? No one has ever seen a mark on your child, heard of any abuse claims in the past or seen you abuse your children…..so what? Obviously you are clever enough to hit without leaving a mark (how many of us from watching too much tv know that the ‘right’ people know how to do this professionally), and you are also smart enough not to do it except in the privacy of your own home. Your children say it never happened? You are terrorizing them and influencing them to say that. No medical records of any untoward abuse or suspected abuse? Well who would bring their kid into the doctors office for injuries sustained during abuse? You just didn’t bring them in, doesn’t mean there weren’t any injuries. Lie-detector test? Not admissible in court, and even if it were – who here fully believes in their scientific accuracy? Sorry – guess you can’t prove your innocence – no matter who you are.
Why is the court set up this way? In the supposed interest of the child. The ‘better safe than sorry’ motive. Many offenders are clever enough to abuse children without any clue as to their guilt. Better to assume guilt and take action until innocence can be proven. The problem here is this – if you are innocent, your children have been taken away and put in foster care, tramatized by doctors visits, the foster care system and social services….to start with. Is this really ‘safe’? And how is it not ‘sorry’ either way you look at it?
This is just the beginning of the terrorism of Americans at the hand of Social Services – and it is all perfectly legal – furthermore considered either socially acceptable, or out of the ignorance of most Americans, believed to be untrue.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)