HELP Needed by Sunday Night on Potential Landmark Ruling in Judicial Corruption Fight
This is an urgent plea for assistance from those who care about the fight against judicial corruption.
I am seeking any legal research help that anyone can provide by Sunday evening, June 26, 2011.
We have an opportunity to get a court ruling here in Georgia that will pave the way for federal judges to be prosecuted for their corrupt criminal acts!
Can you research state law or contact anyone who knows how to? Or can you contact an attorney friend or law student or paralegal who would help you for free?
I conduct legal research all the time, but my experience is almost all in the federal court. My federal searches using www.versuslaw.com are not coming up with anything relevant on my issues.
Here’s the scoop. I have sued 58 federal judges, judicial employees, and the local Fulton County District Attorney in Fulton County Georgia Superior Court. Here is the Verified Complaint. I have filed a Georgia RICO action -- racketeering and corruption statute in GEORGIA, not federal RICO. My claims are totally state court causes of action, including perjury, subornation of perjury, and obstruction of justice. I used only state court causes of action as part of my precautions for keeping the case in state court. I specifically sued the judges as individuals in individual capacity, not in their official capacities as judges.
The bad guys (the federal judges) will try to remove the case to federal court (as they have done to me before) where they can continue their corruption and make the case go away. That way, the corrupt judges avoid prosecution, conviction, prison, and impeachment.
If you aren't familiar with "removal," it's laws that allow anyone to remove a case from a state or local court to a federal court. The case isn't supposed to remain in the federal court if it was improperly removed, but the corrupt federal judges simply do as they do most of the time and ignore the law because they could go to prison if they allow themselves to be tried in the local/state court. This is a matter that is appropriate for state court, not federal court.
In Fulton County Georgia Superior Court, I believe I can reach a jury in an unprecedented case that could blow the lid sky high on judicial corruption in all of our federal courts. So, we all desperately need for me to prevail in blocking the removal.
The removal statutes that the federal judges are trying to use is 28 U.S.C. 1442 (a)(1) and 28 U.S.C. 1442 (a)(3). See http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1442.html
Here is what the bad guys filed with their Notice of Removal in a similar case that I filed a few weeks ago -- Notice of Removal. They will file this or something very similar, so our goal is to beat them to the punch.
In Georgia, a Notice of Removal is invalid if (a) all the parties have not been served, and (b) if there is not unanimity in the Defendants requesting removal. In my case, the bad guys will not be able to comply with either of these requirements. I have deliberately not served most of the Defendants yet, and there are at least three Defendants who will not go along with the removal.
The trick is to find some cases in any state anywhere that give the non-federal judge the ability to issue a Temporary Restraining Order that will prohibit the federal defendants from filing a Notice of Removal. (The Notice of Removal will be illegal, but the federal statute puts the issue in the hands of the federal judges where they will ignore the law and screw you. That’s why we have to come up with any decision anywhere that will give a judge a case to lean on to encourage him to issue a TRO.)
Can you help?
Research 28 U.S.C. 1442 in your state. Research “Notice of Removal.” Research “remand” (which is what happens when a federal court send it back to the local court.) Research things that I know nothing about. Our goal here is to come up with one or more cases where a court has pre-empted the filing of a notice of removal by issuing a TRO. In my case, the bad guys have already filed three illegal notices of removal, so perhaps their proven track record of doing this may give us something else to research as to TROs.
If you have any questions, email me at bill@LawlessAmerica.com or call me at 770-578-1094.
Update, Saturday 10:45 am:
I am overwhelmed by the number of people who have responded to help! I cannot thank you enough. Please keep helping. I haven't been able to read a fraction of what has been provided, so I don't know if we have magic yet, so let's all keep looking.
William M. Windsor
Exposing Child UN-Protective Services and the Deceitful Practices They Use to Rip Families Apart/Where Relative Placement is NOT an Option, as Stated by a DCYF Supervisor
Unbiased Reporting
What I post on this Blog does not mean I agree with the articles or disagree. I call it Unbiased Reporting!
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Sunday, June 26, 2011
Saturday, June 25, 2011
The Constitution is DEAD in Family Court
The Constitution is DEAD in Family Court
AFRA EDITORIALS
By Leonard Henderson
June 25, 2011
The Constitution is DEAD in Family Court
...and it has been dead for a long time.
In the summer of 1999, when I was utterly confused why I was in trouble with CPS, it occurred to me to search the internet to see if other people were having similar problems with Oregon CPS.
That is how I found Will and Pamela Gaston's "A Voice for Children" website. They had been heavily involved in court cases for several years. I was absolutely SHOCKED at how lawless the Oregon courts were and the absolutely corrupt, insane decisions Gastons were getting.
Obviously the Constitution did not apply, nor did any actual laws either. CPS had a free hand to do whatever they wanted to. The courts would contrive any shitty "decision" necessary to defend the Status Quo and keep the agencies operating at their full, evil capacity. Everybody working in the system has a "get out of jail free" card. Right or wrong has nothing to do with it.
Watching how Pamela presented her cases to GET THE TRUTH ON THE RECORD was an extremely useful learning curve to me.
Along the line, it occurred to a bunch of us that we did not merely have a problem in our particular state- it was a nation-wide problem.
Not since the overthrow of the Weimar Republic have the leaders of a major democracy used their offices and the mass media to disseminate invective against millions of their own citizens. In fact it was Adolph Hitler who urged that “the state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people” and who explained, in the words of Rabbi Daniel Lapin, that “as long as government is perceived as working for the benefit of children, the people happily will endure almost any curtailment of liberty.” Using children to tug on our heartstrings may be not only a weakness of the sentimental. It also may be a ploy by those cynical and unscrupulous enough to exploit children for their own purposes. This is likely to be remembered as one of the most diabolical perversions of governmental power in our history, a time when we allowed children to be used and abused by fast-talking government officials and paid for it with our families, our social order and our constitutional rights.-- STEPHEN BASKERVILLE (in about 2000)
As we explored around the country, we ran into numerous dynamic people who were dealing with CPS THE HARD WAY. We ended up getting together and started the American Family Rights Association for the exact reason to develop and promote defense against the lawless fascist CPS and their colluding psychiatric contractors.
As far as we know, no state in the United State requires CPS to operate within Constitutional constrictions, because child abuse allegations are Civil in nature, not Criminal. See What Happens in the FOG. So if you are accused of having dirty dishes or not enough groceries, you have no more rights than the Jews did in Germany in 1940.
Ever since the 1950's, there has been an ever-growing emphasis on "The Child" world-wide. This has basically evolved into stripping EVERYBODY of all rights, replaced with the "Best Interest of the Child" mantra, which says that the child has some sort of a weird new "Civil Right" to have government make all their decisions for them. See Best interest of the child- A new "Civil Right".
Three years ago, I heard the Obamination say some words that made the hair raise up on the back of my neck- "Negative Liberties"-
..."But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can't do to you. Says what the Federal government can't do to you, but doesn't say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf, and that hasn't shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was, um, because the civil rights movement became so court focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change"...
The look on my face November 5, 2008 When the Obamination said that, I nearly fell off my chair.
I screamed at my TV "What kind of weird twisted up communist NewSpeak shit is THAT??
A Constitutional Right is a "Negative Liberty"?"
He even explained it- "Says what the states can't do to you".
(Constitutional Right or Negative Liberty, if you are in family court, you are at the mercy
of a lawless judge, who can just make stuff up as he goes along)
And then Obama twisted his Constitution comment into a RACE issue too.
Which confuses me greatly, because CPS is kidnapping more black kids than any other race.
Are they Napoleon's pups to be a new Obama Army?
So now, here's the brand new TIME magazine for July, 2011-
I have known about this for a couple days now, and frankly it has really been burning my guts. I really don't want to have to admit that the Constitution has been progressively reduced to insignificance, and the system now pretty much does whatever it wants to without feeling any particular constraint from the Constitution.
I really cannot understand how the Lefties can have so much confidence in tossing out our legal system for a Kangaroo court or China Court. I guess they believe that it's fine as long as the POWER remains in their hands to rape and destroy families.
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." --John F. Kennedy, In a speech at the White House, 1962
We know from dealing with CPS and the family courts for so many years now, Constitutional Rights do not apply- practically ANYWHERE anymore.
That's why we developed our advice in using Sworn Declarations to Make the Record in Court. It's about the only non-violent thing left we can do.
The fact is, CPS people have been committing CONSTITUTIONAL violations and Federal Crimes against America's families (crimes that the Federal Statutes call for the Death Penalty).
Us old fashioned Americans are really, REALLY PISSED. They had better hope that WE stick with Constitutional constraints (there are a bunch of us ready for WAR) when we start dishing it back to them for their TREASON.
"Nothing whatever but the constitutional law, the political structure, of these United States protects any American from arbitrary seizure of his property and his person, from the Gestapo and the Storm Troops, from the concentration camp, the torture chamber, the revolver at the back of his neck in a cellar." -Rose Lane
Comment on this story
"Better be wise by the misfortunes of others than by your own." --Aesop (c. 550 B.C.) legendary Greek fabulist
If CPS hasn't attacked YOUR FAMILY yet, see If you are ever approached by anyone from social services.... and WHEN THEY COME AFTER YOU
Learn as much as you can, as fast as you can at How To Fight CPS
Get YOUR VERSION OF HISTORY ON THE RECORD with your Sworn Declaration
Leonard Henderson, co-founder
American Family Rights Association
http://familyrights.us
"Until Every Child Comes Home" ©
"The Voice of America's Families" ©
I am not a lawyer and I do not pretend to give legal advice. If you need legal advice, see AFRA's Lawyer Friends who certainly are not pretenders (http://familyrights.us/info/law) I merely relate the things I learned in the past that seemed to work in my own case or things that others have related to me that worked in their cases. I provide information for free and do not expect to receive any form of payment or reward on this side of heaven. Therefore, DO NOT rely on this information as legal advice. Real Legal advice would come from a real lawyer who hates CPS and prepares a VIGOROUS DEFENSE against a negative (proving nothing happened) instead of talking you into a plea bargain (http://familyrights.us/bin/The_Problem_with_Plea_Bargaining.htm)
AFRA Editorials are NOT copyrighted. Please feel free to forward widely. We are at 100% total complete WAR with CPS, not trying to be famous or important.
AFRA EDITORIALS
By Leonard Henderson
June 25, 2011
The Constitution is DEAD in Family Court
...and it has been dead for a long time.
In the summer of 1999, when I was utterly confused why I was in trouble with CPS, it occurred to me to search the internet to see if other people were having similar problems with Oregon CPS.
That is how I found Will and Pamela Gaston's "A Voice for Children" website. They had been heavily involved in court cases for several years. I was absolutely SHOCKED at how lawless the Oregon courts were and the absolutely corrupt, insane decisions Gastons were getting.
Obviously the Constitution did not apply, nor did any actual laws either. CPS had a free hand to do whatever they wanted to. The courts would contrive any shitty "decision" necessary to defend the Status Quo and keep the agencies operating at their full, evil capacity. Everybody working in the system has a "get out of jail free" card. Right or wrong has nothing to do with it.
Watching how Pamela presented her cases to GET THE TRUTH ON THE RECORD was an extremely useful learning curve to me.
Along the line, it occurred to a bunch of us that we did not merely have a problem in our particular state- it was a nation-wide problem.
Not since the overthrow of the Weimar Republic have the leaders of a major democracy used their offices and the mass media to disseminate invective against millions of their own citizens. In fact it was Adolph Hitler who urged that “the state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people” and who explained, in the words of Rabbi Daniel Lapin, that “as long as government is perceived as working for the benefit of children, the people happily will endure almost any curtailment of liberty.” Using children to tug on our heartstrings may be not only a weakness of the sentimental. It also may be a ploy by those cynical and unscrupulous enough to exploit children for their own purposes. This is likely to be remembered as one of the most diabolical perversions of governmental power in our history, a time when we allowed children to be used and abused by fast-talking government officials and paid for it with our families, our social order and our constitutional rights.-- STEPHEN BASKERVILLE (in about 2000)
As we explored around the country, we ran into numerous dynamic people who were dealing with CPS THE HARD WAY. We ended up getting together and started the American Family Rights Association for the exact reason to develop and promote defense against the lawless fascist CPS and their colluding psychiatric contractors.
As far as we know, no state in the United State requires CPS to operate within Constitutional constrictions, because child abuse allegations are Civil in nature, not Criminal. See What Happens in the FOG. So if you are accused of having dirty dishes or not enough groceries, you have no more rights than the Jews did in Germany in 1940.
Ever since the 1950's, there has been an ever-growing emphasis on "The Child" world-wide. This has basically evolved into stripping EVERYBODY of all rights, replaced with the "Best Interest of the Child" mantra, which says that the child has some sort of a weird new "Civil Right" to have government make all their decisions for them. See Best interest of the child- A new "Civil Right".
Three years ago, I heard the Obamination say some words that made the hair raise up on the back of my neck- "Negative Liberties"-
..."But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can't do to you. Says what the Federal government can't do to you, but doesn't say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf, and that hasn't shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was, um, because the civil rights movement became so court focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change"...
The look on my face November 5, 2008 When the Obamination said that, I nearly fell off my chair.
I screamed at my TV "What kind of weird twisted up communist NewSpeak shit is THAT??
A Constitutional Right is a "Negative Liberty"?"
He even explained it- "Says what the states can't do to you".
(Constitutional Right or Negative Liberty, if you are in family court, you are at the mercy
of a lawless judge, who can just make stuff up as he goes along)
And then Obama twisted his Constitution comment into a RACE issue too.
Which confuses me greatly, because CPS is kidnapping more black kids than any other race.
Are they Napoleon's pups to be a new Obama Army?
So now, here's the brand new TIME magazine for July, 2011-
I have known about this for a couple days now, and frankly it has really been burning my guts. I really don't want to have to admit that the Constitution has been progressively reduced to insignificance, and the system now pretty much does whatever it wants to without feeling any particular constraint from the Constitution.
I really cannot understand how the Lefties can have so much confidence in tossing out our legal system for a Kangaroo court or China Court. I guess they believe that it's fine as long as the POWER remains in their hands to rape and destroy families.
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." --John F. Kennedy, In a speech at the White House, 1962
We know from dealing with CPS and the family courts for so many years now, Constitutional Rights do not apply- practically ANYWHERE anymore.
That's why we developed our advice in using Sworn Declarations to Make the Record in Court. It's about the only non-violent thing left we can do.
The fact is, CPS people have been committing CONSTITUTIONAL violations and Federal Crimes against America's families (crimes that the Federal Statutes call for the Death Penalty).
Us old fashioned Americans are really, REALLY PISSED. They had better hope that WE stick with Constitutional constraints (there are a bunch of us ready for WAR) when we start dishing it back to them for their TREASON.
"Nothing whatever but the constitutional law, the political structure, of these United States protects any American from arbitrary seizure of his property and his person, from the Gestapo and the Storm Troops, from the concentration camp, the torture chamber, the revolver at the back of his neck in a cellar." -Rose Lane
Comment on this story
"Better be wise by the misfortunes of others than by your own." --Aesop (c. 550 B.C.) legendary Greek fabulist
If CPS hasn't attacked YOUR FAMILY yet, see If you are ever approached by anyone from social services.... and WHEN THEY COME AFTER YOU
Learn as much as you can, as fast as you can at How To Fight CPS
Get YOUR VERSION OF HISTORY ON THE RECORD with your Sworn Declaration
Leonard Henderson, co-founder
American Family Rights Association
http://familyrights.us
"Until Every Child Comes Home" ©
"The Voice of America's Families" ©
I am not a lawyer and I do not pretend to give legal advice. If you need legal advice, see AFRA's Lawyer Friends who certainly are not pretenders (http://familyrights.us/info/law) I merely relate the things I learned in the past that seemed to work in my own case or things that others have related to me that worked in their cases. I provide information for free and do not expect to receive any form of payment or reward on this side of heaven. Therefore, DO NOT rely on this information as legal advice. Real Legal advice would come from a real lawyer who hates CPS and prepares a VIGOROUS DEFENSE against a negative (proving nothing happened) instead of talking you into a plea bargain (http://familyrights.us/bin/The_Problem_with_Plea_Bargaining.htm)
AFRA Editorials are NOT copyrighted. Please feel free to forward widely. We are at 100% total complete WAR with CPS, not trying to be famous or important.
PSYCHO-ANTILIPSEY - How Social Services and CPS might manipulate you through Perception Control Management: Technique revealed
PSYCHO-ANTILIPSEY - How Social Services and CPS might manipulate you through Perception Control Management: Technique revealed
by Cess Ssec
June 24, 2011
NOTE TO PARENTS VICTIMIZED by CPS and SOCIAL SERVICES
This is a previously, unknown and undocumented technique that is generally used by most of the CPS's and social service agencies to corral families into submission, through psychological intimidation and assault.
One might encounter, a slight complexity in understanding how this technique might be applied against a targeted parent or family to steal their child under the guise of protecting them. However, all information is relevant to it's use and all information is weaponized. We have identified and named it for you, so you can recognize the method and its potential if and when, it is ever used against you. Please study the definition and promote it, wherever possible.
We will continue to author new information, create additional tools and disseminate intelligence to help protect your family, from the social engineers that have indicated their intentions against you.
[SSEC] Social Service Economic Crime (research)
Protecting Children and Families from Social Service Fraud and Abuse
© Copyright 2011.
SSEC is a research group of experts in the field of social services, structured to investigate and analyze how the social service industry functions. SSEC (research) prepares studies and analysis then provides its recommendations to the competent authorities.
cess.ssec@gmail.com
__________________________________________________________________________________
PSYCHO-ANTILIPSEY [psy-cho-anti-lip-sey]
Is a technique of perception control management, that could be used by a social service agency against an individual, to create a false representation of that individual, or create an event that does not exist, for the purpose of wrongly influencing others.
The process consists, of any number of methods or formulas already developed and borrowed from various disciplines and sub-disciplines, such as behavior science, psychological operations, psychological warfare, Platonian dialectics and nuero-linguistic programming.
Formulas and or methods are used to manage the perception of an individuals image, speech, actions, reactions, or to change and control the perception of an event to influence an intended audience, for profit.
A manufactured representation, of an individual could be fabricated and weaponized with propaganda at any time, without the knowledge of that individual.
This is accomplished by creating a false representation to achieve the proper response, from a targeted audience the social service engineer's objectives is designed to obtain.
For example, PSYCHO-ANTILIPSEY could be used to manipulate a victim or an event, to control an outcome of an investigation or wrongly influence the judgment of a court case.
PSYCHO-ANTILIPSEY was created for and is the intellectual property of:
[SSEC] Social Service Economic Crime (research) © Copyright 2011. All rights reserved.
This definition may be reproduced with attribution of authorship to:
[SSEC] Social Service Economic Crimes (research)
and a link to this article.
_____________________________________
Nicolas Stathopoulos
Social service crimes researcher
[SSEC] Social Service Economic Crime (research)
cess.ssec@gmail.com
by Cess Ssec
June 24, 2011
NOTE TO PARENTS VICTIMIZED by CPS and SOCIAL SERVICES
This is a previously, unknown and undocumented technique that is generally used by most of the CPS's and social service agencies to corral families into submission, through psychological intimidation and assault.
One might encounter, a slight complexity in understanding how this technique might be applied against a targeted parent or family to steal their child under the guise of protecting them. However, all information is relevant to it's use and all information is weaponized. We have identified and named it for you, so you can recognize the method and its potential if and when, it is ever used against you. Please study the definition and promote it, wherever possible.
We will continue to author new information, create additional tools and disseminate intelligence to help protect your family, from the social engineers that have indicated their intentions against you.
[SSEC] Social Service Economic Crime (research)
Protecting Children and Families from Social Service Fraud and Abuse
© Copyright 2011.
SSEC is a research group of experts in the field of social services, structured to investigate and analyze how the social service industry functions. SSEC (research) prepares studies and analysis then provides its recommendations to the competent authorities.
cess.ssec@gmail.com
__________________________________________________________________________________
PSYCHO-ANTILIPSEY [psy-cho-anti-lip-sey]
Is a technique of perception control management, that could be used by a social service agency against an individual, to create a false representation of that individual, or create an event that does not exist, for the purpose of wrongly influencing others.
The process consists, of any number of methods or formulas already developed and borrowed from various disciplines and sub-disciplines, such as behavior science, psychological operations, psychological warfare, Platonian dialectics and nuero-linguistic programming.
Formulas and or methods are used to manage the perception of an individuals image, speech, actions, reactions, or to change and control the perception of an event to influence an intended audience, for profit.
A manufactured representation, of an individual could be fabricated and weaponized with propaganda at any time, without the knowledge of that individual.
This is accomplished by creating a false representation to achieve the proper response, from a targeted audience the social service engineer's objectives is designed to obtain.
For example, PSYCHO-ANTILIPSEY could be used to manipulate a victim or an event, to control an outcome of an investigation or wrongly influence the judgment of a court case.
PSYCHO-ANTILIPSEY was created for and is the intellectual property of:
[SSEC] Social Service Economic Crime (research) © Copyright 2011. All rights reserved.
This definition may be reproduced with attribution of authorship to:
[SSEC] Social Service Economic Crimes (research)
and a link to this article.
_____________________________________
Nicolas Stathopoulos
Social service crimes researcher
[SSEC] Social Service Economic Crime (research)
cess.ssec@gmail.com
Social workers see sense – it's just a shame they're not ours
Social workers see sense – it's just a shame they're not ours - Telegraph
Vicky Haigh fled to Ireland to escape her council's social workers, but they haven't given up, reports Christopher Booker.
Vicky Haigh fled to Ireland to escape her council's social workers, but they haven't given up, reports Christopher Booker.
The Attack on the Family Continues as Same-Sex Marriage is Legalized in New York
The Attack on the Family Continues as Same-Sex Marriage is Legalized in New York « The Everyday Christian
Last night same-sex marriage became law in the state of New York when Gov. Cuomo signed the bill. New York became the second state to legalize same-sex marriage through the legislative process (New Hampshire was the first). Four other states have legalized same-sex marriage through the court system. They are Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, and Vermont.
Last night same-sex marriage became law in the state of New York when Gov. Cuomo signed the bill. New York became the second state to legalize same-sex marriage through the legislative process (New Hampshire was the first). Four other states have legalized same-sex marriage through the court system. They are Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, and Vermont.
Mass drugging of schoolchildren remains dark secret of public education, psychiatry
Mass drugging of schoolchildren remains dark secret of public education, psychiatry
Believe it or not, until recently, it has been perfectly legal for schools to force schoolchildren to be put on psychoactive mind-altering drugs as a condition of attending that school. That is, the school administrator or counselor could insist that a certain child be dosed with mind-altering drugs. It sounds bizarre, but it was absolutely true until just recently.
Learn more:
Believe it or not, until recently, it has been perfectly legal for schools to force schoolchildren to be put on psychoactive mind-altering drugs as a condition of attending that school. That is, the school administrator or counselor could insist that a certain child be dosed with mind-altering drugs. It sounds bizarre, but it was absolutely true until just recently.
Learn more:
Psychiatrists with corrupt pasts found working in juvenile justice facilities and doping children
Psychiatrists with corrupt pasts found working in juvenile justice facilities and doping children
(NaturalNews) An investigation into the massive drugging of kids in Florida juvenile jails has uncovered psychiatric doctors with deplorable records working for the state's Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ). Their histories include not only grand theft and medical malpractice, but overmedicating patients to the point of death.
Learn more:
(NaturalNews) An investigation into the massive drugging of kids in Florida juvenile jails has uncovered psychiatric doctors with deplorable records working for the state's Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ). Their histories include not only grand theft and medical malpractice, but overmedicating patients to the point of death.
Learn more:
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)