Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Sunday, June 5, 2011
Foster Mom's License Revoked
Foster Mom's License Revoked - :: Cincinnati news story :: LOCAL 12 WKRC-TV in Cincinnati
A seven month old girl dies in foster care.The girl's foster mother is getting her license revoked.
Lighthouse Youth Services officials asked state officials to de-certify the woman. But this investigation is far from over.
"The children services department has substantiated child abuse."
A seven month old girl dies in foster care.The girl's foster mother is getting her license revoked.
Lighthouse Youth Services officials asked state officials to de-certify the woman. But this investigation is far from over.
"The children services department has substantiated child abuse."
Speaking of Immigrant Right's Terminated Illegally:Austin Knightly's Immigrant Father's Right's Terminated Illegally Also!
Austin Ricardo Gamez-Knightly was born on January 25th, 2000 in Nashua, NH. His father, Ricardo Arturo Gamez, was an illegal immigrant from Honduras, living and working in Nashua for many year's.
Austin was only a couple of month's old when his father was arrested and sent to jail for giving a false name and then deported back to Honduras. Austin didn't see his father after he was deported. His father was afraid of being arrested if he returned to the U.S. for his son, so he staid away.
Austin's mother lost custody of him to the State of NH in January of 2006, after she was arrested at Nashua DCYFs cohort Hospital for intoxication. She was charged with Child Endangerment, a criminal charge that was later dropped, after hidden lab test result's from that night proved there was no alcohol in her system. Austin was still never returned as the caseworker and CASA worker vowed to make sure he wasn't returned. Nashua District Court's Judge LeFrancois refused to dismiss the false charges against Austin's mother or to admit the evidence proving innocence.
Austin's mother was later hand delivered TPR paperwork from the Sheriff's Dept. for the Termination of Parental Right's of Austin's father. While reading over the paperwork, we noticed the Petition was not for Austin's father, but for a man thirteen year's younger from Nashua. We immediately notified the DCYF caseworker that they had the wrong man. Her response,"Oh well, no big deal. It doesn't matter." It most certainly does matter. A fictitious man's right's were terminated on September 25,2007, making it easier to terminate Austin's mother's right's, without having to contact his REAL father, whom DCYF and the Court's had ALL information on.
Immigrant's may be in this country illegally, but does that give our court's the right to steal their children? Should their right's be taken because they were deported?
Austin was ILLEGALLY adopted in December of 2009, or so we've been told by NH DCYF. But who know's when he was adopted for sure, or if in fact he was adopted, knowing DCYFs horrible track record of NEVER telling the truth.
Below are document's of proof as to the above horrible story:
Austin's Mother Lab work showing NO ALCOHOL
Judge LeFrancois denial to present new evidence, drop charges of abuse and neglect AND vacate the order's of the Nashua District Court
Judge LeFrncois-Page 2
Termination of Fictitious Man's Right's Page 1 and 2
Austin's Birth Certificate Before he was Illegally Adopted
Austin was only a couple of month's old when his father was arrested and sent to jail for giving a false name and then deported back to Honduras. Austin didn't see his father after he was deported. His father was afraid of being arrested if he returned to the U.S. for his son, so he staid away.
Austin's mother lost custody of him to the State of NH in January of 2006, after she was arrested at Nashua DCYFs cohort Hospital for intoxication. She was charged with Child Endangerment, a criminal charge that was later dropped, after hidden lab test result's from that night proved there was no alcohol in her system. Austin was still never returned as the caseworker and CASA worker vowed to make sure he wasn't returned. Nashua District Court's Judge LeFrancois refused to dismiss the false charges against Austin's mother or to admit the evidence proving innocence.
Austin's mother was later hand delivered TPR paperwork from the Sheriff's Dept. for the Termination of Parental Right's of Austin's father. While reading over the paperwork, we noticed the Petition was not for Austin's father, but for a man thirteen year's younger from Nashua. We immediately notified the DCYF caseworker that they had the wrong man. Her response,"Oh well, no big deal. It doesn't matter." It most certainly does matter. A fictitious man's right's were terminated on September 25,2007, making it easier to terminate Austin's mother's right's, without having to contact his REAL father, whom DCYF and the Court's had ALL information on.
Immigrant's may be in this country illegally, but does that give our court's the right to steal their children? Should their right's be taken because they were deported?
Austin was ILLEGALLY adopted in December of 2009, or so we've been told by NH DCYF. But who know's when he was adopted for sure, or if in fact he was adopted, knowing DCYFs horrible track record of NEVER telling the truth.
Below are document's of proof as to the above horrible story:
Austin's Mother Lab work showing NO ALCOHOL
Judge LeFrancois denial to present new evidence, drop charges of abuse and neglect AND vacate the order's of the Nashua District Court
Judge LeFrncois-Page 2
Termination of Fictitious Man's Right's Page 1 and 2
Austin's Birth Certificate Before he was Illegally Adopted
Missouri court rules immigrant's adoption rights terminated illegally
Missouri court rules immigrant's adoption rights terminated illegally - CNN
January 25, 2011|By the CNN Wire Staff
The Missouri Supreme Court Tuesday overturned a lower court ruling that terminated the parental rights of a Guatemalan woman whose son, the woman says, was adopted without her consent while she was imprisoned following an immigration sting in 2007.
The court ruled that the state violated its own laws in terminating the parental rights of Encarnacion Bail Romero, but the supreme court sent the case back to the lower court for retrial rather than return the boy to his biological mother.
Read more at the above link and also read the Missouri Supreme Court Ruling at:
http://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=43941
January 25, 2011|By the CNN Wire Staff
The Missouri Supreme Court Tuesday overturned a lower court ruling that terminated the parental rights of a Guatemalan woman whose son, the woman says, was adopted without her consent while she was imprisoned following an immigration sting in 2007.
The court ruled that the state violated its own laws in terminating the parental rights of Encarnacion Bail Romero, but the supreme court sent the case back to the lower court for retrial rather than return the boy to his biological mother.
Read more at the above link and also read the Missouri Supreme Court Ruling at:
http://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=43941
Saturday, June 4, 2011
LAW REFORM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
LAW REFORM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE | Parents Rights Blog
There are many procedures by which citizens can challenge the legality of decisions made by public bodies. They include: Judicial review: court proceedings in which a judge is asked to review the lawfulness of the decision which is being challenged; Complaints procedures such as the social service complaints procedure; and Ombudsman schemes such as the
via IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE.
There are many procedures by which citizens can challenge the legality of decisions made by public bodies. They include: Judicial review: court proceedings in which a judge is asked to review the lawfulness of the decision which is being challenged; Complaints procedures such as the social service complaints procedure; and Ombudsman schemes such as the
via IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE.
ADHD Diagnosis, Treatment Differ Across the Globe-The U.S. use drug's
ADHD Diagnosis, Treatment Differ Across the Globe
In the U.S. the children are drugged that are diagnosed with ADHD. Especially Foster children, because Child Protective Services doesn't won't to deal with them. For that matter, most foster parent's don't want to either. An active, busy child doesn't need to be drugged!
Economic, historical, and political forces and cultural values affect the implementation of treatment for ADHD worldwide.
In Israel, highly active children are well tolerated in the classroom, making it difficult to distinguish high activity from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) manifestation. In Brazil, light physical punishment is considered by a large number of teachers to be “therapeutic,” and physical exercise is considered a viable alternative to medication for children with ADHD. In Canada, health professionals view ADHD as an impairing, often lifelong disorder that requires careful assessment and multimodal intervention.
In the U.S. the children are drugged that are diagnosed with ADHD. Especially Foster children, because Child Protective Services doesn't won't to deal with them. For that matter, most foster parent's don't want to either. An active, busy child doesn't need to be drugged!
Economic, historical, and political forces and cultural values affect the implementation of treatment for ADHD worldwide.
In Israel, highly active children are well tolerated in the classroom, making it difficult to distinguish high activity from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) manifestation. In Brazil, light physical punishment is considered by a large number of teachers to be “therapeutic,” and physical exercise is considered a viable alternative to medication for children with ADHD. In Canada, health professionals view ADHD as an impairing, often lifelong disorder that requires careful assessment and multimodal intervention.
Older Americans Act & the Aging Network
Older Americans Act & the Aging Network
Older Americans Act
Congress passed the Older Americans Act (OAA) in 1965 in response to concern by policymakers about a lack of community social services for older persons. The original legislation established authority for grants to States for community planning and social services, research and development projects, and personnel training in the field of aging. The law also established the Administration on Aging (AoA) to administer the newly created grant programs and to serve as the Federal focal point on matters concerning older persons.
Although older individuals may receive services under many other Federal programs, today the OAA is considered to be the major vehicle for the organization and delivery of social and nutrition services to this group and their caregivers. It authorizes a wide array of service programs through a national network of 56 State agencies on aging, 629 area agencies on aging, nearly 20,000 service providers, 244 Tribal organizations, and 2 Native Hawaiian organizations representing 400 Tribes. The OAA also includes community service employment for low-income older Americans; training, research, and demonstration activities in the field of aging; and vulnerable elder rights protection activities. The links below offer an unofficial compilation of the OAA, an outline of changes made to the OAA at the most recent reauthorization (2006), a set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) about the OAA and other related sources of information/data.
Please select from the topics below to learn more:
Unofficial Compilation of Older Americans Act, as amended in 2006
Outline of 2006 Amendments to Older Americans Act
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Historical Evolution of Programs for Older Americans
Older Americans Act Regulations (1988), 45 CFR Part 1321 (Title III)
Grants for State and Community Programs on Aging
Older Americans Act Regulations (1988), 45 CFR Part 1326 (Title VI)
Grants to Indian Tribes for Support and Nutrition Services
Older Americans Act Regulations (1988), 45 CFR Part 1328 (Title VI)
Grants for Supportive and Nutritional Services to Older Hawaiian Natives
Older Americans Act
Congress passed the Older Americans Act (OAA) in 1965 in response to concern by policymakers about a lack of community social services for older persons. The original legislation established authority for grants to States for community planning and social services, research and development projects, and personnel training in the field of aging. The law also established the Administration on Aging (AoA) to administer the newly created grant programs and to serve as the Federal focal point on matters concerning older persons.
Although older individuals may receive services under many other Federal programs, today the OAA is considered to be the major vehicle for the organization and delivery of social and nutrition services to this group and their caregivers. It authorizes a wide array of service programs through a national network of 56 State agencies on aging, 629 area agencies on aging, nearly 20,000 service providers, 244 Tribal organizations, and 2 Native Hawaiian organizations representing 400 Tribes. The OAA also includes community service employment for low-income older Americans; training, research, and demonstration activities in the field of aging; and vulnerable elder rights protection activities. The links below offer an unofficial compilation of the OAA, an outline of changes made to the OAA at the most recent reauthorization (2006), a set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) about the OAA and other related sources of information/data.
Please select from the topics below to learn more:
Unofficial Compilation of Older Americans Act, as amended in 2006
Outline of 2006 Amendments to Older Americans Act
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Historical Evolution of Programs for Older Americans
Older Americans Act Regulations (1988), 45 CFR Part 1321 (Title III)
Grants for State and Community Programs on Aging
Older Americans Act Regulations (1988), 45 CFR Part 1326 (Title VI)
Grants to Indian Tribes for Support and Nutrition Services
Older Americans Act Regulations (1988), 45 CFR Part 1328 (Title VI)
Grants for Supportive and Nutritional Services to Older Hawaiian Natives
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)