Anthrax vaccine: Children targeted for testing | Patriotpainter's Blog
On May 2, 2011, Department of Health and Human Services announced it will buy 3.42 million doses of Bio-thrax a vaccine developed by the military to counter its weaponized anthrax that it also developed. The problem is, the vaccine is known to be worthless in the event of an attack because of the time it takes to become effective (they don’t know for sure that it is) and you have to get two doses of the vaccine to get any benefit at all.
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Saturday, May 14, 2011
The Truth Bites "NH": WHERE TO REPORT CHILD SUPPORT OVERPAYMENTS AND UNDERPAYMENTS
The Truth Bites "NH": WHERE TO REPORT CHILD SUPPORT
OVERPAYMENTS AND UNDERPAYMENTS
Saturday, May 14, 2011
WHERE TO REPORT CHILD SUPPORT OVERPAYMENTS AND UNDERPAYMENTS
New Hampshire Family's should be Aware that the same problems exist here.
Child Support Overpayments: Lawsuit Alleges State of Ohio Withholds Too Much Money, Unfairly Charging Parents and U.S. Taxpayers - By American Coalition for Fathers and Children Published: Tuesday, May. 10, 2011 - 8:01 am
November 2010 through May 2011 an investigated by DMVC shows the state of New Hampshire is engaging in:
Overpayment's and Underpayments to parents providing and receiving Child Support. Statements show that parent's payments were received and the current amount owed. Be aware that in the cases we investigated, you will find in many that parents have over paid, moreover that the receiving parent has been underpaid! Several accounts show that overpayment's are as high as $300 to several thousand. Furthermore, parents requesting reimbursements have been put off and have not received the overpayment's to date; much like Ohio they are being told they will have to wait until the child turns 18.
FIND OUT WHERE YOU CHILD SUPPORT LIES CALL YOUR CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION AND ASK FOR AN UP TO DATE CHILD SUPPORT STATEMENT.
Once you receive your statement it will show how much was collected line by line and how much was paid by and to both parties be aware of (-) signs indicating the overpayment's and not underpayments.
Discrepancy's shows the payor’s have overpaid; and the payee (the person who receives the child support) have been underpaid. This causes discord between the parties that is needless, senseless and premeditated by the government.
For New Hampshire the discrepancies are starting to be investigated by the Federal Department and should be reported to:
Mr. Truong Tran DHHS Program Specialist
1-617-565-2459
Region 1 Child Support Enforcement Office
JFK Federal Building - Government Center
Room 2025
Boston Mass. 02203
Or can be emailed to trtran@acf.hhs.gov
!!When you know better you can do better!!
OVERPAYMENTS AND UNDERPAYMENTS
Saturday, May 14, 2011
WHERE TO REPORT CHILD SUPPORT OVERPAYMENTS AND UNDERPAYMENTS
New Hampshire Family's should be Aware that the same problems exist here.
Child Support Overpayments: Lawsuit Alleges State of Ohio Withholds Too Much Money, Unfairly Charging Parents and U.S. Taxpayers - By American Coalition for Fathers and Children Published: Tuesday, May. 10, 2011 - 8:01 am
November 2010 through May 2011 an investigated by DMVC shows the state of New Hampshire is engaging in:
Overpayment's and Underpayments to parents providing and receiving Child Support. Statements show that parent's payments were received and the current amount owed. Be aware that in the cases we investigated, you will find in many that parents have over paid, moreover that the receiving parent has been underpaid! Several accounts show that overpayment's are as high as $300 to several thousand. Furthermore, parents requesting reimbursements have been put off and have not received the overpayment's to date; much like Ohio they are being told they will have to wait until the child turns 18.
FIND OUT WHERE YOU CHILD SUPPORT LIES CALL YOUR CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION AND ASK FOR AN UP TO DATE CHILD SUPPORT STATEMENT.
Once you receive your statement it will show how much was collected line by line and how much was paid by and to both parties be aware of (-) signs indicating the overpayment's and not underpayments.
Discrepancy's shows the payor’s have overpaid; and the payee (the person who receives the child support) have been underpaid. This causes discord between the parties that is needless, senseless and premeditated by the government.
For New Hampshire the discrepancies are starting to be investigated by the Federal Department and should be reported to:
Mr. Truong Tran DHHS Program Specialist
1-617-565-2459
Region 1 Child Support Enforcement Office
JFK Federal Building - Government Center
Room 2025
Boston Mass. 02203
Or can be emailed to trtran@acf.hhs.gov
!!When you know better you can do better!!
Adoption subsidies help children find a family -
Adoption subsidies help children find a family - thestar.com
Most children removed from their families for their own protection do not get placed with a permanent new family. They are shuffled through various foster homes or, worse still, placed in institutional group homes.
Most children removed from their families for their own protection do not get placed with a permanent new family. They are shuffled through various foster homes or, worse still, placed in institutional group homes.
Principal Family Court Judge welcomes review
Radio New Zealand : News : National : Principal Family Court Judge welcomes review
The review, approved by Cabinet in April, will focus on improving the Court and ensuring its processes are straightforward and meet the needs of vulnerable people, particularly children.
The review, approved by Cabinet in April, will focus on improving the Court and ensuring its processes are straightforward and meet the needs of vulnerable people, particularly children.
Grandparent's Right's-Case Law
Leonard Henderson ALSO CASE LAW- Because of the magnitude of the liberty interests of parents and adult extended family members in the care and companionship of children, the Fourteenth Amendment protects these substantive due process liberty interests by prohibiting the government from depriving fit parents of custody of their children. See Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 651, 92 S.Ct. 1208, 31 L.Ed.2d 551 (1972); Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 760, 102 S.Ct. 1388, 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982); Duchesne v. Sugarman, 566 F.2d 817, 824 (2d Cir. 1977); Hurlman v. Rice, 927 F.2d 74, 79 (2d Cir. 1991). In the United States Supreme Court’s view, the state registers "no gains toward its stated goals [of protecting children] when it separates a fit parent from the custody of his children." Stanley, 405 U.S. at 652.
Grandparents are also entitled to procedural due process. “An essential principle of due process is that a deprivation of life, liberty, or property ‘be preceded by notice and opportunity for hearing appropriate to the nature of the case.’” Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 542, 105 S.Ct. 1487, 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985) (quoting Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 70 S.Ct. 652, 94 L.Ed.2d 865 (1950)).
The grandchildren have a Fourth Amendment right not to be seized by the government for child protective purposes unless it has probable cause to believe that the children have been neglected. Tenenbaum v. Williams, 193 F.3d 581 (2d Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1098, 120 S.Ct. 1832, 146 L.Ed.2d 776 (2000). Probable cause exists only if the officials have persuasive evidence of serious ongoing abuse and reason to fear imminent recurrence. Robison v. Via, 821 F.2d 913, 922 (2d Cir. 1987).
Grandparents cannot be dismissed from the dependency case because the dependency case is the only legal way that the state can interfere with their custody. The state must prove that they are abusive or neglectful and that the children would be at risk of immediate serious harm if returned
Grandparents are also entitled to procedural due process. “An essential principle of due process is that a deprivation of life, liberty, or property ‘be preceded by notice and opportunity for hearing appropriate to the nature of the case.’” Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 542, 105 S.Ct. 1487, 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985) (quoting Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 70 S.Ct. 652, 94 L.Ed.2d 865 (1950)).
The grandchildren have a Fourth Amendment right not to be seized by the government for child protective purposes unless it has probable cause to believe that the children have been neglected. Tenenbaum v. Williams, 193 F.3d 581 (2d Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1098, 120 S.Ct. 1832, 146 L.Ed.2d 776 (2000). Probable cause exists only if the officials have persuasive evidence of serious ongoing abuse and reason to fear imminent recurrence. Robison v. Via, 821 F.2d 913, 922 (2d Cir. 1987).
Grandparents cannot be dismissed from the dependency case because the dependency case is the only legal way that the state can interfere with their custody. The state must prove that they are abusive or neglectful and that the children would be at risk of immediate serious harm if returned
Friday, May 13, 2011
Agencies put families first
Agencies put families first - Medford News - KTVL.com
MEDFORD, Ore. — Jackson County agencies celebrated families Thursday.
Several nonprofits including OnTrack, CASA and The Child Welfare Center have dedicated the last few years to keeping families together. Traditionally, children of parents suffering from drug addictions are removed from their families and put into foster care. Now, local agencies are working together to provide treatment services to parents, while allowing their families to stay together.
The director of OnTrack says this effort has reduced the amount of children in foster care by 40 percent since 2007.
"We love it because of the damage that is done with children when they're removed from families, anything to keep them safely at home," said Rita Sullivan.
MEDFORD, Ore. — Jackson County agencies celebrated families Thursday.
Several nonprofits including OnTrack, CASA and The Child Welfare Center have dedicated the last few years to keeping families together. Traditionally, children of parents suffering from drug addictions are removed from their families and put into foster care. Now, local agencies are working together to provide treatment services to parents, while allowing their families to stay together.
The director of OnTrack says this effort has reduced the amount of children in foster care by 40 percent since 2007.
"We love it because of the damage that is done with children when they're removed from families, anything to keep them safely at home," said Rita Sullivan.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)