[WATCH]: Crime and Punishment: Child Protective Services Busted! | business services
HELLO, US ATTORNEYS GENERAL!!!!! DO YOU WANT TO GET THE BAD GUYS, SEIZE ASSETS WORTH MILLIONS, AND BECOME OUTRAGEOUSLY FAMOUS AND LOVED BY MILLIONS, NOT JUST IN AMERICA, BUT ALL OVER THE WORLD? IF SO, THEN NOW IS THE TIME TO GET THE CRIMINALS WHO ARE DESTROYING CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, THE CRIMINALS WITHIN CPS WHO ARE KIDNAPPING CHILDREN FROM GOOD FAMILIES, COMMITING PERJURY, FRAUD, TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE, ENACTING RETRIBUTION ON WITNESSES, AND ENGAGING IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY – MAKE A NAME FOR YOURSELF, AND GET A TON OF PUBLICITY AND GO DOWN IN HISTORY AS THE ONE WHO DID THE WORLD A WORLD OF GOOD. EVERYONE CAN SEE THIS COMING – DON’T WAIT FOR TOMORROW, BE A LEADER, TODAY, AND MAKE HISTORY! AND THINK HOW PROUD YOUR MOM WILL BE OF YOU. SERIOUSLY. Thе Racketeer Influenced аnԁ Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO Act οr RICO) іѕ a United States federal law thаt provides fοr extended criminal penalties аnԁ a civil cause οf action fοr acts performed аѕ раrt οf аn ongoing criminal organization. RICO hаѕ bееn used tο prosecute organized crime, including thе Mafia, thе Hells Angels, аnԁ thе Key West Police Department іn Monroe County, Florida. International equivalents οf RICO аrе аѕ follows: In Australia thе Australian Crime Commission hаѕ powers based οn similar legislation аnԁ regulations. Nеw Zealand hаѕ a similar agreement аnԁ commission. In Canada, thе Royal Canadian Mounted Police аnԁ thе Office οf thе Superintendent οf Financial Institutions enforce policy аnԁ …
Exposing Child UN-Protective Services and the Deceitful Practices They Use to Rip Families Apart/Where Relative Placement is NOT an Option, as Stated by a DCYF Supervisor
Unbiased Reporting
What I post on this Blog does not mean I agree with the articles or disagree. I call it Unbiased Reporting!
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Sunday, March 6, 2011
Child Protective Services: CPS & Police Abuse Constitution, Invading Homes, Kidnapping Children, Ignoring Courts, and Criminalizing Americans. Polygamist FLDS Raid Sheds Light on More Cases.
Child Protective Services: CPS & Police Abuse Constitution, Invading Homes, Kidnapping Children, Ignoring Courts, and Criminalizing Americans. Polygamist FLDS Raid Sheds Light on More Cases. | Free Classified Ads Cardiff.Com
Child Protective Services can take your children too. CPS has come to believe they are above the law and the Constitution, that they do not need a search warrant to come into your home, label you as a child abuser for any reason and make you a criminal based upon their opinion alone, take your children away in a paddy wagon, and put your kids into foster homes pending a court hearing where CPS will try their best to win and permanently take custody of your kids. If CPS loses, they will continue to fight you, slandering your family and listing you as a child abuser in government databases. CPS is an abusive government agency spiraling completely out of control. It’s time to shut them down. The unlawful removal of 468 children from the FLDS ranch in west Texas, has put CPS under the microscope. That case has led others to wonder if they can do that to FLDS children, can CPS do that to my children? CBS 42 investigative reporter, Nancy Wilson, shows us one family who says the same thing happened to them, and eight years later they are still trying to clear their names. This is the Gates family, Gary and Melissa have 13 children, 11 of them adopted. They saw a need for kids from a variety of backgrounds who need love in a stable home. Imagine their surprise when 11 government employees, 6 police officers and 5 CPS workers, showed up on their doorstep. The school called CPS when they discovered that the Gates pinned a baggy with food wrappers inside the shirt of one of the kids …
Child Protective Services can take your children too. CPS has come to believe they are above the law and the Constitution, that they do not need a search warrant to come into your home, label you as a child abuser for any reason and make you a criminal based upon their opinion alone, take your children away in a paddy wagon, and put your kids into foster homes pending a court hearing where CPS will try their best to win and permanently take custody of your kids. If CPS loses, they will continue to fight you, slandering your family and listing you as a child abuser in government databases. CPS is an abusive government agency spiraling completely out of control. It’s time to shut them down. The unlawful removal of 468 children from the FLDS ranch in west Texas, has put CPS under the microscope. That case has led others to wonder if they can do that to FLDS children, can CPS do that to my children? CBS 42 investigative reporter, Nancy Wilson, shows us one family who says the same thing happened to them, and eight years later they are still trying to clear their names. This is the Gates family, Gary and Melissa have 13 children, 11 of them adopted. They saw a need for kids from a variety of backgrounds who need love in a stable home. Imagine their surprise when 11 government employees, 6 police officers and 5 CPS workers, showed up on their doorstep. The school called CPS when they discovered that the Gates pinned a baggy with food wrappers inside the shirt of one of the kids …
An Oklahoma County judge charged with fraud is asking the state Supreme Court to give her back two children she adopted last year. « How Child Protection Services Buys and Sells Our Children
An Oklahoma County judge charged with fraud is asking the state Supreme Court to give her back two children she adopted last year. « How Child Protection Services Buys and Sells Our Children
Yes, the Judges are just as guilty if not more so when it comes to abuse in the CPS System.
Judge Tammy Bass- LaSure
Oklahoma County judge accused of fraud wants her adopted children returned The twin boy and girl have been in the custody of the Department of Human Services since the night District Judge Tammy Bass-LeSure and her husband, Karlos Antonio LeSure, were charged in January.
The judge and her husband became foster parents to the children in 2008 then adopted them May 11. Prosecutors allege the judge and her husband secretly gave away the twins to her bailiff’s sister, Ravonda Edwards, in 2008 and lied on adoption papers to conceal it. Prosecutors also allege the judge misused some state funds provided for the children’s care. The judge has denied wrongdoing.
Edwards also goes by the last name Booker. The children, Jakobi and Jazlyn, officially were given the last name Booker at the time of their adoption. They are now 3.
Attorneys for Bass-LeSure and her husband told the Supreme Court the couple “at some point … placed the minor children with Ravonda.” The attorneys’ legal brief gives no explanation for why the children were placed there.
Edwards is now facing felony charges accusing her of a series of violent acts against a former girlfriend. The attorneys for Bass-LeSure and her husband told the Supreme Court, “There is no imminent threat of harm to the children if the adoptive parents are willing to take the children home and not again place them in the dangerous home.”
At a hearing Jan. 25, a Canadian County associate district judge, Bob Hughey, ruled the children will remain in DHS custody. A prosecutor told Hughey that DHS in 2009 had authorized Edwards to be an alternative caregiver in case of emergencies but “not to keep them and raise them.”
Bass-LeSure’s attorneys told the Supreme Court that Hughey “should have ordered the return of the children to the adoptive parents under ‘conditions’ that Ms. Booker not be allowed in the presence of the children.”
“The adoptive parents pose no risk of harm to the children as long as they are willing to keep the children in their home,” the attorneys wrote in the legal brief. “The adoptive parents are willing to comply with any reasonable terms of placement as provided by the Department of Human Services. Therefore, the children must be returned to the care and custody of the adoptive parents.”
Bass-LeSure, 43, was charged Jan. 21 with 30 counts of making a fraudulent claim against the state and two counts of perjury.
Her husband, 46, was charged with two counts of making a fraudulent claim against the state and two counts of perjury.
Bass-LeSure was the original trial judge in the murder case against the Oklahoma City pharmacist who fatally shot a robber. She stepped down from that case Aug. 31 after prosecutors raised concerns about her. Prosecutors were upset because the judge spoke at a gym with a trainer who had a pending drug case before her. The judge gave the trainer the names of three defense attorneys. One of those attorneys, Joe Reynolds, is helping to defend the pharmacist.
The state Council on Judicial Complaints reviewed the judge’s statement to the trainer but took no action against her, sources told The Oklahoman.
Read more: http://newsok.com/oklahoma-county-judge-accused-of-fraud-wants-her-adopted-children-returned/article/3544642#ixzz1FqiWeij0
Yes, the Judges are just as guilty if not more so when it comes to abuse in the CPS System.
Judge Tammy Bass- LaSure
Oklahoma County judge accused of fraud wants her adopted children returned The twin boy and girl have been in the custody of the Department of Human Services since the night District Judge Tammy Bass-LeSure and her husband, Karlos Antonio LeSure, were charged in January.
The judge and her husband became foster parents to the children in 2008 then adopted them May 11. Prosecutors allege the judge and her husband secretly gave away the twins to her bailiff’s sister, Ravonda Edwards, in 2008 and lied on adoption papers to conceal it. Prosecutors also allege the judge misused some state funds provided for the children’s care. The judge has denied wrongdoing.
Edwards also goes by the last name Booker. The children, Jakobi and Jazlyn, officially were given the last name Booker at the time of their adoption. They are now 3.
Attorneys for Bass-LeSure and her husband told the Supreme Court the couple “at some point … placed the minor children with Ravonda.” The attorneys’ legal brief gives no explanation for why the children were placed there.
Edwards is now facing felony charges accusing her of a series of violent acts against a former girlfriend. The attorneys for Bass-LeSure and her husband told the Supreme Court, “There is no imminent threat of harm to the children if the adoptive parents are willing to take the children home and not again place them in the dangerous home.”
At a hearing Jan. 25, a Canadian County associate district judge, Bob Hughey, ruled the children will remain in DHS custody. A prosecutor told Hughey that DHS in 2009 had authorized Edwards to be an alternative caregiver in case of emergencies but “not to keep them and raise them.”
Bass-LeSure’s attorneys told the Supreme Court that Hughey “should have ordered the return of the children to the adoptive parents under ‘conditions’ that Ms. Booker not be allowed in the presence of the children.”
“The adoptive parents pose no risk of harm to the children as long as they are willing to keep the children in their home,” the attorneys wrote in the legal brief. “The adoptive parents are willing to comply with any reasonable terms of placement as provided by the Department of Human Services. Therefore, the children must be returned to the care and custody of the adoptive parents.”
Bass-LeSure, 43, was charged Jan. 21 with 30 counts of making a fraudulent claim against the state and two counts of perjury.
Her husband, 46, was charged with two counts of making a fraudulent claim against the state and two counts of perjury.
Bass-LeSure was the original trial judge in the murder case against the Oklahoma City pharmacist who fatally shot a robber. She stepped down from that case Aug. 31 after prosecutors raised concerns about her. Prosecutors were upset because the judge spoke at a gym with a trainer who had a pending drug case before her. The judge gave the trainer the names of three defense attorneys. One of those attorneys, Joe Reynolds, is helping to defend the pharmacist.
The state Council on Judicial Complaints reviewed the judge’s statement to the trainer but took no action against her, sources told The Oklahoman.
Read more: http://newsok.com/oklahoma-county-judge-accused-of-fraud-wants-her-adopted-children-returned/article/3544642#ixzz1FqiWeij0
PEACE JOURNEY: "In the best interest of the child" - Autism and a mother's fight against CPS | Autism Support Network
PEACE JOURNEY: "In the best interest of the child" - Autism and a mother's fight against CPS | Autism Support Network
WELCOME TO PEACE JOURNEYA grief support group for biological parents and their family members who have lost their parental rights either voluntarily or involuntarily. Voluntarily is often when you sign over or relinquish your rights to avoid a termination with the promise you could still be a part of your child’s life after adoption. It also means a decision or plan to put your child up for adoption before or after the birth. Involuntarily means you were not willing to surrender your rights and they were terminated by a judge in a juvenile or family court trial. You may have lost custody of your children through Divorce, maybe you are a victim of parental alienation. We offer friendship, compassion, hope and guidance as you work the grief steps that are necessary to be free from some of the pain you are experiencing. We are advocates for parental rights and are striving to hel change the system that has so unjustly torn apart so many families.
Sunday, March 6, 2011
"In the best interest of the child" - Autism and a mother's fight against CPS | Autism Support Network
"In the best interest of the child" - Autism and a mother's fight against CPS Autism Support Network
Tiffany Pritchett
When does cps really act in the best interest of the child? When does children serve as a dollar sign with child protective services? Offering parents “services” that they don’t need. Offering them to parents because they get paid to do so. Getting federal bonus money for each child they adopt out and an extra 2k for a special needs child. Before my kids were taken; I thought cps acted in the common good of families and not rip children away from families that loved them. My name is Tiffany Pritchett and I have three beautiful children. My oldest son’s name is James Pritchett. He has Autism.
WELCOME TO PEACE JOURNEYA grief support group for biological parents and their family members who have lost their parental rights either voluntarily or involuntarily. Voluntarily is often when you sign over or relinquish your rights to avoid a termination with the promise you could still be a part of your child’s life after adoption. It also means a decision or plan to put your child up for adoption before or after the birth. Involuntarily means you were not willing to surrender your rights and they were terminated by a judge in a juvenile or family court trial. You may have lost custody of your children through Divorce, maybe you are a victim of parental alienation. We offer friendship, compassion, hope and guidance as you work the grief steps that are necessary to be free from some of the pain you are experiencing. We are advocates for parental rights and are striving to hel change the system that has so unjustly torn apart so many families.
Sunday, March 6, 2011
"In the best interest of the child" - Autism and a mother's fight against CPS | Autism Support Network
"In the best interest of the child" - Autism and a mother's fight against CPS Autism Support Network
Tiffany Pritchett
When does cps really act in the best interest of the child? When does children serve as a dollar sign with child protective services? Offering parents “services” that they don’t need. Offering them to parents because they get paid to do so. Getting federal bonus money for each child they adopt out and an extra 2k for a special needs child. Before my kids were taken; I thought cps acted in the common good of families and not rip children away from families that loved them. My name is Tiffany Pritchett and I have three beautiful children. My oldest son’s name is James Pritchett. He has Autism.
Kimberly Harris ILLEGALLY Jailed By Kentucky Judge Catherine Rice Holderfield. « Battered Mothers-A Human Rights Issue
Kimberly Harris ILLEGALLY Jailed By Kentucky Judge Catherine Rice Holderfield. « Battered Mothers-A Human Rights Issue
Battered Mothers-A Human Rights Issue
ABOUT MR PRESIDENT, WHEN WILL YOU GIVE MOTHERS THEIR CHILDREN BACK?? DOCTOR WHO INTENTIONALLY SEVERS BONDS WITH MOTHERS IS A MONSTER MATERNAL DEPRIVATION FAMILY COURT CRISIS; OUR CHILDREN AT RISK PBS DOCUMENTARY: BREAKING THE SILENCE: CHILDREN’S STORIES WOMEN WE WILL BE VICTORIOUS AMPP-AMERICAN/AUSTRALIAN MOTHERS POLITICAL PARTY ARCHIVES RSS FEED
Kimberly Harris ILLEGALLY Jailed By Kentucky Judge Catherine Rice Holderfield.
In domestic law on March 6, 2011 at 9:01 pm
See updates as they happen here:Free Kimberly Harris Mother of Christian Coffey Now and Christian’s Voice
PRESS RELEASE: AMPP Stands Behind Christian Coffey HIS Mother and All Their Supporters
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – First Amendment Violations in Warren County, Kentucky
Contact: AMPP Chairperson – American Mothers Political Party, Phone: (657) 549-2677
Send us an E-mail
Web Site
First Amendment Violations in Warren County Kentucky Courtroom
The truth is heavy; therefore few care to carry it.
October 17, 2010 National USA –First Amendment violations and other illegal and unethical maneuvers in Warren County Kentucky. American Mothers Political Party has announced they will stand up for those in Warren County Kentucky that have been unconstitutionally gagged by the family courts.
Kimberly Harris is preparing to be sent to jail on October 19, 2010 as she is being accused of speaking out about her horrific nightmare with Warren County government officials. The Warren County Kentucky Judge, Catherine Rice-Holderfield, has threatened Mrs.Harris not to speaking publicly regarding her son being placed into the foster care system by the juge. The corruption, illegal maneuvers of this unconstitutional activity came to the attention of AMPP in early October. Frightened supporters knew that they could not in good conscience submit to the intimidation as Rice-Holderfield threatened to also jail the supporters for speaking out.
Warren County officials have become hostile due to the highly publicized blogging and/or expressing the outrage about this severe case of judicial abuse and impropriety, basic fundamental rights are in peril. Many supporters have been warned that Bowling Green PD and DHS workers are questioning and harassing individuals regarding blog posts made, including the 14 year old girlfriend of the child abuse victim.
The 15 year old son of Mrs. Harris was brutally beaten by his father and was subsequently placed in foster care by Rice-Holderfield. The child victim asked that his story be made public before he was taken into foster care. This young man has stated that he wants to be home in the safe loving arms of his mother, Kimberly, and that very wish is disappearing by the same officials sworn to protect and serve their community and its most vulnerable citizens.
Please visit the following page and links for the incredible in-justice being done and the ILLEGAL actions of the Court and Child Welfare Services in Kentucky.
Please visit the following links for the incredible in-justice being done and the ILLEGAL actions of the Court and Child Welfare Services in Kentucky.
Face Book Page: “Stop The Abuse of Christian Coffey”
Battered Mothers-A Human Rights Issue
ABOUT MR PRESIDENT, WHEN WILL YOU GIVE MOTHERS THEIR CHILDREN BACK?? DOCTOR WHO INTENTIONALLY SEVERS BONDS WITH MOTHERS IS A MONSTER MATERNAL DEPRIVATION FAMILY COURT CRISIS; OUR CHILDREN AT RISK PBS DOCUMENTARY: BREAKING THE SILENCE: CHILDREN’S STORIES WOMEN WE WILL BE VICTORIOUS AMPP-AMERICAN/AUSTRALIAN MOTHERS POLITICAL PARTY ARCHIVES RSS FEED
Kimberly Harris ILLEGALLY Jailed By Kentucky Judge Catherine Rice Holderfield.
In domestic law on March 6, 2011 at 9:01 pm
See updates as they happen here:Free Kimberly Harris Mother of Christian Coffey Now and Christian’s Voice
PRESS RELEASE: AMPP Stands Behind Christian Coffey HIS Mother and All Their Supporters
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – First Amendment Violations in Warren County, Kentucky
Contact: AMPP Chairperson – American Mothers Political Party, Phone: (657) 549-2677
Send us an E-mail
Web Site
First Amendment Violations in Warren County Kentucky Courtroom
The truth is heavy; therefore few care to carry it.
October 17, 2010 National USA –First Amendment violations and other illegal and unethical maneuvers in Warren County Kentucky. American Mothers Political Party has announced they will stand up for those in Warren County Kentucky that have been unconstitutionally gagged by the family courts.
Kimberly Harris is preparing to be sent to jail on October 19, 2010 as she is being accused of speaking out about her horrific nightmare with Warren County government officials. The Warren County Kentucky Judge, Catherine Rice-Holderfield, has threatened Mrs.Harris not to speaking publicly regarding her son being placed into the foster care system by the juge. The corruption, illegal maneuvers of this unconstitutional activity came to the attention of AMPP in early October. Frightened supporters knew that they could not in good conscience submit to the intimidation as Rice-Holderfield threatened to also jail the supporters for speaking out.
Warren County officials have become hostile due to the highly publicized blogging and/or expressing the outrage about this severe case of judicial abuse and impropriety, basic fundamental rights are in peril. Many supporters have been warned that Bowling Green PD and DHS workers are questioning and harassing individuals regarding blog posts made, including the 14 year old girlfriend of the child abuse victim.
The 15 year old son of Mrs. Harris was brutally beaten by his father and was subsequently placed in foster care by Rice-Holderfield. The child victim asked that his story be made public before he was taken into foster care. This young man has stated that he wants to be home in the safe loving arms of his mother, Kimberly, and that very wish is disappearing by the same officials sworn to protect and serve their community and its most vulnerable citizens.
Please visit the following page and links for the incredible in-justice being done and the ILLEGAL actions of the Court and Child Welfare Services in Kentucky.
Please visit the following links for the incredible in-justice being done and the ILLEGAL actions of the Court and Child Welfare Services in Kentucky.
Face Book Page: “Stop The Abuse of Christian Coffey”
Parents denied a voice in court against the child-snatchers - Telegraph
Parents denied a voice in court against the child-snatchers - Telegraph
Christopher Booker
Parents denied a voice in court against the child-snatchers
Lord Justice Thorpe was 'aghast' at the way children had been removed from their parents by a county court. But such outrages are an everyday procedure, says Christopher Booker
Lord Justice Thorpe in the Court of Appeal was 'aghast' at the way three children and been removed from their family Photo: PHOTOSHOT
By Christopher Booker 7:00PM GMT 05 Mar 2011
72 Comments
In the Court of Appeal recently, Lord Justice Thorpe said he was “completely aghast” at a case where a Derby County Court judge had ordered three children to be removed from their parents. The only evidence was that of a doctor who “expressed the opinion” that bruising on one child’s ear looked as though it was caused by pinching. The hearing had lasted just 15 minutes and the parents had not been allowed to say a word. Thorpe observed: “There is nothing more serious than a removal hearing, because the parents are so prejudiced [against] in proceedings thereafter. Once you have lost a child, it is very difficult to get a child back.” He ruled that the children should be reunited with their parents.
For once, a senior judge has spoken out about a mockery of justice which is repeated week after week in courts across the land. I have now followed dozens of such cases, where children are seized from their parents by social workers on the flimsiest of evidence, and where the parents then find themselves in the clutches of a system rigged against them in every way. Often they are not allowed to speak while they hear judges apparently accepting extraordinary lies, or evidence given by supposed “experts” which cannot be questioned.
One of the most disturbing features of this system, which protects itself behind a wall of secrecy, is how far it goes to ensure that aggrieved parents are represented only by lawyers who are themselves accomplices of the system. Again and again parents are bemused to find that the lawyers they were advised to use seem unwilling to challenge the case being made against them, however spurious.
Of all the cases I have followed, none is more bizarre than that of a couple whose six children were snatched by social workers last year on evidence which seemed at best highly questionable and was at worst an absurd fiction. The mother was advised to use a solicitor, on legal aid, who she felt was so much on the other side that she discharged him. Just before Christmas, when the council’s case seemed to be falling apart, I tracked down one of the very rare solicitors who has a reputation for fighting the system. His firm applied to the Legal Services Commission for transfer of the legal aid, and when the LSC seemed to be delaying its response, I paid £2,000 from my own pocket to enable the firm to start work.
The local authority learned, it seemed before anyone else, that the LSC would not allow the transfer from the solicitor who had been discharged – and the head of the council’s legal department then sent the mother a list of other solicitors who would be able to take her case on legal aid. By the time the solicitor to whom I had given £2,000 heard that he had been turned down, he was able to present me with a bill which, including VAT, came to exactly £2,000.
Christopher Booker
Parents denied a voice in court against the child-snatchers
Lord Justice Thorpe was 'aghast' at the way children had been removed from their parents by a county court. But such outrages are an everyday procedure, says Christopher Booker
Lord Justice Thorpe in the Court of Appeal was 'aghast' at the way three children and been removed from their family Photo: PHOTOSHOT
By Christopher Booker 7:00PM GMT 05 Mar 2011
72 Comments
In the Court of Appeal recently, Lord Justice Thorpe said he was “completely aghast” at a case where a Derby County Court judge had ordered three children to be removed from their parents. The only evidence was that of a doctor who “expressed the opinion” that bruising on one child’s ear looked as though it was caused by pinching. The hearing had lasted just 15 minutes and the parents had not been allowed to say a word. Thorpe observed: “There is nothing more serious than a removal hearing, because the parents are so prejudiced [against] in proceedings thereafter. Once you have lost a child, it is very difficult to get a child back.” He ruled that the children should be reunited with their parents.
For once, a senior judge has spoken out about a mockery of justice which is repeated week after week in courts across the land. I have now followed dozens of such cases, where children are seized from their parents by social workers on the flimsiest of evidence, and where the parents then find themselves in the clutches of a system rigged against them in every way. Often they are not allowed to speak while they hear judges apparently accepting extraordinary lies, or evidence given by supposed “experts” which cannot be questioned.
One of the most disturbing features of this system, which protects itself behind a wall of secrecy, is how far it goes to ensure that aggrieved parents are represented only by lawyers who are themselves accomplices of the system. Again and again parents are bemused to find that the lawyers they were advised to use seem unwilling to challenge the case being made against them, however spurious.
Of all the cases I have followed, none is more bizarre than that of a couple whose six children were snatched by social workers last year on evidence which seemed at best highly questionable and was at worst an absurd fiction. The mother was advised to use a solicitor, on legal aid, who she felt was so much on the other side that she discharged him. Just before Christmas, when the council’s case seemed to be falling apart, I tracked down one of the very rare solicitors who has a reputation for fighting the system. His firm applied to the Legal Services Commission for transfer of the legal aid, and when the LSC seemed to be delaying its response, I paid £2,000 from my own pocket to enable the firm to start work.
The local authority learned, it seemed before anyone else, that the LSC would not allow the transfer from the solicitor who had been discharged – and the head of the council’s legal department then sent the mother a list of other solicitors who would be able to take her case on legal aid. By the time the solicitor to whom I had given £2,000 heard that he had been turned down, he was able to present me with a bill which, including VAT, came to exactly £2,000.
Legally Kidnapped: We The People Family Preservation Organization
Legally Kidnapped: We The People Family Preservation Organization
FAMILIES’ RIGHTS GROUPS FROM ACROSS THE NATION AND CANADA TO CONVERGE ON WASHINGTON DC
Numerous Groups Plan To Rally On The US Capitol To Protest Anti-Family Agencies And Laws We the People Family Preservation, a coalition of numerous families’ and children’s rights groups have come together to conduct four days of congressional education and rallying to change Federal and state laws regarding the treatment of families and children in various governmental systems. Currently, and unconstitutionally, families are being denied their due process rights and the right to the society of their families.
The federal funding of state agencies, responsible for the taking of children from families, with or without just cause, without due process, makes states more interested in the income rather than the best interests of children. Title IV-D of the Social Security Code now pays states on the number of children removed from households, regardless of the reason. Additionally, the Code pays state Child Support Enforcement Agencies dollars based on the amount of support collected. These policies result in states seeing the destruction of families – the cornerstone of civilization - as income generators.
Issues such as Parental Alienation, dysfunctional governmental agencies (CPS, Divorce and Family Courts, etc.), familial damage done by the Violence Against Women Act, Child Abduction, the International Effects of Family Dissolution and Family Dissolution in general
will be the topics of a Congressional Educational Panel on March 24, 2011 inside the Gold Room of the Rayburn Building
The Congressional Educational Panel was sponsored and obtained through Democrat of the 11th District in Ohio Congresswoman Marsha Fudge.
Lobbying efforts on March 25, 2011.will cover all six building elected officials have an office in. Lobbying begins at 9 a.m and ends the close of the day.
On March 26 and 27, 2011, a public rally will be held on the South Lawn of the Capitol, aimed at educating the public on the problems that families and children face with governmental policies, currently in place.
MnowTV (www.Mnow.TV) and various other media outlets will cover the events.
For more information about this topic, or to schedule an interview with L. Wilson, please contact
New York Board Member, John Chichester at 516-672-9099, or email ChiDad@Consultant.com, L. Wilson
Telephone: 740-622-0168
Cell Phone: 740-610-1643
Email: WethePeopleFPR@OfficialDCRallyFest.ORG
Posted by LK at 1:50 PM
FAMILIES’ RIGHTS GROUPS FROM ACROSS THE NATION AND CANADA TO CONVERGE ON WASHINGTON DC
Numerous Groups Plan To Rally On The US Capitol To Protest Anti-Family Agencies And Laws We the People Family Preservation, a coalition of numerous families’ and children’s rights groups have come together to conduct four days of congressional education and rallying to change Federal and state laws regarding the treatment of families and children in various governmental systems. Currently, and unconstitutionally, families are being denied their due process rights and the right to the society of their families.
The federal funding of state agencies, responsible for the taking of children from families, with or without just cause, without due process, makes states more interested in the income rather than the best interests of children. Title IV-D of the Social Security Code now pays states on the number of children removed from households, regardless of the reason. Additionally, the Code pays state Child Support Enforcement Agencies dollars based on the amount of support collected. These policies result in states seeing the destruction of families – the cornerstone of civilization - as income generators.
Issues such as Parental Alienation, dysfunctional governmental agencies (CPS, Divorce and Family Courts, etc.), familial damage done by the Violence Against Women Act, Child Abduction, the International Effects of Family Dissolution and Family Dissolution in general
will be the topics of a Congressional Educational Panel on March 24, 2011 inside the Gold Room of the Rayburn Building
The Congressional Educational Panel was sponsored and obtained through Democrat of the 11th District in Ohio Congresswoman Marsha Fudge.
Lobbying efforts on March 25, 2011.will cover all six building elected officials have an office in. Lobbying begins at 9 a.m and ends the close of the day.
On March 26 and 27, 2011, a public rally will be held on the South Lawn of the Capitol, aimed at educating the public on the problems that families and children face with governmental policies, currently in place.
MnowTV (www.Mnow.TV) and various other media outlets will cover the events.
For more information about this topic, or to schedule an interview with L. Wilson, please contact
New York Board Member, John Chichester at 516-672-9099, or email ChiDad@Consultant.com, L. Wilson
Telephone: 740-622-0168
Cell Phone: 740-610-1643
Email: WethePeopleFPR@OfficialDCRallyFest.ORG
Posted by LK at 1:50 PM
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)