CPS Problems? Here Are 7 Ways to Fight CPS…
If you’re appalled by the actions of CPS, here are some ideas for correcting the injustices:
1. Write a letter to each and every member of your county board of supervisors detailing actions that show illegal activities or injustice on the part of local caseworkers. Suggest that they cut the CPS budget if caseworkers are taking children who shouldn’t be separated from their parents. Suggest that these illegal and unjust activities could cause the county to have to deal with expensive lawsuits. Follow this up by regularly attending meetings of the county board of supervisors and by getting up to share during community participation time; use your three minutes to tell people what’s going on.
2. Write a letter to your state legislators (don’t bother with the federal legislators – they’re usually worthless and corrupt unless they’re Ron Paul or someone exactly like him.) Go for the state level legislators. Tell them that child welfare is mismanaged in your county. Then follow up by going to the capitol to try to have a face to face encounter with these legislators. Take with you a gift-offering of a folder you’ve prepared with lots of information about how corrupt and evil CPS is. Tell them you support the State Sovereignty Movement and that federal child welfare laws are a violation of the U.S. Constitution’s Tenth Amendment.
3. Study your state’s social services regulations. You should be able to find a copy at your local county law library. Ask the librarian there for help finding them. If you have an open CPS case take notes on every regulation that’s being violated by your caseworker. Get photocopies of the regulations that are violated. Next, review your court order to see what orders may be violated by the caseworker. If you find discrepancies you can file for a state administrative hearing.
4. Does your county have a Grand Jury? If so, write them a letter, not about your personal case so much as about the problems of CPS injustice in general. Ask them to investigate CPS in your county.
5. If you haven’t already, write a Legal Declaration to clarify each point of malfeasance by caseworkers and others involved in your case. As when writing any letter or legal document, NEVER include any self-incriminating type of statement. Give this to your attorney. If he won’t see you in person, mail it to him and request (1) a response, and (2) that it be presented to the judge for the next hearing.
6. If your caseworker’s report to the court contains inaccurate statements, misrepresentations, or lies, create a legal document called “Objections and Corrections to the Report of the Social Worker” and as with the Legal Declaration, send it to your lawyer to be presented to the court.
Links to legal documents samples are here: Legal Document and Information Library.
7. If your caseworker is violating your court order or state social service regulations, treating you disrespectfully, or in any other way doing something you believe is wrong, write a letter to the county personnel department with a detailed complaint about the person. This will probably keep the caseworker from ever getting a promotion in that county. He or she might also get demoted, or fired.
I hope you find some solutions that will work for you.
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Saturday, January 29, 2011
Friday, January 28, 2011
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Drugs not approved for children still being used to treat them
Science|Business - The media network for research, industry and policy: "Drugs not approved for children still being used to treat them"
Science|Business reporting
Off-label and unauthorised drugs are still being prescribed, according to a European survey on use of medicines for children.
A survey of all uses of medicines for children shows that the prescription of off-label and unauthorised drugs is still widespread in Europe, more than three years after the European Union legislation that aimed to end this practice came into force.
The survey was commissioned as part of the European Paediatric regulation, which is intended to improve children’s healthcare by encouraging the development and availability of medicines for children aged 0 to 17 years, ensuring they are ethically researched and properly authorised.
The regulation, passed after long deliberation in 2007, is meant to achieve this without subjecting children to unnecessary trials, or delaying the authorisation of medicines for use in adults.
A wide range of drugs are being used off-label or without an appropriate marketing authorisation, with higher rates in very young children and children with very severe conditions, according to the survey. One of the main reasons is the lack of age-appropriate formulations.
The Paediatic regulation was intended to give drug companies an incentive to carry out safety testing in children, offering a six-month patent extension in the case of standard treatments, and a two-year extension to the patent life of orphan drugs – if safety and dosage trials are carried out on children.
In addition, there was a new designation, the Paediatric Use Marketing Authorisation, which provides 10 years’ patent protection for companies that carry out paediatric clinical trials of off-patent drugs.
The survey will inform the work of the European Medicines Agency’s Paediatric Committee, which maintains an inventory of the potential commercial opportunities for companies to develop paediatric medicines.
Science|Business reporting
Off-label and unauthorised drugs are still being prescribed, according to a European survey on use of medicines for children.
A survey of all uses of medicines for children shows that the prescription of off-label and unauthorised drugs is still widespread in Europe, more than three years after the European Union legislation that aimed to end this practice came into force.
The survey was commissioned as part of the European Paediatric regulation, which is intended to improve children’s healthcare by encouraging the development and availability of medicines for children aged 0 to 17 years, ensuring they are ethically researched and properly authorised.
The regulation, passed after long deliberation in 2007, is meant to achieve this without subjecting children to unnecessary trials, or delaying the authorisation of medicines for use in adults.
A wide range of drugs are being used off-label or without an appropriate marketing authorisation, with higher rates in very young children and children with very severe conditions, according to the survey. One of the main reasons is the lack of age-appropriate formulations.
The Paediatic regulation was intended to give drug companies an incentive to carry out safety testing in children, offering a six-month patent extension in the case of standard treatments, and a two-year extension to the patent life of orphan drugs – if safety and dosage trials are carried out on children.
In addition, there was a new designation, the Paediatric Use Marketing Authorisation, which provides 10 years’ patent protection for companies that carry out paediatric clinical trials of off-patent drugs.
The survey will inform the work of the European Medicines Agency’s Paediatric Committee, which maintains an inventory of the potential commercial opportunities for companies to develop paediatric medicines.
Black Mother Jailed For Sending Kids to White School DistrictEducation : Black Economic Development
Education : Black Economic Development: "Black Mother Jailed For Sending Kids to White School District"
An Ohio mother of two was sentenced to 10 days in jail and placed on three years probation after sending her kids to a school district in which they did not live. Kelly Williams-Bolar was sentenced by Judge Patricia Cosgrove on Tuesday and will begin serving her sentence immediately.
The jury deliberated for seven hours and the courtroom was packed as the sentence was handed down. She was convicted on two counts of tampering with court records after registering her two girls as living with Williams Bolar’s father when they actually lived with her. The family lived in the housing projects in Akron, Ohio, and the father’s address was in nearby Copley Township.
Additionally, Williams-Bolar’s father, Edward L. Williams, was charged with a fourth-degree felony of grand theft, in which he and his daughter are charged with defrauding the school system for two years of educational services for their girls. The court determined that sending their children to the wrong school was worth $30,500 in tuition. Read more:
An Ohio mother of two was sentenced to 10 days in jail and placed on three years probation after sending her kids to a school district in which they did not live. Kelly Williams-Bolar was sentenced by Judge Patricia Cosgrove on Tuesday and will begin serving her sentence immediately.
The jury deliberated for seven hours and the courtroom was packed as the sentence was handed down. She was convicted on two counts of tampering with court records after registering her two girls as living with Williams Bolar’s father when they actually lived with her. The family lived in the housing projects in Akron, Ohio, and the father’s address was in nearby Copley Township.
Additionally, Williams-Bolar’s father, Edward L. Williams, was charged with a fourth-degree felony of grand theft, in which he and his daughter are charged with defrauding the school system for two years of educational services for their girls. The court determined that sending their children to the wrong school was worth $30,500 in tuition. Read more:
Please sign the Amicus Brief ASAP » THE PUBLIC COURT
Please sign the Amicus Brief ASAP » THE PUBLIC COURT
Sign > Amicus Brief NOW
Read Entire > Amicus Brief
Please friends if you would, please sign the Amicus Brief for the Public good in the case of Tadros vs. Doyne. This case has potential to cause ripples throughout the legal and psychological communities across the Nation in a positive way, protecting Families and Children from Fraudulent, Corrupt, Lying, Con-artist, Unqualified, Custody Evaluators who conduct Custody Evaluations. The Amicus Brief or Amici is a unique legal tool whereby the Public at large can enjoin and show support for one side in a lawsuit — in this case, the lawsuit that Emad Tadros MD filed against Stephen Doyne PhD (see Custody Evaluators tab above). By signing this you will not be called in to court to testify, the Judge will see (hopefully) thousands of signatures and that will send the right message; again, Amici is a unique legal tool that allows the Public to have a voice in a legal matter. The link is to the Amicus Brief and your signature page to show support, with instructions on where to send it. It is all very thorough. It’s a good thing to support. Please show your support for Families and Children in crisis, to protect them from corruption and abuse in the Family Courts. Here is the link: Click the link at the top
Sign > Amicus Brief NOW
Read Entire > Amicus Brief
Please friends if you would, please sign the Amicus Brief for the Public good in the case of Tadros vs. Doyne. This case has potential to cause ripples throughout the legal and psychological communities across the Nation in a positive way, protecting Families and Children from Fraudulent, Corrupt, Lying, Con-artist, Unqualified, Custody Evaluators who conduct Custody Evaluations. The Amicus Brief or Amici is a unique legal tool whereby the Public at large can enjoin and show support for one side in a lawsuit — in this case, the lawsuit that Emad Tadros MD filed against Stephen Doyne PhD (see Custody Evaluators tab above). By signing this you will not be called in to court to testify, the Judge will see (hopefully) thousands of signatures and that will send the right message; again, Amici is a unique legal tool that allows the Public to have a voice in a legal matter. The link is to the Amicus Brief and your signature page to show support, with instructions on where to send it. It is all very thorough. It’s a good thing to support. Please show your support for Families and Children in crisis, to protect them from corruption and abuse in the Family Courts. Here is the link: Click the link at the top
The Truth Bites "NH" Women Justices on a role?
The Truth Bites "NH"
Did you know that?
• In New Hampshire one party is pro se in 85% of all civil cases in the district court and 48% of all civil cases in the superior court in 2004. -
• In probate court, both sides are unrepresented by lawyers in 38% of cases. In superior court domestic relations cases, almost 70% of cases have one pro se party, while in district court domestic violence cases, 97% of the cases have one pro se party. See. http://www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/Memos/ProSeStatsMemo.htm
The below gives an idea why NH has not been reporting since 04:
Quote from attached article:
"Taken as a whole, the record reflects an individual with a long history of evading his financial obligations, as well as failing to take responsibility for the consequences of his poor judgment and criminal behavior," Justice Carol Ann Conboy wrote in the court's unanimous ruling. "We see no evidence that, as an attorney, the applicant would conduct himself any differently.
So when will James L. DeHart, Thomas V. Trevethick, Janet DeVito, Jennifer B. Sargent and James L. Kruse get with the program? Do you known out of 9000 lawyers the discipline office, has not recognized the traits of the Judicial Branch is the above area, poor billing , overbilling, knowingly mis- representing fact, drunk driving, claiming bankruptcy to get of school bills, yet unless the papers publish it first. NO sanctions fines and rarely will they publish something in the bar news about an attorney after all who do you think funds the NH they fund them with yearly dues and:
Dismissals with warnings are not considered attorney discipline under Supreme Court Rules 37 and 37A. And under -
The New Hampshire Lawyers Assistance Program (NHLAP) provides confidential, meaningful assistance to lawyers, judges, law students and their families in coping with alcoholism and other addictions, depression, and other personal or professional crises.
Under Supreme Court Rule 58, NHLAP treats all contact, whether with lawyers, judges, law students, or concerned third parties, with confidentiality. We are exempt from reporting professional misconduct under Rule 8.3. Information between NHLAP employees and volunteers, and a lawyer, judge or law student, who seeks assistance, is strictly confidential and will not be disclosed
The Judicial conduct committee is another a joke here in NH as well a lofty position without the benefit of invoking any sanctions even when the players break the law there is blatant acceptance for poor behavior of attorneys and judges throughout New Hampshire. And if one considers the amount of divorces among them and the acts of their own children against them it’s a wicked soap as the Granite crumbles...
..
..
..
Delanis we're hoping you can continue in a more positive manner than that ...B what was his name? When people are taking their chances pro se' as much as they are, several factors come to mine lawyers are expensive - good ones are worth it --- conduct committees are suppose to monitored conduct yet they do not., they fail to inform the public of some huge idiots in the system - how many people use the bar news? And another factor to consider is - you have to belong to the Bar in NH to be an attorney - hard to regulate what funds you. Conflict of interest??
More so it is the Fact that the courts are mismanaged a lawyer runs each court and they are not necessarily business majors they can't get their orders out on time or appropriately. The fact is JUDGES IN NH increase litigation by incomplete, in accurate orders, not enforcing the orders they already issued and they fail to supervise the marital masters under them creating more visits to the court.
Did you know that?
• In New Hampshire one party is pro se in 85% of all civil cases in the district court and 48% of all civil cases in the superior court in 2004. -
• In probate court, both sides are unrepresented by lawyers in 38% of cases. In superior court domestic relations cases, almost 70% of cases have one pro se party, while in district court domestic violence cases, 97% of the cases have one pro se party. See. http://www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/Memos/ProSeStatsMemo.htm
The below gives an idea why NH has not been reporting since 04:
Quote from attached article:
"Taken as a whole, the record reflects an individual with a long history of evading his financial obligations, as well as failing to take responsibility for the consequences of his poor judgment and criminal behavior," Justice Carol Ann Conboy wrote in the court's unanimous ruling. "We see no evidence that, as an attorney, the applicant would conduct himself any differently.
So when will James L. DeHart, Thomas V. Trevethick, Janet DeVito, Jennifer B. Sargent and James L. Kruse get with the program? Do you known out of 9000 lawyers the discipline office, has not recognized the traits of the Judicial Branch is the above area, poor billing , overbilling, knowingly mis- representing fact, drunk driving, claiming bankruptcy to get of school bills, yet unless the papers publish it first. NO sanctions fines and rarely will they publish something in the bar news about an attorney after all who do you think funds the NH they fund them with yearly dues and:
Dismissals with warnings are not considered attorney discipline under Supreme Court Rules 37 and 37A. And under -
The New Hampshire Lawyers Assistance Program (NHLAP) provides confidential, meaningful assistance to lawyers, judges, law students and their families in coping with alcoholism and other addictions, depression, and other personal or professional crises.
Under Supreme Court Rule 58, NHLAP treats all contact, whether with lawyers, judges, law students, or concerned third parties, with confidentiality. We are exempt from reporting professional misconduct under Rule 8.3. Information between NHLAP employees and volunteers, and a lawyer, judge or law student, who seeks assistance, is strictly confidential and will not be disclosed
The Judicial conduct committee is another a joke here in NH as well a lofty position without the benefit of invoking any sanctions even when the players break the law there is blatant acceptance for poor behavior of attorneys and judges throughout New Hampshire. And if one considers the amount of divorces among them and the acts of their own children against them it’s a wicked soap as the Granite crumbles...
..
..
..
Delanis we're hoping you can continue in a more positive manner than that ...B what was his name? When people are taking their chances pro se' as much as they are, several factors come to mine lawyers are expensive - good ones are worth it --- conduct committees are suppose to monitored conduct yet they do not., they fail to inform the public of some huge idiots in the system - how many people use the bar news? And another factor to consider is - you have to belong to the Bar in NH to be an attorney - hard to regulate what funds you. Conflict of interest??
More so it is the Fact that the courts are mismanaged a lawyer runs each court and they are not necessarily business majors they can't get their orders out on time or appropriately. The fact is JUDGES IN NH increase litigation by incomplete, in accurate orders, not enforcing the orders they already issued and they fail to supervise the marital masters under them creating more visits to the court.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)