Education : Black Economic Development: "Black Mother Jailed For Sending Kids to White School District"
An Ohio mother of two was sentenced to 10 days in jail and placed on three years probation after sending her kids to a school district in which they did not live. Kelly Williams-Bolar was sentenced by Judge Patricia Cosgrove on Tuesday and will begin serving her sentence immediately.
The jury deliberated for seven hours and the courtroom was packed as the sentence was handed down. She was convicted on two counts of tampering with court records after registering her two girls as living with Williams Bolar’s father when they actually lived with her. The family lived in the housing projects in Akron, Ohio, and the father’s address was in nearby Copley Township.
Additionally, Williams-Bolar’s father, Edward L. Williams, was charged with a fourth-degree felony of grand theft, in which he and his daughter are charged with defrauding the school system for two years of educational services for their girls. The court determined that sending their children to the wrong school was worth $30,500 in tuition. Read more:
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Please sign the Amicus Brief ASAP » THE PUBLIC COURT
Please sign the Amicus Brief ASAP » THE PUBLIC COURT
Sign > Amicus Brief NOW
Read Entire > Amicus Brief
Please friends if you would, please sign the Amicus Brief for the Public good in the case of Tadros vs. Doyne. This case has potential to cause ripples throughout the legal and psychological communities across the Nation in a positive way, protecting Families and Children from Fraudulent, Corrupt, Lying, Con-artist, Unqualified, Custody Evaluators who conduct Custody Evaluations. The Amicus Brief or Amici is a unique legal tool whereby the Public at large can enjoin and show support for one side in a lawsuit — in this case, the lawsuit that Emad Tadros MD filed against Stephen Doyne PhD (see Custody Evaluators tab above). By signing this you will not be called in to court to testify, the Judge will see (hopefully) thousands of signatures and that will send the right message; again, Amici is a unique legal tool that allows the Public to have a voice in a legal matter. The link is to the Amicus Brief and your signature page to show support, with instructions on where to send it. It is all very thorough. It’s a good thing to support. Please show your support for Families and Children in crisis, to protect them from corruption and abuse in the Family Courts. Here is the link: Click the link at the top
Sign > Amicus Brief NOW
Read Entire > Amicus Brief
Please friends if you would, please sign the Amicus Brief for the Public good in the case of Tadros vs. Doyne. This case has potential to cause ripples throughout the legal and psychological communities across the Nation in a positive way, protecting Families and Children from Fraudulent, Corrupt, Lying, Con-artist, Unqualified, Custody Evaluators who conduct Custody Evaluations. The Amicus Brief or Amici is a unique legal tool whereby the Public at large can enjoin and show support for one side in a lawsuit — in this case, the lawsuit that Emad Tadros MD filed against Stephen Doyne PhD (see Custody Evaluators tab above). By signing this you will not be called in to court to testify, the Judge will see (hopefully) thousands of signatures and that will send the right message; again, Amici is a unique legal tool that allows the Public to have a voice in a legal matter. The link is to the Amicus Brief and your signature page to show support, with instructions on where to send it. It is all very thorough. It’s a good thing to support. Please show your support for Families and Children in crisis, to protect them from corruption and abuse in the Family Courts. Here is the link: Click the link at the top
The Truth Bites "NH" Women Justices on a role?
The Truth Bites "NH"
Did you know that?
• In New Hampshire one party is pro se in 85% of all civil cases in the district court and 48% of all civil cases in the superior court in 2004. -
• In probate court, both sides are unrepresented by lawyers in 38% of cases. In superior court domestic relations cases, almost 70% of cases have one pro se party, while in district court domestic violence cases, 97% of the cases have one pro se party. See. http://www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/Memos/ProSeStatsMemo.htm
The below gives an idea why NH has not been reporting since 04:
Quote from attached article:
"Taken as a whole, the record reflects an individual with a long history of evading his financial obligations, as well as failing to take responsibility for the consequences of his poor judgment and criminal behavior," Justice Carol Ann Conboy wrote in the court's unanimous ruling. "We see no evidence that, as an attorney, the applicant would conduct himself any differently.
So when will James L. DeHart, Thomas V. Trevethick, Janet DeVito, Jennifer B. Sargent and James L. Kruse get with the program? Do you known out of 9000 lawyers the discipline office, has not recognized the traits of the Judicial Branch is the above area, poor billing , overbilling, knowingly mis- representing fact, drunk driving, claiming bankruptcy to get of school bills, yet unless the papers publish it first. NO sanctions fines and rarely will they publish something in the bar news about an attorney after all who do you think funds the NH they fund them with yearly dues and:
Dismissals with warnings are not considered attorney discipline under Supreme Court Rules 37 and 37A. And under -
The New Hampshire Lawyers Assistance Program (NHLAP) provides confidential, meaningful assistance to lawyers, judges, law students and their families in coping with alcoholism and other addictions, depression, and other personal or professional crises.
Under Supreme Court Rule 58, NHLAP treats all contact, whether with lawyers, judges, law students, or concerned third parties, with confidentiality. We are exempt from reporting professional misconduct under Rule 8.3. Information between NHLAP employees and volunteers, and a lawyer, judge or law student, who seeks assistance, is strictly confidential and will not be disclosed
The Judicial conduct committee is another a joke here in NH as well a lofty position without the benefit of invoking any sanctions even when the players break the law there is blatant acceptance for poor behavior of attorneys and judges throughout New Hampshire. And if one considers the amount of divorces among them and the acts of their own children against them it’s a wicked soap as the Granite crumbles...
..
..
..
Delanis we're hoping you can continue in a more positive manner than that ...B what was his name? When people are taking their chances pro se' as much as they are, several factors come to mine lawyers are expensive - good ones are worth it --- conduct committees are suppose to monitored conduct yet they do not., they fail to inform the public of some huge idiots in the system - how many people use the bar news? And another factor to consider is - you have to belong to the Bar in NH to be an attorney - hard to regulate what funds you. Conflict of interest??
More so it is the Fact that the courts are mismanaged a lawyer runs each court and they are not necessarily business majors they can't get their orders out on time or appropriately. The fact is JUDGES IN NH increase litigation by incomplete, in accurate orders, not enforcing the orders they already issued and they fail to supervise the marital masters under them creating more visits to the court.
Did you know that?
• In New Hampshire one party is pro se in 85% of all civil cases in the district court and 48% of all civil cases in the superior court in 2004. -
• In probate court, both sides are unrepresented by lawyers in 38% of cases. In superior court domestic relations cases, almost 70% of cases have one pro se party, while in district court domestic violence cases, 97% of the cases have one pro se party. See. http://www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/Memos/ProSeStatsMemo.htm
The below gives an idea why NH has not been reporting since 04:
Quote from attached article:
"Taken as a whole, the record reflects an individual with a long history of evading his financial obligations, as well as failing to take responsibility for the consequences of his poor judgment and criminal behavior," Justice Carol Ann Conboy wrote in the court's unanimous ruling. "We see no evidence that, as an attorney, the applicant would conduct himself any differently.
So when will James L. DeHart, Thomas V. Trevethick, Janet DeVito, Jennifer B. Sargent and James L. Kruse get with the program? Do you known out of 9000 lawyers the discipline office, has not recognized the traits of the Judicial Branch is the above area, poor billing , overbilling, knowingly mis- representing fact, drunk driving, claiming bankruptcy to get of school bills, yet unless the papers publish it first. NO sanctions fines and rarely will they publish something in the bar news about an attorney after all who do you think funds the NH they fund them with yearly dues and:
Dismissals with warnings are not considered attorney discipline under Supreme Court Rules 37 and 37A. And under -
The New Hampshire Lawyers Assistance Program (NHLAP) provides confidential, meaningful assistance to lawyers, judges, law students and their families in coping with alcoholism and other addictions, depression, and other personal or professional crises.
Under Supreme Court Rule 58, NHLAP treats all contact, whether with lawyers, judges, law students, or concerned third parties, with confidentiality. We are exempt from reporting professional misconduct under Rule 8.3. Information between NHLAP employees and volunteers, and a lawyer, judge or law student, who seeks assistance, is strictly confidential and will not be disclosed
The Judicial conduct committee is another a joke here in NH as well a lofty position without the benefit of invoking any sanctions even when the players break the law there is blatant acceptance for poor behavior of attorneys and judges throughout New Hampshire. And if one considers the amount of divorces among them and the acts of their own children against them it’s a wicked soap as the Granite crumbles...
..
..
..
Delanis we're hoping you can continue in a more positive manner than that ...B what was his name? When people are taking their chances pro se' as much as they are, several factors come to mine lawyers are expensive - good ones are worth it --- conduct committees are suppose to monitored conduct yet they do not., they fail to inform the public of some huge idiots in the system - how many people use the bar news? And another factor to consider is - you have to belong to the Bar in NH to be an attorney - hard to regulate what funds you. Conflict of interest??
More so it is the Fact that the courts are mismanaged a lawyer runs each court and they are not necessarily business majors they can't get their orders out on time or appropriately. The fact is JUDGES IN NH increase litigation by incomplete, in accurate orders, not enforcing the orders they already issued and they fail to supervise the marital masters under them creating more visits to the court.
HSLDA | Appellate Briefs Filed in Arizona Illegal-Search Case
HSLDA | Appellate Briefs Filed in Arizona Illegal-Search Case
Appellate Briefs Filed in Arizona Illegal-Search Case
In March of 2005, two social workers and six deputy sheriffs descended on the home of John and Tiffany Loudermilk to “investigate” a two-month-old anonymous tip that their house was unsafe for children. After almost an hour of threats, the social workers finally threatened to take all of their children into custody if not allowed inside. The Loudermilks reluctantly agreed. The assembled officials took less than five minutes to determine that the allegations in the anonymous report were false.
HSLDA reviewed the case and sued the social workers, their attorney, and four of the deputies for violating the Loudermilks’ Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches. We also sued the social workers for threatening to remove their children without justification.
The judge denied the defendants’ motions to dismiss in September 2007, and then denied their motions for summary judgment in March 2010. The deputies appealed, claiming that they should be immune from liability because, they said, the right to be free from unreasonable searches was not clear enough for them to realize that threatening to remove a child if not allowed inside the home violated the Fourth Amendment.
Click here to read their brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (requires Adobe Acrobat Reader).
In HSLDA’s answering brief, we argued that the law has been clearly established for at least 10 years, ever since we successfully sued social workers on behalf of the Calabretta family in a similar case. We also demonstrated that any reasonable officer should know that threatening to remove a child to gain the “cooperation” of the parents is inherently coercive and that the officers should have known so at the time.
Within the next few weeks the appellate court will either decide the case or will schedule oral argument. In the meantime, proceedings in the trial court are on hold.
Other Resources
“Judge Upholds Family’s Right to Day in Court”
July/August 2010 Court Report: “Family Wins Round Two”
September/October 2009 Court Report: “Arguments Proceed in Federal Lawsuit”
January/February 2008 Court Report: “Judge Slams Coercive Tactics”
“Judge Rules Social Worker Fear Tactics Unconstitutional”
“Social Workers and Sheriff’s Deputies Violate Family’s 4th and 14th Amendment Rights”
Appellate Briefs Filed in Arizona Illegal-Search Case
In March of 2005, two social workers and six deputy sheriffs descended on the home of John and Tiffany Loudermilk to “investigate” a two-month-old anonymous tip that their house was unsafe for children. After almost an hour of threats, the social workers finally threatened to take all of their children into custody if not allowed inside. The Loudermilks reluctantly agreed. The assembled officials took less than five minutes to determine that the allegations in the anonymous report were false.
HSLDA reviewed the case and sued the social workers, their attorney, and four of the deputies for violating the Loudermilks’ Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches. We also sued the social workers for threatening to remove their children without justification.
The judge denied the defendants’ motions to dismiss in September 2007, and then denied their motions for summary judgment in March 2010. The deputies appealed, claiming that they should be immune from liability because, they said, the right to be free from unreasonable searches was not clear enough for them to realize that threatening to remove a child if not allowed inside the home violated the Fourth Amendment.
Click here to read their brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (requires Adobe Acrobat Reader).
In HSLDA’s answering brief, we argued that the law has been clearly established for at least 10 years, ever since we successfully sued social workers on behalf of the Calabretta family in a similar case. We also demonstrated that any reasonable officer should know that threatening to remove a child to gain the “cooperation” of the parents is inherently coercive and that the officers should have known so at the time.
Within the next few weeks the appellate court will either decide the case or will schedule oral argument. In the meantime, proceedings in the trial court are on hold.
Other Resources
“Judge Upholds Family’s Right to Day in Court”
July/August 2010 Court Report: “Family Wins Round Two”
September/October 2009 Court Report: “Arguments Proceed in Federal Lawsuit”
January/February 2008 Court Report: “Judge Slams Coercive Tactics”
“Judge Rules Social Worker Fear Tactics Unconstitutional”
“Social Workers and Sheriff’s Deputies Violate Family’s 4th and 14th Amendment Rights”
Natl. Family Rights Protest
Natl. Family Rights Protest
OFFICIAL WEBSITE
National Family Rights Protest
“Government Abuse IS Child Abuse for Profit”
When: Friday, August 12, 2011
Where: See State/PLC tab for your area
Who: United States- Child/Family Rights Groups
Why:“We the People”
are no longer tolerating;
· Unjust Laws
· TAXPAYER dollars (billions) used to separate, and financially demolish families.
We the People” demand reformation of:
· OUR FAMILY COURT SYSTEMS including:
· Assigned Judges- (must be abolished)
· Court Appointed Guardian-ad-litem
(must be abolished-severely limited at a minimum)
· Family courts / records must be made public
· Court Gag orders are a violation of 1st amendment
· Adoption incentive payments (must be abolished)
Re; Adoption / Safe Families Act 1997
Every effort must be made for children to stay with Grandparents / family members instead of foster care.
· Grandparents / family must have visitation rights without current criminal treatment
· Families must be given assistance instead of removing their
Children example; removal due to gas shut-off
· Parents must be restored freedoms to raise their children
· Immediate access in all cases for children’s records
· Option to have a Jury, when requested in family courts
We the People” demand reformation of:
OUR FAMILY COURT SYSTEM including:
Assigned Judges- must be abolished
· We are stripped of our right to elect public servants (judges)
· Assigned judges cannot be voted out of office as they are ‘assigned’ to hear cases after pretending to retire.
· They have zero incentive to administer justice or follow law or legal procedures because they cannot be voted out of office after they ‘retire’ THEREFORE, we have been stripped of our legal right to elect (vote) for our judges
· Assigned judges are ‘DOUBLE-DIPPING’. Pretend to ‘retire’
but are assigned to family court cases, collecting approx; $485.00 per ‘day’ while collecting their retirement pay- all paid by taxpayers
· Court appointed guardian-ad-litem / advocate for child / lawyer for child
· Child Protective Services aka; CPS/ DHS / DFS/DSS/Foster Care and Adoption Services
Protest Organization & Coordiation
OFFICIAL WEBSITE
National Family Rights Protest
“Government Abuse IS Child Abuse for Profit”
When: Friday, August 12, 2011
Where: See State/PLC tab for your area
Who: United States- Child/Family Rights Groups
Why:“We the People”
are no longer tolerating;
· Unjust Laws
· TAXPAYER dollars (billions) used to separate, and financially demolish families.
We the People” demand reformation of:
· OUR FAMILY COURT SYSTEMS including:
· Assigned Judges- (must be abolished)
· Court Appointed Guardian-ad-litem
(must be abolished-severely limited at a minimum)
· Family courts / records must be made public
· Court Gag orders are a violation of 1st amendment
· Adoption incentive payments (must be abolished)
Re; Adoption / Safe Families Act 1997
Every effort must be made for children to stay with Grandparents / family members instead of foster care.
· Grandparents / family must have visitation rights without current criminal treatment
· Families must be given assistance instead of removing their
Children example; removal due to gas shut-off
· Parents must be restored freedoms to raise their children
· Immediate access in all cases for children’s records
· Option to have a Jury, when requested in family courts
We the People” demand reformation of:
OUR FAMILY COURT SYSTEM including:
Assigned Judges- must be abolished
· We are stripped of our right to elect public servants (judges)
· Assigned judges cannot be voted out of office as they are ‘assigned’ to hear cases after pretending to retire.
· They have zero incentive to administer justice or follow law or legal procedures because they cannot be voted out of office after they ‘retire’ THEREFORE, we have been stripped of our legal right to elect (vote) for our judges
· Assigned judges are ‘DOUBLE-DIPPING’. Pretend to ‘retire’
but are assigned to family court cases, collecting approx; $485.00 per ‘day’ while collecting their retirement pay- all paid by taxpayers
· Court appointed guardian-ad-litem / advocate for child / lawyer for child
· Child Protective Services aka; CPS/ DHS / DFS/DSS/Foster Care and Adoption Services
Protest Organization & Coordiation
Child Protective Services: CPS & Police Abuse Constitution, Invading Homes, Kidnapping Children, Ignoring Courts, and Criminalizing Americans. Polygamist FLDS Raid Sheds Light on More Cases.
Child Protective Services: CPS & Police Abuse Constitution, Invading Homes, Kidnapping Children, Ignoring Courts, and Criminalizing Americans. Polygamist FLDS Raid Sheds Light on More Cases. | Free Classified Ads Belfast.Com
Child Protective Services can take your children too. CPS has come to believe they are above the law and the Constitution, that they do not need a search warrant to come into your home, label you as a child abuser for any reason and make you a criminal based upon their opinion alone, take your children away in a paddy wagon, and put your kids into foster homes pending a court hearing where CPS will try their best to win and permanently take custody of your kids. If CPS loses, they will continue to fight you, slandering your family and listing you as a child abuser in government databases. CPS is an abusive government agency spiraling completely out of control. It’s time to shut them down. The unlawful removal of 468 children from the FLDS ranch in west Texas, has put CPS under the microscope. That case has led others to wonder if they can do that to FLDS children, can CPS do that to my children? CBS 42 investigative reporter, Nancy Wilson, shows us one family who says the same thing happened to them, and eight years later they are still trying to clear their names. This is the Gates family, Gary and Melissa have 13 children, 11 of them adopted. They saw a need for kids from a variety of backgrounds who need love in a stable home. Imagine their surprise when 11 government employees, 6 police officers and 5 CPS workers, showed up on their doorstep. The school called CPS when they discovered that the Gates pinned a baggy with food wrappers inside the shirt of one of the kids …
Child Protective Services can take your children too. CPS has come to believe they are above the law and the Constitution, that they do not need a search warrant to come into your home, label you as a child abuser for any reason and make you a criminal based upon their opinion alone, take your children away in a paddy wagon, and put your kids into foster homes pending a court hearing where CPS will try their best to win and permanently take custody of your kids. If CPS loses, they will continue to fight you, slandering your family and listing you as a child abuser in government databases. CPS is an abusive government agency spiraling completely out of control. It’s time to shut them down. The unlawful removal of 468 children from the FLDS ranch in west Texas, has put CPS under the microscope. That case has led others to wonder if they can do that to FLDS children, can CPS do that to my children? CBS 42 investigative reporter, Nancy Wilson, shows us one family who says the same thing happened to them, and eight years later they are still trying to clear their names. This is the Gates family, Gary and Melissa have 13 children, 11 of them adopted. They saw a need for kids from a variety of backgrounds who need love in a stable home. Imagine their surprise when 11 government employees, 6 police officers and 5 CPS workers, showed up on their doorstep. The school called CPS when they discovered that the Gates pinned a baggy with food wrappers inside the shirt of one of the kids …
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)