Bring Us a Baby: An Early Christmas Present
One Families happiness is through another families pain. A baby stolen from a parent to make another happy. CPS strikes again!
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Monday, December 20, 2010
Suit accuses Oregon caseworker of hitting 8-year-old foster child | OregonLive.com
Suit accuses Oregon caseworker of hitting 8-year-old foster child | OregonLive.com: "A court-appointed representative is suing the Oregon Department of Human Services for $149,000 on behalf of an 8-year-old foster child who reportedly was hit by her caseworker.
The suit, filed in Multnomah County Circuit Court Thursday, offers few details about the alleged incident. It states that on Oct. 11, an unnamed caseworker struck the girl without justification. The blow physically injured the child, as well as embarrassed, frightened and degraded her, according to the suit."
The suit, filed in Multnomah County Circuit Court Thursday, offers few details about the alleged incident. It states that on Oct. 11, an unnamed caseworker struck the girl without justification. The blow physically injured the child, as well as embarrassed, frightened and degraded her, according to the suit."
Sunday, December 19, 2010
DMVC Productions: Research/Sample/DHHS
DMVC Productions: Research/Sample/DHHS: "Research/Sample/DHHS
This is a sample of research for a New Hamsphire RSA 169 C The Child Protection Act when dealing with the Department of Health and Human Services. This is not legal advice; you should check the particulars of your case with an Attorney. If there is an area not covered, or you have comments or suggestions please leave a comment, all inquires will be confidential and information will be updated. "
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SOUTH
XXXXXX-XXXXX XXXXXXXX, et., al., }
PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT }
} CIVIL ACTION
V. }MANDATORY DE NOVO APPEAL
} VOID JUDGMENT
} AND
STATE OF NH and DEPARTMENT OF } JURY DEMAND
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et., al., }
DEFENDANT/APPELLEE } Civil Action Number:# 226-2010-cv-00612
PLAINTIFFS’ APPEAL/BRIEF/COMPLAINT
IN SUPPORT OF THE ABOVE ACTIONS
1. NOW COMES, the Plaintiff/Appellant, Xxxxxx-xxxxx xxxxxxxx, pro se, (hereinafter Plaintiff) and in accordance with NH RSA 169 C:28 I. The Plaintiff, files this Brief in Appeal and on the above referenced action (s) individually and combined due to the intrinsic pattern of systemic ills that tie this case and occur in cases shrouded in secrecy for its own sake. With the absence of governmental checks and balances present in other areas of our national life, this case makes clear the Defendant’s lack of credibility, when effective restraints are absent and/or manipulated by those intent on self protection or self-promotion.
INTRODUCTION
2. This Appeal comes before the court based on actions by the Defendants under the color of law, indicative of Judicial Oppression through the court (s) that rendered orders without subject matter jurisdiction, denial of due process and the State of New Hampshire employees of various Departments of Health and Human Services (herein DHHS) who put together unconstitutionally gathered evidence, fraudulent fact witnesses, an investigation based on improper analysis, that they were untrained to reach, and/or that evidence was purposefully ignored, the analysis of which would have conclusively proven the Plaintiff’s innocence in the entire matter behind the De Novo appeal. The action leading to the De Novo appeal was brought forward by DHHS and the order of the trial court confirmed as 11/18/10, by the court on 12/10/10 from the Plaintiffs motion to correct. It was not readable, the case is In Re: ***** X. - 05-JV-565, neither order was signed by the clerk of court as attached. The action by DHHS for contempt against the Plaintiff, finally allowed her access to evidence that was concealed in the District Court Files. Evidence that demonstrates the matter was and is forever VOID reverting back to orders from the Xxxxxx Superior Court in the matter of ***** and ***** 00-M-927, for having previously been adjudicated. The invalidity/voidness of which may be asserted by any person whose rights are affected at any time and at any place directly or collaterally. There is no time limit for attacking a void judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(iv). Eggl v. Fleetguard, Inc., 1998 ND 166, 583 N.W.2d 812 . "A void judgment is one that has been procured by extrinsic or collateral fraud or entered by a court that did not have jurisdiction over the subject matter or the parties." Rook v. Rook, 233 Va. 92, 95, 353 S.E.2d 756, 758 (1987).
This is just a portion of this lawsuit. Click on the link for the entire document.
This is a sample of research for a New Hamsphire RSA 169 C The Child Protection Act when dealing with the Department of Health and Human Services. This is not legal advice; you should check the particulars of your case with an Attorney. If there is an area not covered, or you have comments or suggestions please leave a comment, all inquires will be confidential and information will be updated. "
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SOUTH
XXXXXX-XXXXX XXXXXXXX, et., al., }
PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT }
} CIVIL ACTION
V. }MANDATORY DE NOVO APPEAL
} VOID JUDGMENT
} AND
STATE OF NH and DEPARTMENT OF } JURY DEMAND
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et., al., }
DEFENDANT/APPELLEE } Civil Action Number:# 226-2010-cv-00612
PLAINTIFFS’ APPEAL/BRIEF/COMPLAINT
IN SUPPORT OF THE ABOVE ACTIONS
1. NOW COMES, the Plaintiff/Appellant, Xxxxxx-xxxxx xxxxxxxx, pro se, (hereinafter Plaintiff) and in accordance with NH RSA 169 C:28 I. The Plaintiff, files this Brief in Appeal and on the above referenced action (s) individually and combined due to the intrinsic pattern of systemic ills that tie this case and occur in cases shrouded in secrecy for its own sake. With the absence of governmental checks and balances present in other areas of our national life, this case makes clear the Defendant’s lack of credibility, when effective restraints are absent and/or manipulated by those intent on self protection or self-promotion.
INTRODUCTION
2. This Appeal comes before the court based on actions by the Defendants under the color of law, indicative of Judicial Oppression through the court (s) that rendered orders without subject matter jurisdiction, denial of due process and the State of New Hampshire employees of various Departments of Health and Human Services (herein DHHS) who put together unconstitutionally gathered evidence, fraudulent fact witnesses, an investigation based on improper analysis, that they were untrained to reach, and/or that evidence was purposefully ignored, the analysis of which would have conclusively proven the Plaintiff’s innocence in the entire matter behind the De Novo appeal. The action leading to the De Novo appeal was brought forward by DHHS and the order of the trial court confirmed as 11/18/10, by the court on 12/10/10 from the Plaintiffs motion to correct. It was not readable, the case is In Re: ***** X. - 05-JV-565, neither order was signed by the clerk of court as attached. The action by DHHS for contempt against the Plaintiff, finally allowed her access to evidence that was concealed in the District Court Files. Evidence that demonstrates the matter was and is forever VOID reverting back to orders from the Xxxxxx Superior Court in the matter of ***** and ***** 00-M-927, for having previously been adjudicated. The invalidity/voidness of which may be asserted by any person whose rights are affected at any time and at any place directly or collaterally. There is no time limit for attacking a void judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(iv). Eggl v. Fleetguard, Inc., 1998 ND 166, 583 N.W.2d 812 . "A void judgment is one that has been procured by extrinsic or collateral fraud or entered by a court that did not have jurisdiction over the subject matter or the parties." Rook v. Rook, 233 Va. 92, 95, 353 S.E.2d 756, 758 (1987).
This is just a portion of this lawsuit. Click on the link for the entire document.
Amy & Markel Charron
Amy & Markel Charron
On this page you are going to hear secretly-taped audio of a little two-year girl in ‘protective custody’ say she is being hit at home, that it hurts, you will her hear cry to go home with her mommy in the car she remembers, you will her scream at being separated from her mother at the end of the CPS-supervised visit, but worse than that, you will see color photos of this angel’s back and bottom covered in bruises and welts. At the time these abuse photos were taken, she had not been in my care for 8 months. But before you see how she looks in my mother and step-father’s care, see how she looked in mine.
On this page you are going to hear secretly-taped audio of a little two-year girl in ‘protective custody’ say she is being hit at home, that it hurts, you will her hear cry to go home with her mommy in the car she remembers, you will her scream at being separated from her mother at the end of the CPS-supervised visit, but worse than that, you will see color photos of this angel’s back and bottom covered in bruises and welts. At the time these abuse photos were taken, she had not been in my care for 8 months. But before you see how she looks in my mother and step-father’s care, see how she looked in mine.
What Would Happen If Jesus Were Born In U.S. Today?
What Would Happen If Jesus Were Born In U.S. Today?
What Would Happen If Jesus Were Born In U.S. Today?
Infant Discovered In Barn, Child Protective Services Launch Probe
Nazareth Carpenter Being Held On Charges Involving Underage Mother
12/14/06 --"Information Clearing House" - Bethlehem, Judea - Authorities were today alerted by a concerned citizen who noticed a family living in a barn. Upon arrival, Family Protective Service personnel, accompanied by police, took into protective care an infant child named Jesus, who had been wrapped in strips of cloth and placed in a feeding trough by his 14-year old mother, Mary of Nazareth.
During the confrontation, a man identified as Joseph, also of Nazareth, attempted to stop the social workers. Joseph, aided by several local shepherds and some unidentified foreigners, tried to forestall efforts to take the child, but were restrained by the police.
At one point Joseph became confrontational and delusional claiming the child was "God's child". An officer, who used a Tazer device on Joseph, stated,"The man became uncooperative. We feared for his own safety and that of the child so we used a non-lethal weapon and restrained him in handcuffs. This was the same man I detained earlier for attempting to take a donkey on a public highway. At that time he incredibly claimed a 'common right to his conveyance of choice on a public highway' explaining that his donkey only used the grassy portion and was nointerference to the faster vehicles.
He showed no identification, said he had no job and claimed to not have a social security number-laughing and uttering some non-sense that it was the 'mark of the beast'. He was cooperative at that time so I let him go with a highway warning and a charge of vagrancy. It's a trend with these types of people: We find that they start in minor trouble like traffic incidents and graduate to more acts of civil disobedience. Eventually they cross-over and break one of the many many laws of and for government. Still, I can't understand why he became uncooperative to the point that we had to use non-lethal force-after all we're just doing the job of the 'consent of the governed'. Don't these people understand that they must submit to authority that is in their best interests?"
Also being held for questioning are three foreigners who incredibly allege to be "wise men" from an eastern country. The INS and Homeland Security officials are seeking information about these who may be in the country illegally. A source with the INS states that they had no passports, but were in possession of gold and other possibly illegal substances. They resisted arrest saying that they had been warned by God to avoid officials in Jerusalem and to return quickly to their own country. The chemical substances in their possession will be tested. An officer at the scene said the suspicious enclosures for the chemical substances might constitute "drug paraphernalia". The agent for Homeland Security stated that he contacted the IRS under the suspicion that this gold might be linked to a foreign trust method of "under-reporting income".
An agent commented: "The presence of paraphernalia, chemical substances, gold, and foreign people without passports is certainly suspicious. Terrorists are known to fund terrorism activities through illegal drug trading. Or these could be part of an illegal-alien smuggling ring from Mexico. In either case the claim that these three are Kings is unsubstantiated as they are not diplomats registered with the Department of State."
The owner of the barn is also being held for questioning. The manager of Bethlehem Inn faces possible revocation of his license for violating health and safety regulations by allowing people to stay in the stable. Civil authorities are also investigating the zoning violations involved in maintaining livestock in a commercially-zoned district. The owner of the barn claimed he provided the lodging free hence the guests did not need to register.
He was noted to exclaim, "For heaven's sake, its Jesus! Can't we forego government intrusion into our lives for the Christ-child celebration?" Authorities were not amused and demanded his identification and his Inn lodging and restaurant board-of-health certification.
The location of the minor child will not be released, and the prospect for a quick resolution to this case is doubtful. Asked about when Jesus would be returned to his mother, a Child Protective Service spokesperson said, "The father is middle-aged and the mother definitely underage. This is suspicious behavior worthy of investigation." When asked who these people were and where they were from, the spokesman replied: "Both parents refuse to provide identification. Both claim no social security number and provided no marriage license.
The father claims a license from heaven as a common-law right. They have no birth certificate for the baby Jesus. In this sense they are deemed uncooperative by us and are probably members of some anti-government common-law movement group. I simply can't imagine why parents would not want to register the birth and citizenship of a baby such as Jesus!
In America everybody does this--it's for the welfare of the child. Why would they not want to register that baby Jesus as a UNITED STATES CITIZEN and hence leave his real citizenship in question? If they are not hiding something, what do they have to fear?
I tried to reason with the father. I asked the father the question as to why he never applied for baby Jesus' social security number explaining that Jesus could have earning's credit's and receive retirement benefits. The father uttered total non-sense about 'rendering unto Caesar', more religious 'mark-of-the-beast' dogma, and retirement in God's kingdom.
Frankly I'm flabbergasted by these types of people. It's a trend we wish to stop. They never volunteer and this we view as uncooperative behavior. They never apply for social security numbers, they never register the birth of their children, they refuse to register to vote for our two parties, they don't show us identification when we ask 'for their papers" kindly, they refuse to send their children to public education under a homeschool banner, they claim adherence to God's law and not man's, they claim government harassment as the reason they must be transients, and they protest filling-out voluntary-compliance government forms. Frankly, these types of anti-government people are always uncooperative. We are checking with officials in Nazareth to determine what the legal relationship is between father, mother and baby."
Joseph has admitted taking Mary from her home in Nazareth because of a census requirement. However, because she was obviously pregnant when they left, investigators are looking into other reasons for their departure. Joseph is being held without bond on charges of molestation, kidnapping, child endangerment, and statutory rape.
The local prosecutor had this to say: "I feel confident that this man is either suffering from a psychological problem or is hiding his uncooperative, anti-social and anti-government viewpoints under the disguise of religious dogma. Everybody is entitled to a viewpoint but the defining line is statutory criminal activity and possible terrorist threats. We will weigh the evidence collected and then decide the extent of the charges and whether to prosecute."
A spokesman for the court said this: "We always consider the welfare of people first. If this case is brought to trial we will judge it on the basis of social welfare for the child and criminal activity in violation of law for government. If brought to trial they will be allowed court-determined due process before a jury of their peers to present factual evidence on their behalf. Rest assured, they will NOT be permitted to express their view of the law to the jury-even though they claim to operate under God's law and not man's. This could 'unduly influence' the jury.
They will be appointed an attorney free of charge as attorneys are always for incompetents only. Rest assured that even though our incarceration rate is the highest in the world, the People still claim our courts and judges are the fairest in the world. We respect their religious viewpoints however, they will be judged and prosecuted to the full extent of our government statutory law and we will not allow their religious viewpoints to interfere with our government statutory law in the administration of our justice."
Mary was taken to the Bethlehem General Hospital where she is being examined by doctors. Charges may also be filed against her for endangerment. She will also undergo psychiatric evaluation because of her claim that she is a virgin and that the child is from God.
The director of the psychiatric wing said, "I don't profess to have the right to tell people what to believe, but when their beliefs adversely affect the safety and well-being of others - in this case her child - we must consider her a danger to others. The unidentified drugs at the scene didn't help her case, but I'm confidant that with the proper therapy regimen we can get her back on her feet."
A spokesperson for the governor's office said, "Who knows what was going through their heads? But regardless, their treatment of the child was inexcusable, and the involvement of these others frightening. There is much we don't know about this case, but for the sake of the child and the public, you can be assured that we will pursue this matter to the end."
What Would Happen If Jesus Were Born In U.S. Today?
Infant Discovered In Barn, Child Protective Services Launch Probe
Nazareth Carpenter Being Held On Charges Involving Underage Mother
12/14/06 --"Information Clearing House" - Bethlehem, Judea - Authorities were today alerted by a concerned citizen who noticed a family living in a barn. Upon arrival, Family Protective Service personnel, accompanied by police, took into protective care an infant child named Jesus, who had been wrapped in strips of cloth and placed in a feeding trough by his 14-year old mother, Mary of Nazareth.
During the confrontation, a man identified as Joseph, also of Nazareth, attempted to stop the social workers. Joseph, aided by several local shepherds and some unidentified foreigners, tried to forestall efforts to take the child, but were restrained by the police.
At one point Joseph became confrontational and delusional claiming the child was "God's child". An officer, who used a Tazer device on Joseph, stated,"The man became uncooperative. We feared for his own safety and that of the child so we used a non-lethal weapon and restrained him in handcuffs. This was the same man I detained earlier for attempting to take a donkey on a public highway. At that time he incredibly claimed a 'common right to his conveyance of choice on a public highway' explaining that his donkey only used the grassy portion and was nointerference to the faster vehicles.
He showed no identification, said he had no job and claimed to not have a social security number-laughing and uttering some non-sense that it was the 'mark of the beast'. He was cooperative at that time so I let him go with a highway warning and a charge of vagrancy. It's a trend with these types of people: We find that they start in minor trouble like traffic incidents and graduate to more acts of civil disobedience. Eventually they cross-over and break one of the many many laws of and for government. Still, I can't understand why he became uncooperative to the point that we had to use non-lethal force-after all we're just doing the job of the 'consent of the governed'. Don't these people understand that they must submit to authority that is in their best interests?"
Also being held for questioning are three foreigners who incredibly allege to be "wise men" from an eastern country. The INS and Homeland Security officials are seeking information about these who may be in the country illegally. A source with the INS states that they had no passports, but were in possession of gold and other possibly illegal substances. They resisted arrest saying that they had been warned by God to avoid officials in Jerusalem and to return quickly to their own country. The chemical substances in their possession will be tested. An officer at the scene said the suspicious enclosures for the chemical substances might constitute "drug paraphernalia". The agent for Homeland Security stated that he contacted the IRS under the suspicion that this gold might be linked to a foreign trust method of "under-reporting income".
An agent commented: "The presence of paraphernalia, chemical substances, gold, and foreign people without passports is certainly suspicious. Terrorists are known to fund terrorism activities through illegal drug trading. Or these could be part of an illegal-alien smuggling ring from Mexico. In either case the claim that these three are Kings is unsubstantiated as they are not diplomats registered with the Department of State."
The owner of the barn is also being held for questioning. The manager of Bethlehem Inn faces possible revocation of his license for violating health and safety regulations by allowing people to stay in the stable. Civil authorities are also investigating the zoning violations involved in maintaining livestock in a commercially-zoned district. The owner of the barn claimed he provided the lodging free hence the guests did not need to register.
He was noted to exclaim, "For heaven's sake, its Jesus! Can't we forego government intrusion into our lives for the Christ-child celebration?" Authorities were not amused and demanded his identification and his Inn lodging and restaurant board-of-health certification.
The location of the minor child will not be released, and the prospect for a quick resolution to this case is doubtful. Asked about when Jesus would be returned to his mother, a Child Protective Service spokesperson said, "The father is middle-aged and the mother definitely underage. This is suspicious behavior worthy of investigation." When asked who these people were and where they were from, the spokesman replied: "Both parents refuse to provide identification. Both claim no social security number and provided no marriage license.
The father claims a license from heaven as a common-law right. They have no birth certificate for the baby Jesus. In this sense they are deemed uncooperative by us and are probably members of some anti-government common-law movement group. I simply can't imagine why parents would not want to register the birth and citizenship of a baby such as Jesus!
In America everybody does this--it's for the welfare of the child. Why would they not want to register that baby Jesus as a UNITED STATES CITIZEN and hence leave his real citizenship in question? If they are not hiding something, what do they have to fear?
I tried to reason with the father. I asked the father the question as to why he never applied for baby Jesus' social security number explaining that Jesus could have earning's credit's and receive retirement benefits. The father uttered total non-sense about 'rendering unto Caesar', more religious 'mark-of-the-beast' dogma, and retirement in God's kingdom.
Frankly I'm flabbergasted by these types of people. It's a trend we wish to stop. They never volunteer and this we view as uncooperative behavior. They never apply for social security numbers, they never register the birth of their children, they refuse to register to vote for our two parties, they don't show us identification when we ask 'for their papers" kindly, they refuse to send their children to public education under a homeschool banner, they claim adherence to God's law and not man's, they claim government harassment as the reason they must be transients, and they protest filling-out voluntary-compliance government forms. Frankly, these types of anti-government people are always uncooperative. We are checking with officials in Nazareth to determine what the legal relationship is between father, mother and baby."
Joseph has admitted taking Mary from her home in Nazareth because of a census requirement. However, because she was obviously pregnant when they left, investigators are looking into other reasons for their departure. Joseph is being held without bond on charges of molestation, kidnapping, child endangerment, and statutory rape.
The local prosecutor had this to say: "I feel confident that this man is either suffering from a psychological problem or is hiding his uncooperative, anti-social and anti-government viewpoints under the disguise of religious dogma. Everybody is entitled to a viewpoint but the defining line is statutory criminal activity and possible terrorist threats. We will weigh the evidence collected and then decide the extent of the charges and whether to prosecute."
A spokesman for the court said this: "We always consider the welfare of people first. If this case is brought to trial we will judge it on the basis of social welfare for the child and criminal activity in violation of law for government. If brought to trial they will be allowed court-determined due process before a jury of their peers to present factual evidence on their behalf. Rest assured, they will NOT be permitted to express their view of the law to the jury-even though they claim to operate under God's law and not man's. This could 'unduly influence' the jury.
They will be appointed an attorney free of charge as attorneys are always for incompetents only. Rest assured that even though our incarceration rate is the highest in the world, the People still claim our courts and judges are the fairest in the world. We respect their religious viewpoints however, they will be judged and prosecuted to the full extent of our government statutory law and we will not allow their religious viewpoints to interfere with our government statutory law in the administration of our justice."
Mary was taken to the Bethlehem General Hospital where she is being examined by doctors. Charges may also be filed against her for endangerment. She will also undergo psychiatric evaluation because of her claim that she is a virgin and that the child is from God.
The director of the psychiatric wing said, "I don't profess to have the right to tell people what to believe, but when their beliefs adversely affect the safety and well-being of others - in this case her child - we must consider her a danger to others. The unidentified drugs at the scene didn't help her case, but I'm confidant that with the proper therapy regimen we can get her back on her feet."
A spokesperson for the governor's office said, "Who knows what was going through their heads? But regardless, their treatment of the child was inexcusable, and the involvement of these others frightening. There is much we don't know about this case, but for the sake of the child and the public, you can be assured that we will pursue this matter to the end."
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)