N.H. Families Request Audit of NH DHHS/DCYFNH DCYF - The Petition Site

N.H. Families Request Audit of NH DHHS/DCYFNH DCYF - The Petition Site

Target: Petition for Audit of NH DCYF
Sponsored by: Dorothy Knightly, Hope Nardone and Pat Patterson
NH families are requesting an audit of NH DHHS/DCYF. A list of points has been put together by NH families to show how much an audit is duly warranted in this state.

1) thorough investigation of skillset/mindset/educational backgrounds/experience of the NH DCYF caseworkers, supervisors and subcontracted staff, to determine if NH DCYF staff (and subcontracted staff) are capable of the determinations that they make for children taken into NH DCYF custody and of the decisions regarding the families of those children

2) indepth investigation of the actions of NH DCYF caseworkers,supervisors, lawyers and subcontracted staff upon taking *children away from their families and placing the children* into "protective custody," and proof that the child in NH DCYF custody is kept safe and that all actions of NH DCYF are soley in the best interest of the child, instead of in the best interest of NH DCYF staff.

3) an in-depth investigation to study the damages that NH DCYF has caused to children and their families, resulting from NH DCYF allegations of parents and families of the children/youth in "protective custody"

3A) That a yearly clinical study needs to be done on each child that NH DCYF takes into custody and places outside of the family to assess the damage and trauma the child has suffered while in DCYF custody, until the child reaches 18 years of age (21 years of age for disabled children) or until DCYF returns the child to his/her family, which almost never happens

4) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's failure to ensure continued proper assessment and medical/mental health treatment of the children in the system

5) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's failure to place children with relatives prior to placing children in foster homes

6) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's actions to abuse their authority within the NH judicial system, legal, healthcare, medical and school system (this includes and is not limited to: stalling court ordered testing of a child in NH DCYF custody, stalling homestudies, stalling homestudy results and incomplete home studies in order to keep a child in NH DCYF custody, gaining further power via abusing exparte hearings to make false allegations against a parent/family of a child taken into NH DCYF custody, abusing their authority to access medical and healthcare records of a child (or of the child's family) prior to being taken into NH DCYF custody, NH DCYF caseworkers influencing healthcare and medical professionals in order to obtain a slanted 2nd opinion or what should have been a neutral professional opinion, NH DCYF abusing their power to cover up a child's special needs in order to create a false picture that the child is making progress while in NH DCYF custody when in fact the child is not making progress, delaying the child's IEP testing, etc ) and medicating foster children with psychiatric medication for violent behavior, without the parents consent. Behavior the child never experienced until taken from his/her family.

6A) an indepth investigation as to actions and influence of NH DYCF regarding the result/finding of homestudies and the decision/denial of homestudy appeals filed by families to the Administrative Appeals Unit

7) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's actions that failed to follow court orders. IE: court ordered visitation, acting within the timeframes as required by law for any and all actions and decisions regarding children in the system as well as the families of those children

8) an in-depth investigation to study allegations made by NH DCYF's staff to schools, medical professionals, health care professionals, relatives, etc about parents/families of children in NH DCYF custody

9) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's falsifying any type of document and withholding evidence that might be a contradiction of such NH DCYF false allegations and might clear the parent/family of the false allegations made by NH DCYF: This includes and is not limited to: falsifying information on birth certificates in order to promote adoption of a child in NH DCYF custody, false statements and manipulation of facts in order to take a child into NH DCYF custody, false statements in order to obtain social security monies, false statements in order to gain further federal or state monies and false statements to Judges without proof of allegations in order to remove a child from their parents.

10) an in-depth investigation to study how monies were obtained by NH DCYF from the families of the children in protective custody and an audit to the penny of all monies spent by NH DCYF/NH DHHS

11) an in-depth investigation to study the extent of NH DCYF's "double billing" to gain additional funding from the Government, from the State and from families of children in NH DCYF custody

12) an in-depth investigation for a complete audit that will include how every penny of foster care monies was spent on each child in NH DCYF custody

13) an in-depth investigation for determination of financial damages caused by NH
DCYF to the families of those children taken fraudalently by NH DCYF

14) an in-depth investigation for determination of physical, social, psychological, emotional damages caused to the children and to the families of children in NH DCYF custody

15) an in-depth investigation for determination of the extent that NH DCYF has alienated children from their families, including the extent that NH DCYF has alienated the parent from the child in NH DCYF custody

16) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's actions as abuse and neglect of children in NH DCYF's custody (IE: as those children were and are entitled to freedom to practice the same religion that they practiced prior to being taken into NH DCYF custody, children who were not considered to be placed with relatives instead of being placed into foster care, children who were denied the right to prompt IEP testing within the allotted timeframe from the moment that IEP testing was requested of NH DCYF in writing by the guardian or parent of the child in NH DCYF custody, prompt and proper evaluation and treatment of mental, physical and psychiatric illness of the children in NH DCYF custody, and an indepth review of the medications that were given to the children in NH DCYF custody with a full explanation as to the reason for each medication given, the right of the child to spend time with their family, the social and emotional and physical trauma or injury caused to the child as a direct result of the child being taken into NH DCYF custody: this includes and is not limited to: children placed in foster care or in other settings, any bruises, open skin areas, broken bones, fall/accidents, hospitalizations, broken teeth, signs/symptoms of anxiety or depression including suicide attempts of each and every child during the time that the child is in NH DCYF custody)

17) an indepth investigation to determine if NH DCYF has acted on behalf or in violation of our constitution

18) an indepth look at NH DCYF's actions to determine whether NH DCYF has followed or violated their own mission statement: including determination of how NH DCYF has "reunified families", (if any) in a timely manner and in the least traumatic way for the children, youth and families that they are "supposed" to be servicing,

18A) an indepth investigation as to how many families have been reunified by NH DCYF within the last five years,

18B) an indepth investigation as to how many parent's rights were terminated in NH within a five year period and how many TPR's(termination of parental rights) were filed by NH DCYF within that five year period


18C) an indepth investigation to determine if NH DCYF has violated federal law via the manner in which NH DCYF takes children into the system, via the manner in which NH DCYF gains further legal power through the use of exparte hearings, via tampering with documents, via falsifying documents, illegally gaining access to information such as medical and health information without full consent and full knowledge of the child's parent/guardian during the time that NH DCYF doesn't have full custody, via stalling documents and testing in order to stall for time within the legal system in order to keep a child in NH DCYF custody

19) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's actions to determine what extent NH DCYF has acted outside of the scope of their usual practice or their Administrative Rules (IE: slandering any families of children in the system, practicing medicine without a license, stalking families, delaying testing/evaluations of the children in NH DCYF custody, tampering/manipulating evidence and truths in order to obtain physical custody of a child, denial of family homestudies of children in NH DCYF custody in order to keep the child in foster care instead of relative placement, tampering with birth certificates as a means to adopt a child to different family, terminating parental rights without just cause, denying families their parental rights when the parental rights have not been terminated, dating family members/having romantic relationships with families of children in the system, and forceful separations of married couples, and other unethical and inappropriate behaviors


20) an indepth investigation as to financial costs to the people of NH for each NH DCYF allegation (which includes and is not limited to, court costs, transportation costs) and to the financial gains that NH DCYF/NH DHHS makes for each child that they take into NH DCYF custody.

21) An indepth investigation of DCYF files showing services given to the number of at-risk families before the removal of a child within a five year period and how many children were removed due to DCYF's allegation's of the child being in imminent danger

21A) What pertains to imminent danger and how many children have been removed from their families in the last five years for anticipated "Neglect in the Future"

22) an indepth investigation as to the amount of federal money being paid to DCYF for the removal for each child compared to the amount of money paid for each family kept together
And request that there be specific requirements for NH DCYF caseworkers and staff who directly work with children in NH DCYF custody and their families (to include parent aids) as there are for doctors, nurses, health aids.
These specific requirements are to include a professional conduct code for each level of staff, specific levels of education for each level of staff (including ongoing training to work with children youth and families), professional licensure codes and professional and licensure accountability of biased or falsified information for all NH DCYF staff and all NH DCYF subcontracted staff who have direct or indirect contact/work with the children in NH DCYF custody or their families (this would include parent aids also).

Request that NH DCYF be made to correct their wrongdoings, return children promptly to their families as soon as there is evidence that contradicts the allegations made by NH DCYF staff, that NH DCYF be required to financially compensate each child/youth/family whom NH DCYF has traumatized, injured, abused, neglected, slandered. NH DCYF must be required to compensate each parent for the loss of job, loss of home, all physical and emotional insults and injuries caused by NH DCYF staff for practicing outside of the scope of their practice, for obtaining privately protected health and medical information without the consent of the child's parent/guardian, for each false statement made about a family member, for each failure to keep the child in safe environment that is most appropriate for the child's needs, financial compensation for failure to ensure that a child in NH DCYF custody be allowed their Constitutional rights, financial compensation for failure to promptly assess, and ensure appropriate diagnosis and treatment of a child in NH DCYF custody.

FAMILY JURY AMENDMENT - The Petition Site

FAMILY JURY AMENDMENT - The Petition Site

target: cps, jury, family, amendment, constitution, dcs, dhs, dcf, fathers, rights, mothers, children, grand parents
sponsored by: We The People
signature goal: 1,000
signatures: 65
You are now informed to take legal action by helping to establish a Jury trial with in Family Court. Since Family Court began in the early 1960's followed by Child Protection Services in 1974 and Child Support in 1975 along with other issues many have not understood why a Jury Trial isn't available like it is in Criminal Court. We The People said Americans' have been violated of their 4th amendment (free From Invasion), 14th Amendment (freedom of Life, Due Process, etc... only applicable to the child once they become over 18 and with in staute limitations), 6th and 7th (Trial by Jury in Criminal and Civil), etc...... but the laws stay specific to their wording so now We The People ask for an amendment to legislate a firm Jury Process in Family Court. By doing this we can solve many problems especially with those amendments and issues not being followed such as but not limited to:
SBX 11 issued by International Atty Richard Fine (Abolish Conflicts of Interest in Ct)
.........................................
SR519 issued by parentalrights.org involving Equal Parenting & Removal of Children
.........................................
Violence Against Womens Act Reform
.........................................
Child Support Bradley Amendment Reform ( takes drivers and professional licenses)
..........................................
Veterans for Unification with their Family (18 Vets Daily Commit Suicide)
..........................................
Proper spending of Title 4 Funds (Tax Money)
..........................................
Divorce Court Proceedings
By focussing on Jury Trial as Senator Nancy Schaefer was pushing for prior to her passing and after establishing a loopholed Open Court System Nationally we must carry the legacy on. In 1791 (est of Constitution) the very same reasons for the need of Jury Trial existed in other courts and Now We must work together to precisely advance the same method to Family Court for preservation of our dying nation with hopes to reach out to the world! With out proper supervision, checks and balances we can never fix the murdered children, elderly(APS adult protection svc) and corrupt business of the courts. Once the People stand up and say no more it shall be done. Please help us by signing and promoting this petition for International Attorney and Congress review.
Will it cost more money? NO. It will actually save tax paying money because the courts will be forced to abolish their conflicts if interests. Court officials are already in session being paid and with common citizens around they will be more conservative. Over half of Jurrors called in for duty are not utilized in criminal while being sent away and never paid. Court Contractors like CPS, APS, CASA, Prosecutor, Rehabs, Foster Homes, Nursing Homes, Spouse Abuse Centers, etc.... will be watched more closely than ever before.
Is it impossible to accomplish? NO. People came together in numbers back in the 1800's with less technology available today.
Can we donate money? We ask that you donate only your time and participation to full fill our Democracy as a Government built by the people which is you and I. No money is necessary while many of the orgs we deal with do raise funds for their progressive agendas of which stem from the root of Family Court Reform and this petition.
Where can I learn more? There are thousands of Family Preservation Organizations, Advocates and activists and most of them can be researched along with information on amendments here:
WWW.OFFICIALDCRALLYFEST.COM
http://www.officialdcrallyfest.com/Sponsors.html
News Articles here:
http://www.officialdcrallyfest.com/NEWS-CASTS.html
Videos on those who have died in Family Preservation:
GOD Bless you............Bill Bowen
.............................................
GOD Bless you............ Nancy Schaefer
.............................................
GOD Bless you...........REV RON SMITH
.............................................
Film Clips Regarding Our Efforts Hands On
All we ask is that you sign this petition and spread the word either in person or from where you are. You now know the truth and with out action ALL dreams will grow into nightmares.

JUSTICE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN | JUSTICE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN

JUSTICE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN | JUSTICE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN

JUSTICE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN
Sign the Petition : 436 Letters and Emails Sent So Far

WE THE PEOPLE WANT JUSTICE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN -


PETITION FOR REFORM WITHIN THE UNITED STATES' DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES AND THE COURT SYSTEMS

THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY PETITION THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TO INVESTIGATE AND REFORM CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES IN THE UNITED STATES,

DUE TO EXCESSIVE AND GROSS VIOLATIONS OF FEDERAL AND STATE MANDATES, FEDERAL, STATE STATUES; COMMON AND CONSITIUTIONAL LAW, REMOVAL OF CHILDREN FROM GOOD PARENTS.
WE CONTEND THAT THERE IS NO OVERSIGHT IN THESE MATTERS AND COMPLAINTS FALL ON DEAF EARS WITH NO RECOURSE FOR THE FAMILIES TO GET FAIR AND EQUAL TREATMENT IN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM.

ALL POWER AND AUTHORITY REST WITH THE CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICE AS THE JUDGES SIDE WITH THEM IN ALMOST ALL CASES.

CPS Agents are Legally Abducting Children based upon lies and Heresay rather than Facts or Evidence in order to gain Financially through ASFA.
ASFA is The Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA, Public Law 105-89) that was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on Nov. 19, 1997. This Law enables state agencies to use unethical practices to obtain children for Federal funds by falsifying reports and working in collusion with judges, physicians, attorneys, psychologists, psychiatrists, therapists, and other equally unethical contracted workers. Once These Workers have Ripped Apart your Family, you will find that The ASFA includes provisions to deny reunification services under specified conditions and gives states latitude to develop any number of additional aggravated circumstances in which parents need not be offered services.
Legislators have developed a relatively large number of conditions enabling agencies to bypass reunification services, and thus effectively Speed up the Human Trafficking Train By Refusing Parents their Constitutional Rights
---Within 15 months, the kids are on the State Auction Websites, Ready for the Highest Bidder to Buy.

In point of fact, all 50 states have failed to comply with federal child-welfare standards developed to protect children from abuse and neglect cps are the abusers.

Perpetrators of Maltreatment
________________________________________________


Physical Abuse:CPS= 160- Parents = 59
___________________________________________
Sexual Abuse : CPS = 112 - Parents = 13
____________________________________________
Neglect: CPS = 410 -Parents = 241
_____________________________________________
Medical Neglect: CPS = 14 Parents = 12
_____________________________________________
Fatalities: CPS = 6.4 PERCENT- Parents = 1.5 PERCENT


We need YOUR help to Save America s Families from this HORRIBLE TRAVESTY. HOW MANY MORE PRECIOUS CHILDREN NEED TO DIE BEFORE YOU WHO TOOK AN OATH TO UPHOLD THE LAW DO SOMETHING TO REFORM THE SYSTEM THAT IS KILLING AND ABUSING OUR CHILDREN OUR GRANDCHILDREN. THE FUTURE GENERATIONS ALL OF OURS!

We that undersigned citizens of the United States of America, do hereby sign this Petition for Repeal ASFA, and for Reform of the Department of Human Services (CPS). We are intending that upon a sufficient number of persons to sign said Petition, that this petition be Presented to the Legislature in Washington,DC, and the current Governor ,Members of Congress and Senate, and to the President himself for consideration of the passage of legislation reforming the powers reserved to the Department of Human Services as follows:

1. That the agents, servants of employees of DHS, be restricted in such a manner that no one shall be removed unless there is CLEAR and CONVINCING PHYSICAL EVIDENCE (NOT HEARSAY!) that the life, health, or welfare of the person is subject to danger and that there exist no other alternative other than removal.

2. That DHS shall make every attempt to see that persons who are removed from their homes be placed in the homes of a RELATIVE or NEIGHBOR.

3. That ANY AND ALL JUVENILE COURTS & THEIR RECORDS be made to be OPEN TO THE PUBLIC and to PUBLIC SCRUTINY, and that ALL ACCUSERS be held accountable for their actions.

4. That ANY AND ALL PARTIES ACCUSED OF CHILD NEGLECT, ABUSE, etc. BY DHS be allowed to exercise their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF TRIAL BY A JURY OF THEIR PEERS if they so desire.

5. That any and all bonuses received by DHS employees for the Legal Abduction of Children be placed in a Scholarship fund for those same children in an account set aside specifically for this purpose. The goal being to effectively REMOVE the TEMPTATION of treating children as a paycheck.

We the residents of the United States, do hereby sign this Petition For Reform of the immunities given to DHS in the matter of Civil and Criminal Action Against them.

1. When DHS VIOLATES A UNITED STATES CITIZENS CIVIL &/or CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, THE INJURED PARTY SHOULD BE ALLOWED AND ABLE TO PURSUE CRIMINAL, ACTUAL AND PUNITIVE ACTIONS AND CLAIMS AGAINST THEM.

2. When DHS places a person or child into a foster home and/or Facility, They shall be held ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS. If child, or infant becomes a VICTIM of Sexual, Physical, or Emotional Abuse as a DIRECT RESULT of this Placement (or other interference), The Victim and the Victim's Family Deserve to have the Option of Pursuing Criminal, Civil, Actual, and Punitive Actions and Claims against the Facility/ foster home, the Workers Directly Responsible for the Placement, and (Under Color of Law) DHS(and its agents and/or caseworkers) itself.

3. If the Judge in a Juvenile Case Shows Bias and/or Irrational Decisions, he or she should be IMMEDIATELY taken off the case and a Change of Venue Assigned.

4. All State and Federal Employees & Cullusive Agents/Entities/Indivuduals Guilty of this Unwarranted Search and Seizure, Kidnapping, etc shall be tried And Punished with the MAXIMUM Sentence under U.S. Federal Civil Rights Statutes:
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 245 - Federally Protected Activities
Title 42, U.S.C., Section 3631 - Criminal Interference with Right to Fair Housing

LT is released…and comes home. « I Was A Foster Kid

LT is released…and comes home. « I Was A Foster Kid: "i was in the hospital because slightly over 2 weeks ago, i called Dr. Val sobbing and told her i was going to kill myself; i had the weapon, the plan, the place, the song, everything… Dr. C admitted me."

NCCPR Child Welfare Blog: Covering foster care: Overriding the “Veto of Silence”

NCCPR Child Welfare Blog: Covering foster care: Overriding the “Veto of Silence”: "   Yesterday, I wrote about some of the reasons why so many reporters won’t even look into a story about parents who say their children were taken from them needlessly.  And I wrote about an exception: Issac Bailey, metro columnist for The Sun News in Myrtle Beach, S.C.

 Bailey is not one of those sit-on-your-ass-and-pontificate columnists; content, week after week, to regurgitate what reporters found and add some declarations of outrage.  (In all of journalism is there anything easier to do than spit out the “boy to I hate child abuse!” column?)"

Former foster care worker gets 5 years' probation - News

Former foster care worker gets 5 years' probation - News

DAYTONA BEACH -- A former case manager for a local foster care agency was sentenced Tuesday to five years' probation for falsifying records, prosecutors said.

Damion Hall, 29, of Port Orange pleaded no contest to nine counts of falsifying records and forgery.

Trial for Saskatchewan foster mother won't be heard until 2011

Trial for Saskatchewan foster mother won't be heard until 2011: "ABERDEEN, Sask. — The case of a Saskatchewan foster mother charged in connection with the drowning death of a 22-month-old boy will go to a preliminary hearing in the new year.

Eunice Wudrich, 45, is charged with criminal negligence causing death and endangering the life of a child in connection with the death of Evander Lee Daniels.

The toddler was found partially submerged in a bathtub of water in a residence near Aberdeen, Sask., on June 8, 2010."