Exposing Child UN-Protective Services and the Deceitful Practices They Use to Rip Families Apart/Where Relative Placement is NOT an Option, as Stated by a DCYF Supervisor
Unbiased Reporting
What I post on this Blog does not mean I agree with the articles or disagree. I call it Unbiased Reporting!
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
The Truth Bites "NH": Mother Fights Back reference current matter
The Truth Bites "NH": Mother Fights Back reference current matter: "Mother Fights Back reference current matter
On: Dec 12/01/10 4:54 PM
To: carianna.keniston@nh.gov
CC: governorlynch@nh.gov
RE: last request on DHHS Billing Discrepancy's and Procedures of Department of Children Youth and Families"
On: Dec 12/01/10 4:54 PM
To: carianna.keniston@nh.gov
CC: governorlynch@nh.gov
RE: last request on DHHS Billing Discrepancy's and Procedures of Department of Children Youth and Families"
CBC News - Saskatchewan - Boy's death in foster care 'no accident,' dad says
CBC News - Saskatchewan - Boy's death in foster care 'no accident,' dad says: "Boy's death in foster care 'no accident,' dad says
Last Updated: Wednesday, December 1, 2010 | 4:44 PM
CBC News
Evander Daniels was 22 months old when he drowned while in foster care in Aberdeen, about 40 kilometres northeast of Saskatoon, in June. (Legacy.com)
The father of 22-month-old Evander Daniels, who drowned while in foster care outside Saskatoon, says he doesn't believe his son's death was an accident.
'His burns to his body were just horrible, and this is no accident,' Chris Martel told CBC News Wednesday."
Last Updated: Wednesday, December 1, 2010 | 4:44 PM
CBC News
Evander Daniels was 22 months old when he drowned while in foster care in Aberdeen, about 40 kilometres northeast of Saskatoon, in June. (Legacy.com)
The father of 22-month-old Evander Daniels, who drowned while in foster care outside Saskatoon, says he doesn't believe his son's death was an accident.
'His burns to his body were just horrible, and this is no accident,' Chris Martel told CBC News Wednesday."
Grounds for Termination of Parental Rights New Hampshire
Grounds for Termination of Parental Rights New Hampshire
s
Statute: §§ 170-C:5; 169-C:24-a
Circumstances That Are Grounds for Termination
Abandonment or Extreme Parental Disinterest
Abuse/Neglect
Mental Illness or Deficiency
Felony Conviction/Incarceration
Failure of Reasonable Efforts
Sexual Abuse
Failure to Provide Support
Child Judged in Need of Services/Dependent
Child's Best Interest
Child in care 15 of 22 months (or less)
Felony assault of child or sibling
Murder/Manslaughter of sibling child
Circumstances That Are Not Grounds for Termination
Alcohol or Drug Induced Incapacity
(Then why are newborn's stolen when the mother is given MORPHINE in labor?)
(Why are children stolen when their mother is accused of being intoxicated?)
Abuse/Neglect or Loss of Rights of Another Child
Failure to Maintain Contact
Failure to Establish Paternity
N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 169-C:24-a (Lexis, WESTLAW through 1999 Reg. Sess.)
The State, through an authorized agency, or if required by a district court, shall file a petition for termination of parental rights or, if such a petition has been filed by another party, the State shall seek to be joined as a party to such petition, where any one of the following circumstances exist:
Where a child has been an out-of-home placement pursuant to a finding of child neglect or abuse, under the responsibility of the State, for 12 of the most recent 22 months;
Where a court of competent jurisdiction has determined that a child has been abandoned;
Where a court of competent jurisdiction has made any one or more of the following determinations: That the parent has been convicted of murder or manslaughter of another child of the parent; the parent has been convicted of attempt, solicitation, or conspiracy to commit any of the offenses above; or the parent has been convicted of a felony assault that resulted in serious bodily injury to the child or another child of the parent.
The State may not be required to file a petition for termination of parental rights, or seek to be joined as a party to such a petition, if one or more of the following conditions exist:
The child is being appropriately cared for by a relative;
A State agency has documented in the case file a compelling reason for determining that filing a petition for termination of parental rights would not be in the best interests of the child; or
The State has not provided to the family of the child such services and reasonable efforts as the State deems necessary for the safe return of the child to the child's home. In determining whether the State has made reasonable efforts to prevent placement and reunify the family, the district court shall consider whether services to the family have been accessible, available, and appropriate.
N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 170-C:5 (Lexis, WESTLAW through N.H. 2003 Legis. Serv., Ch. 79)
The petition may be granted where the court finds that one or more of the following conditions exist:
The parent has abandoned the child. It shall be presumed that the parent intended to abandon the child if the parent left the child without provision for his identification or left the child in the care and custody of another without any provision for his support or without communication from such parent for a period of six months. If, in the opinion of the court, the evidence indicates that such parent has made only minimal efforts to support or communicate with the child, the court may declare the child to be abandoned;
Although the parents are financially able, they have substantially and continuously neglected to provide the child with necessary subsistence, education, or other care necessary for his mental, emotional, or physical health or have substantially and continuously neglected to pay for such subsistence, education, or other care when legal custody is lodged with others. However, it shall not be grounds for the termination of the parent-child relationship for the sole reason that the parent relied upon spiritual means through prayer in accordance with a recognized religious method of healing in lieu of medical treatment for the healing of the child;
The parents, subsequent to a finding of child neglect or abuse, have failed to correct the conditions leading to such a finding within 12 months of the finding, despite reasonable efforts under the direction of the district court to rectify the conditions;
Because of mental deficiency or mental illness, the parent is, and will continue to be, incapable of giving the child proper parental care and protection for a longer period of time than would be wise or prudent to leave the child in an unstable or impermanent environment;
The parent knowingly or willfully caused or permitted another to cause severe sexual, physical, emotional or mental abuse of the child. Subsequent to a finding of such abuse, the parent-child relationship may be terminated if return of the child to the parent would result in a substantial possibility of harm to the child. A substantial possibility of harm to the child shall be established by testimony of at least two of the following factors:
The parent's conduct toward the child has
resulted in severe harm to the child;
The parent's conduct toward the child has continued despite the reasonable efforts of authorized agencies in obtaining or providing services for the parent to reduce or alleviate such conduct;
The parent's conduct has continued to occur either over a period of time, or many times, or to such a degree so as to indicate a pattern of behavior on the part of the parent which indicates a complete disregard for the child's health and welfare;
Such conduct is likely to continue with no change in parental behavior, attitude, or actions.(This is where the DCYF/CPS Psychic's come into play)
Testimony shall be provided by any combination of at least two of the following people: a licensed psychiatrist, a clinical psychologist, a physician, or social worker who possesses a master's degree in social work and is a member of the Academy of Certified Social Workers.
If the parent or guardian is, as a result of incarceration for a felony offense, unable to discharge his responsibilities to and for the child, and in addition, has been found to have abused or neglected his child or children, the court may review the conviction of the parent or guardian to determine whether the felony offense is of such nature, and the period of incarceration imposed such duration, that the child would be deprived of proper parental care and left in an unstable or impermanent environment for a longer period of time than would be prudent. Placement of the child in foster care shall not be considered proper parental care and protection. Incarceration, in and of itself, shall not be grounds for termination of parental rights;
The parent has been convicted of one or more of the following offenses: Murder or manslaughter of another child of the parent or of the child's other parent; attempt, solicitation, or conspiracy to commit any of the above offenses; or a felony assault which resulted in serious bodily injury to the child or to another child of the parent, or of the child's other parent.
http://library.adoption.com/articles/grounds-for-termination-of-parental-rights-new-hampshire.html
s
Statute: §§ 170-C:5; 169-C:24-a
Circumstances That Are Grounds for Termination
Abandonment or Extreme Parental Disinterest
Abuse/Neglect
Mental Illness or Deficiency
Felony Conviction/Incarceration
Failure of Reasonable Efforts
Sexual Abuse
Failure to Provide Support
Child Judged in Need of Services/Dependent
Child's Best Interest
Child in care 15 of 22 months (or less)
Felony assault of child or sibling
Murder/Manslaughter of sibling child
Circumstances That Are Not Grounds for Termination
Alcohol or Drug Induced Incapacity
(Then why are newborn's stolen when the mother is given MORPHINE in labor?)
(Why are children stolen when their mother is accused of being intoxicated?)
Abuse/Neglect or Loss of Rights of Another Child
Failure to Maintain Contact
Failure to Establish Paternity
N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 169-C:24-a (Lexis, WESTLAW through 1999 Reg. Sess.)
The State, through an authorized agency, or if required by a district court, shall file a petition for termination of parental rights or, if such a petition has been filed by another party, the State shall seek to be joined as a party to such petition, where any one of the following circumstances exist:
Where a child has been an out-of-home placement pursuant to a finding of child neglect or abuse, under the responsibility of the State, for 12 of the most recent 22 months;
Where a court of competent jurisdiction has determined that a child has been abandoned;
Where a court of competent jurisdiction has made any one or more of the following determinations: That the parent has been convicted of murder or manslaughter of another child of the parent; the parent has been convicted of attempt, solicitation, or conspiracy to commit any of the offenses above; or the parent has been convicted of a felony assault that resulted in serious bodily injury to the child or another child of the parent.
The State may not be required to file a petition for termination of parental rights, or seek to be joined as a party to such a petition, if one or more of the following conditions exist:
The child is being appropriately cared for by a relative;
A State agency has documented in the case file a compelling reason for determining that filing a petition for termination of parental rights would not be in the best interests of the child; or
The State has not provided to the family of the child such services and reasonable efforts as the State deems necessary for the safe return of the child to the child's home. In determining whether the State has made reasonable efforts to prevent placement and reunify the family, the district court shall consider whether services to the family have been accessible, available, and appropriate.
N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 170-C:5 (Lexis, WESTLAW through N.H. 2003 Legis. Serv., Ch. 79)
The petition may be granted where the court finds that one or more of the following conditions exist:
The parent has abandoned the child. It shall be presumed that the parent intended to abandon the child if the parent left the child without provision for his identification or left the child in the care and custody of another without any provision for his support or without communication from such parent for a period of six months. If, in the opinion of the court, the evidence indicates that such parent has made only minimal efforts to support or communicate with the child, the court may declare the child to be abandoned;
Although the parents are financially able, they have substantially and continuously neglected to provide the child with necessary subsistence, education, or other care necessary for his mental, emotional, or physical health or have substantially and continuously neglected to pay for such subsistence, education, or other care when legal custody is lodged with others. However, it shall not be grounds for the termination of the parent-child relationship for the sole reason that the parent relied upon spiritual means through prayer in accordance with a recognized religious method of healing in lieu of medical treatment for the healing of the child;
The parents, subsequent to a finding of child neglect or abuse, have failed to correct the conditions leading to such a finding within 12 months of the finding, despite reasonable efforts under the direction of the district court to rectify the conditions;
Because of mental deficiency or mental illness, the parent is, and will continue to be, incapable of giving the child proper parental care and protection for a longer period of time than would be wise or prudent to leave the child in an unstable or impermanent environment;
The parent knowingly or willfully caused or permitted another to cause severe sexual, physical, emotional or mental abuse of the child. Subsequent to a finding of such abuse, the parent-child relationship may be terminated if return of the child to the parent would result in a substantial possibility of harm to the child. A substantial possibility of harm to the child shall be established by testimony of at least two of the following factors:
The parent's conduct toward the child has
resulted in severe harm to the child;
The parent's conduct toward the child has continued despite the reasonable efforts of authorized agencies in obtaining or providing services for the parent to reduce or alleviate such conduct;
The parent's conduct has continued to occur either over a period of time, or many times, or to such a degree so as to indicate a pattern of behavior on the part of the parent which indicates a complete disregard for the child's health and welfare;
Such conduct is likely to continue with no change in parental behavior, attitude, or actions.(This is where the DCYF/CPS Psychic's come into play)
Testimony shall be provided by any combination of at least two of the following people: a licensed psychiatrist, a clinical psychologist, a physician, or social worker who possesses a master's degree in social work and is a member of the Academy of Certified Social Workers.
If the parent or guardian is, as a result of incarceration for a felony offense, unable to discharge his responsibilities to and for the child, and in addition, has been found to have abused or neglected his child or children, the court may review the conviction of the parent or guardian to determine whether the felony offense is of such nature, and the period of incarceration imposed such duration, that the child would be deprived of proper parental care and left in an unstable or impermanent environment for a longer period of time than would be prudent. Placement of the child in foster care shall not be considered proper parental care and protection. Incarceration, in and of itself, shall not be grounds for termination of parental rights;
The parent has been convicted of one or more of the following offenses: Murder or manslaughter of another child of the parent or of the child's other parent; attempt, solicitation, or conspiracy to commit any of the above offenses; or a felony assault which resulted in serious bodily injury to the child or to another child of the parent, or of the child's other parent.
http://library.adoption.com/articles/grounds-for-termination-of-parental-rights-new-hampshire.html
CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES REFORM (LOBBY CONGRESS)
CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES REFORM (LOBBY CONGRESS): "CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES REFORM (LOBBY CONGRESS)
by twinkletoe on Mon Oct 18, 2010 6:49 am
Grandparents blog-Dedicated to Austin and Isabella
Austin Knightly-Doped up by Nashua, NH DCYF"
by twinkletoe on Mon Oct 18, 2010 6:49 am
Grandparents blog-Dedicated to Austin and Isabella
Austin Knightly-Doped up by Nashua, NH DCYF"
Nashua DCYF Complaints - Fraud
Nashua DCYF Complaints - Fraud: "Nashua DCYF
Posted: 2009-08-04 by
Fraud
Complaint Rating:
Company information:
DCYF
19 Chestnut St.
Nashua, New Hampshire
United States
Phone: 603-883-7726"
Nashua DCYF Complaints - Fraud
Review all Nashua DCYF complaints
Nashua DCYF
Posted: 2009-08-04 by unhappygrammy
Fraud
Complaint Rating:
Company information:
DCYF
19 Chestnut St.
Nashua, New Hampshire
United States
Phone: 603-883-7726
The Dcyf Lawyers perjure themselves in court, along with the caseworkers. They take children illegally. They do not provide services to at-risk families. They don't place children with relatives or even consider relatives. They place the children immediately in foster care so Federal funding kicks right in. There are no reasonable efforts or any efforts at all made by DCYF to reunite families. They drug the children when the children become violent thanks to be taken away from their entire families, then they say the child has ADHD even though you have all proof why the child was put on drugs.
They keep the children away from their grandparents and other relatives when they have done nothing wrong. Caseworkers split up married couples and then visit the husband on nights and weekends. When the parents prove their innocence, their children are still not returned. When they do everything their court-ordered to do, the Caseworker goes into court and lies to the Judge, even though all paperwork including call logs prove different. When a child is bi-racial, but looks white, the caseworkers tell the parent not to tell anybody. Could the reason be because white children are worth more to them than bi-racial children? They terminate rights of the wrong men even after their told all information on the father. so in all actuality, the fathers rights are no terminated, and the children are adopted illegally. This is a picture of my grandson Austin Knightly doped up by the state in an orphanage.
Posted: 2009-08-04 by
Fraud
Complaint Rating:
Company information:
DCYF
19 Chestnut St.
Nashua, New Hampshire
United States
Phone: 603-883-7726"
Nashua DCYF Complaints - Fraud
Review all Nashua DCYF complaints
Nashua DCYF
Posted: 2009-08-04 by unhappygrammy
Fraud
Complaint Rating:
Company information:
DCYF
19 Chestnut St.
Nashua, New Hampshire
United States
Phone: 603-883-7726
The Dcyf Lawyers perjure themselves in court, along with the caseworkers. They take children illegally. They do not provide services to at-risk families. They don't place children with relatives or even consider relatives. They place the children immediately in foster care so Federal funding kicks right in. There are no reasonable efforts or any efforts at all made by DCYF to reunite families. They drug the children when the children become violent thanks to be taken away from their entire families, then they say the child has ADHD even though you have all proof why the child was put on drugs.
They keep the children away from their grandparents and other relatives when they have done nothing wrong. Caseworkers split up married couples and then visit the husband on nights and weekends. When the parents prove their innocence, their children are still not returned. When they do everything their court-ordered to do, the Caseworker goes into court and lies to the Judge, even though all paperwork including call logs prove different. When a child is bi-racial, but looks white, the caseworkers tell the parent not to tell anybody. Could the reason be because white children are worth more to them than bi-racial children? They terminate rights of the wrong men even after their told all information on the father. so in all actuality, the fathers rights are no terminated, and the children are adopted illegally. This is a picture of my grandson Austin Knightly doped up by the state in an orphanage.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)