Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Monday, October 11, 2010
12 Step Program for the Recovering CPS Caseworker
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCrQ_cvdesw&feature=player_embedded#!
Sunday, October 10, 2010
CPS incorrect affidavit may dismiss case - John Irish - Alex Jones
How many more affidavits are incorrect in the State of NH? After watching this video, I am aware of MANY!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPusttbnc6A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPusttbnc6A
IT’S NOT A CASE OF “IF”, BUT “WHEN” WE COLLAPSE.
IT’S NOT A CASE OF “IF”, BUT “WHEN” WE COLLAPSE.
Bill Medvecky
In a poll taken almost two years ago, 60% of Americans did not believe the United States would be a single Country by 2076, our Tri-Centennial.
As we already have, we’re going to be separate Nations of Black Americans, Hispanic Americans, Conservative Americans, Liberal Americans, and Indian Americans.
I’m looking forward to it. But then again, I’m a "Whackball" and this could "Never" happen, right?
Libertarian icon and perennial FBN’s Freedom Watch guest Rep. Ron Paul visited the program once again to talk pleasantries with host Judge Andrew Napolitano–
namely, the imminent threat of revolution and Soviet-style collapse. Why is Rep. Paul so happy about these things?
They will force us to adhere to the Constitution!
Judge Napolitano questioned Rep. Paul’s calls of revolution– “are good things about to happen or are horrible things about to happen?”– to which Paul explained that he was not referring to bloody coups or socialist uprising but, rather, an increased interest in “austere economics” and “limited government.” Call it more of an awakening than a revolution, though it will require significant financial turmoil. As to his “Soviet-style collapse” comments, Paul also sees this possibility as a good thing.
“What I’m referring to,” he explained, “is the giving up of our empire.” Just as the USSR had to give up their satellite countries, Americans will have to give up military bases in places like Japan and Germany. “That, to me, will be good. We’ll take care of ourselves, of our borders,” he noted. Judge Napolitano had interpreted the collapse somewhat differently– with states becoming independent nations. The Texas Congressman said he did not foresee pure independence from the federal government, “but [they will be] more independent than they are now. They will have to give up their dependence on the federal government and they will because the federal government will be proven totally inept.” This, in turn, will lead to a more narrow interpretation of the Constitution, which limits government in ways that Paul and Napolitano view as being underminded by stretching out the scope of federal power.
With all due respect Mr. Paul, what "Superpower" EVER gave up their place in the world without one bloody, bloody, revolution?
http://www.flds.ws/2010/10/10/its-not-a-case-of-if-but-when-we-collapse/
Bill Medvecky
In a poll taken almost two years ago, 60% of Americans did not believe the United States would be a single Country by 2076, our Tri-Centennial.
As we already have, we’re going to be separate Nations of Black Americans, Hispanic Americans, Conservative Americans, Liberal Americans, and Indian Americans.
I’m looking forward to it. But then again, I’m a "Whackball" and this could "Never" happen, right?
Libertarian icon and perennial FBN’s Freedom Watch guest Rep. Ron Paul visited the program once again to talk pleasantries with host Judge Andrew Napolitano–
namely, the imminent threat of revolution and Soviet-style collapse. Why is Rep. Paul so happy about these things?
They will force us to adhere to the Constitution!
Judge Napolitano questioned Rep. Paul’s calls of revolution– “are good things about to happen or are horrible things about to happen?”– to which Paul explained that he was not referring to bloody coups or socialist uprising but, rather, an increased interest in “austere economics” and “limited government.” Call it more of an awakening than a revolution, though it will require significant financial turmoil. As to his “Soviet-style collapse” comments, Paul also sees this possibility as a good thing.
“What I’m referring to,” he explained, “is the giving up of our empire.” Just as the USSR had to give up their satellite countries, Americans will have to give up military bases in places like Japan and Germany. “That, to me, will be good. We’ll take care of ourselves, of our borders,” he noted. Judge Napolitano had interpreted the collapse somewhat differently– with states becoming independent nations. The Texas Congressman said he did not foresee pure independence from the federal government, “but [they will be] more independent than they are now. They will have to give up their dependence on the federal government and they will because the federal government will be proven totally inept.” This, in turn, will lead to a more narrow interpretation of the Constitution, which limits government in ways that Paul and Napolitano view as being underminded by stretching out the scope of federal power.
With all due respect Mr. Paul, what "Superpower" EVER gave up their place in the world without one bloody, bloody, revolution?
http://www.flds.ws/2010/10/10/its-not-a-case-of-if-but-when-we-collapse/
BABY STOLEN FROM HOSPITAL BECAUSE DADDY IS AN “OATHKEEPER”.
BABY STOLEN FROM HOSPITAL BECAUSE DADDY IS AN “OATHKEEPER”.
Bill Medvecky
http://www.flds.ws/2010/10/10/baby-stolen-from-hospital-because-daddy-is-an-oathkeeper/
October 10, 2010 – 10:12 am
It has been confirmed that a brand new baby in a hospital was taken by the Gestapo because it’s father belonged to a group known as "Oathkeepers".
I have no opinion of this group, and don’t belong to it. However, what I did do was to look into what they are all about.
This is the "Oath" these people swear to, and I can fully understand why the government is terrified of them:
(I ain’t making this shit up folks, it taken from their site.)
OATH KEEPERS: ORDERS WE WILL NOT OBEY
Click here to read full length version.
1. We will NOT obey orders to disarm the American people.
2. We will NOT obey orders to conduct warrantless searches of the American people
3. We will NOT obey orders to detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatants” or to subject them to military tribunal.
4. We will NOT obey orders to impose martial law or a “state of emergency” on a state.
5. We will NOT obey orders to invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty.
6. We will NOT obey any order to blockade American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps.
7. We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext.
8. We will NOT obey orders to assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil against the American people to “keep the peace” or to “maintain control."
9. We will NOT obey any orders to confiscate the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies.
10.We will NOT obey any orders which infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances.
Click here to read full length version.
HOW DARE THEY PLEDGE NOT TO DO THESE THINGS?
HOW IN THE WORLD IS OUR GOVERNMENT GOING TO FUNCTION IF THEY DON’T?
From WorldNetDaily
By Bob Unruh
A 16-hour-old newborn was snatched from her parents by authorities in Concord, N.H., after social services workers alleged the father is a member of Oath Keepers.
The organization collects affirmations from soldiers and peace officers that they would refuse orders that violate the U.S. Constitution, in light of what they perceive as the advance of socialism in the U.S.
The father, Johnathon Irish, told WND that the affidavit signed by Child Protective Service worker Dana Bicford seeking government custody of newborn Cheyenne said the agency "became aware and confirmed that Mr. Irish associated with a militia known as the ‘Oath Keepers.’"
Irish, in an interview with WND, said officers and other social services workers ordered him to stand with his hands behind his back, frisked him and then took his daughter from him and his fiancé at Concord Hospital where the baby had been born.
Bill Medvecky
http://www.flds.ws/2010/10/10/baby-stolen-from-hospital-because-daddy-is-an-oathkeeper/
October 10, 2010 – 10:12 am
It has been confirmed that a brand new baby in a hospital was taken by the Gestapo because it’s father belonged to a group known as "Oathkeepers".
I have no opinion of this group, and don’t belong to it. However, what I did do was to look into what they are all about.
This is the "Oath" these people swear to, and I can fully understand why the government is terrified of them:
(I ain’t making this shit up folks, it taken from their site.)
OATH KEEPERS: ORDERS WE WILL NOT OBEY
Click here to read full length version.
1. We will NOT obey orders to disarm the American people.
2. We will NOT obey orders to conduct warrantless searches of the American people
3. We will NOT obey orders to detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatants” or to subject them to military tribunal.
4. We will NOT obey orders to impose martial law or a “state of emergency” on a state.
5. We will NOT obey orders to invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty.
6. We will NOT obey any order to blockade American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps.
7. We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext.
8. We will NOT obey orders to assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil against the American people to “keep the peace” or to “maintain control."
9. We will NOT obey any orders to confiscate the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies.
10.We will NOT obey any orders which infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances.
Click here to read full length version.
HOW DARE THEY PLEDGE NOT TO DO THESE THINGS?
HOW IN THE WORLD IS OUR GOVERNMENT GOING TO FUNCTION IF THEY DON’T?
From WorldNetDaily
By Bob Unruh
A 16-hour-old newborn was snatched from her parents by authorities in Concord, N.H., after social services workers alleged the father is a member of Oath Keepers.
The organization collects affirmations from soldiers and peace officers that they would refuse orders that violate the U.S. Constitution, in light of what they perceive as the advance of socialism in the U.S.
The father, Johnathon Irish, told WND that the affidavit signed by Child Protective Service worker Dana Bicford seeking government custody of newborn Cheyenne said the agency "became aware and confirmed that Mr. Irish associated with a militia known as the ‘Oath Keepers.’"
Irish, in an interview with WND, said officers and other social services workers ordered him to stand with his hands behind his back, frisked him and then took his daughter from him and his fiancé at Concord Hospital where the baby had been born.
Girl poisoned adoptive family?
Girl poisoned adoptive family?
A 13-year-old Florida girl is accused of poisoning her adoptive family. She's suspected of serving up a not-so-tasty meal, according to investigators.
Read More:
http://specials.msn.com/A-List/Lifestyle/Girl-poisoned-adoptive-family.aspx?cp-documentID=25888158
A 13-year-old Florida girl is accused of poisoning her adoptive family. She's suspected of serving up a not-so-tasty meal, according to investigators.
Read More:
http://specials.msn.com/A-List/Lifestyle/Girl-poisoned-adoptive-family.aspx?cp-documentID=25888158
Thumbing Their Noses At Those They Serve » DCYF Rightfully Deserves Our Suspicions
Thumbing Their Noses At Those They Serve »
DCYF Rightfully Deserves Our Suspicions
SATURDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2010 AT 05:26PM
Thursday, October 7, 2010, The New Hampshire Division of Children, Youth and Families went to Concord Hospital and took custody of a newborn baby girl not even 24 hours after its birth. The parents were not afforded the opportunity to be heard by a judge, consult a with a lawyer or confront any evidence against them. As with many other cases, the DCYF makes a bunch of assertions in an affidavit, and a judge signs an order ex parte.
Statutorily Sanctioned Oppression
The Division for Children, Youth and Families does not want the public to know about what they do. The laws of the Child Protection Act favor the arbitrary DCYF and stack the deck against families who come into the division cross hairs. The Division is shielded by "confidentiality" laws that keeps their actions and activities out of the public eye. N.H. RSA 169-C:25 I (a) states in part,
Read More at:
http://www.nhinsider.com/richard-olson-jr/2010/10/9/dcyf-rightfully-deserves-our-suspicions.html
DCYF Rightfully Deserves Our Suspicions
SATURDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2010 AT 05:26PM
Thursday, October 7, 2010, The New Hampshire Division of Children, Youth and Families went to Concord Hospital and took custody of a newborn baby girl not even 24 hours after its birth. The parents were not afforded the opportunity to be heard by a judge, consult a with a lawyer or confront any evidence against them. As with many other cases, the DCYF makes a bunch of assertions in an affidavit, and a judge signs an order ex parte.
Statutorily Sanctioned Oppression
The Division for Children, Youth and Families does not want the public to know about what they do. The laws of the Child Protection Act favor the arbitrary DCYF and stack the deck against families who come into the division cross hairs. The Division is shielded by "confidentiality" laws that keeps their actions and activities out of the public eye. N.H. RSA 169-C:25 I (a) states in part,
Read More at:
http://www.nhinsider.com/richard-olson-jr/2010/10/9/dcyf-rightfully-deserves-our-suspicions.html
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)