Reformed Daughter And Wonderful Grandparents...Willard Case
Message from the Willards:
Our daughter's appeal was denied. We now go to adoption court against the great-grandparents on August 5th. Our daughter is appealing now to the Supreme Court of Washington.
I am campaigning. That means this will be short. But, the story is one of CPS charging forward with their minds already made up. Lying to the judges...they have absolutely no cares for what they have done.
The Willard's daughter was promised by CPS that if she relinquished custody of her little girl (Lilly as reported here) that her parents would be able to adopt Lilly. (That was lie #1. They can not make that promise and there was no paperwork to make them hold to that.)
The state took Lilly and put her in foster adopt with the 26 year-old single woman who had put in an order for a blond blue-eyed little girl.
I entered the seen. You know...just trying to help. The foster adopt filed an ethics complaint with the Senate (something that CPS probably said would be fun for her to do). I won. There is actually nothing wrong with a legislator trying to help a citizen from a lying bureaucracy. Personally, I think more should get involved. But then...I think government people who lie should be held accountable.
The state did a second home study replacing some lies (the grandparents stole a computer, etc) with other lies (Mrs. Willard was on dialysis and had breast cancer, etc.). Nothing happened to anyone because of the lies told to a judge. Nothing good was ever said about the Willards in the home study.
While all this was happening the MOTHER, sobered up, started school, and got a job. She has her own place to live. She petitioned to have her child back in a timely manner. Lilly never would have been taken if the state had not promised that Lilly would go to her young (45ish) grandparents.
With my intervention and some special political connection of the great-grandmother, Lilly was placed with the wealthy GGPs. That is certainly better than having her with the unrelated foster woman. So, that at least is a plus.
The court, today, ruled that Lilly's mother can not have her back and there will be a adoption hearing for the GGPs who have had "Lilly" for many months. The mother will appeal this ruling from the Court of Appeals. She is appealing to the Supreme Court of WA.
Please see the case that was decided in this court just a few weeks ago. The case of AB is reported here in PRR. The system is just fine with the lies. For them the end justifies the means. But the mother and the Willards, the hundreds of friends that the Willards have, and at least one legislator....me....understand that this monster of a government agency helps kill kids (one a month) on one hand...and takes kids and redistributes them on the other.
Posted by State Senator Pam Roach at 10:22 PM
http://pamroachreport.blogspot.com/2010/07/reformed-daughter-and-wonderful.html
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Orphan status for child cancer drug
Orphan status for child cancer drug
Thursday 15th July 2010
An experimental treatment which could help fight a cancer that attacks the nervous system of young children has been granted orphan drug status by the Food and Drug Administration.
http://www.pharmacyeurope.net/default.asp?title=Orphanstatusforchildcancerdrug&page=article.display&article.id=22231
Thursday 15th July 2010
An experimental treatment which could help fight a cancer that attacks the nervous system of young children has been granted orphan drug status by the Food and Drug Administration.
http://www.pharmacyeurope.net/default.asp?title=Orphanstatusforchildcancerdrug&page=article.display&article.id=22231
Attorney Jailed Denied Rights for Exposing Judicial Corruption, Richard Fine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrUv6riFSRA&feature=watch_response
Monday, July 19, 2010
CPS [Child Protection Services] Ordered to Pay 500 Million after Jury Find Guilty for Porno Movie and Murder of the Wife
CPS [Child Protection Services] Ordered to Pay 500 Million after Jury Find Guilty for Porno Movie and Murder of the Wife
From: KM
To: bellringer@fourwinds10.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 7:33 AM
Subject: CPS ordered to pay 500M after jury finds guilty for porno movie then the wife of the child is murdered
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsUXPBNS8HQ&feature=email
Part 1 of a grusome TRUE Story documented in the Court Records of Oregon. Wilbur Gaston, a man with grown, children in his mid 60's fathers a daughter with with a unmarried woman, who soon loses all her children to CPS. Wilbur Finds out, and fights to get his daughter, Melissa Gaston, OUT of the Foster - CPS system, and with help from Pam, a local Artist, WINS. It takes 6 months for 4 year old Melissa to stop
screaming spontaneously after Wilbur gets custody back. Wilbur marries 40+ yr old Pam Gaston, 20 years his junior. After 25 months of custody, Melissa is feeling safe with her Bio Dad, Wilbur Gaston,
Then CPS thugs, send local police to kidnap Melissa playing in the front yard with a friend. Pam & Wilbur fight in court for years to win his daughter Melissa back. The State of Oregon, apparentlyl under
the direct order by CPS agent "Larry Lawson" according to Wilbur, orders Oregon School teacher, Hazel S. to make a porno film on video. the Idea is to get liitle Melissa to accuse her own innocent dad
of making her dance naked and "touch herself" where it feels "good". Then use the video against
Wilbur , after editing, to permanently "REMOVE" and "TERMINATE" his parental Rights, and put him in
Jail so he can NEVER have his daughter back - - for the crime of rescuing her from CPS abuse in Foster homes. Wilbur tells us in a later clip how at age 15, Melissa "found" her dad via the internet, and they got together for a afternoon, and talked and Melisssa said when she turns 18 she wants to come live with
her Dad. BECAUSE the only time she felt "Safe" was when she was those 25 months as a little girl
living with her Dad , Wilbur Gaston, who rather resembles Santa Claus out of uniform. Wilbur sued those who were prosecuting him for "stalking" etc. and in the end... either Wilbur would be found guilty or the STATE of OREGON would owe Wilbur $500 million dollars. Wilbur WON.
Oregon has a judgement against it rendered by a JURY, for $500 million they owe Mr. Gaston, and inspite of the 12000 Oregon State Bar members of Oregon, none has been willing to Perfect the Judgement and start collecting the $$ owed . Wilbur struggles on Soc. Secutity. and Pam got murdered before she could start the collection on the Judgement, . . . by aerial Poisoning by a Helicopter that flew over and dropped a mist on their trailer in a woods, after Pam was forced out of
her home in Mt. Angel , Oregon. Police refused to investigate. Ask yourself. Can this be true. Can the State of Oregon kidnap a mans daughter, use her for a porno film, send it around to CPS agents as a case example of "child Pornography" and then be caught, ordered to pay up, and after a murder of a woman, Pam, simple lock up the tape in a Judges
"safe", so the father can NOT show anyone else how awful the Court system and CPS is?
Research, and start with VOICE for the CHILDREN web site, where you can find Teacher Hazel S.
confession. Then call your CongressCritter and demand Federal Prosecution of the guilty judges, CPS agents, police, and the abolishment of CPS in total. Note, Wilbur's sister calls it NAZISM
--
Few will have the greatness to bend history; however, each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope... and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.
- Robert F. Kennedy
Cherish The Children Lets be The Change We Wish To See In The World
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/health/abuse/news.php?q=1245269363
From: KM
To: bellringer@fourwinds10.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 7:33 AM
Subject: CPS ordered to pay 500M after jury finds guilty for porno movie then the wife of the child is murdered
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsUXPBNS8HQ&feature=email
Part 1 of a grusome TRUE Story documented in the Court Records of Oregon. Wilbur Gaston, a man with grown, children in his mid 60's fathers a daughter with with a unmarried woman, who soon loses all her children to CPS. Wilbur Finds out, and fights to get his daughter, Melissa Gaston, OUT of the Foster - CPS system, and with help from Pam, a local Artist, WINS. It takes 6 months for 4 year old Melissa to stop
screaming spontaneously after Wilbur gets custody back. Wilbur marries 40+ yr old Pam Gaston, 20 years his junior. After 25 months of custody, Melissa is feeling safe with her Bio Dad, Wilbur Gaston,
Then CPS thugs, send local police to kidnap Melissa playing in the front yard with a friend. Pam & Wilbur fight in court for years to win his daughter Melissa back. The State of Oregon, apparentlyl under
the direct order by CPS agent "Larry Lawson" according to Wilbur, orders Oregon School teacher, Hazel S. to make a porno film on video. the Idea is to get liitle Melissa to accuse her own innocent dad
of making her dance naked and "touch herself" where it feels "good". Then use the video against
Wilbur , after editing, to permanently "REMOVE" and "TERMINATE" his parental Rights, and put him in
Jail so he can NEVER have his daughter back - - for the crime of rescuing her from CPS abuse in Foster homes. Wilbur tells us in a later clip how at age 15, Melissa "found" her dad via the internet, and they got together for a afternoon, and talked and Melisssa said when she turns 18 she wants to come live with
her Dad. BECAUSE the only time she felt "Safe" was when she was those 25 months as a little girl
living with her Dad , Wilbur Gaston, who rather resembles Santa Claus out of uniform. Wilbur sued those who were prosecuting him for "stalking" etc. and in the end... either Wilbur would be found guilty or the STATE of OREGON would owe Wilbur $500 million dollars. Wilbur WON.
Oregon has a judgement against it rendered by a JURY, for $500 million they owe Mr. Gaston, and inspite of the 12000 Oregon State Bar members of Oregon, none has been willing to Perfect the Judgement and start collecting the $$ owed . Wilbur struggles on Soc. Secutity. and Pam got murdered before she could start the collection on the Judgement, . . . by aerial Poisoning by a Helicopter that flew over and dropped a mist on their trailer in a woods, after Pam was forced out of
her home in Mt. Angel , Oregon. Police refused to investigate. Ask yourself. Can this be true. Can the State of Oregon kidnap a mans daughter, use her for a porno film, send it around to CPS agents as a case example of "child Pornography" and then be caught, ordered to pay up, and after a murder of a woman, Pam, simple lock up the tape in a Judges
"safe", so the father can NOT show anyone else how awful the Court system and CPS is?
Research, and start with VOICE for the CHILDREN web site, where you can find Teacher Hazel S.
confession. Then call your CongressCritter and demand Federal Prosecution of the guilty judges, CPS agents, police, and the abolishment of CPS in total. Note, Wilbur's sister calls it NAZISM
--
Few will have the greatness to bend history; however, each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope... and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.
- Robert F. Kennedy
Cherish The Children Lets be The Change We Wish To See In The World
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/health/abuse/news.php?q=1245269363
JUDICIAL CORRUPTION
JUDICIAL CORRUPTION
Attorney Richard I. Fine Files A Complaint Against Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Yaffe Who Put Him In Jail Indefinitely Without A Hearing
Los Angeles, CA Full Disclosure Network has learned that Superior Court Judge David Yaffe plans to step down from the bench in October 2010, prior to the expiration date of his elected term of office. Possible reasons for Judge Yaffe's decision could be the long grueling case of jailed anti-trust attorney Richard I. Fine. Yaffe ordered Fine to be held in solitary "coercive confinement for contempt of court indefinitely, without bail, without a hearing and without a release date.On June 30, 2010 Richard I. Fine lodged a formal complaint with the California Commission on Judicial Performance against Judge Yaffe.
L.A. Superior Court Judge David Yaffe
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge David Yaffe Plans To Retire
Leaving Attorney Richard Fine In Jail Without Being Convicted Of Anything
LINK
Los Angeles, CA The Full Disclosure Network® has learned that Superior Court Judge David Yaffe plans to step down from the bench in October 2010, prior to the expiration date of his elected term of office. The reasons? Presumably by retiring early the Governor will have an opportunity to name his successor rather than having a contested election to fill the spot. But there are other possible reasons for Judge Yaffe's decision, not the least of which could be the long grueling case of jailed anti-trust attorney Richard I. Fine. Yaffe ordered Fine to be held in solitary "coercive confinement for contempt of court indefinitely, without bail, without a hearing and without a release date.
CATCH 22 KEEPS FINE IN JAIL
The Judge's Order stated that Fine would not be released from jail until he appeared at a Debtors Hearing in Deptartment 1A and provided the court with information regarding his assets. Fine had contended he would not answer the questions until he had exhausted all his appeals as the Judge's order was void and illegal. The Court had apparently set a Debtor Hearing date of June 14, 2010.
As the date neared a volunteer for Richard Fine attempted to arrange with the Court and Sheriff Baca's office for transportation to the Court. Janette Isaacs related in an Email that both the Court and Sheriff refused to transport Dr. Fine to the hearing. She was told that "budget cuts" prevented them from providing the transportation. Read her Email report to Full Disclosure® with details.
COMPAINT FILED
On June 30, 2010 Richard I. Fine lodged a formal complaint with the California Commission on Judicial Performance against Judge Yaffe. The entire document is available here
Read Full Report & Details Here
EXCERPTS FROM COMPAINT
Demand for Immediate Removal of Los Angeles Superior Court Judge David P. Yaffe
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge David P. Yaffe engaged in fraud upon the court, obstruction of justice, misappropriation of funds, bribery, violation of Code of Judicial Ethics Canons 4D(1), 3E(2), 3E(1) and 2, violation of CCP § 170.1(a)(b)(A)(iii), violation of California Constitution Article 1; §§ 7 and 15 (due process) and section 3 (Petition Government for Redress of Grievances, violation of U.S. Constitution Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment (due process), First Amendment (Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances) and Article II, Clause 2 (Supremacy Clause), violation of the “Intangible Right to Honest Services (18 U.S.C. § 1346, and violation of his oath of office, in his actions in the case of Marina Strand Colony II Homeowners Association v. County of Los Angeles, LASC Case No. BS 109420 (Marina Strand case) and its ancillary contempt proceeding against Richard I. Fine (FINE).
The Marina Strand case was a writ of mandate proceeding brought to invalidate the County Board of Supervisors May 15, 2007 illegal certification of an environmental impact report (EIR) applied for by Los Angeles County and its co-applicant Del Rey Shores Joint Venture and Del Rey Shores Joint Venture North (collectively Del Rey Shores) to re-develop the Del Rey Shores Apartment Complex in Marina Del Rey, California from 200 plus units to 500 plus units extending five stories high with “sails” on the roof resulting in the buildings rising to approximately 100 feet above the ground level of the surrounding two story buildings . The proposed redevelopment also increased the parking spaces from 200 plus to 1,000 plus.
I. Judge Yaffe Committed “Fraud Upon the Court” By Presiding Over the Marina Strand Case While Having Received Illegal Payments From Los Angeles County and Not Having Disclosed Such Thereby Voiding All of His Actions.
II. Senate Bill SBX 211’s Retroactive Immunity is Limited to Just the Payments of the County Benefits to the Judges and Nothing More by its Terms.
III. Judge Yaffe Deliberately Lied in a Court Document
IV. Judge Yaffe Violated CCP Section 170.3(c)(4) by Refusing to Leave the Marina Strand Case After he was Disqualified and by Refusing to Send the File to the Presiding Judge for Re-Assignment.
V. From the Outset of the Marina Strand Case Judge Yaffe Violated Canons 4D(1), 3E(2), 3E(1)2 and CCP Section 170.1(a)(b)(A)(iii) by Taking the Los Angeles County Money, Not Disclosing Such and Not Disqualifying Himself.
VI. Judge Yaffe Violated CCP section 1216.
VII. Judge Yaffe Violated Federal and State Due Process, His Oath of Office and the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution by Judging his Own Actions in the Contempt Proceeding Ancillary to the Marina Strand Case.
VIII. By Taking Payments From Los Angeles County Which Were also Illegal and “Bribes” Judge Yaffe Violated Federal and State Constitutional Due process
IX. Judge Yaffe Violated Due Process by Holding Fine in Contempt and Ordering him and Keeping him in “Coercive Confinement” Without a Hearing. X. Judge Yaffe’s Actions are Not an Isolated Incident But a Continuing Course of Conduct that Mandates his Removal.
CONCLUSION OF COMPLAINT:
Judge Yaffe is the “tip of the iceberg” of the largest judicial scandal in American history. In Los Angeles County alone, approximately $300 million of illegal payments have been made to Los Angeles Superior Court judges from Los Angeles County since the late 1980’s.
Illegal payments have been made to superior court judges in 55 of the 58 California counties. Approximately 90 percent of the court of appeal justices received illegal county payments when they were superior court judges. Based on their biographic records, five of the seven California Supreme Court judges, including the Chief Justice, received illegal county payments when they were superior court judges.
All of these superior court judges, court of appeal justices and superior court justices received retroactive immunity as of May 21, 2009 from civil liability, criminal prosecution and disciplinary actions for the illegal county payments. They did not receive immunity for failure to disclose the payments, “fraud upon the court”, federal criminal acts such as violating the Intangible Right to Honest Services – 18 U.S.C. 1346, violating federal and state constitutional due process and the right to petition the government to redress a grievance.
At the present time California has “the best judiciary that money can buy”. The corruption of the California judiciary due to the illegal county payments exceeds that of any country in the world as it affects over 90 percent of the judges and justices.
The commission must remove Judge Yaffe and then remove every other judge and justice who has taken illegal county payments until the integrity of the judiciary is restored.
Until such time, no Californian will receive a “fair trial presided over by an impartial judge.”
I, Richard I. Fine, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing facts are within my personal knowledge and if called to testify, I could and would competently testify thereto. Executed this ___ day of June, 2010, at Los Angeles, California. ___________________________ RICHARD I. FINE
RELATED LINKS:
Richard I Fine files Demand for Release with U S Supreme Court
Court Transcript: Judge Yaffe Admission as witness while sitting a Judge on the Case
posted by Full Disclosure Network at 9:53 AM
1 Comments:
* US v. Stewart 234 f. supp 94 (1964) if a US government officer acts in violation of the constitution, he ceases to represent the government. Title 5 US Code sec. 556(d), 557, and 706. Courts loose jurisdiction if they don't follow due process of law. Also, Boyd v. United States 116 USR 616.Can't use a mans private papers against him. (5th amendment). Judge Yaffe has been impersonating a judge for over a year, what's he going to "retire" from?
By Blogger joebanana, at Sunday, July 11, 2010
Judicial Corruption Follows Richard Fine, Still Imprisoned Without A Hearing In Solitary Confinement In California
Huffington Post Editor Victoria Fine Writes About Her Dad, Esteemed Lawyer Richard I. Fine, Who Is In Solitary Confinement For Speaking Out About Judicial Corruption in California
Leslie Dutton of Full Disclosure Cable TV Sues For The Right To Interview Richard Fine, In Prison Indefinitely
From Judicial reform activist Joseph Zernik:
The case of Richard Fine was used only as an example. The vast majority of the victims are blacks and latinos, and about a third of them were estimated to have been still juveniles at the time of their false imprisonment.
As quoted in the paper forwarded to you some weeks ago:
1) Reports by PBS in 2001 related to the Rampart scandal investigation (1998-2000) provided various estimates of the number of those who were falsely imprisoned in Los Angeles County as 8,000 to 30,000.
2) Unofficial report by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Founding Dean of the UC Irvine Law School, and renowned constitutional scholar in 2001 stated upon review of the matter: “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.”
3) Unofficial report by Prof David Burcham, Dean of Loyola Los Angeles Law School in 2001 stated: “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
4) Official report by the Blue Ribbon Review Panel stated in 2006: "Innocent people remain in prison". It also recommended "external investigation" of the Los Angeles Superior Court, which the US government so far has refused to conduct.
http://www.parentadvocates.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=article&articleID=7788
Attorney Richard I. Fine Files A Complaint Against Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Yaffe Who Put Him In Jail Indefinitely Without A Hearing
Los Angeles, CA Full Disclosure Network has learned that Superior Court Judge David Yaffe plans to step down from the bench in October 2010, prior to the expiration date of his elected term of office. Possible reasons for Judge Yaffe's decision could be the long grueling case of jailed anti-trust attorney Richard I. Fine. Yaffe ordered Fine to be held in solitary "coercive confinement for contempt of court indefinitely, without bail, without a hearing and without a release date.On June 30, 2010 Richard I. Fine lodged a formal complaint with the California Commission on Judicial Performance against Judge Yaffe.
L.A. Superior Court Judge David Yaffe
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge David Yaffe Plans To Retire
Leaving Attorney Richard Fine In Jail Without Being Convicted Of Anything
LINK
Los Angeles, CA The Full Disclosure Network® has learned that Superior Court Judge David Yaffe plans to step down from the bench in October 2010, prior to the expiration date of his elected term of office. The reasons? Presumably by retiring early the Governor will have an opportunity to name his successor rather than having a contested election to fill the spot. But there are other possible reasons for Judge Yaffe's decision, not the least of which could be the long grueling case of jailed anti-trust attorney Richard I. Fine. Yaffe ordered Fine to be held in solitary "coercive confinement for contempt of court indefinitely, without bail, without a hearing and without a release date.
CATCH 22 KEEPS FINE IN JAIL
The Judge's Order stated that Fine would not be released from jail until he appeared at a Debtors Hearing in Deptartment 1A and provided the court with information regarding his assets. Fine had contended he would not answer the questions until he had exhausted all his appeals as the Judge's order was void and illegal. The Court had apparently set a Debtor Hearing date of June 14, 2010.
As the date neared a volunteer for Richard Fine attempted to arrange with the Court and Sheriff Baca's office for transportation to the Court. Janette Isaacs related in an Email that both the Court and Sheriff refused to transport Dr. Fine to the hearing. She was told that "budget cuts" prevented them from providing the transportation. Read her Email report to Full Disclosure® with details.
COMPAINT FILED
On June 30, 2010 Richard I. Fine lodged a formal complaint with the California Commission on Judicial Performance against Judge Yaffe. The entire document is available here
Read Full Report & Details Here
EXCERPTS FROM COMPAINT
Demand for Immediate Removal of Los Angeles Superior Court Judge David P. Yaffe
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge David P. Yaffe engaged in fraud upon the court, obstruction of justice, misappropriation of funds, bribery, violation of Code of Judicial Ethics Canons 4D(1), 3E(2), 3E(1) and 2, violation of CCP § 170.1(a)(b)(A)(iii), violation of California Constitution Article 1; §§ 7 and 15 (due process) and section 3 (Petition Government for Redress of Grievances, violation of U.S. Constitution Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment (due process), First Amendment (Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances) and Article II, Clause 2 (Supremacy Clause), violation of the “Intangible Right to Honest Services (18 U.S.C. § 1346, and violation of his oath of office, in his actions in the case of Marina Strand Colony II Homeowners Association v. County of Los Angeles, LASC Case No. BS 109420 (Marina Strand case) and its ancillary contempt proceeding against Richard I. Fine (FINE).
The Marina Strand case was a writ of mandate proceeding brought to invalidate the County Board of Supervisors May 15, 2007 illegal certification of an environmental impact report (EIR) applied for by Los Angeles County and its co-applicant Del Rey Shores Joint Venture and Del Rey Shores Joint Venture North (collectively Del Rey Shores) to re-develop the Del Rey Shores Apartment Complex in Marina Del Rey, California from 200 plus units to 500 plus units extending five stories high with “sails” on the roof resulting in the buildings rising to approximately 100 feet above the ground level of the surrounding two story buildings . The proposed redevelopment also increased the parking spaces from 200 plus to 1,000 plus.
I. Judge Yaffe Committed “Fraud Upon the Court” By Presiding Over the Marina Strand Case While Having Received Illegal Payments From Los Angeles County and Not Having Disclosed Such Thereby Voiding All of His Actions.
II. Senate Bill SBX 211’s Retroactive Immunity is Limited to Just the Payments of the County Benefits to the Judges and Nothing More by its Terms.
III. Judge Yaffe Deliberately Lied in a Court Document
IV. Judge Yaffe Violated CCP Section 170.3(c)(4) by Refusing to Leave the Marina Strand Case After he was Disqualified and by Refusing to Send the File to the Presiding Judge for Re-Assignment.
V. From the Outset of the Marina Strand Case Judge Yaffe Violated Canons 4D(1), 3E(2), 3E(1)2 and CCP Section 170.1(a)(b)(A)(iii) by Taking the Los Angeles County Money, Not Disclosing Such and Not Disqualifying Himself.
VI. Judge Yaffe Violated CCP section 1216.
VII. Judge Yaffe Violated Federal and State Due Process, His Oath of Office and the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution by Judging his Own Actions in the Contempt Proceeding Ancillary to the Marina Strand Case.
VIII. By Taking Payments From Los Angeles County Which Were also Illegal and “Bribes” Judge Yaffe Violated Federal and State Constitutional Due process
IX. Judge Yaffe Violated Due Process by Holding Fine in Contempt and Ordering him and Keeping him in “Coercive Confinement” Without a Hearing. X. Judge Yaffe’s Actions are Not an Isolated Incident But a Continuing Course of Conduct that Mandates his Removal.
CONCLUSION OF COMPLAINT:
Judge Yaffe is the “tip of the iceberg” of the largest judicial scandal in American history. In Los Angeles County alone, approximately $300 million of illegal payments have been made to Los Angeles Superior Court judges from Los Angeles County since the late 1980’s.
Illegal payments have been made to superior court judges in 55 of the 58 California counties. Approximately 90 percent of the court of appeal justices received illegal county payments when they were superior court judges. Based on their biographic records, five of the seven California Supreme Court judges, including the Chief Justice, received illegal county payments when they were superior court judges.
All of these superior court judges, court of appeal justices and superior court justices received retroactive immunity as of May 21, 2009 from civil liability, criminal prosecution and disciplinary actions for the illegal county payments. They did not receive immunity for failure to disclose the payments, “fraud upon the court”, federal criminal acts such as violating the Intangible Right to Honest Services – 18 U.S.C. 1346, violating federal and state constitutional due process and the right to petition the government to redress a grievance.
At the present time California has “the best judiciary that money can buy”. The corruption of the California judiciary due to the illegal county payments exceeds that of any country in the world as it affects over 90 percent of the judges and justices.
The commission must remove Judge Yaffe and then remove every other judge and justice who has taken illegal county payments until the integrity of the judiciary is restored.
Until such time, no Californian will receive a “fair trial presided over by an impartial judge.”
I, Richard I. Fine, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing facts are within my personal knowledge and if called to testify, I could and would competently testify thereto. Executed this ___ day of June, 2010, at Los Angeles, California. ___________________________ RICHARD I. FINE
RELATED LINKS:
Richard I Fine files Demand for Release with U S Supreme Court
Court Transcript: Judge Yaffe Admission as witness while sitting a Judge on the Case
posted by Full Disclosure Network at 9:53 AM
1 Comments:
* US v. Stewart 234 f. supp 94 (1964) if a US government officer acts in violation of the constitution, he ceases to represent the government. Title 5 US Code sec. 556(d), 557, and 706. Courts loose jurisdiction if they don't follow due process of law. Also, Boyd v. United States 116 USR 616.Can't use a mans private papers against him. (5th amendment). Judge Yaffe has been impersonating a judge for over a year, what's he going to "retire" from?
By Blogger joebanana, at Sunday, July 11, 2010
Judicial Corruption Follows Richard Fine, Still Imprisoned Without A Hearing In Solitary Confinement In California
Huffington Post Editor Victoria Fine Writes About Her Dad, Esteemed Lawyer Richard I. Fine, Who Is In Solitary Confinement For Speaking Out About Judicial Corruption in California
Leslie Dutton of Full Disclosure Cable TV Sues For The Right To Interview Richard Fine, In Prison Indefinitely
From Judicial reform activist Joseph Zernik:
The case of Richard Fine was used only as an example. The vast majority of the victims are blacks and latinos, and about a third of them were estimated to have been still juveniles at the time of their false imprisonment.
As quoted in the paper forwarded to you some weeks ago:
1) Reports by PBS in 2001 related to the Rampart scandal investigation (1998-2000) provided various estimates of the number of those who were falsely imprisoned in Los Angeles County as 8,000 to 30,000.
2) Unofficial report by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Founding Dean of the UC Irvine Law School, and renowned constitutional scholar in 2001 stated upon review of the matter: “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.”
3) Unofficial report by Prof David Burcham, Dean of Loyola Los Angeles Law School in 2001 stated: “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
4) Official report by the Blue Ribbon Review Panel stated in 2006: "Innocent people remain in prison". It also recommended "external investigation" of the Los Angeles Superior Court, which the US government so far has refused to conduct.
http://www.parentadvocates.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=article&articleID=7788
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)